iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 31/08/2026

When is an outgroup kinda sorta an ingroup? Lucy Song asks whether race affects foreign threat perception. Among white Americans, higher white identity tracked with viewing white-depicted adversaries as lower threat than non-white-depicted, even when controlling for out-group animus. buff.ly/yFalewy

1138

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 28/08/2026

When does *not moving forward* become *stuck*? Acevedo et al. examine how social movement leaders view stalled progress. In interviews of 28 climate advocates, they find expected outcomes of gridlock, like intransigence & radicalization, as well as surprisingly cooperative attitudes. buff.ly/qEv5RKu

012

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 21/08/2026

Does walking a mile in someone else's shoes do any good if you just can't get them to fit? Rapp et al. find perspective-taking has disparate effects on reducing discrimination. Hardened beliefs & personal associations may be the key to how well the shoe fits & if one wears it. More: buff.ly/LbyyNBr

012

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 18/08/2026

Immigrant groups are no monolith, nor are their responses to discrimination. Suntay & Ruhe study these responses for Turkish immigrants in Germany. They find in facing discrimination, more education strengthened religious identification & the opposite for less education. Read more: buff.ly/LEzsBXY

044

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 14/08/2026

What's in a word(s)? Durrheim et al. argue words—or language, at least—may be key in polarization, finding political divisions stem from diverging opinions & groups defined through language. Read for how minority & majority group discourse differed & what it means for polarization: buff.ly/VhBFP6z

083

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 13/08/2026

Does caste shape what we feel? Jogdand & Reicher study humiliation for India's Dalits. They find humiliation relies on the tension of being devalued & powerless to respond, but also on having self-worth. Responses to humiliation are strategic, centered on collective resistance. More: buff.ly/sm24kjb

056

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 12/08/2026

If I'm angry, is my representative angry? Stout et al. examine officials' statements after George Floyd's murder to find when they deploy emotions matching their constituents'. Read their findings on when emotional representation was highest & its effect on constituent appraisals: buff.ly/0xiUbP8

011

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

The origins of political preferences are likely endless, but Fluit et al. present new findings for mental health's role in preference development. They link adolescent mental health & midlife behavior, with externalizing problems tied to rightward beliefs & internalizing, left. More: buff.ly/IjkyldB

022

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 09/08/2026

Is feeling blue the only thing making us want to go green? Sapin et al. begin charting out varying emotions about the environment & different political stakeholders. Read more for how feelings like anger & hope drive climate action & map onto stakeholders like institutions & NGOs: buff.ly/wgmXcMs

022

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 06/08/2026

Can reinforcing identity counter the forward march of democracy? Sumaktoyo & Soedirgo find that hardliner identity groups—but not moderate ones—tend to promote victimized majority narratives & hardliner identity is associated with more anti-democratic attitudes. Open-access: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

122

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 05/08/2026

Maybe the real treasure was the [leadership skills] we made along the way. In studying prejudice reduction, Blaylock et al. find that intergroup contact not only improves out-group relations, but is also associated with greater self-esteem & civic engagement. Read more open-access: buff.ly/n4Tm5bF

092

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 04/08/2026

In their article, Kende et al. seek to answer the question "When do people challenge economic inequality & when are they more likely to accept it?" They find strength of local social movements interacts with local levels of inequality & predict individuals' justification. Read more: buff.ly/AoitqH6

022

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 03/08/2026

What mechanisms are at play in the decision to vaccinate? Beylat et al. examine perceptions of risk & trustworthiness to find out. Their findings reveal that perceived government integrity or high risk perception are individually enough to predict who gets vaccinated. Read more: buff.ly/LIcvrRw

021

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 02/08/2026

How closely is identity threat tied to one's values & political attitudes? Kuehnhanss & Scharfbillig find a tight connection surveying citizens across all 27 EU member states. Read the full piece open-access for more on identity threat and weaker liberal policy support: buff.ly/YW0LC64

072

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 01/08/2026

August is here and so is the new issue of Political Psychology. We've got articles on everything from prejudice reduction to polarization to populism. We'll be spotlighting every article, but you can check the whole issue out online now: buff.ly/uOet23U

085

Reposted by Political Psychology

Osman Suntay @osmansuntay.bsky.social · 21/07/2026

How does education shape the way immigrants respond to discrimination? In a new paper with Constantin Ruhe, out now in @ispp-pops.bsky.social, we try to answer this question by bridging the psychology of social class with discrimination-group identification research (doi.org/10.1111/pops...). 1/6

doi.org

183

Reposted by Political Psychology

mark brandt @mjbsp.bsky.social · 09/07/2026

New paper in Political Psychology (@ispp-pops.bsky.social) tested the Social Identity Model of Collective Action during Gen Z protests in Madagascar. They show SIMCA's relevance for post-action social harmony This is also the first data exclusively from Madagascar published in the journal!

Screenshot of article title and abstract. The title is, "Navigating social change and social harmony: Testing SIMCA in Gen Z collective action in Madagascar and its role in reconciliation processes". The abstract is, "The Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) effectively predicts collective action and social change, but has been less examined in emerging movements and non-WEIRD contexts. This research had two aims: to test SIMCA during the Gen Z mobilization in Madagascar, a largely online movement that culminated in the overthrow of the government in October 2025; and to examine how SIMCA variables relate to post-action activism and reconciliation. Study 1 (N = 959), conducted during the governmental transition, tested SIMCA—including national identification, Gen Z identification, perceived injustice, collective efficacy, and morality—on online collective action support, intention, and participation. Study 2 (N = 258), conducted post-transition, examined associations with activism intention, reconciliation, and forgiveness. Gen Z identification and morality were consistently associated with collective action and activism intention, whereas perceived injustice was primarily linked to ongoing collective action. Collective efficacy showed mixed associations. In contrast, national identification emerged as a key factor of post-action forgiveness. These findings suggest that SIMCA variables are involved not only in social change but also in post-action social harmony. They highlight the distinct roles of politicized and non-politicized identities, underscoring the importance of conceptualizing collective action as a temporally and contextually embedded process."

02810

Reposted by Political Psychology

Political Science Department at Northwestern University @polisciatnu.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

🔥Hot off the press via @ispp-pops.bsky.social A very particular set of skills: The role of perspective-taking in hostage diplomacy negotiations Profs. Dani Gilbert ( @danigilbert.bsky.social / @buffett.northwestern.edu ) & Cynthia Wang ( @cynthiascwang.bsky.social / @drrc-kellogg.bsky.social )

Gilbert, D., & Wang, C. S. (2026). A very particular set of skills: The role of perspective-taking in hostage diplomacy negotiations. Political Psychology, 47, e70173. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70173

Abstract
Hostage diplomacy—detaining foreign nationals for leverage under the pretext of national law—is a growing international security problem. Beyond constituting a violation of international law, hostage diplomacy is challenging to resolve. Target states must deal with aggressive, sovereign perpetrators; handle a fraudulent but plausible legal process; account for numerous stakeholders; and protect their citizens from future harm. How do target-state negotiators navigate these challenges? This theory-building article explores perspective-taking—imagining the world from another's vantage point—as a tool to shape target-state negotiators' effectiveness in navigating hostage diplomacy. We introduce a model that conceptualizes perspective-taking on two dimensions. First, negotiators can use multiple-perspective taking, considering various stakeholders, including interests within their own government, the perpetrator's government, and the hostage's family. Second, across stakeholders, negotiators can take strategic, cultural, emotional, and moral perspectives. We posit that engaging in different forms of perspective-taking improves target-state negotiators' ability to identify a domestic win-set, reach international agreement, and anticipate future crises. Drawing on insights from members of the U.S. hostage-recovery enterprise, we offer a plausibility probe suggesting that perspective-taking affects the process and outcomes of negotiations. Perspective-taking may thus help negotiators better manage power dynamics, navigate informal rules of engagement, alleviate uncertainty, and bolster global security.

173

Reposted by Political Psychology

American University School of Public Affairs @au-spa.bsky.social · 01/06/2026

Congratulations, Liz Suhay! SPA Prof. Elizabeth Suhay is the winner of the Best Book in Political Psychology award from the @ispp-pops.bsky.social for her new book “Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics.” Learn more about the award here: bit.ly/4x0PkF9

2114

Reposted by Political Psychology

mark brandt @mjbsp.bsky.social · 28/05/2026

At Political Psychology (@ispp-pops.bsky.social), we typically publish empirical articles, but we do have other options! One exciting option are Dialogues, that put 2+ books in conversation with one another.

11911

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 18/05/2026

When it comes to public opinion is "What do you think?" better explained by "Do you think?" Tappin & McKay study when opinions are shaped by information, effortful thinking, & party cues. Read for how information minimizes the party effect & the questions to keep thinking on: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 4: Separate party cue and policy information effects at baseline.

073

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 13/05/2026

Can cross-cutting beliefs help dial down polarization? Sander & Degner examine the effects that counterstereotypes (eg, a pro-gun control Republican) have on how partisans view and categorize those opinions. Read open-access for more on their experiments: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Example of the typicality manipulation. The figure shows the last three responses of an example transcript in which the Republican target guest (black boxes) expresses either a stereotype‐disconfirming (upper panel) or stereotype‐confirming (lower panel) opinion on the target issue (affirmative action). The full transcript is available in Supporting Information S3.

Figure 2: Mean categorization scores for Experiment 1. A categorization score of 100 indicates that the person with the target opinion is perceived as definitely belonging to the category associated with that opinion, while a score of 50 indicates they are seen as equally likely to belong to either category. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

001

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 12/05/2026

We know psychological factors & partisan identity both contribute to conspiracy beliefs, but when & how do they work together? Yair et al. study this interaction on political & nonpolitical conspiracies, finding an interaction effect only on the former. Read open-access: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Partisan conspiracy theories – The interaction coefficients. Point estimates are shown, based on the regression results in Tables 1 and 2 and the meta‐analysis, with whiskers representing 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 2: Non‐partisan conspiracy theories – The interaction coefficients. Point estimates are shown, based on the regression results in Table 3 and the meta‐analysis, with whiskers representing 95% confidence intervals.

031

Reposted by Political Psychology

Agustin Blanco @blancobosco.bsky.social · 08/05/2026

❗ New paper out in @ispp-pops.bsky.social! 😯 @bertous.bsky.social and I used a conjoint experiment to investigate whether name-based preferences influence adoption decisions. We take Catalonia as the case study, where linguistic boundaries overlap with contested political identities.

2189

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 04/05/2026

Anyone can say "can't we all just get along?" but *how* is another question. Moritz et al. study the use of metacognitive training (MCT) to reduce hostilities between two polarized voter groups in Germany, with measurable results on both sides of the divide. Read open access: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Change in political hostility scores. Improvement in attitude measured as pre–post difference score.

Figure 2: Change in appraisal of antidemocratic attitude over time.

010

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 21/04/2026

Lions, Tigers, and... Futbol? Oh my! From our April issue, Singh et al. try to isolate the effects of emotion on citizens' satisfaction with democracy through reactions to cultural phenomena like watching The Lion King or experiencing a win/loss for your favorite team. Read online: buff.ly/ifYLPcL

Figure 1: (A) Changes in mood from before to after the Super Bowl according to geographic region. Estimates are from an OLS regression of change in mood on dummies for location and covariates. The horizontal lines indicate 90% confidence intervals. The number of observations is 1407. (B) Changes in mood from before to after the Super Bowl according to preferred team. Estimates are from an OLS regression of change in mood on dummies capturing team support and covariates. The horizontal lines indicate 90% confidence intervals. The number of observations is 1410. (C) Changes in mood from before to after the Super Bowl according to preferred team and level of concern. Estimates are from an OLS regression of change in mood on dummies capturing team support interacted with level of concern about the game's outcome, and covariates. “Weak” indicates a respondent scoring 0 on the 0–10 level of concern measure; “Strong” indicates a score of 10. The horizontal lines indicate 90% confidence intervals. The number of observations is 1408.

Figure 4: Changes in SWD from before to after the Super Bowl according to preferred team and level of concern. Estimates are from an OLS regression of change in SWD on dummies capturing team support interacted with level of concern about the game's outcome, and covariates. “Weak” indicates a respondent scoring 0 on the 0–10 level of concern measure; “Strong” indicates a score of 10. The horizontal lines indicate 90% confidence intervals. The number of observations is 1408.

042

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 14/04/2026

When does national victimhood "expire"? Główczewski et al. study the psychology behind Polish and Greek citizens' support for WWII reparations from Germany. Read their piece from our April issue for their findings on what we can learn when calls for restitution surface doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Indirect effect of national narcissism on support for claiming war reparations from Germany via collective victimhood (Study 1). ***p < .001. Entries are standardized coefficients; total effects are reported without brackets, and the direct effect is reported in brackets. The pattern of results remained similar when we controlled for national identification, political orientation, and assessment of Polish‐German relations.

Figure 2: Indirect effect of national narcissism on support for claiming war reparations from Germany via collective victimhood (Study 2). **p < .01. ***p < .001. Entries are standardized coefficients; total effects are reported without brackets, and the direct effect is reported in brackets.

Figure 3: Tested the structural dual‐mediator model (Study 3b). **p < .01. ***p < .001. Entries are standardized coefficients; total effects are reported without brackets, and the direct effects are reported in brackets.

020

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 10/04/2026

EXTRA! EXTRA! The April issue of Political Psychology is hot off the press! With over 40 amazing articles in this issue, we'll be highlighting each in batches. Check out the classifieds here for the first set we're promoting or check out the full issue online: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14679221...

071

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 31/03/2026

If politics is a party game then why is loneliness on the rise? And what does the loneliness epidemic mean for political attitudes? Langenkamp et al. find a connection between loneliness and heightened perception of threats & conflict in society. Read open-access for more: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Confirmatory factor analysis of social tension. RMSEA = .067, CFI = .978, TLI = .958, χ2 = 1557.347, n = 31,476 (this model was estimated with all available observations, before listwise deletion).

Figure 2: Multilevel regression of perceived social tension. Dots indicate the point estimate, lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 3: Random slopes of loneliness by country. The random slope estimates were added to the fixed coefficient of loneliness to estimate the total effect of loneliness. The lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

01710

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 26/03/2026

Strange bedfellows? Maybe not. The various ideologies observed participating in violent protests may seem incompatible at first glance, but Frenken & Imhoff in our February issue find commonalities that paint a clearer picture of support for violent protests. Open-access: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 2: Means and 95% CI of the variables support for general protest, support for illegal protests, and anger across classes (Study 1, similar pattern in the other studies).

Figure 3: Interaction effect between spirituality and authoritarianism (note 95% CI).

032

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 23/03/2026

Are economic attitudes based on status as direct as we often assume? Burns & Ray find that economic conservatism & welfare policy support is more complicated than high status = high conservative attitudes. Read for more on how the middle class throws a curveball to linear assumptions buff.ly/lgtxaWK

Figure 1: Curvilinear effects of objective SES on economic inequality beliefs (Panel A), government assistance (Panel B), help for needy beliefs (Panel C), and beliefs about poor people (Panel D), Study 1. Data are estimated based on SES scores. Dotted lines represent linear SES effects, and solid lines represent curvilinear SES effects.

Figure 2: Linear and curvilinear effects of SES on economic conservatism (Panel A) and welfare support (Panel B), Study 3. Data are estimated based on SES scores. Dotted lines represent linear SES effects and solid lines represent curvilinear SES effects. Shaded bands represent Standard Errors for point estimates.

Figure 3: Linear and curvilinear effects of SES on economic conservatism (Panel A), welfare support (Panel B), and intolerance of inequality (Panel C), Study 4. Data are estimated based on SES scores. Dotted lines represent linear SES effects, and solid lines represent curvilinear SES effects. Shaded bands represent Standard Errors for point estimates.

071

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 19/03/2026

The UK may have left the EU, but the two sides of the #Brexit debate are still PO'd. Phillips & Stoeckel explore the lingering animus Remainers & Leavers have toward each other & how those feelings manifest in political bias. Read their open-access article for their findings doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Distribution of Brexit group affects among the Leavers and Remainers in each sample.

Figure 3: Affective polarization and support for publication of Brexit in‐group and Brexit out‐group criticism. See Tables A2 and A22 in the Supplementary Material for full models.

054

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 18/03/2026

Protect the dolls AND have it all? Galván-Hernández et al. study feminist support for Spain's Trans Law. They find that win-win messaging bolsters support among feminist women, while conflict narratives increase zero-sum beliefs. Read the full piece open-access for more: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Perceived threat theoretical model. In dotted lines, theoretical constructs; in regular lines, empirical variables tested in our studies.

Figure 2: Timeline of the studies in relation to the approval of the trans law in Spain. Italic = final decision around the specific proposal.

Figure 3: Conditional effects of feminist identification on pro‐trans and collective actions moderated by perceived threat in Studies 1a (Figure A) and 1b (Figure B). Blue line = Mean level of perceived threat; Green line = −1SD below the mean (lower perceived threat); and Red line = +1SD above the mean (higher perceived threat).

074

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 17/03/2026

To conceal or to reveal? Campbell & Williams dive into what drives the decision to share or hide one's identity as Roma. Read open-access to see the 3 motivating factors they identify in this decision & what their work could mean for ethnic & minority populations more broadly doi.org/10.1111/pops...

032

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 16/03/2026

With rising populism and affective polarization globally, are the two entwined? Stefanelli & Castanho Silva explore in their paper from our Feburary issue and find that the relationship isn't as straightforward as we might assume. Read for more on their findings doi.org/10.1111/pops...

176

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 16/03/2026

What can political angst reveal about efforts to redress past wrongs? Wenzel et al. describe 2 types of angst (collective & empathetic collective) in the Australian Indiginous Voice referendum. Read their findings & what they mean for empowering historically victimized groups doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Moderations by perceived material meaning of the effects of (A) collective angst and (B) empathetic collective angst (simple slopes with 95% confidence interval bands).

Figure 2: Latent true change models for collective angst and empathetic collective angst, with political orientation as covariate and voting intention (depicted here or actual vote) as predictor variable.

012

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 09/03/2026

What can affective styles reveal about emotion's role in politics? Nielsen & Mønster suggest pushing beyond the Big 5 to better understand the relationship between why people "adjust, conceal, or tolerate" & social trust. More on these styles in their February article for us doi.org/10.1111/pops...

032

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 24/02/2026

What effect does politician corruption have on the publics they serve? Ramos et al. explore in their paper from this month's issue. Read the full piece for their findings on corruption's toll on perceived morality & justice of society & what it means for people's well-being. doi.org/10.1111/pops...

053

Reposted by Political Psychology

Nate Micatka @nmicatka.bsky.social · 23/02/2026

Check out the thread below about my new article with @fatiherol.bsky.social and @aleksks.bsky.social in @ispp-pops.bsky.social ! We show that better sleep quality is associated with being more likely to vote, but that poor sleep quality leads to more engagement in non-electoral political acts.

072

Reposted by Political Psychology

Fatih Erol @fatiherol.bsky.social · 19/02/2026

New in @ispp-pops.bsky.social: “Waking up to politics: How sleep quality relates to political participation”: doi.org/10.1111/pops... With @nmicatka.bsky.social & @aleksks.bsky.social, we examined how sleep quality relates to voter turnout & non-electoral participation across multiple countries.🧵1/8

1158

Reposted by Political Psychology

[Christopher M. Federico] @chrispps.bsky.social · 17/02/2026

now out at @ispp-pops.bsky.social from me, Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, and Tomasz Baran, "Rebels without a cause: Collective narcissism and political contrarianism" -->

022

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 17/02/2026

Is narcissism bad for democracy? Federico et al. examine the relationship between collective narcissism and politically contrarian attitudes ("need for chaos" & "anti-establishment"). Read the full piece for their full findings and what they mean for democracy. doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Figure 1: Coefficient plots: NFC and AE as a function of national CN and IS (Study 1). Plot based on estimates in Table S2.

Figure 2: Coefficient plots: NFC and AE as a function of GN, VN, national CN, and national IS (Study 2). Plot based on estimates in Table S5.

Figure 3: Coefficient plots: NFC and AE as a function of GN, VN, national CN, and national IS (Study 3, Wave 1). Plot based on estimates in Table S8.

162

Reposted by Political Psychology

Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 09/02/2026

The algorithmic curation of information online can exacerbate polarization and support the spread of misinformation. This review makes the case that social media algorithms amplify content from extreme parties, especially the far right, and threatens democracy. www.science.org/doi/full/10....

1147

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 10/02/2026

February is here, and so is the latest issue of Political Psychology! We'll be highlighting all 12 special issue articles and 14 original articles throughout the month, but if you can't wait to see what's in store, check out the full issue now! buff.ly/l4gb7cg

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Political Psychology: Volume 47, Issue 1

033

Reposted by Political Psychology

ISPP @polpsyispp.bsky.social · 15/12/2025

Call for ISPP 2026 Awards Nominations ISPP’s nominations process for all 2026 Awards is now open. We encourage members to recognize outstanding contributions to the field by submitting a nomination. Award recipients will be honored during the 2026 ISPP

112

Reposted by Political Psychology

ISPP @polpsyispp.bsky.social · 02/02/2026

Registration is now open for International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP)’s 49th Annual Scientific Meeting, taking place 16-19 July 2026 in Newcastle, United Kingdom. 👉 Register here: bit.ly/isppannualme...

032

Reposted by Political Psychology

ISPP @polpsyispp.bsky.social · 04/02/2026

Applications are open for the 2026 ISPP Academy! The International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP) Academy takes place July 13–15, 2026 at the University of Newcastle, UK. Deadline: March 1, 2026 Apply here: bit.ly/3LTXX1E

023

Reposted by Political Psychology

ISPP @polpsyispp.bsky.social · 06/02/2026

📣 Applications Now Open: ISPP 2026 Early Career Scholar Travel Awards ISPP is pleased to announce the 2026 Early Career Scholar Travel Awards, supporting early career researchers to attend ISPP's Annual Meeting in Newcastle. For more information and to apply, visit docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

155

Political Psychology @ispp-pops.bsky.social · 29/01/2026

How much does extremism—independent of ideology—determine participation in collective action? Marinthe et al. present two studies in their paper from our December issue that suggest extremism could play a role in the intention to and act of participating. Full paper: doi.org/10.1111/pops...

Relationship between political ideology and collective action intentions (Study 1). The shaded area represents the 95% CI.

Relationship between political ideology and collective action intentions (Study 2). The shaded area represents the 95% CI.

111