iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Samwise

@littlebitofanass.bsky.social

24 followers 22 following 1 posts

He/They/It. 25. Tired of this shit. Not the best at socializing but we're here anyways

Posts Replies Media

Reposted by Samwise

Siobhan Thompson @vornietom.bsky.social · 11/12/2024

I am also voting No on this, unfortunately the protections against AI are not good enough and animators are at the cutting edge of AI-related job cuts

121528

Reposted by Samwise

Erin Reed @erininthemorning.com · 11/12/2024

Incredible news! Montana’s Supreme Court just affirmed that the state’s gender affirming care ban is likely unconstitutional. This makes the state the first state Supreme Court to rule that trans medical care is protected. This applies REGARDLESS of what the US Supreme Court does.

targets, the District Court reasonably concluded that the balance of the equities tips toward
preliminary relief pending full consideration of the merits. Its analysis of the last two
preliminary injunction factors was not arbitrary or unreasonable. The court did not
manifestly abuse its discretion, and its injunction was not overbroad.
156 Finally, both parties have submitted notices of supplemental authority, citing recent
cases considering challenges to various laws regarding gender-affirming care. Without
exception, the additional authority pertains to claims grounded in the equal protection
clause or otherwise based on alleged unlawful discrimination. Some of the authorities also
reference new developments in research and evidence that was not part of the record
presented to the District Court in the preliminary injunction proceedings. Because, on the
record here, the District Court's conclusions on Montana's express privacy protections are
sufficient to uphold its preliminary injunction, we affirm on that basis. The parties will
have the opportunity during the merits proceeding for full development of the record, where their experts may offer insight on any new research, and for briefing on the current case law relative to their claims.
CONCLUSION
157 The District Court made no error of law and did not manifestly abuse its discretion.
We affirm its grant of a preliminary injunction on the basis of Plaintiffs' right to privacy claim. The case will proceed to trial, at which point the District Court will finally resolve the disputed facts and issue a final determination on the constitutional issues presented.
/S/ BETH BAKER
32
We Concur:
/S/ MIKE McGRATH
/S/ LAURIE MCKINNON
/S/ INGRID GUSTAFSON /S/ DIRK M. SANDEFUR
/S/ JAMES JEREMIAH SHEA

11898362322

Reposted by Samwise

Erin Reed @erininthemorning.com · 10/12/2024

This is horrifying story about how Florida is attempting to detransition trans prisoners calling their identity a delusion.

511834482

Reposted by Samwise

Scott Dworkin @dworkin.bsky.social · 09/12/2024

Are you against Tulsi Gabbard's nomination? I am. Tell your Senators to oppose Gabbard too:

actionnetwork.org

Tell your Senators: Oppose Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence

Please contact Congress now!

47697682623

Reposted by Samwise

Kenny Akers @keneakers.bsky.social · 08/12/2024

Thoughts?

27637480211939

Reposted by Samwise

talia jane @taliajane.bsky.social · 07/12/2024

Happening now at Washington Square Park: A United Healthcare CEO shooter lookalike competition, including people who intentionally and unintentionally dressed the part.

126221424303

Reposted by Samwise

godlessbitch.bsky.social @godlessbitch.bsky.social · 07/12/2024

381369394526

Samwise @littlebitofanass.bsky.social · 01/12/2024

Sup. Only making this so I don't get flagged as a bot. This will probably be a reposting account but 🤷🏻 we're having fun right y'all

240