Sign in

Joe Melling

@joemelling.bsky.social
252 followers 449 following 16 posts

PhD candidate, studying cognitive science of (mis)perception/ philosophy of Active Inference @monash-m3cs.bsky.social (M3CS).

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Joe Melling
Shawn Prest @shawnprest.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
How do advanced meditators deconstruct experience? Happy to announce that the peer-reviewed version of Towards an Active Inference Account of Deep Meditative Deconstruction is now out open access in Neuroscience of Consciousness @nconsc.bsky.social - work with @kevinberryman.bsky.social🧵
2166
Reposted by Joe Melling
Beth Fisher @bethfisher.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
New paper is out! 🌟 Here we consider challenges in computational psychiatry and address them drawing on ideas from philosophy of science. This paper came together during my PhD through many wonderful discussions with Noor, Laura and Jakob. No surprises that I have an optimistic take 😊
0175
Reposted by Joe Melling
MIT Press @mitpress.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
Jakob @hohwy.bsky.social unravels how we understand the mind, cognition, and existence in "The Self-Evidencing Agent," analyzing how human agents perceive and make sense of the world, decide to act, and act of their own volition: bit.ly/4sXomMq
A copy of "The Self-Evidencing Agent: Mind, Existence, and Predictive Processing" by Jakob Howhy on a plain background. The cover features a simple one-line illustration of a profile of a character painting a line that stems from their foot.
1227
Reposted by Joe Melling
Gaia Mizzon @gaiamizzon.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
Very excited to announce that our new paper “Are Dreams Narrative Experiences? How Assumptions About Fictional Narratives Shape Debates on Dream Experiences” is officially published in Topoi. I am truly honoured to have collaborated with my supervisor, Jennifer Windt, on this work. rdcu.be/eSXvP
rdcu.be
Are Dreams Narrative Experiences? How Assumptions About Fictional Narratives Shape Debates on Dream Experiences
152
Reposted by Joe Melling
Will Turner @renrutmailliw.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
New BBS article w/ @lauragwilliams.bsky.social and Hinze Hogendoorn, just accepted! We respond to a thought-provoking article by @smfleming.bsky.social & @matthiasmichel.bsky.social, and argue that it's premature to conclude that conscious perception is delayed by 350-450ms: bit.ly/4nYNTlb
bit.ly
OSF
12710
Reposted by Joe Melling
PLOS Biology @plosbiology.org · 27/05/2025
It takes time for the #brain to process information, so how can we catch a flying ball? @renrutmailliw.bsky.social &co reveal a multi-stage #motion #extrapolation occurring in the #HumanBrain, shifting the represented position of moving objects closer to real time @plosbiology.org 🧪 plos.io/3Fm83Fc
Mapping the position of moving stimuli. The top three panels show the three events of interest: stimulus onset, stimulus offset, and stimulus reversal (left to right). The bottom three panels show group-level probabilistic spatio-temporal maps centered around these three events. Diagonal black lines mark the true position of the stimulus. Horizontal dashed lines mark the time of the event of interest (stimulus onset, offset, or reversal). Red indicates high probability regions and blue indicates low probability regions (‘position evidence’ gives the difference between the posterior probability and chance). Note: these maps were generated from recordings at posterior/occipital sites.
0185
Reposted by Joe Melling
Matthew O’Donohue @matthewod.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
Takeaways: musicians better in SJ tasks (but may be response bias) yet show > multisensory integration in a more objective RT task (but may be just better sustained attention, motivation, etc.). SJs show rapid recalibration but RTs don't, so RR probs not due to early sensory latency changes 9/10
121
Reposted by Joe Melling
Matthew O’Donohue @matthewod.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
⚠️New paper! If you like multisensory temporal perception, this one has HEAPS for you. We looked at simultaneity perception, simple RTs, race model inequality, serial dependence (recalibration), modality shift costs, musicians, and more! Findings summarised below 1/10 psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
psycnet.apa.org
APA PsycNet
374
Reposted by Joe Melling
Jakob Hohwy @hohwy.bsky.social · 03/02/2025
Frame and relevance problems from the perspective of predictive processing - new paper led by @monash-m3cs.bsky.social's Tom Darling #philsky www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Solving the relevance problem with predictive processing
The frame or relevance problem is a classic problem in cognitive science and philosophy. We attempt to resolve this problem by appealing to predictive processing, a growing theory of cognition. As ...
0208
Reposted by Joe Melling
Beth Fisher @bethfisher.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
Excited to have our new paper out in @cpsyjournal.bsky.social 🎉✨ with my amazing co-authors @christopherjwhyte.bsky.social @hohwy.bsky.social We develop an active inference model of the optimism bias to model development, belief updating and optimistic action. cpsyjournal.org/articles/10....
cpsyjournal.org
An Active Inference Model of the Optimism Bias | Computational Psychiatry
Computational Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews that involve the application, analysis, or invention of theoretical, computational and statistical approaches to mental functi...
12813
Joe Melling @joemelling.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
Just realised Bluesky supports videos so here is our new visual illusion! Fix your gaze on the grey dot. How many red dots do you see within the green frames? Many people consistently see two, despite only ever being shown one! jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx... w/ @renrutmailliw.bsky.social
1134
Joe Melling @joemelling.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
Excited to share my first paper: a novel visual illusion discovered by my co-authors Will Turner and Hinze Hogendoorn which we call the "Split-Stimulus Effect", in which a single flashed stimulus is perceived to be in two different locations simultaneously jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx... [1/5]
jov.arvojournals.org
Concurrent perception of competing predictions: A “split-stimulus effect” | JOV | ARVO Journals
14715