Reposted by Matheus Vinicius
"Então se vão bloquear a rede social A porque ela não se adequa às leis do Brasil, você defende o bloqueio das redes sociais B, C e D também?"
Olha... Sim.
Se uma rede social não segue as leis de um país ela não pode atuar naquele país. É real bem simples a questão.
![The Southern states in the great republican confederation of North America have been, since the Declaration of Independence of the republican states, democratic par excellence and fed-eralist to the point of wanting secession. Nevertheless, they have drawn upon themselves the condemnation of all friends of freedom and humanity in the world, and with the iniquitous and dishonorable war they fomented against the republican states of the North [the Civil War], they nearly overthrew and destroyed the finest political organization that ever existed in history. What could have been the cause of so strange an event? Was it a political cause? NO, it was entirely social. The internal political organization of the Southern states was, in certain respects, even freer than that of the Northern states. It was only that in this magnificent organization of the Southern states there was a black spot, just as there was a black spot in the republics of antiq-uity; the freedom of their citizens was founded upon the forced labor of slaves. This sufficed to overthrow the entire existence of these states.
Citizens and slaves such was the antagonism in the ancient world, as in the slave states of the new world. Citizens and slaves, that is, forced laborers, slaves not de jure but de facto [not in law but in fact], such is the antagonism in the modern world. And just as the ancient states perished through slavery, the modern states will likewise perish through the proletariat.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:phk7appelvods6wuq3le2ofm/bafkreihna2chzfeniedjnexjkf53i5biyivh2duvnxivu6gscm5yrynzhm)
