Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 08/10/2026A better tomorrow eh? Some interesting imagery there. 000 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 29/05/2026Among the weirder overcorrections to "fewer" that I've ever seen. Honestly, the grammar pedants of c. a decade ago have done untold damage. 000 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 14/05/2026Sunder I will not stand for this Tottenham erasure. 092 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 21/02/2026Can't make up my mind whether this is a very funny headline, or one that the writer hasn't thought about at all. 000 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 12/12/2025Many thanks to NYT connections for the free publicity. Check out my blog! www.hold-sway.com/blog 000 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 26/11/2025Can't we just rely on the right to remain split? I don't think so. 110 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 26/11/2025Combine the swing against progressive parties since the election with our existing electoral geography, and it gets ugly. 100 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 26/11/2025Just to give the game away little: I think the notion that Labour wins by uniting all the progressive voters is wishful thinking. 100 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 18/11/2025You wait years for a Roald Dahl reference and two arrive in a day. Brilliant image from Rushdie here. 020 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 05/11/2025Someone needs to subtitle it "An Office for Ovals" 000 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 27/01/2025Quote with a photo of a bridge from your gallery. 010 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 18/11/2024Fair enough but if anything he'll be glad of missing that Q&A. 000 0
Peter McLeod @mcleodp.bsky.social · 16/11/2024I have this characteristically enormous footnote from a David Foster Wallace essay to thank for my familiarity and, hence, discomfort with the term. 010 0