Sign in

Lauritz van Luijk

@lvanluijk.bsky.social
269 followers 150 following 16 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Dulwich Quantum Computing @dulwichquantum.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Imagine if all 38 papers that Jens has co-authored this year get accepted in QIP, and for some reason none of the other authors can attend so he has to present them all himself.
Histogram of all papers by Jens Eisert this year.
1243
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Johannes Jakob Meyer @jjmeyer.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Can people please stop to write that they "take full responsibility for the results" in their AI disclosures? You posted a paper on the arXiv. With your name on it.
293
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Dmitry Grinko @dmitry-grinko.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
One could try to explain Navier-Stokes drama via hypothesis that Levent or Tristan did not properly turn off data-sharing in ChatGPT. It is not enough to turn off "Improve the model for everyone" in Data controls settings, you need to submit it via "Privacy center". 1/3
1153
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Can‘t you be dumber and do better research? 😅
040
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Dulwich Quantum Computing @dulwichquantum.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
New system: 1. A week before QIP deadline the program committee publishes the titles of all accepted papers. 2. Everyone prompts LLMs for a week to produce these papers. 3. For each title, the best paper gets accepted (decided by an LLM). 4. This week's QIP is over and another QIP happens next week.
1394
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henry Yuen @henryyuen.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
Some initial thoughts, and a complicated mix of feelings. Wow. I mean, Erdos problems are cool (I genuinely mean that), I didn't know about the Jacobian conjecture before it got disproved. But this newest batch from OpenAI hits home in a way the previous announcements did not.
233072
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
QIP @qipconference.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
We're pleased to announce the key dates for QIP 2027, as follows (refer to the website qipconference.org/2027/ for up-to-date information). We look forward to your participation!
02210
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
debbie-leung-q.bsky.social @debbie-leung-q.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
Lecturer/Senior Lecturer/Associate Professor in Quantum Computing Theory at University of Bristol www.bristol.ac.uk/jobs/find/de...
bristol.ac.uk
Details | Working at Bristol | University of Bristol
032
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
nate @loglog.wtf · 25/03/2026
a new issue of nate's gates is available on my website :))) nates.place/gates/
cover of nates gates volume 2. cover depicts a 4x4 matrix, a 3-torus, a 2 qubit gate, and a weyl chambera page about the weyl chamber.U(4) appreciation club
2166
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Happy to see our paper Uniqueness of Purifications Is Equivalent to Haag Duality with @arrr.de and @stotti-alex.bsky.social published in PRL! 🥳 doi.org/10.1103/d7nm...
doi.org
Uniqueness of Purifications Is Equivalent to Haag Duality
The uniqueness of purifications of quantum states on a system $A$ up to local unitary transformations on a purifying system $B$ is central to quantum information theory. We show that, if the two syste...
163
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Tom Gur @tomgur.bsky.social · 02/01/2026
I strongly recommend Tobias Osborne's lectures on general relativity. They are full of insight and lots of fun to watch. www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...
youtube.com
General Relativity - YouTube
181
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
debbie-leung-q.bsky.social @debbie-leung-q.bsky.social · 07/11/2025
We're a group of fun, loving, and fun-loving people welcoming more :)
052
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Graeme Smith @graemesmith.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
If you are interested in doing a postdoc with me, please apply to the IQC postdoctoral fellowship here: iqc-uwaterloo.slideroom.com#/login/progr...
iqc-uwaterloo.slideroom.com
University of Waterloo Attn: Institute for Quantum Computing - SlideRoom
Apply to University of Waterloo Attn: Institute for Quantum Computing. Powered by SlideRoom.
11812
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 30/10/2025
Happy to see that our paper on pure state entanglement and von Neumann algebras with @lvanluijk.bsky.social, @stotti-alex.bsky.social and Reinhard Werner is finally out in CMP 🥳 link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Pure State Entanglement and von Neumann Algebras - Communications in Mathematical Physics
We develop the theory of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) for bipartite quantum systems represented by commuting von Neumann algebras. Our central result is the extension of Nielsen...
0122
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
Here's a picture of the four of us at my defense some weeks ago.
From left to right: Alexander Stottmeister, Henrik Wilming, Lauritz van Luijk, and Reinhard F. Werner. September 2025.
1130
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
The thesis is based on a series of works with my wonderful collaborators @stotti-alex.bsky.social, Reinhard Werner, and @arrr.de. I'm grateful for the wonderful time I had as a PhD student in Hanover!
030
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
Interested in entanglement theory for systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom? Take a look at my PhD thesis, now available on the arXiv 🥳 arxiv.org/abs/2510.07563
arxiv.org
Entanglement in von Neumann Algebraic Quantum Information Theory
In quantum systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom, states can be infinitely entangled across a pair of subsystems, but are there different forms of infinite entanglement? To understand entang...
1193
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 10/10/2025
Inclined to send around a mail to everyone: Dear colleagues, friends and family, due to the consequences of QIP's post-submission-arXiv-posting-deadline you won't see or hear from me in the next two weeks while I try to catch up with the literature. Thanks for your understanding.
081
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
With Simon Becker, Niklas Galke and Robert Salzmann. The paper is inspired by doi.org/10.1103/Phys..., where Burgarth et al show unexpectedly slow Trotter convergence rates of N^{-¼} for the Coulomb dynamics of certain states. We quantitatively link such slow rates to certain regularity properties.
doi.org
Strong error bounds for Trotter and strang-splittings and their implications for quantum chemistry
Efficient error estimates for the Trotter product formula are central in quantum computing, mathematical physics, and numerical simulations. However, the Trotter error's dependency on the input state ...
010
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
The Trotter product formula has countless applications from quantum simulation to numerical analysis—but sharp error bounds, especially for unbounded Hamiltonians, are often hard. We prove new state-dependent bounds and apply them to Schrödinger, Dirac and Coulomb dynamics: doi.org/10.1007/s102...
doi.org
Convergence Rates for the Trotter Splitting for Unbounded Operators - Foundations of Computational Mathematics
We study convergence rates of the Trotter splitting $$\begin{aligned} e^{A+L} = \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \Big (e^{L/n} e^{A/n}\Big )^n \end{aligned}$$ e A + L = lim n → ∞ ( e L / n e A / n ) n in the strong operator topology. In the first part, we use complex interpolation theory to treat generators L and A of contraction semigroups on Banach spaces, with L relatively A-bounded. In the second part, we study unitary dynamics on Hilbert spaces and develop a new technique based on the concept of energy constraints. Our results provide a complete picture of the convergence rates for the Trotter splitting for all common types of Schrödinger and Dirac operators, including singular, confining and magnetic vector potentials, as well as molecular many-body Hamiltonians in dimension $$d=3$$ d = 3 . Using the Brezis-Mironescu inequality, we derive convergence rates for the Schrödinger operator with $$V(x)=\pm |x|^{-a}$$ V ( x ) = ± | x | - a potential. In each case, our conditions are fully explicit.
160
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 22/09/2025
Like embezzlement of entanglement but not von Neumann algebras? Check out arxiv.org/abs/2509.15749 where we show explicitly that generic Gaussian fermionic states provide universal embezzling families. Plus: A novel bound relating trace distance of Gaussian states to their covariance matrices.
arxiv.org
Gaussian fermionic embezzlement of entanglement
Embezzlement of entanglement allows to extract arbitrary entangled states from a suitable embezzling state using only local operations while perturbing the resource state arbitrarily little. A natural...
192
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
Main takeaway: Haag duality and the uniqueness of purifications are equivalent, but not automatic in bipartite systems with infinitely many DoF. E.g., they can fail in certain bipartitions of topologically ordered systems.
030
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
By our result, the Uhlmann property must also fail. But can we understand this explicitly? Yes: Creating a pair of anyons in the two cones leaves the B-marginal unchanged. With unitaries in A, the anyons can't be removed. The resulting states remain perfectly distinguishable from the ground state.
110
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
Example: The ground state sector of the surface code on an infinite square lattice. Let A be two disjoint cones, and let B be the complement (see below). Then tomography holds, but it was shown by P. Naaijkens in doi.org/10.1063/1.48... that Haag duality fails.
110
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
For systems with finitely many DoF, all three are equivalent. In the general case, where subsystems are modeled by von Neumann factors on the full system’s Hilbert space, we prove:  Haag duality ⇔ Uhlmann property ⇒ tomography.  The converse to the second implication does not hold.
110
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
Uhlmann property: Pure states with equal A-marginals are connected by unitaries of Bob, up to arbitrarily small error. In other words: Purifications of A-states are unique, modulo their obvious symmetries.
100
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
A bipartite system is a system composed of two subsystems. We investigate three formalizations of what "composed of" means: Tomography: States are uniquely determined by correlation experiments. Haag duality: Observables belong to Alice if and only if they commute with all of Bob’s observables.
100
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
New paper on entanglement in infinite quantum systems with @stotti-alex.bsky.social @arrr.de 🎉:  arxiv.org/abs/2509.12911 The paper investigates bipartitions of quantum systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom. Small thread below 👇
arxiv.org
Uniqueness of purifications is equivalent to Haag duality
The uniqueness of purifications of quantum states on a system $A$ up to local unitary transformations on a purifying system $B$ is central to quantum information theory. We show that, if the two syste...
1142
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 04/09/2025
🥳I am very happy to have been awarded an ERC Starting Grant that I will use to start my own group and explore the large-scale entanglement properties of complex quantum systems. This would not have been possible without my fantastic collaborators and supervisors. A big "thank you" to all of you! 🙏
3283
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Nicolai Friis @improbabilitydrive.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
Glad someone took the time to debunk the (obviously nonsensical) claim that Bell inequalities could be violated w/o entanglement. It is astonishing (to say the least) that this claim was made by experienced authors & that it passed peer review in the first place, does not reflect well on the journal
arxiv.org
Bell Inequality Violations Without Entanglement? It's Just Postselection
Recently Wang et al. have reported a violation of a Bell inequality without entanglement [arXiv:2507.07756]. We show that their result is an artifact of postselection. It is well known that postselect...
2457
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
051
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 07/08/2025
Small paper w/ @lvanluijk.bsky.social and @stotti-alex.bsky.social: We revisit the amazing operator inequality by Lin et al. (arXiv:2211.13372), which implies strong sub-additivity of entropy and find that it's a special case of Connes' theory of spatial derivatives: arxiv.org/abs/2508.03731
An inequality between density operators: \rho_A \otimes \sigma_{BC}^{-1} \geq \rho_{AB} \otimes \sigma_C^{-1}
1162
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
For the math folks on here: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant. www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/...
nsf.gov
NSF Award Search: Award # 2347850
Structure theory for measure-preserving systems, additive combinatorics, and correlations of multiplicative functions
9275119
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
qit-cqt.bsky.social @qit-cqt.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
Quantum Toolbox (8): Hadamard's Three-Lines Theorem (1/6)
1114
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 30/07/2025
Happy to see that our paper on multipartite embezzlement with @lvanluijk.bsky.social and @stotti-alex.bsky.social is finally out in @quantum-journal.bsky.social quantum-journal.org/papers/q-202...
quantum-journal.org
Multipartite Embezzlement of Entanglement
Lauritz van Luijk, Alexander Stottmeister, and Henrik Wilming, Quantum 9, 1818 (2025). Embezzlement of entanglement refers to the task of extracting entanglement from an entanglement resource via loca...
0153
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Andreea Lefterovici @andreealefterovici.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Henrik will soon talk about entanglement in the thermodynamic limit at LUH :).
073
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 23/06/2025
Thanks to @phys.org.web.brid.gy for covering our recent work with @stotti-alex.bsky.social and @lvanluijk.bsky.social on embezzlement of entanglement in critical systems: phys.org/news/2025-06... Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
phys.org
Universal embezzlers naturally emerge in critical fermion systems, study finds
Embezzlement of entanglement is an exotic phenomenon in quantum information science, describing the possibility of extracting entanglement from a resource system without changing its quantum state. In...
0114
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Andreas Bluhm @hippoquantus.bsky.social · 16/06/2025
I am currently looking for a PhD student who would like to work on position-based cryptography. Details can be found here: andreasbluhm.eu/wp-content/u... Please spread the word!
andreasbluhm.eu
065
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Alexander Stottmeister @stotti-alex.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
Today our paper on universal embezzlement of entanglement in critical fermion systems has been published in Nature Physics: www.nature.com/articless415... Another intense collaboration with the great Lauritz (@lvanluijk.bsky.social) & Henrik (@arrr.de). Below is the former Twitter thread.
nature.com
2132
Lauritz van Luijk @lvanluijk.bsky.social · 08/05/2025
My paper Energy-limited quantum dynamics was published in CMP! 🎉 doi.org/10.1007/s002... I'll do a short thread when I find the time for it.
doi.org
Energy-Limited Quantum Dynamics - Communications in Mathematical Physics
We consider quantum systems with energy constraints relative to a reference Hamiltonian. In general, quantum channels and continuous-time dynamics need not satisfy energy conservation. Physically mean...
0233
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 05/03/2025
For this year’s #QIP2025 we sadly had to give our talk as a video. The upshot: Everyone can already watch @lvanluijk.bsky.social’s nice talk on pure state entanglement and von Neumann algebras! m.youtube.com/watch?v=U70p9sauZ_E #entanglement #quantum @stotti-alex.bsky.social
m.youtube.com
Pure state entanglement and von Neumann algebras (QIP 2025)
1186
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 31/12/2024
For popular science descriptions see: thequantuminsider.com/2024/12/31/q... www.newscientist.com/article/2461... www.sciencealert.com/physicists-d... www.scihb.com/2024/12/phys...
thequantuminsider.com
Quantum Embezzlers -- Physicists Bank on Relativistic Fields for Infinite Entanglement
Researchers demonstrated that relativistic quantum fields can be "universal embezzlers," extracting quantum states with minimal disturbance
152
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 31/12/2024
My scientific year 2024 was entirely focussed on the curious „embezzlement of #entanglement“. Just in time PRL has published our short overview article: link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/... Thanks go out to @lvanluijk.bsky.social and @stotti-alex.bsky.social for the intense and fruitful collaboration! 🧪⚛️💚
link.aps.org
Relativistic Quantum Fields Are Universal Entanglement Embezzlers
Embezzlement of entanglement refers to the counterintuitive possibility of extracting entangled quantum states from a reference state of an auxiliary system (the ``embezzler'') via local quantum opera...
262
Reposted by Lauritz van Luijk
Henrik Wilming @arrr.de · 24/12/2024
A little Christmas present by @kpc.bsky.social at @newscientist.bsky.social covering our work on embezzlement of entanglement to appear in @apsphysics.bsky.social Phys. Rev. Lett. I‘d like to emphasize the important role of Reinhard F. Werner in this work. www.newscientist.com/article/2461...
newscientist.com
Quantum entanglement can be endlessly 'embezzled' from quantum fields
Some quantum fields that extend throughout all of space-time could be a rich resource of quantum entanglement that can be extracted forever
122