Sign in

Jonas R. Kunst

@kunstjonas.bsky.social
2.5K followers 376 following 130 posts

Professor of Communication and Psychology at BI Norwegian Business School and the University of Oslo Past Yale, Harvard, UiB. Editor-in-Chief at Advances.in Father. Views are my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 28/09/2026
Ideologies aren't just belief salads—they're structured systems. New commentary in advances.in/psychology shows how sacred cores & flexible peripheries explain radicalization. doi.org/10.56296/aip00070 #OpenAccess
advances.in
Sacred-symbolic cores and shifting peripheries: A structural account of ideological change in extremism
Beyond the 'salad bar' metaphor: how a structural account of sacred cores and mutable peripheries explains ideological shift in violent extremism.
011
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 19/08/2026
Challenging extremism research: advances.in/psychology study shows radicalization isn't linear passion→engagement→violence. Instead, obsessive passion & deliberate engagement reciprocally reinforce each other in a "syndrome." doi.org/10.56296/aip00067 🔗
advances.in
The radicalization syndrome: Reciprocal dynamics of obsessive passion and deliberate engagement
Why do few who see radical content support violence? A multi-study analysis pinpoints obsessive passion and active engagement as the key coupling.
021
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 07/08/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: childhood trauma linked to violent extremism. A scoping review of 23 studies (4,946 people) finds those engaged in extremism report more adverse childhood experiences than the general population. 📊 doi.org/10.56296/aip00065
advances.in
Adverse childhood experiences and violent extremism: A scoping review of the literature
A scoping review of 23 studies finds violent extremists show higher rates of adverse childhood experiences than the general population. Explore the evidence.
021
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
I really like this new contribution to our special issue!
000
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 03/08/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: How do violent extremist leaders become deadlier? A multilevel analysis reveals that charismatic + personalized power = far deadlier organizations—but pragmatic leaders show the opposite pattern. doi.org/10.56296/aip00069
advances.in
Deadly persuasion: A multilevel analysis of leader influence tactics and lethality in violent extremist organizations
How does a leader's tenure change an extremist group's lethality? A longitudinal analysis of 645 leader-years uncovers surprising interaction effects.
021
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 20/07/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: Extremism isn't fragmenting—it's a developmental journey. Rousseau and Veissière argue that young people move fluidly across ideologies, often seeking meaning rather than coherent political goals. doi.org/10.56296/aip00068 #Psychology
advances.in
Shifts and continuity in contemporary violent extremism: Moving toward a dynamic and developmental understanding?
Why is violent extremism fragmenting? A developmental look at youth radicalization, hybrid grievances, and nihilistic violence beyond static categories.
021
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 14/07/2026
When teens lose faith in politics, radicalism follows. New 5-year study in advances.in/psychology shows political distrust & powerlessness predict radical behavior. doi.org/10.56296/aip00061 🔍
advances.in
System-disillusioned youth radicalize: The role of political alienation in the formation of political radicalism
Can feeling powerless make teens radical? A 5-year study of Swedish youth reveals how political distrust and alienation drive adolescent radicalism—especially in boys.
131
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Cool paper edited by Milan Obaidi!
000
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 09/07/2026
🔍 New commentary in advances.in/psychology: Modern extremism often isn't ideological—some extremists are fixated on violence itself, not political goals. Cassam challenges how we understand radicalization. doi.org/10.56296/aip00062
advances.in
Extremism without ideology
Can you be an extremist with no ideology at all? A provocative new analysis uses the Southport killer to challenge everything we assume about extremism.
021
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 08/07/2026
Hybrid extremism is real & intensifying, argues new advances.in/psychology paper. Baele defends the 'salad bar' concept against critics—showing how societal shifts produce composite ideological worldviews. doi.org/10.56296/aip00060
advances.in
Why the ‘salad bar’ might actually help extremism research – A reply to Horgan and Shayler
Is 'salad bar' extremism real or just hype? A new analysis reveals why hybrid, incoherent ideologies are surging—and what the data actually show.
011
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 06/07/2026
We're sharing Arie Perliger's sharp critique of how the political violence research field diagnoses ideological "incoherence"—often missing deeper worldviews. A call for rigorous historical & comparative analysis. doi.org/10.56296/aip00059
advances.in
The erosion of conceptual clarity in the study of political violence
Are extremists really ideologically incoherent? A sharp critique of the 'salad bar of ideologies' and the erosion of clarity in political violence research.
011
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Over the past eight years, LGBTQ+ communities have demonstrated remarkable resilience. While the perceived possibility of progressive change has steadily decreased, the strength of their social identity has only continued to grow.
042
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Over the past eight years, LGBTQ+ communities have demonstrated remarkable resilience. While the perceived possibility of progressive change has steadily decreased, the strength of their social identity has only continued to grow.
042
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
tomekbesta.bsky.social @tomekbesta.bsky.social · 12/04/2026
Our study in 58 countries: support for intergroup violence is not a single mindset, but we can identify two distinct forms of extremism: defensive & offensive. Result of the @ncn.gov.pl project led by me & article led by @kunstjonas.bsky.social More in #PNAS www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... #psychology
pnas.org
The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries | PNAS
Evolutionary theory and historical evidence suggest humans possess distinct psychological tendencies for defensive and offensive violence, which ha...
052
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Sander van der Linden @profsanderlinden.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
New paper: we propose a theory to help explain variation in democratic backsliding. We look at the case of Russia, Israel, & the US. We posit that collective memories about democracy influence models of collective action. advances.in/psychology/1... Led by the brill Neil Lavie-Driver @advances.in
0209
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 09/04/2026
New article! Why do some societies resist democratic backsliding while others remain indifferent or actively support it? Neil Lavie-Driver and @profsanderlinden.bsky.social extend the social identity model of collective action to explore the role of collective memory. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Weaponising the past: An extended SIMCA model for how social identity and collective memory shape variation in collective action responses to democratic backsliding - advances.in/psychology
Explore a SIMCA-based framework on how identity and collective memory drive resistance or acquiescence to democratic backsliding in Russia, Israel, and the U.S.
174
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
Very important work!
000
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
Fascinating study on Russian public opinion from August 2022. Researchers caught a rare window for an independent survey before the platform was shut down to academic polling. They found that 69% of respondents construed the war as undermining their social values. A vital look behind the propaganda.
040
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Open access link to the article: doi.org/10.1177/1088...
doi.org
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
001
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
This was a fruitful collaboration with Milan Obaidi, @antongollwitzer.bsky.social, @petterbb1969.bsky.social, @yhinrichs.bsky.social, Neha Saini, and @daniel-thilo.bsky.social. Thanks to UiO:Demokrati for funding our work and the AI:Democracy group.
121
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Crucially, we emphasize that these technologies do not operate in a vacuum, but rather exploit established cognitive, social, and personality risk factors. To address these challenges, we conclude the review by outlining specific stage-based policy measures and directions for future research.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Following this is group integration, where individuals are absorbed into extremist networks, a process increasingly reinforced by generative AI and bot swarms. This trajectory ultimately sets the stage for violent extremist action.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Next, during reinforcement, algorithms create filter bubbles that leverage biases and strengthen extremist beliefs.
120
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
The framework maps the socio-technical architecture across four distinct stages. It begins with exposure, where recommender systems and virality metrics push users toward extreme content.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
​Our review synthesizes process models of radicalization with research on artificial intelligence and psychological mechanisms to propose a four-stage framework. We explore how algorithms and generative AI intersect with human vulnerabilities to drive individuals toward violent extremism.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
How exactly does artificial intelligence drive individuals toward violent extremism? ​I am excited to share our recent publication in Personality and Social Psychology Review, "Intelligent Systems, Vulnerable Minds: A Framework for Radicalization to Violence in the Age of AI."
172
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
Preprint openly accessible here: osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
010
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
You can read the full paper here: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
pnas.org
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
120
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
Crucially, only offensive intentions were consistently associated with macrolevel societal dysfunction, such as political terror and internal conflicts. This suggests that preventing radicalization requires tailored interventions rather than uniform strategies.
112
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
Individuals high in machiavellianism and narcissism showed stronger inclinations toward defensive extremism. On the other hand, social dominance orientation and religious fundamentalism were more strongly linked to offensive extremism.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
Our data show that defensive intentions are far more prevalent, being higher than offensive intentions in 56 out of the 58 nations surveyed. Interestingly, these two forms appeal to different psychological profiles.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
We found that the readiness for intergroup violence is not a single mindset. Instead, it is driven by two distinct psychological motivations: defensive extremism, which aims to protect a group from threats, and offensive extremism, which seeks to establish dominance.
100
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
What really drives someone to support violent extremism? I am thrilled to share our new article published today in PNAS. Together with an incredible team of collaborators, we conducted a preregistered study across 58 countries with over 18,000 participants. This is what we found.
13016
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Rory White @rorywh.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
My latest story is out. Bots get banned on social media. The workaround? Real humans posting AI-generated messages in a gamified system, coordinated by an AI command centre. And it's being offered to your local town councillor. www.nationalobserver.com/2026/02/24/i...
nationalobserver.com
Canadian politicians are being sold AI-powered civilian patrols
A new app gets around bot bans by recruiting real people to post political messages generated by AI.
89057
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
000
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
Anthropic trains its models on the entire internet without paying for it. ​Also Anthropic:
144
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
"Eighty percent of Americans said voters have a responsibility to keep up with the news, but just 8% said they had a responsibility to pay for it." www.semafor.com/newsletter/0...
30333107
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Omid V. Ebrahimi @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
📝 New preprint on the threat of cyborg propaganda to democracy. We discuss how the key divide in online influence is no longer bots vs humans. We are entering an era of 'cyborg propaganda': Verified human identities disseminate centrally generated, AI-crafted narratives 🧵 osf.io/preprints/ps...
1185
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Prof Aleksandra Cichocka @alekscichocka.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
Kent Psychology is hiring 🎓We have two posts: 1) open area and 2) cog neuro. More details can be found here: jobs.kent.ac.uk/vacancy.aspx... Feel free to reach out with questions!
jobs.kent.ac.uk
Job Opportunity at the University of Kent: Lecturer in Psychology
The School of Psychology is seeking to appoint a Lecturer in Psychology and a Lecturer in Psychology focusing on Cognition and Neuroscience  to join a collegial, supportive, and intellectually vibrant...
02319
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
Jon Roozenbeek, @daniel-thilo.bsky.social, @jayvanbavel.bsky.social, @profsanderlinden.bsky.social , @rorywh.bsky.social, and Live Leonhardsen Wilhelmsen.
020
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
The preprint is available here: doi.org/10.31234/osf... Thankful for another fruitful collaboration with @kbierwiaczonek.bsky.social, Meeyoung Cha, @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social, Marc Fawcett-Atkinson, Asbjørn Følstad, @antongollwitzer.bsky.social, @nckobis.bsky.social, @garymarcus.bsky.social,
doi.org
OSF
131
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
📉 The Result: A coordinated campaign that looks like spontaneous, organic public sentiment, effectively bypassing current bot detection filters. This raises a massive regulatory paradox: How do you regulate coordinated inauthentic behavior when the "bot" is a real citizen exercising free speech?
230
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
The Core Mechanism: 🤖 The Tech: A central "organizer" sends a directive. An AI multiplier generates thousands of unique, style-matched captions. 👨 The Human: Real, verified users review and click "post".
The Operational Workflow of Cyborg Propaganda. Cyborg propaganda utilizes an AI multiplier to scale distinctiveness. A central coordination hub issues a single strategic directive (e.g., “Oppose the new tax bill”). This coordination hub may retrieve data from an AI system monitoring emerging narratives and shifts on social media. The hub may vary in terms of automation versus human involvement. To overcome recruitment bottlenecks, the system utilizes network harvesting, where users are incentivized to supply data on friends and neighbors, linking private social graphs with public voter registries. An AI-driven multiplier engine then processes the operative directive alongside individual user profiles, analyzing their posting history, syntax, and background characteristics of each participant. The system generates thousands of unique, context-aware message variations, effectively performing ‘style transfer’ to match each user’s voice. Simultaneously, the system may employ gamification or monetary rewards to incentivize user engagement. Verified human users then ratify and broadcast these posts or comments. The resulting information cascade creates a manufactured consensus that exhibits the linguistic diversity of a genuine grassroots movement, thereby bypassing duplicate-content filters and signaling authenticity to social peers. Crucially, the system operates as a closed feedback loop: The AI Monitor continuously tracks the performance of these posts or comments on social media, feeding engagement data back into the organizer directive to adjust strategy in real-time. Simultaneously, successful narratives are harvested to reinforce and fine-tune the AI Multiplier to produce increasingly persuasive content in subsequent cycles.
173
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
In our new perspective paper (preprint), my colleagues and I explore how partisan apps and Generative AI are creating a new architecture of influence. This isn’t about fake accounts; it is about verified humans using AI-generated scripts.
131
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
The distinction between grassroots activism and automated influence is collapsing. We typically worry about "bot farms" or "troll factories." But a distinct, more complex threat is emerging. We call it "Cyborg Propaganda."
The Matrix of Coordinated Influence. Traditional frameworks for analyzing online influence focus on the distinction between human and automated actors (Identity Axis) or between spontaneous and coordinated behavior (Articulation Axis). Bot Nets (top-left) rely on synthetic identities and automated scripts. Troll Farms (bottom-left) use human operators to manage fake personas. Grassroots Action (bottom-right) involves verified citizens sharing self-authored views. Cyborg Propaganda (top-right) represents a new paradigm: verified human users disseminating centrally generated, algorithmically generated narratives, effectively ‘hybridizing’ the authenticity of the grassroots with the scale of the botnet.
12521
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Omid V. Ebrahimi @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
Thrilled to announce the Oxford Psychological Networks Summer School (OxPNS)! This is the first-ever psychological network analysis workshop in the UK, to be held in magical Oxford from June 22-26, 2026. To apply and for more information, please visit: oxfordpns.com A brief thread 🧵
25433
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Advances.in @advances.in · 02/02/2026
Publication Alert: Deconstructing the "Secure" Narrative of U.S. Democracy Many believe that recent authoritarian rhetoric in the United States is a sudden departure from a historically secure democracy. But has it ever been as stable as we think? advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Race, memory, and colorblindness: Critical history and deconstructing United States democracy
How colorblind history fuels authoritarianism—and how critical racial memory can build a stronger, more equitable democracy.
012
Reposted by Jonas R. Kunst
Sander van der Linden @profsanderlinden.bsky.social · 22/01/2026
We have a new paper in Science today on how malicious AI swarms can threaten democracy. AI systems can already coordinate autonomously, infiltrate communities, and fabricate social consensus. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... Led by @kunstjonas.bsky.social & @daniel-thilo.bsky.social!
8195120
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
The politics of well-being during democratic backsliding: How partisan affiliation and support for government actions relate to happiness and life satisfaction
Do politics shape happiness? Evidence from 5-week tracking links policy support to well-being amid democratic backsliding in the U.S.
001
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Resilience or Complacency? While Republicans reported a steady increase in well-being during the start of Trump’s second term, Democrats showed a "rebound" pattern. Does returning to a higher state of well-being provide the strength to persist or reflect complacency? Study link in comments.
101