Sign in

Leon Lotter

@leondlotter.de
818 followers 760 following 129 posts

👨‍💻 Physician scientist (MD) 📊 What does brain imaging measure biologically? 🧠 ADHD | ASD 🏫 INM-7, Research Centre Juelich 🎓 Max Planck School of Cognition 🛠️ NiSpace | nispace.readthedocs.io 🐮 Vegan | 👤 He/him | 📷 By N. Brade 🌐 leondlotter.de

PostsRepliesMedia
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Another one: In patients with early psychosis, AUC+ scores are reduced across neurotransmitter systems, but most prominently for serotonergic and dopaminergic indices! As far as we could test, reductions are independent of antipsychotic medication and may be associated with symptom severity. 14/n
Early psychosis. AUC+ scores broadly reduced across neurotransmitter systems, strongest for serotonergic and dopaminergic indices; correlates with symptom severity and antipsychotic intake.
120
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Application: Pharmaco-fMRI data for 3/4 substances show AUC score modulation largely in line with expected receptor targets (risperidone, ketamine, midazolam). For ketamine and midazolam administered intravenously during scans, NEOFC scores change dynamically during infusion (lower right). 13/n
Pharmacological sensitivity. Risperidone, ketamine, and midazolam modulate AUC scores in line with their receptor targets; IV drug effects tracked dynamically via sliding-window analysis.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Back to a core finding: The NET effect is driven by a sensorimotor-insular network. In two independent samples, NET AUC+ is inversely associated with autonomic arousal – heart rate variability and pupil unrest – indicating a physiologically relevant signal. Correlation: 0.6 for pupil unrest! 12/n
Regional drivers and autonomic relevance. NET AUC+ is anchored in sensorimotor-insular cortex and inversely correlates with autonomic arousal (HRV and pupil unrest) across two datasets.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Indeed, they do! AUC profiles correlate 0.8 – 0.9 between rsfMRI datasets, ICC approaches 0.9. MEG mirrors MRI results, but with a twist: We find high correspondence in the beta band (scatter plots). But especially gamma bands show pronounced AUC+ effects not present in MRI. 9/n
Reproducibility and MEG extension. AUC profiles replicate across 6 fMRI cohorts and mirror rsfMRI in MEG — strongest cross-modal alignment in the beta band.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
During our exploration, we realized: Our approach is intrinsically sensitive to positive associations (high connectivity in regions with high PET density: "AUC+"), but to test for negative associations, we can invert the PET maps. A range of transmitter systems showed strong "AUC–" effects! 7/n
fMRI connectivity organizes along neurobiology. NET shows the strongest and most consistent AUC+ effect across all subjects and cohorts; AUC− effects span most neurotransmitter systems.

Highlighted are AUC– effects
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Next, we find that, across 6 independent cohorts, rsfMRI connectivity aligns with neurobiology. Importantly, the strongest effect by far emerges for the noradrenaline transporter (NET), significant in every individual subject! AUC scores showed good-to-excellent 1-day-test-retest reliability! 6/n
fMRI connectivity organizes along neurobiology. NET shows the strongest and most consistent AUC+ effect across all subjects and cohorts; AUC− effects span most neurotransmitter systems.

Highlighted are AUC+ effects
130
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
With this approach, we evaluate 25 PET atlases for their associations with individual connectome architecture. We test for statistical significance with spatial nulls of the PET maps. But first, we run a positive control confirming that we can trace underlying canonical resting-state networks. 5/n
Positive control of the NEOFC approach: Resting-state network probability maps induce the expected AUC effects compared to spatial null models
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
We introduce the NEOFC framework: if a receptor contributes to regional signals, regions with higher density should show more synchronization. We quantify this by masking an individual's connectome by receptor/transporter density percentiles, producing a curve and a subject-level "AUC" score. 4/n
Neurobiologically enriched organization of functional connectivity (NEOFC). Receptor density maps threshold individual FC matrices → percentile curves → single subject-level AUC scores.
120
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
My most recent and biggest work so far is finally out as a preprint! 🧠🧵 *Linking human brain functional connectivity to underlying neurotransmission* doi.org/10.64898/202... 1/n TL;DR below ↓ #neuroskyence #neuroimaging #MedSky #PsySciSky
13517
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Pathway-specific imaging biomarkers – multimodal colocalization, multi-tracer PET, advanced MRS – interrogate that grid, linking genes X environment X brain to the individual. A step toward precision psychiatry with heterogeneity built in as a feature, rather than dealing with it post-hoc. 5/n
The general, literature-derived vulnerability search grid can be refined based on an individual’s genetic profile and environmental exposures, generating a personalized vulnerability risk grid. This risk grid can then be interrogated using pathway-specific biomarkers to detect actual pathophysiological alterations along these pathways. Based on this biomarker evidence, personalized interventions can be selected to target the identified pathophysiological alterations.Schematic representation of the spatial co-localization approach for deriving biological pathway-specific information from multimodal neuroimaging.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
We propose a solution: a "vulnerability search grid", intersecting pathway-specific genetic risk (single-ontology PRS) with individual environmental exposures. Not a diagnosis, but a biologically informed prior that narrows the search space for what's actually going on in a given patient. 4/n
A A schematic representation of the general symptom-specific vulnerability search grid as defined by genetic and environmental risk factors. B A schematic representation of the individual vulnerability search grid as derived from individual genetic and environmental exposure.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
If altered neurotransmission underlies psychiatric disorders, we identify a problem: neurotransmitter systems are strongly colocalized – GABAa and 5-HT2a share ~80% of spatial variance. The same imaging signal can reflect entirely different pathophysiology in two patients. But you'd never know. 3/n
A Spatial correlation matrix of different neurotransmitter properties as derived from the positron emission tomography included in the JuSpace toolbox. B Exemplary visualization of the strong colocalization observed between GABAa and serotonergic 5-HT2a receptors. Regions with high expression of each receptor and their overlaps are displayed.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 07/05/2026
Catching up on my paper threads 🧵 Here is a perspective from this year, lead-authored by my supervisor, @juergendukart.bsky.social The many-to-many problem of endophenotypes in psychiatry - a biological perspective doi.org/10.1038/s413... #neuroskyence #neuroimaging #MedSky #PsychSciSky 1/n
The general, literature-derived vulnerability search grid can be refined based on an individual’s genetic profile and environmental exposures, generating a personalized vulnerability risk grid. This risk grid can then be interrogated using pathway-specific biomarkers to detect actual pathophysiological alterations along these pathways. Based on this biomarker evidence, personalized interventions can be selected to target the identified pathophysiological alterations.
121
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
While grey matter volume alterations demonstrated similar recovery dynamics, voxel-wise controlling did barely affect rsfMRI group differences, suggesting differing mechanisms in place (panel C). Correlations with clinical variables did not survive multiple comparison correction. 4/n
Correlations among resting-state measures and with clinical outcome; effect sizes of resting-state group comparisons with and without controlling for voxelwise gray matter volume.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
Strong widespread resting-state activity and connectivity decreases in severely underweight patients (T1acu) that nearly resolved after inpatient treatment (T2acu) and were normalized in long-term recovered patients (T3rec). 3/n
Network- and seed-based statistics.Voxelwise functional connectivity and activity.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
Integrating these data, we hypothesized that human INS is tightly linked to social attentional processing, with the right TPJ as a sensory-integration hub at the brain system level, and potentially facilitated by GABA-mediated E/I balance at the neurophysiological level. 8/n
ummary of results and hypotheses. Abbreviations: INS = interpersonal neural synchronization, DAN/VAN = dorsal/ventral attention network, DMN = default mode network, ToM = theory of mind network, TPJ = temporoparietal junction, IFG = inferior frontal gyrus, dm/vmPFC = dorsomedial/ventromedial prefrontal cortex, AI = anterior insula, PMC = premotor cortex, IPL = inferior parietal lobule, OFC = orbitofrontal cortex, VS = ventral striatum, OXT = oxytocin, E/I = excitation/inhibition balance.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
Interestingly, the meta-analytic whole-brain INS distribution was correlated to GABAergic and glutamatergic receptor systems (A). In line with that, gene enrichment analyses showed assocations with layer IV/V GABAergic interneurons, and neurodevelopmental disorders (B & D)! 7/n
Spatial associations of INS to neurotransmitter receptor and synaptic density distributions, as well as genetic markers of neuronal cell types, brain development, and psychiatric disorders.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
We found convergence in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and the left inferior prefrontal cortex (A & B)! The TPJ coactivated with mainly cortical regions and thalami (C & D) and the INS data was associated with attention and mentalizing processes & networks (E & F). 6/n
Brain-functional INS correlates resulting from fMRI and fNIRS meta-analyses with their neuronal connectivity and neurobehavioral association patterns. A: Results of the main fMRI INS meta-analysis. Upper: Unthresholded Z-map derived from ALE p values. Middle/lower: Significant INS clusters after thresholding. B: Upper: Parcel-wise fNIRS INS results. C: Meta-analytic coactivation network using the rTPJ INS cluster as a seed (black contour). D: Functional resting-state connectivity between MACM clusters. E: Relationships of the rTPJ cluster and MACM network to major resting-state networks. Relative: Proportion of “INS-voxels” within a given network vs. all “INS-voxels”. Absolute: Proportion of “INS-voxels” within a given network vs. all voxels within the network. F: Functional decoding of INS-related activation using Neurosynth topics.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
We started with meta-analyses of fMRI and fNIRS hyperscanning studies that assessed temporal synchronization of brain activities between interacting subjects. Overall, we included 22 fMRI studies and 69 fNIRS studies with 740 and 3,721 subjects in separate meta-analyses. 5/n
Structured literature search. A: Flow chart depicting the literature search process in line with the PRISMA 2020 statement. SetYouFree was used for the automatic literature search, duplicate detection, and the cross-reference search. The resulting records, together with results from other sources, were submitted to Cadima to manually identify eligible studies. Note that the exclusion criteria listed in Reports excluded were not mutually exclusive. Records are entries in the publication lists resulting from the main search and screened on the abstract level, reports are publications screened in full, studies are included publications, and experiments are sets of data derived from independent study samples and can cover data from multiple studies. B: Citation network generated from OpenCitations data, including overview figures of reported INS foci and fNIRS probe setups. An interactive version with metadata for each individual study is available at https://leondlotter.github.io/MAsync/citenet. Note that the OpenCitations database only contains citations and references made openly accessible by the publishers and thus does likely not include all existing links among publications. Abbreviations: fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging, fNIRS = functional near-infrared spectroscopy, y = years, INS = interpersonal neural synchronization.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
We performed a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) and contextualized the results using diverse public databases to develop new hypotheses on involved physiological processes. 2/n
The multimodal data fusion approach to explore the neurobiology of human INS. The figure outlines the multimodal data fusion workflow applied in the present study. Depicted are data sources and major analysis steps applied to generate multilevel knowledge and new hypotheses about the neurobiological basis of INS. Abbreviations: INS = interpersonal neural synchrony, fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging, fNIRS = functional near-infrared spectroscopy, GCEA = gene-category enrichment analysis.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
*Rescuing Twitter Threads* series 2023: *Revealing the neurobiology underlying interpersonal neural synchronization with multimodal data fusion* doi.org/10.1016/j.ne... 1/n #neuroskyence #neuroimaging #AcademicSky #SciSky
Summary of results and hypotheses. Abbreviations: INS = interpersonal neural synchronization, DAN/VAN = dorsal/ventral attention network, DMN = default mode network, ToM = theory of mind network, TPJ = temporoparietal junction, IFG = inferior frontal gyrus, dm/vmPFC = dorsomedial/ventromedial prefrontal cortex, AI = anterior insula, PMC = premotor cortex, IPL = inferior parietal lobule, OFC = orbitofrontal cortex, VS = ventral striatum, OXT = oxytocin, E/I = excitation/inhibition balance.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
I think these results are quite cool 🤓. Why? The biology of human brain development is pretty understudied bc we usually can't study it in vivo. Pioneering work by Tomas Paus et al. introduced approaches such as ours a few years ago. Here, we aimed to extend them by... 10/n
Condensed visualization of the reported results (first line of each block, emphasized are neurobiological markers that showed consistent results) in context with related results of previous human studies investigating similar biological processes or cell populations (lines below). We do not claim this collection to be exhaustive. In the left upper panel, we show studies investigating general cellular remodeling processes; in the other panels, each header indicates one neurobiological marker with associated studies below. Each thin black line overlaid by a colored bar indicates results from one study. If a study reported multiple results pertaining to the same process (e.g., from two different brain regions), bars were laid over each other (Data S5 for individual listings). Thin black lines: overall time span investigated. Colored overlay: time period in which the respective study target was reported to show developmental changes (present study: nominal p < 0.05), independent of the sign of the association. Large dots: Timepoint of the maximum association. See also Fig. S28 and Data S5 for a more comprehensive overview including various topics. Abbreviations: ST = somatostatin, CR calretinin, sMRI structural MRI, CBF cerebral blood flow, PET positron emission tomography, ASL arterial spin labeling, ACh(E) acetylcholine (esterase), see Fig. 2 for abbreviations used in neurobiological marker names.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
Until now, all analyses were based on predicted data from the normative model. We validate our results in 10-to-23-year longitudinal data from ~8,000 ABCD and IMAGEN subjects, explaining up to 18% of individual CT change (on average; ranging from 0 to 60%)! 9/n
Explained spatial CT change variance in ABCD and IMAGEN data. The overall model performance is illustrated as scatter plots contrasting predicted CT change (y axis) with observed CT change (x axis). Scatters: single brain regions, color-coded by prediction error. Continuous line: linear regression fit through the observations. Dashed line: theoretical optimal fit. Brains: prediction errors corresponding to scatters. Rows: upper: cohort-average predicted by the reference (Braincharts) model, lower sample size due to subjects dropped during model adaptation (see Methods); middle: observed cohort-average (ComBat-harmonized); lower: observed single-subject values (ComBat-harmonized), one regression model was calculated for each subject, but the results were combined for illustration purposes. CT cortical thickness, adj. adjusted.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
We confirmed our results - as far as possible - in human developmental gene expression data from ~30 postmortem brains. The data converged with neuroimaging findings, due to very limited spatial resolution and high noise, however, we could not get into specifics. 8/n
First row: Modeled CT change explained by individual neurobiological markers, exactly corresponding to univariate results in Figs. 3 and 4. X values are aligned to the first year of each tested modeled CT change time period (e.g., Δ(5,10) is aligned to 5 years on x-axis). Shades following each line visualize other possible alignments (Δ(5,10) is aligned to 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 years). Vertical shaded boxes indicate time periods in which CT change was explained significantly (FDR). Following rows: Normalized log2-transformed gene expression trajectories for maximally 5 original atlases that loaded on factor-level neurobiological markers with λ > |0.3| (c.f., Fig. S15). Gene expression for each marker was derived from related single genes or from averaging across gene sets. Grey dots indicate the average neocortical expression of individual subjects. Black lines and shades show locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) curves with 95% confidence intervals. Associations were tested for by averaging the LOESS data within and outside of each respective time period and comparing mean and ratio against null data randomly sampled from non-brain genes (positive-sided exact p values). ★: FDR-corrected across all tests; ✩: nominal p < 0.05. CT CT change, adj. adjusted, FDR false discovery rate, ns not significant, see Fig. 2 for abbreviations used in neurobiological marker names.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
Zooming in, we identified D1/2 dopamine receptors, microglia, & somatostatin interneurons as relevant for early CT development (purple, brown, yellow), while cholinergic receptors (green) seemed important later on. Motor, medial temporal/occipital, & cingulate areas were influential. 7/n
Modeled lifespan CT change explained by neurobiological markers, selected from the univariate analyses (Figs. 3 and 4; 9 FDR-corrected significant markers). See Fig. 3 for descriptions of global plot elements. Top: overall explained modeled CT change variance, the two colored lines highlight contributions of molecular and cellular markers. Middle: Marker-wise contributions to the overall explained spatial variance. Note that, as the used total dominance statistic describes the average R2 associated with each predictor relative to the “full model” R2, the sum of the predictor-wise values at each timepoint in the middle plot equals the R2 values expressed in the upper panel. Bottom: Spearman correlations between modeled CT change and markers to visualize the sign of the association patterns. CT cortical thickness, see Fig. 2 for abbreviations used in neurobiological marker names. Regional influences on explained modeled CT change. Each row shows one of the 9 markers included in dominance analyses. Scatterplots: Correlation between modeled CT change at the respective predictor’s peak timestep (y axis) and the predictor map, corresponding to panel A-bottom. The first surface shows the residual difference maps calculated for each marker, highlighting the most influential regions on modeled CT change association effects. For illustration purposes, the second and third surface show modeled CT change and the spatial distribution associated with the marker. Colorbars map (i) residual difference, (ii) percent-change, and (iii) z-transformed marker density; individual colorbars were not labelled to maintain readability. See Fig. S14 for all residual difference maps, Fig. S6C for all modeled CT change maps, and Fig. S4 for all predictor maps. CT cortical thickness, see Fig. 2 for abbreviations used in neurobiological marker names.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
Molecular (PET, left) and cellular (right) "neurobiological markers" explained up to 55% of the variance associated with lifespan CT change patterns! Large neurotransmitter systems, brain metabolism, neuronal and glial cells seemed esp. relevant for the first 3 decades. 6/n
Associations between modeled lifespan CT change and neurobiological markers derived from imaging modalities. Developmental periods covered by this study as defined by Kang et al.27 are shown on top. Time periods were aligned to the center of each modeled CT change step (e.g., Δ(5,10) = 7.5). Colored lines show the amount of spatial modeled CT change variance explained (y axis) by the combined markers (upper) or each marker individually (lower) throughout the lifespan (x axis). Each y value represents the results of one multiple (upper) or single (lower) linear regression model predicting CT change across regions from neurobiological marker densities across regions. Stars indicate positive-sided significance of each regression model based on null regression models estimated on permuted marker maps; ★: FDR-corrected across all tests shown in each panel of the plot; ✩: nominal p < 0.05. To provide an estimate of the actual observed effect size, gray areas show the distributions of modeled CT change explained by permuted marker maps (n = 10,000). For the lower panel, null results were combined across marker maps. See Fig. S6C for all CT change maps, and Fig. S4 for all predictor maps. CT cortical thickness, PET positron emission tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, FDR false discovery rate, see Fig. 2 for abbreviations used in neurobiological marker names. Associations between modeled lifespan CT change and neurobiological markers derived from mRNA expression data. The figure layout and shown plot elements correspond to Fig. 4. See Fig. S6C for all CT change maps, and Fig. S4 for all predictor maps. CT cortical thickness, see Fig. 2 for abbreviations used in neurobiological marker names.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
We first looked at modeled CT at each timepoint between 5 and 90 years. We found remarkably diverse "colocalization" trajectories! This already indicated potential biological processes, but of course *change* is what we focus on if we are interested in brain development. 5/n
Lifespan trajectories of colocalization between neurobiological markers and modeled cross-sectional CT. For each marker, the upper panel shows a surface projection of the parcellated data; yellow-violet: nuclear imaging markers, yellow-green: gene-expression, yellow-gray: microstructural; yellow = higher density. The center panel shows the marker’s colocalization trajectory: Z-transformed Spearman correlation coefficients are shown on the y axis, age on the x axis; blue-to-orange lines indicate percentiles of modeled CT data (see legend, note that these do not show actual percentiles of colocalization strengths); the green line (LOESS = locally estimated scatterplot smoothing) was smoothed through the percentile data to highlight trajectories (shades: 95% confidence intervals). The lower panel shows year-to-year changes (y axis) derived from the LOESS line in the upper plot. See Fig. S7 for trajectories including ABCD and IMAGEN subjects and Fig. S8 for trajectories split by sex. Coloc. colocalization, SV2A synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A, M1 muscarinic receptor 1, mGluR5 metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, 5HT1a/1b/2a/4/6 serotonin receptor 1a/2a/4/6, CB cannabinoid receptor 1, GABAa γ-aminobutyric acid receptor A, HDAC histone deacetylase, 5HTT serotonin transporter, FDOPA fluorodopa, DAT dopamine transporter, D1/2 dopamine receptor 1/2, NMDA = N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor, GI glycolytic index, MU mu opioid receptor, A4B2 = α4β2 nicotinic receptor, VAChT vesicular acetylcholine transporter, NET noradrenaline transporter, CBF cerebral blood flow, CMRglu cerebral metabolic rate of glucose, COX1 cyclooxygenase 1, H3 histamine receptor 3, TSPO translocator protein, Microstr cortical microstructure, Ex excitatory neurons, In inhibitory neurons, Oligo oligodendrocytes, Endo endothelial cells, Micro microglia, OPC oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, Astro astrocytes.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
...could be explained by spatial patterns found in PET atlases and neural cell type maps (plots after dimensionality reduction) to detect potential biological mechanisms underlying cortex development. 4/n
Dimensionality reducted multilevel brain atlases.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
We draw on two recent areas in neuroimaging: Predictions from a normative model of cortical thickness (CT) were subjected to spatial correlation analyses with neurotransmitter and cell type maps. Specifically, we asked if cortex-wide patterns found in "modeled CT" data (animation)... 3/n
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
In this paper, published in 2024 by @natcomms.nature.com, we explore how human cerebral cortex development unfolds along patterns of molecular & cellular brain organization. 2/n
The workflow of the present study, from data sources (left side) to data processing and analysis method (middle) to the research questions and results (right side). A A collection of postmortem “cellular” and in vivo “molecular” brain atlases was parcellated and dimensionality reduced. B “Modeled” predicted CT data was extracted from a normative model. C We calculated the colocalization between neurobiological markers and CT at each point throughout the lifespan (see Fig. 2). D We evaluated how combined and individual neurobiological markers could explain lifespan CT change (see Figs. 3 and 4). E The strongest associated markers were examined in detail, accounting for shared spatial patterns (see Fig. 5). F A developmental gene expression dataset was used to generate trajectories of gene expression associated with each neurobiological marker. G Periods in which CT change was significantly explained were validated in developmental gene expression data (see Fig. 7). H Single-subject longitudinal data was extracted from two developmental cohorts. I Findings based on the normative model were validated in single-subject data (see Fig. 8). Abbreviations: CT = cortical thickness, ABA = Allen Brain Atlas, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging. Here, data plots are employed for demonstration purposes; for definitions of plot elements, please refer to the individual figures as refererred to above, similarly, source data are provided in Source Data files of each following figure. ABCD Study®, Teen Brains. Today’s Science. Brighter Future.® and the ABCD Study Logos are registered marks of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS).
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 06/05/2026
*Rescuing Twitter threads* series 2024: *Regional patterns of human cortex development correlate with underlying neurobiology* doi.org/10.1038/s414... 1/n #neuroskyence #neuroimaging #AcademicSky #SciSky
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 03/10/2023
Important topic! BlueSky confused me a bit, however 😬
Screenshot of the exact same post I am responding to. BlueSky showed the link to the article with it’s heading cut off at an unfortunate spot: „Autistic individuals have increased risk of chronic physical health“.
120
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 22/09/2023
Last, there was some (very limited) indication of relationships between maternal behavior and persistant MRI alterations. Stuff for future work! (Last picture: both hormone and behav. associations) Thanks go to our collaborators, especially Natalia Chechko and my supervisor Jeurgen Dukart! 🎉 7/7
Subject-level spatial colocalization between postpartum rsfMRI alterations and hormonal/neurotransmitter receptor densities.
Left side: Parcellated and Z-standardized whole-brain hormone and neurotransmitter receptor distributions. Right side: Spatial colocalization analyses. Upper panel: Baseline analyses testing for
colocalization between receptor distributions and rsfMRI data of each postpartum subject at baseline relative to the control group. X-axis: Z-transformed Spearman correlation coefficients, y-axis: rsfMRI
metrics, colors: receptor maps. Lower panels: Longitudinal analyses following up on each baseline results if associated group permutation p values survived false discovery rate-correction (filled stars). The plot design equals Figure 2 with the y axis showing Z-transformed Spearman correlation coefficients.
010
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 22/09/2023
While we cannot claim causality, we found subcortical effects related to pp progesterone levels. (1) whole-brain distributions of MRI changes colocalized with corticosteroid hormone receptors and related transmitters. (2) subcortical MRI trajectories & progesterone levels covaried over time. 6/n
Subject-level spatial colocalization between postpartum rsfMRI alterations and hormonal/neurotransmitter receptor densities.
Left side: Parcellated and Z-standardized whole-brain hormone and neurotransmitter receptor distributions. Right side: Spatial colocalization analyses. Upper panel: Baseline analyses testing for
colocalization between receptor distributions and rsfMRI data of each postpartum subject at baseline relative to the control group. X-axis: Z-transformed Spearman correlation coefficients, y-axis: rsfMRI
metrics, colors: receptor maps. Lower panels: Longitudinal analyses following up on each baseline results if associated group permutation p values survived false discovery rate-correction (filled stars). The plot design equals Figure 2 with the y axis showing Z-transformed Spearman correlation coefficients.
110
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 22/09/2023
On the other hand, decreased *subcortical* *whole-brain* connectivity showed clear linear and quadratic normalization trajectories, reaching control-levels at about 6-9 weeks pp. What may cause this dissociation, coinciding with the so-called "subacute postpartum period"? 5/n
Longitudinal development of rsfMRI clusters.
Development of baseline cluster-wise averaged global connectivity metrics across 6 postpartum months. 
Boxplots: x-axes show time in weeks postpartum (dimensional scale), y-axes show the Z-standardized rsfMRI metric. Each dot represents one subject at one individual time point, lines connect longitudinal scans. Boxplots show the distribution across subjects at each time point (black dot = mean, middle line = median, boxes = quartile 1 and 3, whiskers = range if below 1.5 * interquartile range from quartile 1 or 3). Heatmaps show effect sizes (Hedge’s g) of within- and between-group comparisons, overlaid labels mark significances (filled star = false discovery-corrected, empty star = nominal p < .05, ns = p > .05. Significance of linear mixed models is printed in the lower left corner.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 22/09/2023
We found striking dissociations between temporal trajectories of cluster-averaged data: Increased cortical local activity (fALFF) remained persistent across the 6 follow-up months. Visually less clear, but statistically so, did decreased insular local connectivity (LCOR). 4/n
Longitudinal development of rsfMRI clusters.
Development of baseline cluster-wise averaged local connectivity and activity metrics across 6 postpartum months. 
Boxplots: x-axes show time in weeks postpartum (dimensional scale), y-axes show the Z-standardized rsfMRI metric. Each dot represents one subject at one individual time point, lines connect longitudinal scans. Boxplots show the distribution across subjects at each time point (black dot = mean, middle line = median, boxes = quartile 1 and 3, whiskers = range if below 1.5 * interquartile range from quartile 1 or 3). Heatmaps show effect sizes (Hedge’s g) of within- and between-group comparisons, overlaid labels mark significances (filled star = false discovery-corrected, empty star = nominal p < .05, ns = p > .05. Significance of linear mixed models is printed in the lower left corner.
100
Leon Lotter @leondlotter.de · 22/09/2023
We expected strong differences between mother’s brains at pp week 1 vs. nulliparous controls. We found decreases of global (GCOR) and local (LCOR) connectivity in bilateral putamen and insula, respectively. Increases of local activity (fALFF) were more distributed, and only cortical. 3/n
Clusters of differing local activity (fALFF), local connectivity (LCOR), and global connectivity (GCOR) in the nulliparous (NP) and postpartum (PP) groups at baseline.
Cluster-level and whole-brain results from baseline (T0) rsfMRI analyses. Brain maps for each rsfMRI metric (rows) and each contrast (columns) show voxel-level negative log10-transformed p values
overlaid by cluster-level results in darker shades (non-parametric cluster mass permutation).
100