iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Kilopower a micro reactor that has been worked for atleast a decade under different names. Berillium reflection reactor with carbon parts and heat pipes to drive sterling engines for electricity. Ps: moon is dark for 14 days.

000

Indeed it doesn't for half the time 14 days. And it's very cold.

000

I Love Science! @ilovescience.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Because you can inform yourself trough science-based dat and understand, the fear is irrational.

000

Reposted by GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏

Getting away from the linear-no-threshold hypothesis

011

Lcoe is a false definer to use between different energy types. And completely a nogo on variable versus demand driven capacity. The grid recipe only works optimal with a balanced set of ingredients.

For those semi-enviromentalists*, that still exclude nuclear. Change your mindset.

000

For 3x to 4x the longevity and much higher capacity factor.

100

Nuclear isn't a chemical energy. It's magnitude more effecient and it doesn't emmit.

110

Not to mention those stable energy sources are are also heat sources we need for industry. Wind solar are nice for displacement. Replacement is a step beyond that.

000

Build and launch it towards the moon. It's know ûnder the development Name, kilopower. The timeline most likely is optomistic, for every element of this moonbase programm

000

Radical no and why. It's finished and will be used for permanent storage. Also many ways to recycle and repurpuse spend fuel. It's much more a resource then an end product.

The leading scientist are actually connected to Anti- nuclear groups or did I guess wrong.

000

Fearmongering is easy with limited knowledge, about what it will be. Ps: kilopower

000

Was that a heating source, or as an experiment source?

100

Left Foot Forward @left-foot-forward.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

What the Fins are doing. Science prevails.

100

Reposted by GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏

The Green Party has voted to abandon its long-running opposition to nuclear power

leftfootforward.org

Green Party abandons opposition to nuclear power

A major shift in policy

63612

Yes you can, other green parties have done it.

000

Nice to see science braking trough, not the first green party to acknowledge this.

041

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

That doesn't really explain how and why enough. There is almost zero CO2 capture equipment integration. The infrastructure to transfer. And as last the gigantic location to store this aren't ready. Secondary we might want to use ccs for the difficult industries that need to decarbonise. Concrete

100

Not cheapest, there low cost. Not perse cheap. Ps: not for or against, just a consultation, now where removing fossil.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

I think its a data error. Also a lot of fossil. www.elia.be/nl/grid-data...

elia.be

Emil Jacobs - Collectifission @collectifission.greennuclear.online.ap.brid.gy · 02/10/2026

Many "enviromental" groups ran with it!

000

Reposted by GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏

My comments: This puts first-of-a-kind new nuclear as CHEAPER than offshore wind in one of the best areas for offshore wind in the world: the North Sea. The Dutch government is currently preparing a tender where it’ll offer up to €114 per MWh (indexed to 2025) for IJmuiden Ver Gamma-B, a plot […]

greennuclear.online

Original post on greennuclear.online

013

Adverted point, not the subject. PS: not a production source.

000

Sure they can there also invest in gasplants and to convert them to hydrogen. Yet that wasn't the article, you missed that it's a European investment figure. Where they benefit from other countries including nuclear under netzero for 2040 goals.

000

We don't know if anyone one is real, your attempt is just a point of distraction from the topic, a tactic.

100

blabla, is it helping the climate goals, Yes. is it increasing while you say it has no value, Yes. So it's natural to include it in the sustainable goals of the EU instead of excluding it! As per starting topic.

100

What numbers, you're probalby talk about percentages, not TWh. And then some ad hominen, valued addition to my point I guess! As for the numbers: In 2025 nuclear plants supplied 2702 TWh of electricity, up from 2667 TWh in 2024. Highest number ever, even with the German Climate Sabotage of 24GW!

000

What numbers, you're probalby talk about percentages, not TWh. And then some ad hominen, valued addition to my point I guess!

201

That's nonsense, you can keep repeating it. The climate accords demand it. And the growing coalition of countries that go for atleast a tripling of capacity are pushing ahead. Without nuclear for electricity and industrial scale heat/steam we will not achieve netzero.

100

Bechtel steps away from TerraPower project

Terrapower - Bechtel. How it was brought by anti-nuclear was as if the project was given up and dead. It's a bump, finding a new contractor for remaining work. Much has been done and will, terrapower keeps to there schedule. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/bec...

world-nuclear-news.org

TerraPower says it intends to rebid the engineering, procurement and construction contract for the project to build the first-of-a-kind Natrium reactor in Kemmerer, Wyoming, following the two companie...

000

Anti-nuclear groups and people are practice Anti-climate. There only interested in there own goals.

110

Oh the bloody anti-nuclear anti-science groups are still busy. There should be no mark for RE, only a mark for sustainable electricity. The anti-nuclear groups keep harming the climate goals.

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

So you work against climate action, thats how I see that.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Luckily nuclear has incesased it's output again to its highest level. A welcome climate action.

000

Reposted by GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏

World Nuclear News @worldnuclearnews.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

A $120 billion framework agreement to build six Westinghouse AP1000 units and two of South Korea's APR1400 units in the USA has been outlined by the US Department of Commerce. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/usa...

world-nuclear-news.org

USA, South Korea targeting six AP1000 and two APR1400 units

A USD120 billion framework agreement to build six Westinghouse AP1000 units and two of South Korea's APR1400 units in the USA has been outlined by the US Department of Commerce.  ;

042

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Nonsense, they don't use up wat, they use a small percentage and releasit at a slightly higher temperature. Reducing fossil ofcourse, for obvious other scientific reasons

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Helium or CO² can be used in those graphite moderated designs. The gas is used as the first loop for temperature transfer towards the second loop and or steam generators. Britain still has some gas cooled reactors. And there are new 4th gen reactors that are going for gascooled designs.