朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 08/04/2026Using the term ratioed while calling someone else a loser is a case of pot and kettle. 100
Reposted by 朱熹研究天理Sam Crane @uselesstree.bsky.social · 07/04/2026We’ve known what Trump is for decades: an inhuman charlatan, totally devoid of empathy and compassion. A moral monster. Yet conservatives and Republicans defend him and invest him with power, a power that he now threatens the world with. They are as much to blame for the current catastrophe as he. 071
Reposted by 朱熹研究天理Chenchen Zhang 🤦🏻♀️ @chenchenzhang.net · 06/04/2026anyhow it's an old book and the term isn't well known or widely used at all. critical scholars & activists who bring together XJ & Palestine today are not using it or saying they're equivalent, but rather make comparisons, connections & build transnational solidarity beyond geopolitical binary. 1132
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 07/04/2026I don’t refuse to explain why my statement is correct, the explanation comes from the OP and my comment. If you can’t connect the two, then I’m not going to move forward in the conversation. You’ve failed to actually argue against what I said, and instead ask me to repeat, which is what I refuse. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 07/04/2026Telling you that you didn’t understand something, then giving you a hint to clarify meaning isn’t a ad hominem. Yeah, I was mean, but you were stupid (again, not an ad hominem, just a statement of fact). 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 07/04/2026Again with the shitty reading ability. Where did I call Kamala a radical? 100
Reposted by 朱熹研究天理Joel S. @joelhs.bsky.social · 06/04/2026"All people should go back to the land where their ancestors lived" is in fact a deeply reactionary political sentiment, no matter how much you may try to dress it up as progressive and liberatory. 401231191
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026The above shows otherwise dude. The fact that 35% of registered voters didn’t vote also shows that. Do you think that if the 35% did vote it’ll all go to Trump? There wasn’t a stay home campaign on the right, but there was on the left. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026Do you think Kamala’s dealings with Israel would be the same as trump’s? I mean come on man. This is why I don’t engage with bad faith actors. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026I never said vote for a blue candidate regardless of their position. You’re making things up and acting in bad faith. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026Because you didn’t understand my comment enough to ask a question. You still don’t. You’re an idiot. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026It answered her own question. “How tf did this happen” well there was a huge contingency of leftists who actively work against progressivism. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026The main point here is the user the post is about said in 2024 said “hope she loses” meaning Kamala loses to Trump, while also not supporting Trump. She defaulted to Trump purposefully and acknowledged it in 2024 that that’s what she was doing. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026Yes it does. If you don’t vote, it’s fair to say you defaulted to the winner, and also fair to say that you don’t support the winner. The point is that you can’t say the ~35% that didn’t vote supports Trump, while at the same time placing blame on some of them for making this vote a purity test. 101
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026My part unless you show that you are willing to work with me instead of just being contradictory (you haven’t), in the latter your just going to comment with what basically amounts to a catch phrase to get likes. So what motivation do I have to leave 4+ comments when I can just say “reread my 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026(I need three now) stupid this website is at engaging in argumentation, and that’s the reason I don’t often do it to bad faith actors. I’m wasting my time writing something that you either lack the capacity to understand or refuse to do the work to read, in the former case this is wasted effort on 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026Here I’ll be generous: not voting means your vote defaults to the winner, so even if you don’t support a candidate who won you would still have voted for them. The fact Kamala lost is the reason “not voting for Trump” is different from “not voting for Kamala.” The fact I need two tweets shows how 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026No, you don’t lol. Reread my first comment again — this is the only answer I can give. Unless you show that you’re willing to engage in good faith then I’m not going to argue. Asking such a question is either arguing in bad faith or because you lack basic reasoning skills. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026No, I understand the question, which is why I’m pointing out it’s irrelevant to what I said. You didn’t understand what I said and it’s very clearly written. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 05/04/2026That’s a weird question, gotta be honest. You also didn’t understand what I clearly wrote. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Nah, it just came so out of left field with so little substance that my gut reaction was to laugh, and the fact that the moderation team had manually tagged you as rude is just funny. 100
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026If you’ve ever had native Chinese food… hard pass. 001
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Granted, she was about 30% behind he male colleagues the entire time. As is tradition 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026You would be able to understand anything of substance 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Not really. I’m just pointing out that your trolling isn’t really good. You come across as an idiot and not in the way a troll wants to be. 010
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Yeah, because I’m not going to put in the work of clarifying to someone who is either arguing in bad faith or not willing to learn. I had offered to help you understand my comment but you’ve doubled down and ignored my offers, so why would I clarify instead of keep pointing out that you’re an idiot? 000
Reposted by 朱熹研究天理Dr Mark | 北马克 |🍉🇦🇺🇲🇾🇹🇭 @ajaanmark.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Catholics made the right choice by reading the Old Testament against its literal reading as a prefiguration of Christ because there's some very disturbing stuff in there if you take it literally! 1121
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Seriously, if you wanted to engage with my argument, you would’ve asked for clarification when I said “you didn’t understand my comment.” Instead if of doubling down. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026I’m not defending my argument right now, I’m saying you didn’t understand the argument I presented, and to me that’s because you lack reading comprehension. You doubled down on your point which solidifies what I thought. Again, your reading comprehension is a bigger problem. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026I’m not insulting you, I’m telling you that you didn’t understand the comment. The third grade reading level wasn’t something I made up, but based on actual rubrics of “if you didn’t understand this, it would put you below this reading level.” 220
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026It’s not an accusation, I’m telling you that you didn’t understand my comment to the point that I feel your reading comprehension is a much bigger problem here. If you had actually understood what I said then I would address that, but you need help understanding some very basic writing. 000
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Bro, you are literally struggling to understand a comment of less than 50 words, I think you need help. As in, you need to have a teacher walk you through my comment like you’re in elementary school. I’m not kidding. I’m actually dumbing this comment down so you understand it. How old are you? 160
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026No, but you did just put on display the fact that you lack competent reading skills. If you need me to I can walk you through a comment that requires a third grade reading level. 060
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Had an argument with someone about how a news article was making a point that international students are economically beneficial because they pay more than natives, they thought it was complaining about native students. 010
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Both a great example of why “not voting for Harris is voting for Trump” and “not everyone who didn’t vote supports Trump.” These things are true at the same time, and the radical left is as much to blame from Trump as the moderate right. 2291
Reposted by 朱熹研究天理Chenchen Zhang 🤦🏻♀️ @chenchenzhang.net · 04/04/2026"Wang analyzes the making of homeownership ideologies through "inflexible demand" (gangxu)—a concept that real estate brokers, developers, homebuyers, and the govt use to craft homeownership as indispensable for fulfilling dreams of urban citizenship" www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501...cornellpress.cornell.eduAnxious Homes by Mengqi Wang | Paperback | Cornell University PressAnxious Homes is a study of the power that shapes the forms of the homes Chinese citizens strive for and the possible paths they may take to realize their home ownership dreams. Mengqi Wang discusses.... 0122
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 04/04/2026Sometimes I cringe at the political views I held as a teenager/young adult, but then I remember I never identified as a libertarian #blessed. 010
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 01/04/2026“it’s not okay to lynch people, unless I agree with it.” Seems to be a motto for the terminally online left at this point. Makes it hard to wonder why they don’t make any progress in America. 030
朱熹研究天理 @iacobusstudies.bsky.social · 31/03/2026Isn’t the whole thing about Batman being a foil to Superman. Whereas Batman truly is Batman, and not Bruce, Superman is Clark, and not really Superman. 140
