iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Maggie Steiner

John Novembre @jnovembre.bsky.social · 05/06/2025

Excited for our publication on how the geographic scale of a sample affects the discovery of rare, deleterious variants to be out this week. With a mix of theory, simulation, and data analysis, we show when samples are narrow vs broad, the number of variants discovered and their frequencies change

pnas.org

PNAS

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...

27127

Reposted by Maggie Steiner

Jeff Spence @jeffspence.github.io · 17/12/2024

What do GWAS and rare variant burden tests discover, and why? Do these studies find the most IMPORTANT genes? If not, how DO they rank genes? Here we present a surprising result: these studies actually test for SPECIFICITY! A 🧵on what this means... (🧪🧬) www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

biorxiv.org

Specificity, length, and luck: How genes are prioritized by rare and common variant association studies

Standard genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and rare variant burden tests are essential tools for identifying trait-relevant genes. Although these methods are conceptually similar, we show by anal...

420695

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 05/12/2024

Hi! Could I please be added? Thanks for setting this up!

000

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 05/12/2024

I just figured out how to use feeds! So, sharing this with #popgen 🧪

091

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Thanks to co-lead Dan Rice & co-authors @aabiddanda.bsky.social, Marida Ianni-Ravn, and Chris Porras!

000

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Overall - while our theoretical model is no doubt a simplification of the complex dispersal/evolutionary processes seen in natural populations, especially humans - we hope that this work will help improve our interpretation of existing genetic studies and provide guidance for the design of new ones.

120

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Our results have implications for several applications of genetic data. Power to detect trait/disease associations (e.g., GWAS) is tied to allele frequency. The SFS is also used for inference of the distribution of fitness effects, which our results suggest may be biased by effects of study design.

111

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

However, when it comes to avg. allele frequency across all sites (incl. monomorphic ones) these effects can cancel - in our theoretical model we see unchanging avg. allele frequency with sampling design. In human data we see this for fine scale samples (within the UK) but not for broader samples.

110

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

We find evidence of these effects in re-sampling experiments using the UK Biobank. For example, our broadest re-sample with n=10,000 discovers ~98% more variant LoF sites than our most narrow sample, but allele frequency at those variant sites is on average ~41% lower.

110

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Broad samples will sample a greater number of rare, deleterious variants than narrow samples (we call this “discovery”), but each will be sampled at lower average frequency (we call this “dilution”). These effects lead to substantial changes in some summary statistics, especially for large samples.

110

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

We develop a model for the evolution of carriers of rare deleterious variants, and use it to approximate the site frequency spectrum (SFS, the distribution of allele frequencies) in samples at various scales of geographic breadth. We find several key patterns as samples go from “narrow” to “broad”.

120

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

We focus on rare, deleterious variants, which are expected to cluster in geographic space. Rare variants are also generally of interest since they tend to have large effects on traits (including disease traits), and can help improve understanding of biological mechanisms.

120

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

In particular, we are interested in geographic breadth, or how broad a region across which individuals are sampled. This is important to current discourse in human genetics surrounding the Euro-centric bias of genetic datasets, and the launch of new biobanks to improve representation globally.

130

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Excited to share a new preprint with @jnovembre.bsky.social ! We use a combination of population genetic theory, simulation, and data analysis to ask: how does study design in genetic studies (including biobanks) impact the discovery of rare, deleterious variants?

27430

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Thanks to co-lead Dan Rice + co-authors @aabiddanda.bsky.social, Marida Ianni-Ravn, and Chris Porras!

000

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Broad samples will sample a greater number of rare, deleterious variants than narrow samples (we call this discovery), but each will be sampled at lower average frequency (we call this dilution). These effects lead to substantial changes in some summary statistics, especially for large samples.

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100

Maggie Steiner @maggiesteiner.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

100