Sign in

Justus Wilhelm Fink

@justuswfink.bsky.social
102 followers 90 following 13 posts

scientist fascinated by microbes in extreme environments and their ability to evolve. PhD' 2023 Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich. post-doc at the Orphan lab, Caltech. justuswfink.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 29/05/2025
seems like it works well enough to compare shapes in 3d brain scans (random example paper: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...)
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Shape Analysis with Hyperbolic Wasserstein Distance
Shape space is an active research field in computer vision study. The shape distance defined in a shape space may provide a simple and refined index to represent a unique shape. Wasserstein distance d...
110
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 29/05/2025
math to the rescue! in abstract form, distances between 3d shapes can be measured with the wasserstein distance (=minimal energy to turn one shape into the other-formalized in optimal transport theory, also known as earth mover distance ) - random internet cartoon
110
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 17/03/2025
biologist at APS2025 Anaheim? join us for the Evolutionary Dynamics sessions, first round starting today 11.30 with a talk by Daniel Fisher. excited for the line-up we put together!
000
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
Feel free to reach out with comment and questions! I might catch the comments here, but usually email works better - the address is on my website (link in bio). Thank you!
000
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
Why care about the choice of fitness statistic? As microbial ecologist, we naturally care about reliable physical equipment to get the best data out of the labor. I argue, we should apply the same high standards to the relative fitness statistics that we use to quantify these experimental data. n/n
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
Finally, we take a closer look at bulk fitness measurements -even under perfect measurement there is room for discrepancy because of different choices for the reference group and higher-order effects. We recommend inoculating the mutant library at ~25% of the initial biomass, and include wild-type.
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
Using competition data from the LTEE, we confirm the long-term fitness increase in relative fitness per-cycle (but see Figure S10). The disranking effect *does* raise questions for quantifying epistasis: we see negative magnitude statistic between lag time and yield in one statistic, not the other.
110
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
We use empirical traits from Yeast mutants to show that relative fitness per-generation leads to a different mutant ranking than the per-cycle statistic. This effect occurs is based on a fundamental inconsistency of the two definitions, and it's possible to construct complete anti-correlation. 6/n
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
Now what about the relative fitness per-generation W and the per-cycle selection coefficient s? Both are based on the logit encoding, but the per-generation statistic uses information on the wild-type growth to normalize the time-scale. Simple math shows that de-correlation between them is possible!
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
To improve the prediction, we can consider the transformed trajectory log(x) or logit(x). This linearizes (part of) the trajectory, so the derivative d log(x)/dt and especially d logit(x)/dt make for much better statistics of relative fitness. This logic generalizes to other dynamics! 4/n
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
What's the most basic relative fitness statistic? It's the slope dx/dt where x is the relative abundance trajectory of the mutant of interest. Clearly, it can predict the future abundance (linear extrapolation), but the slope only works over a short time horizon - see this simulated trajector. 3/n
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
We start with a definition: relative fitness is any statistic that is sufficient to predict the relative abundance of the mutant. There is other fitness concepts, like absolute fitness and fitness potentials (used for fitness landscapes) - these are distinct, we focus on relative fitness here. 2/n
100
Justus Wilhelm Fink @justuswfink.bsky.social · 01/10/2024
Why are there so many fitness metrics in microbial ecology? I was confused as I started the PhD - and with @michaelmanhart.bsky.social , I developed a framework that unifies existing statistics of relative fitness and shows how they all derive from a few basic principles. Preprint is up! 1/n
doi.org
Quantifying microbial fitness in high-throughput experiments
Few concepts are as central to evolution as is fitness, and yet the quantification of fitness is often ambiguous. In particular, high-throughput experiments to measure mutant fitness in microbes are i...
1147