Sign in

Kev Cunningham

@krcunningham.bsky.social
230 followers 388 following 542 posts

IT Consultant, singer songwriter, TV watcher. Husband, dad, step dad. So long as one group is left behind there is no equality. He/him.

PostsRepliesMedia
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Pretty under-fucking-appreciated gag even if I do say so myself.
Screenshot of my Facebook post from May 2020 says “I don’t want to promote conspiracy theories but you’ll notice Mark Zuckerberg had a lockdown haircut well ahead of the appearance of covid19”
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
@mredbyrne.bsky.social Impressive bio you have on Apple Music 😂 Would never have thought you were born in 46 though, looking good fella.
000
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Unsure, but this just turned up. :(
460
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
Is this map Scottish? I’m quite tickled at “no Ireland” because it works so well. “Aye, that’s Ireland there, and next to it that’s no Ireland”
020
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
England into the World Cup semis…. time to ready my contingency plan to go into suspended animation for four years.
Image from Futurama with Fry frozen for a thousand years
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
What are you talking about? He’s found an amazing solution to the problem.
Donald Trump as a World Cup VAR official
110
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
In response to concerns about corruption, Infantino announces a special VAR referee will be consulted on all decisions for the remaining World Cup matches.
Donald Trump as a World Cup VAR official
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
A movie couple who would definitely have a podcast.
Dude from Weekend at Bernie’s with Bernie
020
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
120
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 02/01/2026
FFS
120
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
They’ve put this nonsense on the website too. Claiming that the FWS ruling meant single sex spaces must not include trans people.
Screenshot from bbc news showing a quote claiming that the Supreme Court judgement ruled that single sex spaces must not be trans inclusive.
1253
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 06/12/2025
I mean. Wow. No conflict of interest? Incredible how blatant she is here. How can this possibly not be a conflict of interest?
Declarations of interest from the EHRC board meeting, where Reindorf is explicitly acknowledging that she’s been instructed by several organisations to advice them on the FWS Supreme Court ruling but that this does not conflict with her role as commissioner!
2302
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 06/12/2025
It feels like headlines are specifically designed to grind us all down and wear out our mental health. Further exhibit from the Times:
Headline from the Times: “Tony Blair plotting overhaul to ‘save Labour’” with the brief summary citing Blair’s concern about Labour’s “lurch to the left”
020
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
“Who the fuck is Alice?”
Kier Starmer at a press conference with subtitle “there’s a famous slogan in the United Kingdom”
030
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
Image from the movie Rococop showing a classified fourth primary directive
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Just gonna call it now. Absolute certainty Trump’s “ballroom” will have a throne.
Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars sits in his throne on the Death Star
020
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
Also, checked again this morning and their numbers are <drumroll>….. Falling!
030
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
Woops….Nige may need to update his website. I’m sure he wouldn’t want to mislead anybody.
120
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Name a TV show you are positive nobody remembers but you.
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 26/06/2025
The latest addition to our family. He’s growing like a weed. Full of mischief - and gets on better with the dog than the other cat.
110
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 24/05/2025
Good god - the final “or” in that second paragraph really makes it explicit, doesn’t it? Drops all pretence of anything to do with sex based rights. That sentence explicitly says she’ll listen to you if you merely object to trans inclusivity on any level.
Does your organisation campaign for women's sex-based rights, or has it been forced to adopt policies regarding female-only spaces or trans inclusion that you fundamentally disagree with?
4222
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 10/05/2025
This case is also in the BBC sport section, but linked on the FRONT PAGE of BBC News. I have raised a complaint.
I woke up to see this article linked on the front page of BBC News. I am utterly sickened at the BBC’s continual contribution to rising transphobia in this country.

I can sum up my objections:

1. Why is this national front page news? The only reason I can see is to generate outrage towards the trans community. This is a very small story - and the claim has been dropped.
2. Why is the demand for an apology presented uncritically? The claimant is quoted as saying the FA have proved her right - this is utter nonsense. Their recent decision to ban trans women does not amount to an acceptance that transphobia is ok. This isn’t even a grey area - the Supreme Court judgement was very clear that gender reassignment remains a protected characteristic under the equality act.
3. Why is this factor not given prominent space in the article? Where is the balance to explain that transphobia is still not ok - and the recent Supreme Court ruling doesn’t make it so.
4. Why is the BBC continually platforming anti trans views sympathetically?
5. Natalie Washington is quoted, presumably for balance, but the quote is one tiny paragraph that doesn’t actually get the chance to address the specific case. Why were no more balancing views included?
6. In this and other articles the BBC continues to refer to anti trans groups as women’s rights groups. This continues to present the picture that most women object to trans rights, which is not the case. These anti trans groups are not representative of women, as you should be aware - but presenting trans rights as an issue of women V trans rights is hugely damaging. 

Please do better. This hostility towards trans lives has a very direct impact on a very vulnerable minority.I woke up to see this article linked on the front page of BBC News. I am utterly sickened at the BBC’s continual contribution to rising transphobia in this country.

I can sum up my objections:

1. Why is this national front page news? The only reason I can see is to generate outrage towards the trans community. This is a very small story - and the claim has been dropped.
2. Why is the demand for an apology presented uncritically? The claimant is quoted as saying the FA have proved her right - this is utter nonsense. Their recent decision to ban trans women does not amount to an acceptance that transphobia is ok. This isn’t even a grey area - the Supreme Court judgement was very clear that gender reassignment remains a protected characteristic under the equality act.
3. Why is this factor not given prominent space in the article? Where is the balance to explain that transphobia is still not ok - and the recent Supreme Court ruling doesn’t make it so.
4. Why is the BBC continually platforming anti trans views sympathetically?
5. Natalie Washington is quoted, presumably for balance, but the quote is one tiny paragraph that doesn’t actually get the chance to address the specific case. Why were no more balancing views included?
6. In this and other articles the BBC continues to refer to anti trans groups as women’s rights groups. This continues to present the picture that most women object to trans rights, which is not the case. These anti trans groups are not representative of women, as you should be aware - but presenting trans rights as an issue of women V trans rights is hugely damaging. 

Please do better. This hostility towards trans lives has a very direct impact on a very vulnerable minority.
151
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Absolutely shocked that a certain independent MP voted aye….
110
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
The character limit is a challenge!
I am utterly sickened and disgusted at the ongoing hostility towards trans people in the UK. Your government is failing trans people in the worst possible way. First the dogmatic insistence that the Cass Review is a solid foundation for anything, and now enthusiastically embracing the most draconian interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling.

Trans people are living in a state of constant fear and anxiety due to their abandonment by this government. And for what? To appease the right wing press? They’ll never be appeased.

Trans people are going nowhere. However badly they are treated, they will still be here and will still campaign for their basic dignity.

The only way to draw a line under what you clearly see as a thorny political issue is to show some leadership and use all the levers at your disposal to afford trans people the right to exist in peace and good health.

Bigots will move on and find another target. Trans people don’t have the option to stop fighting for recognition.I am utterly sickened and disgusted at the ongoing hostility towards trans people in the UK. Your government is failing trans people in the worst possible way. First the dogmatic insistence that the Cass Review is a solid foundation for anything, and now enthusiastically embracing the most draconian interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling.

Trans people are living in a state of constant fear and anxiety due to their abandonment by this government. And for what? To appease the right wing press? They’ll never be appeased.

Trans people are going nowhere. However badly they are treated, they will still be here and will still campaign for their basic dignity.

The only way to draw a line under what you clearly see as a thorny political issue is to show some leadership and use all the levers at your disposal to afford trans people the right to exist in peace and good health.

Bigots will move on and find another target. Trans people don’t have the option to stop fighting for recognition.
240
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
Showed up on my feed with no context and I was quite shocked 😂
010
Kev Cunningham @krcunningham.bsky.social · 17/01/2025
Since it’s approaching inauguration day in the states I thought I’d wear something topical.
T-Shirt with “Four Seasons Total Landscaping & Conference Center” logo
000