blog.quintarelli.it
Did Anthropic’s A.I. Really Make a Scientific Discovery on Its Own? – The New York Times
Non lo puoi dimostrare ma per me non è un dubbio… Ovvio che ciò che condividi con i chatbot viene usato per le versioni successive! e se in questo ci sono dei passi logici e dei trovati e delle idee… mi spiace, sono andate.
E i frontier labs sono troppo più potenti di chiunque, nel appropriarsi del lavoro e dichiararlo come proprio.
E’ successo con la matematica, e’ divenuto visibile in questo caso, ma quanti casi non diventano visibili ?
> When Anthropic, the artificial intelligence giant, unveiled findings from its new biology lab last week, its scientists claimed to have used A.I. agents to discover new enzymes with promise for biotechnology.
>
> Some scientists were quick to cast doubt on the achievement. Then Mario Rodríguez Mestre, a computational biologist, said this weekend that he and his colleagues had been studying the enzymes and their associated molecules — which Anthropic calls ARTs — for four years.
>
> Dr. Mestre and his colleagues have yet to publish their findings. But for the past three years, they have regularly used Anthropic’s A.I. models as they have written code, drafted manuscripts and performed other tasks.
>
> …
>
> “So, for me, the most important question is not ‘Were ARTs already known?’ They were,” Dr. Mestre said in an interview. The issue instead, he added, is whether Anthropic’s A.I. actually reasoned its way to the results, or whether it was guided to them based partly on his own work.
>
> “My concern is that this information was used to train future versions of the models,” Dr. Mestre said of his own research. “I think it’s important to raise this possibility.”
Source: _Did Anthropic’s A.I. Really Make a Scientific Discovery on Its Own? – The New York Times_
If you like this post, please consider sharing it.
