licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Technically only the original dollar would double every day. It does not say that the doubled dollars inherit the doubling property. 060
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 07/10/2026What's with Dems' rehabilitation of Bush 2? 120
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 29/09/2026The only reason they are where they are is that their parents gave them names that sound like they belong in a science fiction book and the idiot billionaires fell for that. 020
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 28/09/2026Didn't the same happen with the Navier Stokes thing? 131
Reposted by @licorice-2.bsky.socialStellbound: Stellraiser II @antlervel.vet · 26/09/2026Have I played “Control Resonant”? Sorry…I’m too busy reading the story of a man who “Controls Rocinante”…that’s right, Miguel Cervantes’ immortal tale “Don Quixote de La Mancha”. So you enjoy your strange “Federal Bureau”…I’ll be delighting in the adventures of Sancho Panza and his “Friendly Burro” 552625601
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 26/09/2026Why is 'Science Magazine' reporting on something that isn't peer reviewed? Isn't that like a core tenet of science??? 040
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 26/09/2026That time the music duck account and his fellow passengers were taken hostage by a rogue bus driver was great. For us, that is. Probably not for him. 110
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 21/09/2026It would probably deal more lasting damage to the Republican party than any of the other options. 120
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 21/09/2026I would answer no on the junta option because it is anti democratic and that matters too much to me. But it may actually be the best option in the long term as it completely destroys the narrative that the GOP has worked on building for decades that they are the party of strength and manliness. 100
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Thanks for this post. It got me to pull the trigger on tickets for his Cleveland show. We had a blast! 010
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 15/09/2026So, bitch was being used as a title like PhD or Esquire. 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 14/09/2026These assumptions not being quite valid and therefore producing data that could lead us to mistaken conclusions is a possibility that you discard too hastily. 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 14/09/2026That bad thing could be bad data. The data we collect is always a proxy for things that are impossible to measure directly. To build these proxies we build models that rely on assumptions and simplifications. Sampling and weighing decisions depend on these. 200
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 14/09/2026I suppose the root cause is a disagreement of whether the anomaly is more likely to be explained by mass irrational behavior, or by deficiencies in the data or its analysis. You seem to consistently favor the former. 320
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Also, Musk's models are way behind Anthropic and OpenAI's. Of course we wants them to slow down. 001
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 12/09/2026Honestly, two errors. That behavior is not normal. 0350
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 10/09/2026Post quantum alternative algorithms have already been developed for most if not all schemes vulnerable to quantum computing. The only real threat to be concerned about when it comes to that is potentially decrypting old captured data. 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 10/09/2026It is highly unlikely that QC will provide any significant advances to LLM performance in the foreseeable future. 100
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 10/09/2026My point was that the field of quantum machine learning hasn't found any speedups to training or inference of large language models that would be feasible due to having to feed enormous amounts of data directly into the QC qbits and/or have unworkable error rates. 110
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 10/09/2026The physicists I've talked to mostly seem to think that quantum computing will be useful for only a few very specific problems and prohibitively expensive even for those for a long time. It is not a general speed up for all computation. 1140
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Also, as a business who mostly sells access to my team's expertise to larger companies, why would I adopt it and not only atrophy my team's thinking skills, but become wholly dependent on third party providers for the bulk of my product? 030
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 31/08/2026To me he is just that one funny news videos guy on bluesky 010
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 31/08/2026I really thought I would do better than 5. And one of the few that I got, @davejorgenson.bsky.social, no offense, but I had no idea he was popular at all. 110
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Glad to see that @cato.org agrees that taxing their income is not enough and we should go after their wealth. 030
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 24/08/2026It feels like back in 2006 when everyone assumed the next decade belonged to Ronaldo. Then Messi happened. 100
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 21/08/2026The missed "with a capital M" for Mementos... 030
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 16/08/2026Nate Cohn wrote about this. www.nytimes.com/2023/03/13/u...nytimes.comWhy Fox’s Call on Arizona, Which Was Right, Was Still Wrong (Published 2023)It was more a risky guess than a sound decision, and easily could have led to a missed call. 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 16/08/2026You are right that they are a well regarded polling team, but the early AZ call was irresponsible. Biden ended up winning by less than 10k votes. There must have been something severely wrong with their data or modeling for them to make that call. They were lucky that Biden ended up winning. 200
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 12/08/2026A Muslim got 33% of the Jewish vote? Damn, he must be magical. 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 11/08/2026It is also a fairer distribution costs. In the sense that wealthier viewers of ads are paying more since for commercial purposes, their attention is of higher value to potential ad buyers. 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 09/08/2026Also, withdrawal, reparations, etc... are perfectly reasonable demands after being attacked with no provocation. 030
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 26/07/2026The original question was obviously posted in the context of the US in 2026. Pretending that it was in a global context is blatantly moving the goalposts. 100
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 21/07/2026This is a man who is only now realizing that he has raped in the past. The cognitive dissonance of knowing that and still wanting to believe he is a good person is driving him to lash out. 0140
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 20/07/2026Just to be clear, by "his politics" you are referring to his long history of support of white nationalist causes, right? 130
Reposted by @licorice-2.bsky.socialTyler, from the Internet (Haunted) @tylerfromtheinternet.com · 20/07/2026 141046238
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 19/07/2026Were Coldplay there for any particular reason or just kinda vibes? 010
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 16/07/2026Is there a reason to believe they didn't check over them checking and deciding the call on the field was correct? 000
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 16/07/2026Why do you claim that VAR did not review the potential foul on Salah in the buildup to the Argentina goal? VAR checks everything in the phase of play, but only sends the ref to the booth if they make a mistake. 110
licorice-2.bsky.social @licorice-2.bsky.social · 13/07/2026That's what I said. Dynamic pricing is terrible when the supplier has power over you. Like Uber's monopoly. But in this specific case, where the supplier cannot extort buyers, dynamic pricing is probably a net good as it theoretically allows the poorest to buy at marginal production price. 210