iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 8h

nuclear is actually is a very safe and sustainable way of producing heat and electricity.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

Because you can inform yourself trough science-based dat and understand, the fear is irrational.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

Nuclear isn't a chemical energy. It's magnitude more effecient and it doesn't emmit.

110

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 07/09/2026

That's the fear talking not the reality.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 30/08/2026

New nuclear should have been build out much sooner. It's a shame how much fossil has increased, while nuclear could have been build back then too.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 30/08/2026

It's not zero, weird that you claim these inaccurate numbers.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

To really get everything we use and consume we need much more energy, not just electricity, if we want the world to get to netzero. So how much more nuclear will we need.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

Nuclear is a sustainable energy source and part of the necessary transition towards netzero.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 22/08/2026

nuclearpoweryesplease.org/en/ The best version

010

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 21/08/2026

It should have been approved far earlier and for several decades. In addition new nuclear should be added, especially for the industrial sector and to replace materials not directly for more electricity.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 18/08/2026

Yes it is. Enough data to show why nuclear is a part of the global effort to get towards netzero. Impacts of the climate warming are on all energy sources, depending on many factors. As for France yes, there still exporting continuously to provided the rest of Europe with there electrcity.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 17/08/2026

You are misinformed. And seem to mis the context to other sources of electricity. And how we will need a complete netzero system, that's also reliable. 3 slides of data.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 13/08/2026

I'll will. Because we can't achieve netzero without. That's energy, still need to add petroleum material alternatives hydrogen and fertilizer.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 08/08/2026

Coal actually produces a lot of radiation material. Also trough that it uses so much to produce the same energy.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 03/08/2026

Include nuclear as does the entire EU. Solar and also has less performance in these heatwaves especially wind. Excluding nuclear is the same as promoting fossil. GP needs to change it's not 1970 anymore.

010

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 03/08/2026

They also do that, but have a look at the low capacity factor that gas during high pressure domes and this heat. The European grid is helping Hungary out with imports.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 03/08/2026

For everyone that questions a bit of nuclear now. Reminder that during this HP weather, windfarms produce single digit capacity. Solar also suffers capacity efeciency during panel temperatures above 20C Hungary now gets it's electricity trough imports. We'll need to adapt from decades ago.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 02/08/2026

I am op the opnion the recuring constant RE vs Nuclear started from the anti-nuclear era and when the coal/oil/gas, where starting to boom. It lingers and returns. So beside electricity nuclear is there for industrial size applications, with heat/steam at volume.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

Not using nuclear instead of fossil has lead to the massive increase in fossil in the last 4-5 decades.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

Yes nuclear energy and the storage of spend fuel is very safe.

200

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

Remove the ban and let the opputunity exist. Nuclear is an industrial energy source for massive hydrogen and or steam generation.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

This is false standpoint, could this be from the decades of public misinformation

001

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

No, the decades of misinformation has lead us to choose for fossil in the last 40 years. Without nuclear we won't get far enough. Also think beyond electricity.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 25/07/2026

In France the grid also doing fine. There exporting 15GW of electricity when needed.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 25/07/2026

It's a terrible angle. On nuclear, Information isn't right either. Yes reduced, though only where needed. France exports 15GW if the demand is there across the borders. Throttled down for the weekend.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 20/07/2026

Faster with the areas and solutions we are addressing are widespread, not a choice of what we like to do or not. The problem is more dramatic. And we like to do it without leaving people behind wo are still in poverty.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 17/07/2026

It's sustainable, IPCC, EU-taxonomy. If needed i'll show the graphs below to those interested.

010

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 14/07/2026

The next 6 reactors in France are being build on the West-Coast. Is also said SMR as they can even be a passive design, where no open water system is needed. Or just need a much smaller amount of water cooling as the are 1/20th-1/4th of the existing reactors capacity.

Export of electricity in France during Juli 9-10. This was in the period of extreme heat.

10 to over 15 GW still being exported
Mainly from nuclear

110

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 13/07/2026

It isn't so bleek. Compact material, with only a small part of the running cost, interval of 12-18 months. Not also use nuclear energy as one the sources is going to keep us away from a netzero world.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 12/07/2026

Frankreich exportierte viele GW, auch zu Deutschland.

111

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 12/07/2026

Are we still doing this frame. With nuclear there will be no netzero. The challenge is so extensive.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 10/07/2026

Unwanted, not a problem. France is still exporting up to 15+ GW.

010

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 08/07/2026

We need to do so much more to get to netzero and fully off fossil.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 03/07/2026

It is good news. For everything we do we need to do something else. It all has an impact. Fearmongering is not useful.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 01/07/2026

On fusion, not cold fusion, yes that will be a useful addition after 2050. Our current world energy needs are already high, they will become higher.

000

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

Nuclear is one of those sustainable energy sources. And Canada is pretty good with that, also very domestically sourced.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

The existing spend nuclear fuel in the USA alone could be used to power there entire country for 100 years. There is enough nuclear material for the world for eons. The energy density and different reactor types are the clue in this.

100

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 27/06/2026

Well that sentiment is still around It's based on decades disinformation imho. I often show these graphs to put it into perspective. And we won't achieve netzero (not just electricity) without nuclear

110

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

No fossil keeps capital. Nuclear is a investment in diversification. And not also doing other choices like nuclear geothermal hydro here and there we will not get to netzero. Also investment in grid capacity. We aren't even near netzero

210

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 18/06/2026

Building more Candu 's would be the way.

010

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 08/06/2026

Greenpeace is a lobby club, with certain goals and in my opinion not based on science. Some relevant graphs:

011

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 08/06/2026

Still one of the dumbest ideas, excluding nuclear energy (not just electricity) And with this Greenpeace is acting against a netzero world for decades. The task ahead is only getting more difficult. And to act against these concerns, they'll just switch to other arguments or real disinformation.

122

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 08/06/2026

010

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 04/06/2026

Yet they also did and helped feed the decades of disinformation about those. Resulting almost no new builds for decades. And a gigantic growth in energy, we can't seem to get away from and creating a global worsening climate crisis.

020

GP500 🇺🇦📊⚛️☕🙏 @gp5.bsky.social · 02/06/2026

Nope, nuclear is one of those sustainable sources. We are far away from being netzero. Not only in electricity.

100