iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Safeguarding Democracy Project @sdpucla.bsky.social · 14/10/2026

@jonathandiaz.bsky.social Dir., Voting Advocacy & Partnerships @campaignlegal.org encourages U.S. citizens to ignore intimidation tactics and get out the vote. The Trump Administration has been mostly unsuccessful at changing how elections are run. Full vid www.youtube.com/watch?v=kih_...

023

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 12/10/2026

I said this in a thread last night and in a thousand threads before it, but you really are doing the work of those who would destroy democracy and the rule of law when you are a doomer. You can be aware of — and vigorously oppose — the lawlessness of this administration without insisting on doom.

322759620

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 12/10/2026

BREAKING: A federal court just granted a temporary restraining order in our case BLOCKING the Trump administration from using taxpayer money to illegally create and air the president's political propaganda ads on television. Big victory for CLC Action's clients, partners and the rule of law.

11910

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 10/10/2026

A typically excellent resource from my friends at @protectdemocracy.org, but here’s the most important part: Triple check your registration, make a plan (and backup plan) to vote, then talk to other people about doing the same. If you have questions or see any issues, call or text: 866-OUR-VOTE.

131

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

After pressure from the DC Board of Elections and Election Protection organizations, a spokesperson for the Guard said that they are addressing this specific incident, and that National Guard members are "directed not to monitor or secure polling locations" www.washingtonsun.com/metro/nation...

washingtonsun.com

D.C. Elections Board Asks National Guard to Stay Away From Ballot Drop Boxes

Guard members were seen standing next to a drop box in Foggy Bottom this week.

3359135

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Justin Levitt @justinlevitt.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

This is a big deal. DC fed judge says that DOJ's pursuit (and use) of the state voter files is unlawful, on a bunch of different grounds. And effectively confirms that for the 18 states that submitted files willingly, whoever collected the files at DOJ Civil Rights committed federal crimes.

storage.courtlistener.com

Memorandum & Opinion – #51 in COMMON CAUSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (D.D.C., 1:26-cv-01352) – CourtListener.com

MEMORANDUM OPINION re the 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the 32 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. See the attached document for details. Signed by Judge Spark...

18787305

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

What can go wrong (or right) in the upcoming midterms? Join @jonathandiaz.bsky.social @mattgermer.bsky.social @justinlevitt.bsky.social and Shelby Wayment of @sdpucla.bsky.social @law.ucla.edu for October 13 live/streamed event. Free registration required. @campaignlegal.org @rstreet.bsky.social

086

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Does she feel bad watching a bird fly? A horse gallop? This is what he was made for

010

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

For more on the SAVE system (which is not the same thing as the SAVE Act, which Congress has not passed!), read here: campaignlegal.org/update/what-...

campaignlegal.org

What Is the SAVE System?

What is the SAVE system, how has it changed, and why is its use in election administration raising serious concerns?

011

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

DHS's SAVE system regularly returns false positives, incorrectly identifying U.S. citizens as noncitizens. It is not a reliable tool for verifying voter eligibility, and states should not be using it for voter list maintenance without further follow up work to confirm the accuracy of the data.

111

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

This SCOTUS decision means states can use more unreliable and incomplete federal data sources to individually check voters' citizenship status. But the NVRA still prohibits mass voter registration purges during the 90 days before a federal election (we are 39 days away today).

121

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Incredible. First Secretary Mullin claimed that DHS had identified 15,903 noncitizens on Nevada’s voter roll. Then DHS officials told a skeptical Nevada, no no no, that’s just people we flagged. Here are the names of 185 people we KNOW aren’t citizens. All 185 were citizens. DHS got 100% wrong.

When the Department of Homeland Security sent Nevada a list of 185 names last month that it claimed identified noncitizens who had been improperly allowed to register to vote, state election officials got to work.
On Tuesday, the state sent a strongly worded rebuke to the federal government: Every single person on the list was a lawful citizen.
"As for the 185 individuals, our records indicate that they were citizens," Greg D. Ott, a deputy attorney general in Nevada, wrote, according to a copy of a letter sent to Department of Homeland Security officials obtained through open records requests.
"You have provided nothing of substance to suggest otherwise."

Following the meeting, Ms. Vogt sent a clarifying email to Nevada officials. "I also wanted to be sure I clarified that we did not reduce the 15,903 to 185," she wrote. "We've manually reviewed some of the 15,903 and confirmed 185 are not U.S. Citizens."
Now, Nevada officials are saying even that 185 number is wrong. They also took issue with a letter D.H.S. sent them in early September, in which the agency reiterated its initial claims about nearly 16,000 noncitizens on the rolls and pressured state officials to review each case in a letter to Nevada officials in early September.

21088183854

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 15/09/2026

You may have heard that the Department of Justice plans to send as many as 1,000 election monitors to the polls this year. Safeguards already exist to protect voters, but Congress must still strengthen those rules to secure our elections.

campaignlegal.org

Everything You Need to Know About DOJ Election Monitors

The U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) election observation program — once a behind-the-scenes effort with a record of nonpartisan success — has made headlines during the 2026 midterm primaries becaus...

0149

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

National Voter Registration Day @natlvoterregday.bsky.social · 15/09/2026

Rise, shine, & register! 🗽 #NationalVoterRegistrationDay 2026 is FINALLY here & the grand celebration of this 250 year old democracy can officially commence! We've got 1 day to get every eligible American #VoteReady for the midterms: let's get to it! 🇺🇸 bit.ly/2026nvrdreg

0710

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 15/09/2026

BREAKING: In a victory for voters across the country, the U.S. Supreme Court has refused the Trump administration’s request to allow the USPS to implement illegal mail voting restrictions ahead of the midterms. Mail voting remains safe, secure and unchanged. 1/

1109

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 14/09/2026

Among other things, this means that, even if #SCOTUS *grants* a stay of Judge Talwani’s earlier injunction against the USPS rule (which seems increasingly unlikely), the rule would *still* not go into effect; the Court would have to freeze *this* injunction, too.

12396134

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 14/09/2026

BREAKING: Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee sitting in DC, issues a preliminary injunction blocking the entire U.S. Postal Service mail ballot rule. Order: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us... (Key portions of the rule were blocked by Judge Talwani in federal court in Massachusetts.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DSCC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 26-cv-01114 (CJN)
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE
PRESIDENT, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 26-cv-01132 (CJN)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
V.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 26-cv-01151 (CJN)

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that DSCC Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,
ECF 163, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART'; and it is further
ORDERED that LULAC Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, ECF
ECF 171, is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that NAACP Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, ECF
172, is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the United States Postal Service is preliminarily enjoined from
implementing and enforcing the Final Rule it published on August 21, see Ballot Mail for Federal
Elections, 91 Fed. Reg. 54,966 (Aug. 26, 2026).
DATE: September 13, 2026
'ARL. NICHOL
United States District Judge
' The Court denies only the portion of the Motion that seeks to preliminarily enjoin Section 3 of the Executive Order.

111313413

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 11/09/2026

We just filed a major lawsuit against DHS for unconstitutionally retaliating against people for lawfully recording immigration agents in public. "This is a top-down policy of retaliation and it needs to be addressed as such," says CLC’s @danilang-votes.bsky.social.

npr.org

Lawsuit challenges intimidation of DHS observers across the country

The sweeping lawsuit brought by Common Cause argues federal agencies are illegally surveilling and intimidating people who try to peacefully observe federal immigration enforcement activity.

1173

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 11/09/2026

McClatchy gutted the reporting staff of a historic, Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper covering one of America’s most significant metros so that they could commit more fully to their focus on clickbait slop

McClatchy, the owner of the Miami Herald, laid off 20 journalists and eliminated 10 vacant positions. They got rid of their coverage of the city of Miami and city of Miami Beach so that instead they could publish clickbait slop about reality TV.

010

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 10/09/2026

She’s not good she’s not nice she’s just RIGHT

020

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 09/09/2026

The U.S. Postal Service’s illegal mail ballot restrictions cannot be implemented before the November midterm elections. Point blank. Any attempt to implement this rule would result in chaos and countless voters being disenfranchised.

065

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026

If I survive this election for one reason, it's this

020

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 04/09/2026

The court extensively cited the expert report we submitted from a mail voting expert who concluded that “[n]one of the Rule’s requirements can feasibly be implemented before the November 3, 2026 General Election.” 4/ campaignlegal.org/press-releas...

campaignlegal.org

Federal Judge Blocks Unlawful New USPS Rule on Mail Voting

BOSTON — Today, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a new order blocking the United States Postal Service (USPS) rule that would have implemented last-...

042

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 04/09/2026

BREAKING: A federal judge issued a new order BLOCKING the U.S. Postal Service's illegal mail voting rule that would have had disastrous impacts on both voters and election administrators. This ruling is a win for the millions of voters who rely on mail voting. 1/

1136

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 04/09/2026

This is what it all boils down to.

020

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 04/09/2026

Key excerpts from Judge Talwani's order summarizing the expert testimony of Tammy Patrick, submitted by my colleagues at @campaignlegal.org and @democracydefendersfund.org on behalf of our plaintiffs in a related case in DC. It would be literally impossible for USPS to do this before the midterms.

Excerpts from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts's order granting a preliminary injunction to block the implementation of a new USPS rule that would have illegally introduced chaos and mass disenfranchisement into the nation's mail voting system 60 days before the midterm elections.

In this excerpt, the court summarizes the written testimony of Tammy Patrick, a mail voting and election administration expert, who concluded that "none of the Rule's requirements can feasibly be implemented before the November 3, 2026 election" in any state.

051

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Campaign Legal Center @campaignlegal.org · 02/09/2026

As our expert report states, any implementation of President Trump's mail voting executive order would cause "confusion and irreparable harm" to election officials and voters. Read the full report: campaignlegal.org/document/dec...

032

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Protect Democracy @protectdemocracy.org · 02/09/2026

DHS failed to back up its claims about noncitizens on voter rolls, and is doubling down by announcing more (sham) investigations. Let's be clear: this is another attempt to undermine public confidence in elections. The truth: only U.S. citizens vote in our elections. Repost to spread the word.

DHS data on noncitizen voters in Nevada is disputed. Initially estimated at 15,903, the revised estimate is 185. Verified noncitizens = 0 because DHS refuses to provide matching data and methodology on the list of 185 voters making verification of claims impossible.

29654

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Justin Levitt @justinlevitt.bsky.social · 01/09/2026

Quick reality check: If Trump declared a national security emergency and said that it required every parent to rename their first-born child "Donald" ... would you rename your kid? No? Hm. Perhaps the plan's not as bulletproof as the nation's most prominent grifters want it to seem.

122

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 31/08/2026

.....is it bad that I recognized 14?

250

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Alex Zalben @azalben.bsky.social · 25/08/2026

Here's the official announcement of Parton's passing from her reps, along with the request that in lieu of flowers, the family asks for donations to be made to Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library at www.imaginationlibrary.com

NASHVILLE, TN (August 25, 2026) – Global icon and humanitarian, Dolly Parton, known to the world as a beloved singer, songwriter, philanthropist, actress, playwright, and author died peacefully today in Nashville, Tennessee. She was 80 years old.

Dolly is preceded in death by her beloved husband of 59 years Carl Thomas Dean (1942 – 2025), her mother Avie Lee Caroline Owens (1923 – 2003), and father, Robert Lee Parton, Sr. (1921 – 2000).

A rhinestone life that shone bright enough for the world to see, Dolly will forever stand as an inspiration not only through her timeless music and prolific songwriting, but also her wit, warmth, and kindness that made us all feel like family. Dolly Parton’s legacy is one of love, compassion, and resilience. With a seven-decade career, she inspired multiple generations of artists and fans with her music and an unwavering commitment to making the world a better place. Her songs will continue to resonate with people of all ages, and her philanthropic work will have a lasting impact.

At Dolly’s request, a small, private service will be held for immediate family. Dolly’s fans and friends from around the world are encouraged to pay tribute to Dolly on social media by tagging @DollyParton or by leaving a message at www.dollyparton.com.

In lieu of flowers the family asks for donations to be made to Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library at www.imaginationlibrary.com.

69135058673

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 25/08/2026

No matter when, it would have been too soon. RIP to a national treasure.

020

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

I wrote this too quickly, but here’s my very brief explainer for “One First” on why this afternoon’s #SCOTUS ruling is problematic, but not (yet) an existential threat to mail-in voting in the midterms: www.stevevladeck.com/p/246-making...

stevevladeck.com

246. Making Sense of the Mail-in Ballots Ruling

The Supreme Court’s grant of a stay in one of the mail-in ballot cases is deeply wrong, but it’s also not the main event over whether Trump’s patently unlawful executive order can take effect.

16410145

Jonathan Diaz @jonathandiaz.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

The Court's ruling was based entirely on ripeness--essentially, they just said that the district court acted too soon when it issued an order blocking implementation of the EO. SCOTUS did NOT say that the EO is constitutional or lawful--and litigation on those questions is still ongoing.

032

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

And as soon as tomorrow, Judge Talwani may also issue a TRO against the new rule the USPS issued Friday night to implement the EO. In other words, this is a small win for the Trump administration, but *not* a ruling that fully clears the way for Trump to mess with mail-in ballots come November.

502209720

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

#BREAKING: Over dissents from the three Dem. appointees, #SCOTUS has *granted* the Trump administration’s request to freeze a district court injunction that had blocked the mail-in ballots executive order. But Trump’s EO remains blocked by a different injunction in a different case—at least for now:

supremecourt.gov

872236917

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Ben Raderstorf @raders.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

A reminder on the USPS case: Absolutely nothing being litigated so far is on the merits — it's all procedural questions still. That doesn't mean this isn't bizarre and alarming that SCOTUS did this, but it does *NOT* mean that Trump's attempt to blow up vote-by-mail is legal and will succeed.

0123

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

James Hell Brooks @kleinman.bsky.social · 18/08/2026

You're telling me a deeply personalist foreign policy is inherently chaotic and unstable, something that our founders understood when they implemented a government that contained checks and balances on executive power?

515223

Reposted by Jonathan Diaz

Protect Democracy @protectdemocracy.org · 13/08/2026

Election certification is *mandatory* and codified into law to protect election outcomes. Our updated guides outline the safeguards meant to protect against threats or delays to election certification. Read the guides created w/@allvotingislocal.bsky.social, @brennancenter.org & @campaignlegal.org

protectdemocracy.org

Election certification, explained

Election certification is the process through which the canvass – the process of ensuring that every ballot is accounted for – is concluded.

02110