iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

I grew up with so many people using “Hun” or its full, “Honey,” that I use and type it myself. No harm is meant. Much better than like… “Hey you” 😅

210

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 8h

You responded as if I had slighted you, when I was inviting you to push assholes aside for joy. You must understand that sudden illogical hostility comes off as AI these days, right? So, I simply asked genuinely if you didn’t have experience to know hun means no harm or were inauthentically hostile.

120

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 8h

Generally, a word is not intended in the worst, most illogical interpretation. It’s just how people talk. Person online, I just wanted to share some new historical knowledge celebrating a woman who didn’t receive her earned celebration in life. I stressed that we don’t have to center to asshats.

120

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 9h

Have you never met a Midwesterner, or is your prompt to pick meaningless fights with people?

130

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 9h

You may think I am giving the author too much credit, but every one of these instances is written in such a different “My editor forced this change and I hate it but want to get published still” way

000

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 9h

You ever read a book and go: This editor hated you, girl! Summarize the character and relationship development scenes and only show PlotTM. State your implications out loud even if you implied it to death. Leave in plot points that just wasted time. What type of editor does this??

100

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 10h

Word habits are not bold choices. Just trying to spread cool new Rosalind Franklin details 🤷‍♀️

120

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 10h

Assholes aren’t being centered by this investigation. It just has the side effect of giving evidence of their stupidity. You can appreciate Franklin without centering the asshats.

140

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 10h

Hun, it’s an article highlighting her process. She was a perfectionist and cared about getting it right. Photos like this took a long time, but she did it again just to get the better photo for when she published. However, she also wouldn’t waste her time rewriting her notes.

130

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 11h

The 1st photo was off center but clear enough for extensive notes, & she redid it to get a better shot, so she didn’t have notes with the famous photo because she’d made the notes already on the 1st photo. It solves a misconception and explains an oddity (“why weren’t there notes on that photo?”)

150

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 11h

The article is about historians correcting the claim that persists even when people know her work was stolen: “Well, she didn’t fully understand what she saw/how important it was.” The famous photo was a better photo for publication after an earlier flawed photo where she wrote about the helix.

150

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 13h

Got an email from my boss about tossing out a year of fantastic problem-solving work to do what he wants instead…

static.klipy.com

Bloodcartier

Alt: Man saying, “Why you say fuck me for?”

010

Reposted by L 🏳️‍🌈

Sarah Taber @sarahtaber.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

Hot take: I don't think social media made people dumber. We've been dumb this whole time. It's just that you used to have to have a job that people sent their dumb letters to, to notice. This made "Engaging with fools" an occupational hazard rather than the 24/7 experience it is presently.

612406429

Reposted by L 🏳️‍🌈

Ben Collins @bencollins.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

Part of why I don't like the AI-or-bust economy is the constant flopsweat of people on the news who say this HAS to work. Quit making everyone so anxious. Goddamn. If this is the next Google then why are you acting like this? I don't remember being told to buy an iPhone at gunpoint.

298117032128

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

This is adorable. More of this in our politics please!!!

010

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Smiling as he trashes homeless people’s lives himself should have ended his prospects years ago

1341

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

For no reason at all, what proportion of parents never access childcare services at all? Just a random thought as I thought about how many fully stay-at-home parents there are and under what circumstances they become stay-at-home parents (wealthy enough without working or can’t afford childcare)

000

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

And, of course, the person who doesn’t want to truly build community with coworkers wants to be “more influential”

010

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

After reading the list, this article sounds more like the advice of someone who barely talks to people at work…

110

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

These are just increasingly feeling like, “Buy this for your child with your accounts so we can ignore COPPA 😊”

010

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Chiitan????? @chiitan.love is so supportive and kind even in the funny moments of life ❤️

Chiitan liking a post about being “clocked” as gay at work

001

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

I used to never get clocked and still don’t with 99.999% of people, but queer men between 25 and 45 keep scaring me. They always know even after just 30 seconds, and they just act like you already discussed the obvious!!!

000

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Used sacred queer lingo with me off the rip in our first real chat and finished my sentences with it. Bro basically figured it out at some point and moved on already 😭😭😭 Didn’t even feel the need to double-check… just kept it moving!! 🏃💨

100

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

I got clocked as gay so hard at work today. I finally got to interact with someone in person after 2 years of the most strictly business Zoom meetings. My Zoom background is clear, my outfits hyper business casual. We don’t even usually talk to each other in the meetings.

110

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

“You live in bubble! How dare you not know what’s in my bubble that’s on the charts?! Everyone in my bubble checks the charts to keep up! Why isn’t your bubble doing the same as mine? Your bubble must be subpar and less representative than mine!”

050

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

My teaching schedule is only afternoons this semester and gosh is my mental and physical health so much better when I sleep on my schedule!

150

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Did you know ADHD (which I am diagnosed with, is in my file, and was discussed openly with the doctor) is associated with delayed phase sleep disorder? My sleep doctor didn’t know or didn’t care!

160

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

It was funny when I described this as an issue I was having before I did the sleep test at the hospital for a second time because I couldn’t do the sleep prep properly either time and then when the tests still pointed to sleep deprivation and they still just said, “Sleep better.”

160

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Sounds like the author is the one afraid to sit next to people on the train. Being masked, I’m not 🤷‍♀️

080

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

It’s almost like this author is the target demographic for related country music advertising and that country music doesn’t try to market to people outside of what they view as their target demographic.

010

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Also, the “epidemic” word choice implies this is a bad thing. Does the Wall Street Journal think it is bad to leave abusive, toxic relationships because it makes one person feel bad?

030

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Why does it happen? Abusive, neglectful, non-accepting parents making their kids not want to interact with them. Is this article somehow longer than that?

130

Reposted by L 🏳️‍🌈

Jared Yates Sexton @jysexton.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

Just helping with editing here. These bots aren’t sentient. They’re doing what they’re programmed to do. OpenAI, a private company supposedly bound by laws, committed federal crimes.

Screenshot of BBC article: OpenAI bots (struck through) meddled with multiple US government agency sites

16992933068

Reposted by L 🏳️‍🌈

🌈Dr. Frizzle @swilua.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

Idc, I will get angry RESEARCH WOMEN FFS

312319

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

It’s almost like this was the initial marketing message, and tech companies and their CEOs are shocked people finally grasped it and took it as a bad thing.

010

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

Also, supporting more regulation and “slower” AI development will let them stop burning through money to make better models than each other, which will make easier for these companies to actually turn a profit for once.

010

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

It’s marketing to get more investors and users by implying that theirs is more powerful, sentient, and capable than others’, which is why other companies immediately also started reporting the same after the Hugging Face situation went viral and got so much prep

110

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

Sure is amazing that society has already granted enough sentience to LLMs (which they don’t have) that no one is apparently liable for actual crimes at these companies

000

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

Also, interesting that these LLM agents seem to be given access to their own data scraping tool or similar that can data scrape and hack because LLMs don’t have that capacity on their own

000

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

I’m sure this “going rogue” talk also isn’t just to imply your LLM is better and more powerful than others to get more investors and users /s

100

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

“Did not intend” … if effective prompting is something you all are saying all students have to learn, then how are your own employees so bad at it that their prompt gets “misconstrued” as a command to hack something? Methinks you just want to do bad stuff for whatever reason & not get in trouble.

100

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

Yeah, knowing how the tech works, it can’t go “rogue.” It receives input and then completes tasks to produce output. If it “hacked” something, then you should be asking which human prompter went rogue or would fail at precision when granted 3 wishes from a genie. However, that would mean liability.

041

Reposted by L 🏳️‍🌈

Leah McElrath @leahmcelrath.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

AP Stylebook warns against anthropomorphizing AI systems: “Avoid language that gives them human characteristics… Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.”

APStylebook @APStylebook
X.com
Artificial intelligence systems do not think, feel, want or understand. Avoid language that gives them human characteristics. This is called anthropomorphizing, when we ascribe human traits, emotions or behaviors to non-human things, such as animals or inanimate objects.
Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.

1970172264

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 22/09/2026

Human brains struggle to fully grasp big numbers. 8192 can seem as big as 1k in your brain, so he truly prob thought it was no big deal compared to just doing 1k. It’d totally be a quick & easy thing! Look at all the shiny reactions! Actual shiny hunters have enough experience to know that’s bs 😅

000

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 22/09/2026

Yeah, but selling it as “we have 2 brains!” and not “this could help cure/treat ALS!” is a huge issue. We unfortunately know people don’t read beyond headlines, so science communication needs to be more thoughtful to get the actual point across…

130

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 22/09/2026

Mentioning “left brain/right brain” myths in the year of our lord, 2026…

120

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 22/09/2026

As soon as I saw it, I was like, “Is it just spinal cord stuff or hindbrain stuff?” It was hindbrain stuff.

030

L 🏳️‍🌈 @lnluck.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Like, yes, wear what you’d like and don’t be cruel about criticism, but I’m not sure what was in the stylist’s head on this.

000