iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 13/08/2026

There is also an AI (both as a tool and as an investment) pump and dump scheme.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 07/08/2026

Reminds me of some other technology that is currently overhyped…what was that again…

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 24/07/2026

Yes a “kill switch!” That will solve the problem. Give it to Congress! They can stop the AI with a roll call vote but with all the “kill switches.” Ugh.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 22/07/2026

So, the US signed a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia to give them our technology, while going to war with Iran allegedly because of their nuclear program. Next things you’ll tell me is that the US put up a blockade to stop Iran from putting up a blockade.

030

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 12/07/2026

We need a new reconstruction, along with a new deal.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 01/07/2026

I agree and I think it is a shame. This is important and necessary legal analysis. If we do not do this work as legal academics, who else will do it? It’s also why we should celebrate your contribution that much more.

0302

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 01/07/2026

We need to take these steps more often. Dissecting the factual and legal errors in these cases. Maintaining an accurate contemporary analysis of the Court’s egregious misstatements. Thank you for your work.

1505

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 17/06/2026

5 second rule? I am going to assume you are not putting it in your mouth or have open wounds, so I say you’re probably good. I would go for it.

100

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 10/06/2026

Now that is a Rocky Mountain high.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 03/06/2026

Pure partisanship. There is no other explanation.

020

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 29/05/2026

Remember when grift like this was illegal. Remember when Whitewater required a 3 year investigation by Ken Starr. Now, Trump just does it in the open, with impunity, without consequence and the @washingtonpost.com reports on it like it’s another Thursday.

032

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

You can go to an unlimited number of grand juries to seek an indictment and grand juries have wide latitude to take action, including using inadmissible evidence to issue an indictment. Despite all of that, they still had to rig the grand jury and engage in impermissible conduct? Wow!

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

Whoa! Grand jury misconduct! My Criminal Procedure II students would love to know more. This really is something very unusual.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

The Kalamazoo Cold Case team was wild…to say the least.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

Same for Gillis. Tires is unwatchable. It is tired, offensive, and deeply unfunny. It’s the equivalent of taking the worst of 90s sitcoms and removing all the heart and humor.

060

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 07/05/2026

The amount of makeup that man wears makes Queens blush and clutch their pearls.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 07/05/2026

The Tennessee legislature proclaiming that they are being colorblind as they intentionally break up the only majority black congressional district in Tennessee is rich. Racists are going to racist, and the Court is giving the racists a green light.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 29/04/2026

We need to stop legal-washing the Court’s opinions. The last three weeks have made clear the partisan outcome driven decision making that is at the heart of the Roberts Court.

0100

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 29/04/2026

The NYTimes expose made this clear, the court is interested in advancing outcomes over law. We cannot continue to provide legal rationale and cover to an outcome driven “super legislature.” We need to critically dismantle the alleged reasoning that upholds partisan decision making.

030

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 28/04/2026

Oh absolutely! I guess the Federalist papers weren’t a thing or Shay’s rebellion? The list is endless.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 28/04/2026

Will the bonfire be in front of the soon to be ballroom? It seems fitting.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 28/04/2026

I have struggled to figure out if anything she is saying could possibly be interpreted as correct, and I am at a loss.

110

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 28/04/2026

We saw you perform at the Celebrity Theater in Arizona years ago. One of the best live shows I have attended. Your song book is deep and diverse. So well earned!

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 28/04/2026

Let’s set aside the content, the writing is unclear at best. I am administering a 1L exam tomorrow and if my students wrote like this on the exam, they would not do well. I would have serious concerns about their legal writing and reasoning.

090

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 28/04/2026

The memo and policy are simply incomprehensible. I don’t just mean mortifying as policy. But also inscrutable both in language and content. It is written by someone who doesn’t understand sex, gender, medicine, science, history, teaching, research, academics, academia, etc.

040

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 21/04/2026

Yes, the leaker is the problem. Not an openly partisan court taking unprecedented action.

030

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 20/04/2026

Happy birthday! And thank you for all you do! Star Trek from the beginning represented a future that we could work on. As a child immigrant, who lived through war and persecution. You represented possibility and hope.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 18/04/2026

“The 2016 case was a collision between the principles and personalities of Mr. Obama and Chief Justice Roberts.” - He operates as a partisan politician, not the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It’s a mockery of the rule of law.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 18/04/2026

Chief Justice Roberts has long criticized the Lochner era. His own memos, indicate the Roberts court is likely worse. Openly and unequivocally partisan and driven by preferred outcomes and not the law. www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

nytimes.com

The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court

041

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 13/04/2026

Elon has openly spent tremendous sums to influence US and international elections. He brags about doing so. The irony is thick on this criticism and from him can only be explained as purely anti-Semitic.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 12/04/2026

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 06/04/2026

Committing war crimes by directly harming and killing civilians is better than recognizing the existence of other humans? Happy Easter! He has risen!

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 03/04/2026

“Dubois.” Which is far more cringe.

000

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 24/03/2026

When I wrote my dissertation, two of my committee members said, “Why do you have so many citations?!?!?!? What is going on here?!?!?”

030

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 23/03/2026

This is particularly true in legal scholarship where we cite everything.

120

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 23/03/2026

Bibi praising and aligning with an antisemite. Par for the course.

020

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 22/03/2026

F-15s were shot down (allegedly by friendly fire), an F-35 was shot down, the bunker buster bomb (if Trump’s claim about Iran’s continued nuclear program is correct) was not effective, etc. Trump has reduced effective US deterrence.

010

John Parsi JD, PhD @johnparsi.bsky.social · 09/03/2026

There are so many issues, but just waiving off the causation issue of correlation by waiving your hands and pointing to correlational evidence is pretty low. Then dragging in Edmund Burke just to make a claim that you’re a theorist, is some lazy work.

120