iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 15/09/2025

I love this video. Charlie Kirk was a good man. He may have done or said some questionable things, but he’s human, we all make mistakes, and he never deserved to die. Highly recommend watching this video to anyone who thinks otherwise. youtu.be/N14ywRyTWVI?...

youtu.be

Debunking The Biggest Lies Told About Charlie Kirk

YouTube video by Amir Odom

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 10/04/2025

False. They’re just immigrants, they could be just as bad as MAGA. Regardless, MAGA is too wide an audience to really say they’re a problem. At least depending on who is being labelled as MAGA.

040

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 07/04/2025

lol no it’s the other way around. Ignorance is avoidance, stupidity is a flawed understanding.

010

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 23/03/2025

I’m not a Trump supporter lol

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 23/03/2025

It’s also reasonably intelligent people too who aren’t trusting certain sources either. And yes, politics can’t be avoided entirely and shouldn’t, but it’s difficult when people can’t agree on what’s true.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

I assumed you came to defend the main post we’re replying in. You didn’t need to say anything, it is subsumed. That is, assumed given what you seem to be defending. Are you not agreeing with the post that I replied to? If you do agree with the post I replied to, then what I said applies.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

I’m referring to the main post we’re replying under.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 13/03/2025

Saying that the innocence of a man and getting his life ruined doesn’t matter isn’t just ego bruising, it’s a “fuck you”.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 13/03/2025

That’s assuming the man is some highly powerful person. Maybe knows some martial arts skills, but that’s not always the case. Even then, a woman could still kill him. Men are not always the abuser. Women can be just as cruel and deadly.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 13/03/2025

Well, the point isn’t to describe her position, it’s to show the flaw. Like, if you can replace the conclusions term in an argument with a different term that fits the argument and it makes it absurd the argument is shown to be flawed. Even though it may make a good point, it’s a flawed argument.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 12/03/2025

I’m only reflecting the logic. I don’t actually think all women are hoes.

110

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 12/03/2025

We all have to be cautious of people. Anyone, including women, can kill their partner. What builds trust? How come to feel comfortable with a person? Whatever that is, that’s how you determine the okayness of a man. Anyone could have the potential to get close, and be abusive or a killer.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 12/03/2025

Cautious, yes. That I agree with. However, I don’t approve of innocent men getting hurt because a woman accused him of something he didn’t do. It happens and causes men to lose their jobs. Even when they’re verifiably innocent. Good men should never have to be in that position.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

It will always be some men, never all. Just like not all women are hoes. Be suspicious, yes, but don’t hate on all men just because you fear getting into conflict. I don’t want to be rude, but if you want to ruin men’s lives just because some are idiots, then you are the problem, not men.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 11/03/2025

By that logic, all women are hoes. So many do it. Cheat, rack up bodies, and so on. Therefore, all women are hoes and unfaithful. Until it is “no women”, it must be “all women”. You agree? I’m not angry with you, but I don’t agree.

200

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

Correction, Abraham Lincoln was the first republican president, not the first republican. My point still holds. Abraham Lincoln was a republican, a good one.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

*nothing wrong with being political or activist.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

As long as people don’t go too far, there’s nothing with being political or activist. We all just need to focus on truth and how to find it, and be willing to discard beliefs that are wrong. Learning to question what we believe to be true. Remembering to ask, why do I and why do they, believe?

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

As shown in the images, they were not innocent. You and I have different meanings of the word innocent if you think what was in those images shows innocence. It literally said Lincoln decided to approve only those which committed serious crimes. Also mentions Dakotas attacking white settlers.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

That’s what you’re getting from what I said? lol Yeah, ok, I’m done. You don’t care about what I think and I’m honestly not sure if you care about the truth or politics. This is definitely over. Goodbye.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

But then you say, well of course you’d think this shows Christianity is true, you’re a Christian. You’re biased. Well… okay, but if the evidence really does point to it being true, then of course they will be. Nothing is wrong with that. So, victor or not, why does that make it so questionable?

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

Ok, but all that could mean is that the source is questionable. It doesn’t mean they’re wrong or unable to be trusted. Let’s take Christianity for example. Let’s say it’s true. If a Christian were to tell you, in this case is a skeptic, tells you about all the evidence that shows it is true…

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

I’m not claiming that the death penalty is a good thing. I’m only saying it is something that could be seen as justifiable for giving the death penalty. Whether that’s actually a justified conclusion is debatable. What do you mean “It was written by the victors”? What was written by the victors?

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

There’s more to it than him simply not wanting to. www.history.com/news/5-thing... www.nps.gov/liho/learn/h....

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

I’m not arguing that it was right. People can debate about whether the death penalty is justifiable or not, but based off of what I read there, it’s consistent with what some might consider as acceptable for giving the death penalty.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 27/02/2025

It actually does. My point is not that the ideals are still good, but that republicans themselves are not bad. Whatever change that’s occurred could be reversed. If we’re going to change what a party stands for like that then the label doesn’t matter. We’re just talking about bad actions and people.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 27/02/2025

Sounds like they kinda had it coming.

200

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 27/02/2025

Remember, being a republican is not bad. Abraham Lincoln was the first republican, and he freed the slaves. Republicans are not evil.

500

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 25/02/2025

The “other side” could just as easily say the same. Critical thinking is so important.

020

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 23/02/2025

One day: This can describe anyone. Two days: This describe some people. Three days: This describes some people. Four days: This describes some people. Five days: Bruh… Six days: Maybe we have a problem. Seven days: You might be stupid, or ignorant asl. Everyday: Ah hell no, yo ass cooked.

020

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 19/02/2025

Do you think Abraham Lincoln was evil?

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 18/02/2025

Only the bad republicans though. Republicans are not inherently bad.

120

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 17/02/2025

That thing next to and above the second star/dot from the left kinda looks like goat.

010

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 16/02/2025

Every rational dispute in politics will come down to either a question of priorities or an ethical concern. Agree or disagree?

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 13/02/2025

Unless they’re a super idiot. In that case, they’ll believe anything they are told and not hold any real positions.

020

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 13/02/2025

That image is a mental disorder.

030

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 12/02/2025

Matthew 19:12 means that God allows for eunuchs, not that God prefers same sex marriage. In fact, that verse has nothing to do with same sex marriage. Someone who is eunuch is someone who was castrated or don’t have genitals. It’s about a lack of genitals, not homosexuality or being trans.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 12/02/2025

100% Even the philosophical arguments for the necessity of God for morality fail. Religious people are the most ignorant fools on the planet. Don’t get me wrong, theism could still be true and there’s nothing with that. However, accepting just one set of religious texts for beliefs is ignorant.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 10/02/2025

I wish I could, but after having RFK Jr. as a health agency director… I can’t support Trump right now. Only things I can agree with right now is the abolishment of the DoE and the age restriction on gender affirming care. Looks like Trump is choosing some crazy people.

310

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 07/02/2025

I hope that teacher got fired.

030

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

Just because something is different doesn’t make it bad. I’m not protesting nothing. I’ve got other things to worry about that’s more important than paying attention to assumption driven information and assumed urgencies.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

Most atheists care more about God than most theists. Disappointing. Theists know nothing about God except for what a book claims. Yet they cling to it as if it were their own life at stake. It’s crazy and nonsensical. Theism was never the issue, it’s the religious ideals that often come with it.

110

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

Lying is essential when no one in the upper ranks is good. Those who seek destruction or total control will not let those who seek creation and sustainability in.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

For those who think JD Vance was wrong about there being a kind of hierarchy of priorities for helping others. Watch this. Highly recommend. youtu.be/S9vQjNNxlYE?...

youtu.be

In Defense of JD Vance (Ordo Amoris)

YouTube video by Capturing Christianity

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

Cameron Bertuzzi, on Capturing Christianity, did a video on this about JD Vance. He’s not wrong. Go watch it, I highly recommend it.

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

What is meant by “turbo genocide”? Does it mean genocide that happens very quickly? I’m guessing that’s what the turbo part is for but I’m not certain.

100

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 04/02/2025

All good. Take your time. :)

000

Jack @migjj3.bsky.social · 04/02/2025

One additional point though, in the pdf I mention that the healer idea was about preferences of the male. I think it would actually be more accurate to have said about the child. Either works for forming that definition, but I wanted to mention that it’s not just about the male for femininity.

100