iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Livia Fritz @liviafritz.bsky.social · 3h

🌏 How should carbon removal projects be governed ❓ 📣 In our new paper in Nature Climate Change (@natclimate.nature.com), we asked 10,852 people in six counties to judge hypothetical carbon removal projects. ⚖️ We find that getting procedural and distributive fairness right is key 👇

121

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Bennett Institute for Innovation and Policy Acceleration @bennett-innovate.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

New research with @sovacool.bsky.social finds that public consultation, expert scrutiny & fair sharing of benefits can increase support for carbon removal technologies, with people unwilling to trade fairness for greater technical performance. bennettinstitutesussex.org/stories/carb...

bennettinstitutesussex.org

142

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Chad M. Baum @chadmbaum.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

🪨 New Article in Nature Climate Change (open access): We surveyed ~10,850 people in 6 countries, including global South, to examine public support and how to govern novel #CDR projects (ERW, DACCS, BECCS). 🧵 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.com

Public support for novel carbon removal hinges on procedural and distributive fairness - Nature Climate Change

Public support is crucial for carbon removal deployment, yet the role of fairness remains unclear. Using surveys from six countries (N = 10,852), this study shows that procedural and distributive fair...

222

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Karl Scheifinger @karlscheifinger.bsky.social · 01/04/2026

Emission scenarios inevitably embed assumptions about fairness. Tracking these assumptions is genuinely difficult, but making them transparent matters. We developed a framework to do just that. @ic-cep.bsky.social #IIASA @imperialcollegeldn.bsky.social 1/2

1207

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Dr Yuwan Malakar @uanumalakar.bsky.social · 20/10/2025

Our paper (@chadmbaum.bsky.social @sovacool.bsky.social @liviafritz.bsky.social) examines how Australians respond to novel carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. doi.org/10.1016/j.je... #CarbonRemoval #CDR #ClimatePolicy #Australia #PublicSupport #EnvironmentalIdentity #Research

doi.org

Redirecting

122

Livia Fritz @liviafritz.bsky.social · 17/09/2025

❓ How is research funding for carbon dioxide removal #CDR distributed across geographies, disciplines and methods? What do collaboration networks look like and what role do research-industry collaborations play? 📑 New article w. Finn Müller-Hansen, Sarah Lück, @sovacool.bsky.social, Jan Minx 🙌

131

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Lucilla Losi (she/her) @lucillalosi.bsky.social · 07/04/2025

🌍Public consultations on CDR attract mostly for profit actors from the GlobalNorth, disagreeing with NGOs about its regulation. 💡This and more in our new #Uptake article with @liviafritz.bsky.social and Benjamin Sovacool on EU and UNFCCC consultations. Open link www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

053

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Rob Bellamy @drrobbellamy.bsky.social · 04/04/2025

Carbon removal beyond the trees Our new paper in Communications Earth & Environment on how the popularity of tree planting is harming other approaches to carbon removal rdcu.be/ef97T

44013

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Chad M. Baum @chadmbaum.bsky.social · 20/03/2025

🎉 Nature Communications Top 25 Social Science & Human Behavior Articles of 2024 Award 🧞Our #GENIE article examining #public perceptions and support of #CDR and #SRM across the global North and global South was one of the most-read in 2024! 🔗 www.nature.com/articles/s41... @liviafritz.bsky.social

242

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Chad M. Baum @chadmbaum.bsky.social · 17/03/2025

So, this is another first (h/t @liviafritz.bsky.social for lending her French expertise 🎓🗣️). Our new article on #climate emotions in Risk Analysis was covered in the French Canadian media, on Radio Canada! ici.radio-canada.ca/ohdio/premie...

ici.radio-canada.ca

Documenter les émotions liées au climat : Entrevue avec Maxime Boivin

Les années lumière | Rattrapage du 16 mars 2025 : Le secret des abysses, et quiz sur la cabane à sucre

131

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Chad M. Baum @chadmbaum.bsky.social · 17/03/2025

New #GENIE article on #climate emotions at a global level, and how these correspond to support for ten climate intervention approaches. Now available in Risk Analysis (with @liviafritz.bsky.social, Elina Brutschin, Benjamin Sovacool) 🧵 Open access link: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

F I G U R E 3 Emotions about climate change (hopeful, afraid, angry, and sad) across 30 countries, on a 1–5 scale (1 = not at all, 5 = extremely) withN = 30,284 participants (at least 1000 participants in each country); Numbers to the left reﬂect those answering “1” or “2,” in the middle “3,” and to the right“4” or “5.” Panel (a) shows the results for “hopeful”; Panel (b) for “afraid”; Panel (c) for ”angry”; and Panel (d) for “sad”.

1610343

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Environmental Information: Use and Influence (Dalhousie Univ.) @eiui.bsky.social · 07/03/2025

The #ClimateCrisis & technical solutions to the problems prompts questions about #trust in experts. In a large global study, Fritz et al. found #transparency, objectivity in assessing risks, & open #communication of #uncertainties/unknowns are important @chadmbaum.bsky.social doi.org/10.1016/j.en...

Title, authors’ names, and abstract from a paper about the role of experts and governance of climate intervention technologies

086

Reposted by Livia Fritz

Daniel Huppmann @danielhuppmann.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

What are public perceptions on climate change and carbon-dioxide removal around the world? The survey dataset by @chadmbaum.bsky.social @liviafritz.bsky.social et al is now available via the #GENIE CDR Knowledge Hub... 📝 cdr.apps.ece.iiasa.ac.at/story/2025_0...

Worry about Climate Change across thirty countries, on a 1-5 scale (1=, 5= Extremely) with N=30,284 participants (at least 1,000 participants in each country).

In all surveyed countries, more than 75% of survey participants are somewhat or more worried about climate change.

Re-produced from Baum et al. (2025), Risk Analysis.

64513