iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 13/10/2026

So apparently she published her claude work as an artifact (she could have just sent me the link to this instead of blocking me but whatever) and it seems like she left out some stuff that Claude flagged as limitations of her analysis

120

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 13/10/2026

This is the most tenuous part of this data analysis. First, we have no idea how she defined "mild vs harsh" - she blocked me when I asked for her methodology, so for some reason she is unwilling to share.

Aida

"Maybe trans people were just ruder to him." Fair. So I scored every reply and quote.

Very mild posts: 16% of everyone else blocked, 38% of trans people. Harsh posts: 59% vs 77%. Same words, different outcome, at every level.

160

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 12/10/2026

there are consequences for violating hospitality

181

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 11/10/2026

your jaw line, double chin, and missing upper lip aren't doing you any favors, and your hair line is higher than mine- you're just hiding it behind your Becky bangs

110

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 11/10/2026

touched up my hair despite liking how it looked faded this time, but still prefer it darker

jane with dark purple hair, red and black smokey eyes, and a new harness

5311

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 09/10/2026

*checks in on the Bluesky Centrist Caucus* Oh

ellie lockhart (she/they) @eleanor.lockhart.contact
The World
can they arrest people?
also, why exactly should the people who call us faggots and abominations and threaten us with weapons be given de-escalated force? what exactly about living on the streets of a gay neighborhood and dehumanizing queer people entitles people to be approached without weapons?
9:28 PM • Oct 6, 2026
3 reposts
1 quote
10 likes

embracebecoming.bsky... @embrac... • 2d
Fell (From plane)
Because if the cops have the option to beat the shit out of those people they will also beat the shit out of a lot of people who aren't violent bigots.
ellie lockhart (she/they) @eleanor.lo... • 2d
• The World
What exactly are we basing this on exactly? I understand this is what you're required to believe on this site to have clout but I don't care about that. Where is your evidence for this?
eb99 @eb99.bsky.social • 2d
Time Machine Accident (Paradox)
I mean, the overwhelmingly amount of police brutality against black people, for
one

6200

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 09/10/2026

This sorta sounds like she's calling for the indiscriminate murder of Palestinians, including children. Do you disagree?

English. Describing her experience being held in Gaza and her outlook on people living there, she says, “They’d enter the room (children of the family) from time to time to look at me as if I’m an animal. There are no innocent civilians there. Families there live under the Hamas.”

1130

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 09/10/2026

he is right that his highest and best use is as a lawn salesman

The speaker even floated a decidedly less glamorous career change: starting a lawn business back home in Louisiana.
“If God moves on our hearts and says we should, you know, go back to my hometown of Shreveport and start a lawn business, I’ll do that with equal fervor,” Johnson said. “I mean, I just want to be of my highest and best use… to God and to my country.”

070

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 08/10/2026

this is your only post mentioning trans people

Replied to
user
Joined Nov ’24
Laughter (While painting elderly woman)

So orders trump"s little johnson.
Republican incels are worried they will rape a trans?
🏳️‍🌈I Got your back 🙇

070

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 08/10/2026

Amazon is like "this Victorian-ass bitch"

Product Preferences

Selects European history focusing on 19th-20th century political events
Departments

European History Books
Interests & Hobbies

Studies European political and military history
Home & Family

Invested in the Apple ecosystem
Product Preferences

Shops from women's departments
Departments

Alternative Fashion
Product Preferences

Consistently repurchasing hosiery across all time periods
Departments

Hosiery and Legwear
Product Preferences

Prefers patterned and decorative hosiery over plain styles

131

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 07/10/2026

lmao weird to follow me to a different thread just to get dunked on

060

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 07/10/2026

It's unclear how the behavior exhibited by this account daily does not constitute "content meant to intimidate or scare others" or extreme or persistent toxic or disruptive behavior, made primarily to anger, provoke, or belittle, or hostile language intended to create to an unwelcoming environment

Respectful DiscourseWe create a safe space for discussion by prohibiting threats and content meant to scare or intimidate people.

Do not threaten others with death, serious harm, or express that others should be hurt or killed.
Do not promote, glorify, or incite violence against individuals or groups.
Do not share graphic violent content designed to shock, disturb, or intimidate others.
These rules do not prevent you from posting content that involves violence without glorifying real-world harm, including:
Professional combat sports, martial arts demonstrations, and regulated extreme sports.
Discussion, analysis, or depiction of violence in clearly fictional or artistic contexts such as literature, film, television, video games, and visual arts.

Anti-Harassment: We create space for everyone to express themselves by prohibiting harassment and toxic behaviors.

Do not stalk, persistently target, or create malicious content designed to humiliate or degrade individuals, including through coordinated campaigns.
Do not abuse Bluesky features (lists, labels, community moderation tools), engage in bad-faith mass reporting, use automated harassment systems, or create single-purpose harassment accounts.
Accounts that engage in extreme or persistent toxic or disruptive behavior may face restrictions or removal. This includes accounts with a high number or proportion of:
Extreme or repeated personal attacks, such as insults or ad hominem attacks
Posts or responses made primarily to anger, provoke, or belittle instead of to contribute criticism or a genuine opinion
The use of hostile or inflammatory language clearly intended to create or contribute to an unwelcoming environment

1110

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 07/10/2026

this person spends literally every day spamming trans people with fantasies of Republicans are going to kill us, arguing that we must accept being dehumanized and degraded or else we are either responsible for our own deaths or that we are faking being trans.

2120

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 02/10/2026

lol you had nothing to do with the petition

Wolfy D. Lucca @spookalucca.tv
REMEMBER WHEN WE TRIED TO DO THINGS
"THE RIGHT WAY"
and got 50,000 signatures asking for accountability on a petition?
2:50 PM • Oct 2, 2026

581

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 02/10/2026

The Third Way is effectively to the left of the Bluesky Centrist Cadre who have defended triangulation on rhetoric about trans kids

Emphasize the harm these bans will cause to all women and girls by talking about how these invasive policies would require young girls undergo genital inspections, submit up-to-date information on their menstrual cycle, and undergo physical examinations in order to play sports.
Make it personal to parents by highlighting that these bans won’t just affect transgender children—their children will be affected as well.
Pivot to another solution. This issue is complicated, and we need to trust the people closest to these situations—parents, schools, and doctors—to make these decisions, not politicians.
Hit politicians who are pushing these laws for having the wrong priorities. They should be focusing on addressing inflation and the economy instead of passing invasive laws that target young girls.

040

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 02/10/2026

here he boosts the smear that "trans women telling cis people that their pronouns are she/her not they/them" is an attempt to erase nonbinary people or paint them as unsafe. This doesn't get flagged for harassment but it's telling his followers it's okay to misgender us Wokely.

Mike Paulauski Repost:

eleanor.lockhart.contact
ellie lockhart (she/they)
Posted
3mwu7fmqtfk25
12h
@eleanor.lockhart.contact

for the record, a lot of the women who freak out about being called "they" in a thread where they're shouting at someone are the same people who will say that trans women who don't pass well enough are morally obliged to stay home or avoid other trans women and are dangerous to be around

2232

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 02/10/2026

He is a fountain of disinformation that sows discord in center-left coalitions, such as the debunked belief that "the online left" is why Harris lost, rather than the actual reason that people were antsy about lingering inflation, as well as the GOP's now-failed Hasan Piker op.

@mike10010100.com

Bud, I'm talking about *your* choices, your actions resulted in the Democrats losing, Trump coming to power, and Palestinians suffering.

These were *your* actions!

Bar chart titled "@mike10010100.com posts about Hasan Piker, by month," covering November 2024 through September 2026. Monthly counts stay low for most of the range, between 0 and 8. Two spikes dominate: April 2026 at 65 posts and August 2026 at 63. July 2026 is a smaller third peak at 25. September 2026 drops back to 10.

1201

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 02/10/2026

he constantly ignores or defends transphobic/ableist rhetoric from politicians while demonizing trans journalists. He recently participated in harassing Parker Molloy off the site and then gloated about it. This week, he was boosting The Needle's hit piece on Erin Read because he hates Erin Reed

2252

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 02/10/2026

I know i am repeating myself but people really need to stop treating this guy like he's at all a good faith actor on here. He's not. He devotes like 2/3s of his time to attacking and smearing trans women while using the 2 or 3 of us who are impressed with him to hide his (trans)misogyny

5417

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 01/10/2026

Apparently the Needle posted not one but three (3) hit pieces on Erin Read yesterday

Three separate articles on The Needle's Investigations page posted on Sept 30, 2026 about Erin Read:

1 - Erin Reed Has Been Hiding AI-Generated Text in Her Reporting For Years (20,900 words)
2 - How We Did This : Methodology of Above - (1700 words)
3 - 52 Unretracted False Statements in Erin Reed’s 2026 Reporting (4200 words)

3164

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 01/10/2026

also - this article highlights a response from Reed to Brigham in pink blocking that is used throughout the article for quotes, implying this is a direct quote (compare to second screenshot). But it's not a quote! Brigham is paraphrasing Reed, not quoting her -"something to the effect of..."

When Brigham asked Reed in her interview about how Reed writes for a trans audience, Reed paused, looked conflicted, and responded with something to the effect of:

Our main audience isn’t trans people; it’s the cis family members of trans people.

(the website has the last sentence displayed over the same box that the article uses for actual quotes, but this is a paraphrase not a quote)

161

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 01/10/2026

This is an embarrassing claim, honestly, like I just read through like five of her posts and while yeah this is a small sample size, i do not understand how two women with postgraduate education are struggling to understand Reed's writing. It is simply not complex!

Both of the people involved in this investigation often struggled to understand what she was saying in her recent articles, despite both having postgraduate education. We can’t imagine how someone with a high school degree or less would be able to get any meaningful information out of her recent work.

180

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

As Claude points out, human errors aren't evidence of AI use, and a model producing a real deadname is far less likely than a human accidentally typing it. Also, if i were a writer for the Needle, I simply would not criticize competitors for a "litany of errors in 2026 alone"!

Errors aren't AI evidence. Humans misattribute adjacent quotes constantly. The deadnaming, if accurate, is serious, but "only an LLM could have produced it" is speculation. It's also odd reasoning, since a model producing a real, unpublished deadname would be the less likely explanation. Their German-guidelines section even contradicts itself: it gives the release date as both Sep. 30 and Sep. 9, and calls a six-month gap "seven months."

Her litany of errors in 2026 includes deadnaming and misgendering a competing trans journalist who broke a story for one of her competitors! This was seven months ago, and the deadname is still up as of writing.

1111

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

They have no data from 2025 and somehow conclude that she used ChatGPT! This is called lying, not journalism

The model attribution is look-elsewhere reasoning. They admit 2025 is invisible to their test, then assert she used ChatGPT anyway. Model releases are frequent, so some release will always land within four days of any change. And by their own table, Opus 4.5 already produced straight quotes months earlier, so the Opus 4.6 date explains nothing.

1151

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

Their evidence regarding Reed's use of em dashes is overstated and unfalsifiable (also self crit and full disclosure -this shows that using machine learning for this kind of analysis risks overstating the meaning of the collected evidence)

The em dash timeline cuts against them. By their own description, spaced hyphens faded over 2023 and em dashes didn't really take off until February 2025, about two years apart. That's gradual habit drift, not a light switch. Her em dash rate also didn't jump in February 2026, when she supposedly switched to a heavier em dash user. And their 6.5.3 predictions are rigged: nearly every scenario, including "she stops using AI," predicts the same outcome.

It's in section 6.5, "Em Dashes," spread across three subsections:

The two-year gap: section 6.5.1, the chart "Dashes Fall, While Em Dashes Rise." Its description says her spaced hyphens fade over the first half of 2023, and her em dashes stay under 2 per 1,000 words through 2024, then jump in February 2025. The chart text itself says "the two turning points are around two years apart." The "light switch" contrast is mine; that's their phrase for the straight-quote change in 6.2.3.
No jump in February 2026: section 6.5.2, "Em Dashes in Claude's Writing," where they say her em dash usage in 2026 is roughly what it was the year before. I need to retract my point here. Their story is ChatGPT in 2025, then Claude in 2026, and they say both used em dashes heavily. So their own theory predicts a flat line, and a flat line is what they found. That's consistent with them, not against them. It's just as consistent with no AI at all, so it's neutral evidence. I overstated it.
The predictions: section 6.5.3, "Em Dashes in the Future," the four numbered scenarios. Switching to Opus 5.5, switching away from Claude, or quitting AI all predict a drop, and staying on the same Claude predicts no change. So a drop confirms them and a flat line confirms them. "Rigged" was a bit strong for what's really an unfalsifiable setup: they didn't name any outcome that would count against them.

1141

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

This one is all me. "We could not get Claude to replicate Reed's writing that we already determined was written by Claude." What are we doing here, kids?

It’s also concerning that 2 of her articles in 2025-26 are more noticeably like the writing of Claude Opus 5 than anything we got Claude to write as part of this test. Worse still, 21 of her articles in the same period read as being more likely to have been written by Claude than the average of the articles we got Claude to write. All 21 of these occur after she switched to Claude.

1153

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

They state that Reed's 2022 writing is news round ups that read like twitter threads, then compare these to her full length writing 4 years later now that she is full time. Of course her sentences are getting more complex! This is what happens when writers improve their craft over time!

The baseline is a different genre. Their own section 6.1 says her 2022 output was news roundups that read "more like a Twitter thread," written before she went full-time. Comparing that to 2026 full-length articles will shift function words, readability, and Burrows' Delta without any AI involved. "More similar to her employee than to 2022 Reed" is also what an in-house style converging on one beat looks like.

1150

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

Their own style test scored writing that they identified as Reed's typing as closer to Claudish than it scored writing they identified as copied. It also scored Reed as closer to them than to Claude and they handwave this by using their thesis question as proof.

Their own style test contradicts the pasting theory. In both the 2023–24 and 2026 "model lean" charts, her typed text and pasted text score almost identically. In 2026, the typed text actually leans slightly more toward Claude (+0.157 vs +0.136). If the pasted paragraphs were Claude and the typed ones were her, those should diverge.

Longer description (for a caption or linked description):

A horizontal dot plot with two rows, Pasted (n=39) and Typed (n=24). Each dot is one Erin Reed article. The x-axis runs from −0.5 to +0.5, with a dashed vertical line at 0 labeled "no lean." Values to the left mean the article is more like GPT-5.2; values to the right mean it is more like Claude Opus 5.

Pasted articles range from about −0.18 to +0.32. Three fall left of zero; the rest sit between 0 and +0.32. The median is +0.136.

Typed articles range from about −0.05 to +0.36, mostly between +0.05 and +0.26. The median is +0.157.

A line connects the two medians, showing the typed median slightly to the right of the pasted median. The caption reads: "Value = P(LLM | Claude anchor) − P(LLM | GPT-5.2 anchor). Positive = leans toward Claude. Each dot is one Reed article. Source: Erin Reed's Substack archive. In house analysis by The Needle."

Their topic-model detector leaks topic. The "machine" examples were generated from Reed's own headlines, and the "human" examples are the Needle's writers. A topic model will partly learn "writes about Reed's subjects." Even so, her 2025–26 average (0.302) sits much closer to the human bylines (0.18–0.21) than to Claude (0.61–0.75). They concede this is the strongest exculpatory result and wave it off.

The strongest evidence in favor of Reed not using AI is from the same six-phased test that shows her writing drifts towards Claude, and this 17 model benchmark can only reliably tell whether something is 100% AI if the writing in question is actually 100% written by AI. Since we know that Reed mixes the LLM with her own writing, this cannot be used to exonerate her.

1141

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

With that in mind, they massively inflate the sample size by treating each paragraph as a discrete event rather than part of a whole. If a post was drafted on a mobile device or in google docs, every paragraph in it would have the same punctuation style. The actual sample size is 754, not 11,474

The p-values are inflated. They treat thousands of paragraphs as independent when they're clustered inside articles. A p of 10⁻³¹³ is a sign of pseudoreplication, not strength.

A p-value assumes every data point is an independent observation. Their paragraphs aren't.

The classic example: you want to know if a fertilizer works, so you treat 2 plants and leave 2 alone. Then you measure 500 leaves on each and run your stats as if n = 2,000. You'll get a gorgeous p-value, but you really tested 4 plants. Leaves on the same plant share soil, water and genes, so they aren't separate experiments.

Paragraphs work the same way. Paragraphs in one article share:

the same drafting session and tool,
the same topic and source documents,
the same deadline pressure and mood.

If one day's article was drafted in a straight-quote editor, or built around a long court filing, all its paragraphs get tagged and shifted together. That's one event, not forty data points. Their 11,474 paragraphs come from 754 articles, and the 2026 comparison is really about 91 articles, some published the same day and maybe drafted in the same session. The honest n is in the dozens-to-hundreds, not thousands.

Why that matters: p-values shrink fast as n grows. Count every paragraph as independent and the statistics think you've run thousands of experiments, so they report absurd certainty. For scale, 10⁻³¹³ is smaller than the smallest number ordinary floating-point arithmetic can represent at full precision. No real-world claim about human behavior deserves that. When you see a number like that, the model is overcounting.

The fix is standard:

Average per article, then compare articles, or
use a mixed-effects model with article as a grouping factor, or
bootstrap by resampling whole articles instead of paragraphs.

1161

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

I used machine learning to assess some of the claims in this article (turnabout is fair play after all) and here's what we found: Complex sentences with straight apostrophes are scored as "copied" and simple sentences are scored as typed. But of course complex have apostrophes!

The pasted-vs-typed comparison is mostly circular. A paragraph counts as "pasted" if it contains any straight apostrophe or quote. Everything else counts as "typed," including paragraphs with no quote marks at all. Longer paragraphs and sentences are simply more likely to contain an apostrophe. So "pasted paragraphs are longer, wordier, and harder to read" partly falls out of the definition. The comparison that would mean something is straight-marked vs curly-marked paragraphs, and I didn't see it.

1192

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 30/09/2026

I too used AI to determine if the article below includes AI generated content and it turns out that by the article's own standards, it does!

Their own method flags their own article. Their "presence rule" treats any straight apostrophe or quote in a paragraph as evidence of pasting from an LLM. Here's what's in their own writing:

Section 1.1 has "doesn't" twice with straight apostrophes, next to a curly "That’s."
"aren't" in 6.2 is straight.
Altman's "small-but-happy win" is in straight quotes.
"‘pasted content test'" opens curly and closes straight.

By their standard, those paragraphs were machine-pasted. I'm reading a converted copy, so it's worth checking the page source, but mixed marks inside one phrase are hard to blame on conversion. This doesn't prove AI either way. It shows how many innocent sources of straight quotes exist: Google Docs settings, phone keyboards, Notion, pasting between drafts, co-authors with different setups. That's also the load-bearing weakness in their case against Reed.

2549

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 29/09/2026

how are we supposed to take this guy seriously when he can't keep straight the fact that Biden was not on the ballot in 2024?

@ghazelleberner.bsky.social

The anti-Biden people will never talk about this, and it is the single most obvious and clear sign that:

1. Trump was far worse in every way.
2. They have no idea what the fuck they’re talking about.

They all checked out when Biden lost, because that’s what they cared about.

1170

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 29/09/2026

This is really important to flag because there is a tendency among Bluesky centrists to blame 3 specific trans women discouraging trans people from voting by criticizing democrats when the reality of trans people not voting is because of actual GOP voter suppression around our IDs.

A new study from the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law found that one in four transgender Americans will face significant hurdles in voting this fall and nine percent will face the real prospect of disenfranchisement because of mismatching identification documents.

23310

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 29/09/2026

oh, you mean conceding the rhetorical ground to the GOP when it comes to defending a vulnerable group of people tells the GOP it's okay to go further with their attacks? If only someone had said that before!

“For Democrats, it’s really not clear to me they have had good messaging on this issue,” Haider-Markel said. “I think it’s historically comparable to any point in history, when those in power are punching down at the weakest in society. When you concede to them these points, you’re conceding that it’s OK to punch down and letting them position themselves to ask for even more.”

0123

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 29/09/2026

As many of us have repeatedly said, there is no actual evidence that the anti-trans messaging help Trump in 2024 and lots of evidence it harmed the GOP in 2025.

“It’s very clear Republicans think this works, and even when you listen to political pundits talk about this on CNN or elsewhere, they seem to have accepted this idea,” said Don Haider-Markel, a professor at the University of Kansas who has studied the links between public opinion and policy for 25 years. “But as a social scientist, I can say there aren’t any studies to say this worked in 2024. And the evidence from special elections and off-cycle elections in 2025 suggests that it didn’t help Republicans at all.”

1132

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 29/09/2026

The poster in question deleted it i believe, but it was this

@wolfgangbrooks.bsky.social

Trans rights or Trans camps. You chose the camps and you're blaming Dems. Fuck off.

150

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 28/09/2026

Really because it looks like people have been telling you the correct pronouns for over 2 hours now

080

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 28/09/2026

importantly, Juni said this at the time and again less than a year ago.

Therian
Ngl, if aaron had just been like
"Yeah, so what, I liked porn"
I would have liked him more, that's the only relatable thing I've ever seen him do

hi aaron! I've been pretty consistently trying to deflect the hate and harassment away from you so that I can get an actual response from you.
I expected that you'd misclicked.
what i didn't expect was to be permabanned and have my appeal denied in 7 minutes
I'm still open to a conversation
-juni

051

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 28/09/2026

shit like this is why mods don't take our complaints about harassment seriously 1) it was *not* underage porn 2) Juni's account was restored literally hours, not weeks, later 3) likes are still public but have literally never been displayed in the app, that's why the bot was made in the first place

@unwisewoman.bsky.social
he got caught one night liking underage porn by a bot, permambanned the bot owner with no reason or justification (unbanned her after weeks long outcry) played the like off as a misclick, and then made likes nonpublic

6416

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 27/09/2026

yeah mikey, narcissism and oppositional defiance IS the through line, isn't it?

Michael Paulauski
@mike10010100.com
Shot (By Alec Baldwin [On purpose])
Turns out the only consistent through line is narcissism and oppositional defiance disorder.
Who'd'a thunk it.

070

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 27/09/2026

it's now been 15 days since Paulauski mentioned Mary Peltola and 7 days since he was excoriating Parker for being ableist. He still hasn't acknowledged Peltola's ableist and homophobic comments. He doesn't care about these issues - his purpose is reactionary opposition to anything progressive

Michael Paulauski
@mike10010...
• 53m
• Shot (By Alec Baldwin [On purpose])
Turns out a coalition of people held together primarily by the *opposition* to something (establishment Dems), rather than a commitment to *positive* actions/ goals, falls apart the moment the opposition no longer exists (winning the primary).

280

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 27/09/2026

You're being too clever by half. Your thesis, shown here, is that there are many trans women on hrt for less than two years who are competing in women's leagues. This isn't true - and you admit you don't know of ANY instances of this being true, yet you state it as if it were undisputed.

Marvin
@romanapple.bsk... • 5h
Because there is a real unfair balance for many trans women competing in women leagues.
I do not know the best answer. But insisting all trans women must be allowed to compete as a woman in all female sports is automatically creating push back.
¡ 2

120

Jane Ball (living dead girl) @jane.inurhead.lol · 27/09/2026

do you deny that you said this? Do you deny that you don't know of any instances of trans women who have been on hrt for less than two years competing in women's leagues?

Marvin
@romanapple.bsky.social
A person who grows up having testosterone (a steroid) pumping through their body then transitions into a woman and competes against women who have never had testosterone steroids pumping through their system.
I support trans rights, but we also need to be rational here.
9:39 AM - Sep 27, 2026

Marvin
@romanapple.bsky.social
Huh? As far as I am concerned trans women are women. Simple.
I only spoke about in sports. A trans woman who hasn't even begun transitioning competing in women's sports is not fair.
1:39 PM • Sep 27, 2026
2

140