Sign in

NON-TOXICNo ads · No shady algorithms

iiinova is part of the Atmosphere — an open, public network where you own your identity.

Legal Style Blog

@legalstyle.co.uk
1.7K followers 373 following 581 posts

A web-log on legal style, with a focus on England & Wales. Also home of the ‘In the Privy Council’ podcast and the novelty @tritelaw.bsky.social account. Editor: Mr Elijah Z Granet @ezgra.net. Web: legalstyle.co.uk ; e-mail: editor [at] legalstyle.co.uk

PostsRepliesMedia
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 12/08/2025
In "annals of legal chutzpah," murderer Leopold (of "& Loeb" fame) sued to stop a film à clef (COMPULSION, a fave) about his crime, saying the fictionalized aspects hurt him in the community. Ill. Sup. Ct.: you murdered a kid; there's no fiction about you that worsens your rep.
120 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 19/04/2025
Looked this up out of curiosity and it's fascinating when states (here Ohio and Oregon) insist on terms no other state uses. What other examples are there of a state using a unique name for a common offense, procedure, or law?
040 4
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 17/04/2025
In keeping with the GPO style guide, the Supreme Court uses an en-dash (–) not a hyphen (-) in MS–13 (so it's not MS-13). It's an odd quirk of federal style
2222 22
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 12/04/2025
If you want to really annoy a lawyer, just try citing bits from law reports like you would any other book chapter ;)
Burger, Warren E. “Wisconsin v. Yoder.” \emph{United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court}, edited by Henry Putzel, Jr., vol. 406, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973, pp. 207–236. \end{hangparas}
1110 11
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 29/03/2025
120 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 29/03/2025
The official proclamation of Australia's dissolution is not befitting the great Commonwealth… so I re-typeset it! God save the King of Australia! Pathetic original below
161 6
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 16/03/2025
There's a lot of debate on the best list format for law. Some people like Roman (I,II, III or i, ii, iii), others alpha (a, b, c), others numeric (1, 2, 3). I, however, prefer the bra size method of listing, which I think is the clearest way to tabulate.
0105 10
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 13/03/2025
A few excerpts from one of my favourite essays (always a delight to return to), L. Sprague de Camp’s “Language for Time Travellers”
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 11/03/2025
I **ADORE** this little article from Green Bag by a federal judge explaining how he first coined a word and then worked to use it in an opinion so it could make it into Black's Law Dictionary greenbag.org/v13n2/v13n2_...
24017 40
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 04/03/2025
Quiz: name the case from the AI generated image!
311 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 23/02/2025
Library catalogues should not use academic diacritics like this, meaningless and confusing and bad for typeface support, for public listings. Associate the canonical academic transliteration with a name conforming to more standard Cyrillic-English renderings…
110 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 21/02/2025
The trial of the attacker (just convicted) against Sir Salman Rushdie is a good illustration of the quirks of inchoate offences: attempted murder requires an intent to kill, yet murder doesn't. (This is basic stuff to lawyers but for non-legal followers…)
The assistant public defender Andrew Brautigan told the jury that prosecutors had not proved that Matar intended to kill Rushdie. The distinction is important for an attempted-murder conviction. The defendant has pleaded not guilty.

“You will agree something bad happened to Mr Rushdie, but you don’t know what Mr Matar’s conscious objective was,” Brautigan said. “The testimony you have heard doesn’t establish anything more than a chaotic noisy outburst that occurred that injured Mr Rushdie.”

Matar had attacked with him knives, not a gun or bomb, his attorneys have said previously. And in response to testimony that the injuries were life-threatening, they have noted that Rushdie’s heart and lungs were uninjured.
281 8
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 19/02/2025
Legal academics v legal practice: an illustration
News
Law professor with 'profound sense of grievance' banned from courts
By Charlie Moloney18 February 2025

Save articlePlease Sign in to your account to use this feature
Alaw professor who 'grossly misused the procedures of the courts' in a campaign of meritless claims against the University of Warwick has been hit with an extended civil restraint order (ECRO) by a High Court judge.

Professor Theodora Kostakopoulou was employed by the university as professor of law from 2012. But in 2016, disciplinary proceedings were commenced against her, leading to her receiving a written warning.
020 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 12/02/2025
Can someone please explain to me why on earth NextDNS allows this option to be turned off?
020 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 11/02/2025
2 things from the memo dismissing the case against Eric Adams: 1) oddly the Dep. AG cited the Hyde Amend't [crim. not abortion] by Pub.-L. yet it's 18 U.S.C. § 3006A note. The confusion of statutory notes strikes again 2) What on earth does Vickor Bout have to do with things?
100 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 10/02/2025
A helpful guide to avoiding a common spelling error thanks to confusion of the #severance tv show and the Prime Minister!
031 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 08/02/2025
I don't think I can keep watching the #severance show given that in the latest episode the same book is shown first printed in Garamond Premier Pro Caption (small optical size has distinct 'W') and then later in Times New Roman. Disgracefully poor attention to detail
1010213 102
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 07/02/2025
NEW PEERS ALERT! Including for former Downing Street chief Sue Gray. Meanwhile… how does one pronounce Auchenroch?
311 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 06/02/2025
My assumption is that it is the lawyer being cautious about aggressive attempts to get sanctions by opposing counsel (common in the US). Rule 11(b)(3) here is probably the origin of the fear
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 06/02/2025
I strongly endorse being so pedantic as to join in a concurrence save two footnotes
172 7
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 06/02/2025
I know this slam poetry style formatting of allegations is designed to streamline a reply (paragraph 164 is denied/admitted) but it makes complaints unreadable to anyone else.
. Gaiman persisted in his suggestions and grew more insistent.
58. Scarlett eventually agreed after Gaiman told her that he had to make a work call.
59. Upon information and belief, there was no work call.
60. Shortly after Scarlett began to bathe, Gaiman arrived unannounced.
61. And naked.
62. Gaiman got into the bathtub with Scarlett.
63. Without being invited to do so.
64. Scarlett was shocked and frightened by Gaiman’s behavior.
65. At that time Gaiman was 61 years old
110 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 04/02/2025
Lord Campbell was so enamoured of the index he [claimed to have] proposed a bill mandating an index in all books!
Campbell writes, 'So essential did I consider an Index to be to every book, that I proposed to bring a Bill to parliament to deprive an author who publishes a book without an Index of the privilege of copytight; and, moreover, to subject him, for his offence, to a pecuniary penalty? One wonders whether we should take Campbell entirely at his word. Hansard has no record of Campbell ever mentioning such a bill in parliament.
(If he did, and it has gone unrecorded, it was most likely in the context of the Copyright Bill introduced repeatedly by Thomas Taulford in the late 18305). But in fact Campbell's whole bold claim takes place in the context of an admission of guilt. The above quotation goes on: 'from difficulties started by my print-ers, my own books have hitherto been without an Index.' Were his bill to have come into being, Campbell, the shrewdest of legal minds, would have fallen foul of his own legislation. John Lord Campbell,
241 4
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 23/01/2025
I'm so mulish about such things that, if I were in prison and a pardon came with this kind of typo, I would send the pardon back with a request for revisions before agreeing to be released.
For Hisconvictions
011 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 09/01/2025
If you run for president this should absolutely be the title of your pre-campaign book that candidates traditionally release
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 22/12/2024
David Brooks shows his deep grasp of theology certainly not obtained by lazy googling for quotations by to fill copy by calling Simone Weil a ‘Jewish mystic’
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 22/12/2024
Certainly no one would argue this is a good year for the CofE, but marking on a curve, it’s fairly hard to it an annus horribilis given 155 had the Act of 1 & 2 Phil & Mar, c 8 (an Acte repealing all Statutes Articles and Provisions made against the see Apostolick of Rome)
The observer view on the Church of England: how does it recover after its annus horribilis?
100 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 19/12/2024
This is a silly exercise but it’s the end of the year—let’s play English defamation law hypotheticals! Like being back in a media law or torts exam… the feeling we all nostalgically crave (Feel free to chime in with other jurisdictions)
Disney recently settled with Donald Trump over  an allegedly defamatory broadcast where a presenter stated repeatedly that the former president had been found  liable  by a civil jury for rape. Similar to English law, rape (as relevant to this case) in New York required penile penetration and the jury declined to find Trump liable for rape, instead finding him liable for sexual abuse for alleged forcible sexual touching.  \textit{Question:} assuming that the broadcast was made in England, would the defamatory statement that Trump had been found liable for rape constitute `serious harm' for the purposes of the Defamation Act 2013?
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 19/12/2024
I regret to inform you that the Guardian has gone full ‘freeman on the land’ and is one step away from asking if Magna Carta died in vain… ‘unconstitutional’ is an incoherent claim here showing no understanding of the British constitution.
Pensions
‘It’s undemocratic’: Waspi women on the decision not to pay compensation
Some are questioning loyalty to Labour while others say move is unconstitutional
020 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 15/12/2024
The Gov UK AI is exactly as reliable as you’d expect—my drugs gang can be a charity, my seditious organisation needs only a mild licence, and my work to help Islamic State can be a community interest corporation!
033 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 13/12/2024
Qualified immunity continues to be the worst thing ever (Andrew v. White, a pending SCOTUS cert. petition)https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/andrew-v-white/
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 07/12/2024
I can’t actually think of a reason to use criminal slides in a case caption, but it is extremely funny. Incidentally, G’Rico Longllive Kingsqueezer and friends won their appeal (arguing the jury should have heard evidence they were idiots rather than an organized conspirac… yes, actually)
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 04/12/2024
The Arms of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers #heraldry
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 02/12/2024
When asked for legal authority to support Biden’s pardon of his son, the White House noted that “family is the most important thing.” United States v. Peters, 938 F. Supp. 2d 296, 300 (N.D.N.Y. 2013) (taken wildly out of context). ;)
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 01/12/2024
The Law Comm. has silly proposals on digital assets. To get in the game of annoying regulators before any silly law changes, I made a cryptocurrency! WorthlessCoin can be minted by anyone, in unlimited quantity and I will see if it counts as a digital asset! heheh worthlesscoin.streamlit.app
220 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 30/11/2024
The 5th Circuit has a section of an opinion consisting entirely of quotations www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
See link at p 4
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 30/11/2024
And the award for most tautological sentence in a law review abstract goes to…
And last, we conclude
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 28/11/2024
NEW: my thorough and lengthy analysis of the Assisted Dying Bill. I don’t talk the morals or principles of whether or not assisted dying is good. I focus on the drafting—is it fit for purpose? I conclude ‘no’. Link: www.legalstyle.co.uk/2024/11/the-as…
110 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 26/11/2024
Given that it’s both just & popular, it’s really astonishing no government has had the moral decency to increase sentences for atrocities against children. The starting point ought to be life; someone who would do this is as bad as murderer. Seven years is a mockery of justice.
Mother who kept three-year-old locked in a drawer jailed for seven years
Child was found severely malnourished, unable to walk or speak
020 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 25/11/2024
Sadly rarely actually depicted correctly by the department, but when done right the U.S. Department of Labor has decent heraldry with an official blazon #heraldry
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 24/11/2024
Chutzpah is this Ohio prison guard who taunted and egged on an inmate to end his life, and then sued the prison officers union for sex discrimination after the union admitted that her conduct was indefensible and didn’t represent her… she lost, fortunately.
Inmate Ronnie Jones hanged himself in a cell block staffed by Detillion and her partner,
Angelo Brodie. The next day, a prison lieutenant collected statements from inmates who witnessed
the tragedy. The lieutenant learned two important things.
First, Detillion seemingly engaged in egregious misconduct. On the night of the incident,
the lieutenant learned, Detillion locked Jones in a cell by himself and refused to let him speak with
a mental health professional about a recent death in his family. When Jones threatened to kill
himself, a friend asked to enter the cell to calm him down. Detillion called the friend a “f*g” who,
she claimed, only wanted into the cell “so [they] could f*ck.” Detillion had the friend removed
from the block. Jones inquired about his friend, at which point Detillion “announced” to the cell
block “that Jones said he was going to kill himself if they didn’t move him to where his ‘boyfriend’
was” located. Detillion later found Jones with a noose and mocked him for
241 4
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 24/11/2024
Qualified immunity remains an abomination (screenshot from the excellent Short Circuit newsletter). Link to opinion: media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unp...
https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/files/202310762.pdf?utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--mAM7TM0t8zZwQUB3_3v8fH-PuPSyeXA1mYyHSn7nYbAI-CI9RrICN9coOf982k6hITqjSNYXCNY0kz9ASQhyp39cLkA&_hsmi=335266942&utm_content=335266942&utm_source=hs_email
031 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 23/11/2024
Another example of an officially blazoned armorial in the US–the Department of Commerce. #heraldry
120 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 22/11/2024
The former U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare had pretty nice heraldry. Sadly, neither of the two successor departments has armorial bearings
211 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 19/11/2024
Used streamlit to make this quick little regnal year calculator, for when you just have to know the regnal year or reverse convert a regnal year to Gregorian! regnalyear.streamlit.app
020 2
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 15/11/2024
Apparently Mr Jolyon Maugham KC is considering starting a new political party over disillusionment with Labour. I made the following poster as encouragement. If you like it, you might enjoy my annual Foxing Day posts on fox law—see here www.legalstyle.co.uk/2023/12/happ...
Picture of man in kimono with baseball bat standing over fox and text reading VOTE MAUGHAM, INDEPENDENT LABOUR, TOUGH ON FOXES, TOUGH ON THE CAUSES OF FOXES
060 6
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 14/11/2024
Four undated Victorian legal portraits—the captions say who the barrister (Kenealy QC) and two judges (Lush & Mellor JJ) are, but not the LCJ and I am too bad with faces to guess from portraits—does anyone know who it was? Photos *not* necessarily taken at the same year/decade as each other
231 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 14/11/2024
It is a disgrace that not only does English law make it virtually impossible for the innocent to challenge their convictions, but, worse yet, does everything it can to avoid compensation. Change the law!
010 1
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 13/11/2024
3 pts: 1) I hate the tendency of judges to express ‘disbelief’ in cases like this, b/c (intended or not) sounds like ‘I didn’t think a blonde white British woman would do this’ 2) increase penalties for animal torture—sentences too light 3) good use of obscenity laws
sesee link below
031 3
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 13/11/2024
000 0
Legal Style Blog @legalstyle.co.uk · 13/11/2024
I re-typeset the Archbishop of Canterbury’s resignation letter; original below
110 1