Sign in

Jonas Kromand

@jonaskromand.bsky.social
73 followers 174 following 2 posts

Environmental Economist. Meeting needs within planetary boundaries.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Joachim Peter Tilsted @jptilsted.bsky.social · 11/02/2025
🍩 How do you figure out if you are inside the doughnut? 🍩 In a new paper with @jonaskromand.bsky.social and Anders Bjørn, we try to answer that question. We suggest allocating carrying capacity to ensure the fulfilment of human needs. eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com?url=https%3A...
142
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Jason Hickel @jasonhickel.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
Here’s a quick roundup of highlights from research we published in 2024, on unequal exchange, ecosocialism, and post-capitalist transformation. As always, free PDFs are available via the link at the end of the thread. 🧵
361084313
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
The Great Simplification @tgspodcast.bsky.social · 13/12/2024
In this Frankly, Nate reflects on a powerful encounter with a venture capitalist whose life was upended - and ultimately enriched - after immersing himself in the full content of The Great Simplification podcast. www.thegreatsimplification.com/frankly-orig...
thegreatsimplification.com
"Thank You for Ruining My Life” | The Great Simplification
Frankly #80
1103
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
The BREAK—DOWN @the-breakdown.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
“Colombia is trying to actually shut down fossil fuel production in their own country … there is no other significant fossil fuel producer on Earth that has said anything like this” Andreas Malm on why we should all be paying attention to Colombia 🔗⬇️ youtu.be/83fZSQNK1Qk?...
35617
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Jens Anton Tingstrøm @jensantont.bsky.social · 10/12/2024
JP’s leder om biomasse 🎯🔥🌳 “Biomassebedraget er vel nok det bedrag i danmarkshistorien, der blev afsløret flest gange.” jyllands-posten.dk/debat/leder/...
47317
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Andrew Fanning @andrewlfanning.bsky.social · 30/11/2024
You need to see shocking extent of carbon inequality around the world. A remarkable study led by Jared Starr finds that super-rich US households emit *2000 TIMES* more CO2e than average low-income country households. How the f*ck is that even possible? The disparity never ceases to enrage me.
An infographic entitled 'Household CO2e emissions in 2019 per income group (within United States and across countries)'. The graphic uses different-sized bubbles to show household carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions between across countries groups (low-income, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income), and also within the United States (bottom 10%, 90-99%, 99.9%, and super-rich & billionaires). Emissions values shown range from a tiny bubble representing 1.6 tonnes of CO2e per household in low-income countries to a huge bubble extending beyond the chart area representing nearly 3,500 tonnes per household among US-based super-rich & billionaires. Image by @AndrewLFanning using data from Starr et al. (2023).
32616291
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
jorgensteen.bsky.social @jorgensteen.bsky.social · 02/12/2024
2-0 til saudierne: Global miljøaftale om plastik forhindret #INC5 #PlasticsTreaty #dkgreen #dkpol www.information.dk/udland/leder...
information.dk
2-0 til saudierne: Global miljøaftale om plastik forhindret
Efter to års forhandlinger om en global plastiktraktat sluttede møde i Busan, Sydkorea, i dyb uenighed – en lille minoritet af olielande og plastproducenter siger kategorisk nej til indgreb i produkti...
0117
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
ESM2025 @esm2025.bsky.social · 28/11/2024
Did you know even a temporary overshoot of 1.5°C could trigger irreversible tipping points? 🌍 Risks include permafrost thaw, coral reef collapse, and more. More about the risks of overshoot 👉 bit.ly/4g5mASr from @joerirogelj.bsky.social Q&A article in One Earth. #ParisAgreement
esm2025.eu
Exploring the Risks of Overshoot: New Research Highlights Critical Challenges for Climate Strategies
As global warming approaches 1.5°C and the urgency to address climate change grows, ambitious strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions become more important than ever. One increasingly discussed approach is the concept of "overshoot," where temperatures exceed a target temporarily before returning to back below it later on. But what are the risks of overshoot, and are we underestimating its long-term consequences?
01210
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
David Ho @davidho.bsky.social · 24/11/2024
A person on a bicycle is by far the most energy-efficient among animals and machines per distance traveled relative to body weight. The bicycle is magic. www.jstor.org/stable/24923...
A graph titled "Cost of Transport" showing the relationship between body weight (in kilograms) and energy consumption for distance traveled (calories per gram per kilometer) for various animals and machines. It highlights that a person on a bicycle ranks first in efficiency.
26977891691
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Timmons Roberts @timmonsroberts.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
🚨New study alert! Can #greensky define ‘information subsidy’? Would you recognize ‘solutions denial’? Here’s a thread on the networks opposing offshore wind in the Northeast USA, tracing how many of the discourses used against wind come from fossil fuels.. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Screenshot of abstract from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214629624004201?via%3Dihub
15224110
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Destination Degrowth @destinationdeg1.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
I have created a starter pack of #degrowth and #post-growth people on Bluesky! Have a look and let me know if I have missed someone :) Really happy that Bluesky is the new place to be 🐌🌱✊
85822
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Richard Bärnthaler @rbaernthaler.bsky.social · 25/11/2024
We're excited to launch our new research project on sufficiency-oriented policy & planning instruments at the intersection of housing & mobility. I look forward to sharing updates here over the next 3 years. @klimafonds.bsky.social I @envleeds.bsky.social environment.leeds.ac.uk/directories0...
environment.leeds.ac.uk
Transforming essential provision systems through eco-social corridors (HABITATION-CORRIDORS)
1208
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Glen Peters @glenpeters.bsky.social · 25/11/2024
The challenges of Direct Air Capture: 1. Scaling up 2. Energy requirements 3. Siting 4. Cost news.mit.edu/2024/reality... 1/
news.mit.edu
Reality check on technologies to remove carbon dioxide from the air
An MIT Energy Initiative study finds many climate-stabilization plans are based on questionable assumptions about the future cost and deployment of “direct air capture” and therefore may not bring abo...
1710742
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
James Dyke @jamesgdyke.info · 25/11/2024
Last week I gave the @gsiexeter.bsky.social seminar: Overshoot (and other lazy plot devices in climate policy). This summarised some of my work of last few years (& some of my frustrations). 1/4 www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0S2...
youtube.com
GSI Seminar: Dr James Dyke 'Overshoot (and other lazy narratives in climate policy)'
YouTube video by University of Exeter
13415
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
George Monbiot @georgemonbiot.bsky.social · 24/11/2024
How much more evidence do we need, after 29 failures, that the climate COPs are not fit for purpose? Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. There have been many proposals for a process that would actually work, but all are ignored. The talks are MEANT to fail.
1212623672
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 24/11/2024
This is why it is such a bad thing that so many future visions of climate action rely *very* very heavily on CCS; many times bigger than what that study optimistically says is feasible or possible. Eg: here's my compilation of fossil company scenario assumptions: www.rff.org/publications...
a chart showing fossil fuel company projections way more optimsitic than real ccs dpeloyment
812442
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Dr. Aaron Thierry @thierryaaron.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
Another damning @uk.theconversation.com piece by @jamesgyke.bsky.social, Robert Watson & @wknorr.bsky.social "In 2021 we argued that net zero was a dangerous trap. Three years on & we can see the jaws of this trap beginning to close" theconversation.com/the-overshoo...
theconversation.com
The overshoot myth: you can’t keep burning fossil fuels and expect scientists of the future to get us back to 1.5°C
The net zero approach of the Paris agreement has become detached from reality as it increasingly relies on science fiction levels of speculative technology.
416171
Reposted by Jonas Kromand
Christoph Ellersgaard @chellersgaard.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
No doubt about who is winning in the current Danish Economy. This is the growth in wealth for the 100 richest Danes the last 11 years.
36716