Sign in

Krisztina Szabo

@krisztiszabo.bsky.social
149 followers 254 following 3 posts

Postdoc @RHUL; Visiting faculty @CEU

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/01/2026
You should vote, even if your vote won't change the outcome, because this is how we uphold the democratic principles that underlie our republican ideals. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Democratic theorists hold that voting contributes to some political good: individual and collective autonomy, equality, justice, pluralism, stability, better policies, and many others. But elections are common under authoritarianism, and empirical research finds that holding elections can stabilize authoritarian regimes. This creates what we term the democrat’s dilemma, where citizens who vote in authoritarian elections may bolster the regimes they wish to unseat, even when they cast a vote for the opposition. We identify three major ways of thinking about the democratic value of electoral participation—justice-based, epistemic, and proceduralist approaches—and use them to examine the complex moral considerations that confront voters in authoritarian regimes. We contend that authoritarian elections’ residual democratic value can justify voting, even when doing so could further entrench the autocrat. Our argument also implies that the democratic principles that justify voting in authoritarian elections oblige citizens to choose the most democratic alternative.
17024
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Catherine E. de Vries @catherinedevries.bsky.social · 28/01/2026
Today in @theguardian.com, I argue that Donald Trump’s foreign-policy playbook is increasingly about attention capture, or what I call geopolitical clickbait. Plus I outline why this matters for Europe & what to do about it. 🧵 www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
theguardian.com
Trump wants our attention. Let’s stop falling for his geopolitical clickbait | Catherine De Vries
Whether he’s targeting Greenland, tariffs or Iran, Trump’s agenda is to distract – because a Europe that is always reacting is never planning, says political scientist Catherine De Vries
812652
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Scholars Working on East European Politics @sweep-workshop.bsky.social · 02/10/2025
We kick off next week w/ papers from our Estonia time-sharing survey: 1️⃣ "The Democratising Effects of the 1989 Baltic Way Demonstration," Robert Lipinski 2️⃣ “The Historical Determinants of Eastern European Solidarity with Ukraine," @isadesisto.bsky.social ➕ Discussion from @krisztiszabo.bsky.social!
132
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Joost van Spanje @joostvanspanje.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
Here in 🇨🇦Vancouver, @krisztiszabo.bsky.social is presenting joint work with Ádám Reiff & myself. We address the question of why voters vote for corrupt politicians. In a conjoint experiment in Hungary, we test 3 explanation types, including media trust & partisanship. #APSA2025 @apsa.bsky.social
094
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 23/07/2025
We live in an era of democratic backsliding. But the terminology of "backsliding" isn't up to the task of making sense of the deep crisis of liberal democracy around the world. I've just finished a working paper that lays out what I think is going on. tl;dr it's about the state and society 🧵
papers.ssrn.com
State, Society, and the Politics of Democratic Backsliding
Recent scholarship on democratic backsliding has focused on measuring its global prevalence and identifying the causal processes and mechanisms that produce or
720250
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Catherine E. de Vries @catherinedevries.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
🚨 Very excited to share that the call for papers for the EPSS annual conference in Belfast 2026 is live. 🔝 Lots of innovation to enrich the way we exchange ideas in political science in Europe. 🙏🏼 Sharing is caring!
04923
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Joost van Spanje @joostvanspanje.bsky.social · 26/06/2025
Here in Madrid, @krisztiszabo.bsky.social is presenting joint work with Ádám Reiff & myself. We address the question of why voters vote for corrupt politicians. In our conjoint experiment in Hungary, we test 3 explanation types, including media trust & partisanship. #EPSA2025 @epsanet.bsky.social
1123
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Catherine E. de Vries @catherinedevries.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
Most literature reviews miss the point.
 Not because they’re sloppy. 
But because they treat the literature like a box to tick. In my latest Respect the Marble Post, I carve out a 6-step process to writing a meaningful lit review: catherineeunicedevries.substack.com/p/most-liter... 🧵
catherineeunicedevries.substack.com
Most Literature Reviews Miss the Point. Don’t Let Yours
Critically Engaging Past Work to Confidently Shape Your Own
1020058
Krisztina Szabo @krisztiszabo.bsky.social · 30/05/2025
I'm looking forward to having a copy of this one!
010
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 27/05/2025
'Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience' by Bunce, @tompepinsky.com, @beattyriedl.bsky.social & Roberts. 📚 cup.org/4jESqXD 📚 A comprehensive, cross-regional comparative study of democratic backsliding and resiliency around the world.
Front cover of Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience by Bunce et al.
13412
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 19/05/2025
Any democratically minded voter faces a dilemma when deciding whether to participate in an illiberal election. Does participation amount to endorsing the authoritarian status quo? For more, see this excellent writeup of my forthcoming piece with Turku Isiksel, "Voting in Authoritarian Elections"
politicalsciencenow.com
Should We Vote in Authoritarian Elections? -
In the APSA Public Scholarship Program, graduate students in political science produce summaries of new research in the American Political Science Review. This piece, written by Ewa Nizalowska, covers the new article by Turkuler Isiksel [...]
0175
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
American Political Science Review @apsrjournal.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Just published on APSR First View: "A New Measure of Affective Polarization" by Nicolas Campos and Christopher Federico. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
04012
Reposted by Krisztina Szabo
American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) @ajpseditor.bsky.social · 15/04/2025
The ethics of responding to democratic backsliding abroad by James Pattison is now available in Early View. @jamespattison.bsky.social ajps.org/2025/04/14/t...
0176