Sign in

Geoffrey A. Fowler

@geoffreyfowler.bsky.social
13K followers 1.7K following 132 posts

Tech Columnist at The Washington Post. Geoffrey.Fowler@washpost.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Want to follow along? You can sign up for emails from the Institute here: institute.commonsensemedia.org
institute.commonsensemedia.org
Common Sense Media
Common Sense Media protects and prepares kids in the digital era, leading the way to a healthier childhood.
071
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
After years of testing tech as a journalist / reviewer, I’ll now get to work with a big team of researchers, computer scientists, doctors, psychologists and educators. We'll have the resources and technical expertise to keep up with the AI industry and hold it accountable.
232
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
My preschooler already asks to use the Gemini app on my phone. He gets mesmerized by AI-generated videos that blur the line between real and fake. Most American teens are already much deeper in — using AI for homework, creativity, advice, companionship and escape.
121
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
My role is to be a kind of editor at large for the new Institute. I’ve spent much of my career investigating how tech actually works in people’s lives—not just how companies say it works. Now I’m bringing that same approach to a question that feels urgent to me as both a journalist and a father.
111
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
This work is neither pro-AI nor anti-AI. It's pro-kid. I’m doing this because “trust us” is not good enough for AI products, especially when the users are kids — still forming their judgment, identities and relationships with the world.
121
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
The goal is to do something that doesn’t really exist yet: systematically test the AI products kids use, set youth safety standards and publicly evaluate which products meet them. Think: crash-test ratings for AI. Read about it today @cnn.com www.cnn.com/2026/05/05/t...
static.klipy.com
Crash Test Dummies Thumbs Up
ALT: Crash Test Dummies Thumbs Up
111
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Some news: After 25 years in newsrooms at @washingtonpost.com & @wsj.com, I’m helping launch a new research and testing institute to answer one of the most urgent tech questions of our time: What is AI doing to kids? It’s called the Youth AI Safety Institute at Common Sense Media bit.ly/4tT6FOp
geoffreyfowler.substack.com
What is AI doing to our kids? I’m going to find out.
After 12 years as a tech columnist, I'm helping launch the new Youth AI Safety Institute to test the AI products shaping childhood.
13513
Reposted by Geoffrey A. Fowler
evacide @evacide.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Meta thinks now is a great time to launch facial recognition surveillance tech in their creepy glasses because EFF will be too distracted by fascism to notice. We noticed. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
eff.org
Seven Billion Reasons for Facebook to Abandon its Face Recognition Plans
Meta’s analysis that it can avoid scrutiny by releasing a privacy invasive product during a time of political crisis is craven and morally bankrupt. It is also dead wrong.
301807683
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Wow: Meta has been working on plans to add facial recognition technology to its AI smart glasses. nyti.ms/3Os1oxf And this was the company’s cynical view on when, and how, to do it:
28751351
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Look up what ChatGPT thinks about where you live at inequalities.ai. And check out my Substack for more examples and my take on what it means: geoffreyfowler.substack.com/p/chatgpt-bias
geoffreyfowler.substack.com
ChatGPT thinks your state is dumb. Or lazy. Or ugly. See for yourself.
Making ChatGPT’s bias visible — and personal — is powerful.
240
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
ChatGPT's bias isn't just academic — it bleeds into everyday answers. I asked it to write a story about a kid growing up in Mississippi. The character became a public defender. Same prompt set in New York? The kid became an architect.
120
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Many of the patterns in ChatGPT's responses track racial and economic stereotypes. Mississippi — the state with the most Black residents — ranked as having the laziest people. Globally, sub-Saharan African countries clustered at the bottom on nearly every positive measure.
100
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Some findings: When forced, ChatGPT says Nashville is tops for friendliness. New Orleans is the smelliest. Laredo, Texas, ranks last on pizza. And ChatGPT thinks San Francisco — where I live — is filled with "more annoying" and "sluttier" people.
110
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Researchers at Oxford and the University of Kentucky hit ChatGPT with over 20 million questions, each forcing it to compare two places. Which city has friendlier people? Which has smellier people? Which has the worst pizza? The result: a map of the stereotypes buried in ChatGPT's training data.
110
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
NEW by me: ChatGPT thinks the South has stupider people. It thinks sub-Saharan Africa has the worst-quality food on earth. And it thinks the whiter your neighborhood, the more attractive the people. New research lets you see ChatGPT's hidden biases about YOUR community. 🧵 bit.ly/4asLD0x
geoffreyfowler.substack.com
ChatGPT thinks your state is dumb. Or lazy. Or ugly. See for yourself.
Making ChatGPT’s bias visible — and personal — is powerful.
2279
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
A must-read about the bait and switch of ads on ChatGPT from someone who quit OpenAI over them: www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/o... If you start seeing any ads in your chats, please take a screenshot and let me know.
nytimes.com
Opinion | OpenAI Is Making the Mistakes Facebook Made. I Quit.
081
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
For 8 years my stories had to include: "Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post, but I review all technology with the same critical eye." Not anymore. My first Substack is about what it was like covering Amazon while Bezos paid my salary—and why tech accountability matters more than ever bit.ly/4rAmcRn
bit.ly
The truth about covering tech at Bezos’s Washington Post
And why ‘We the users’ matters more than ever
76016
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 07/02/2026
Thank you for flagging! Yes, we changed the address
010
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 07/02/2026
Update: Changed the address of my Substack. It’s now substack.com/@geoffreyfow...
substack.com
Geoffrey Fowler | Substack
Technology journalist and digital rights advocate, formerly tech columnist at The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal
090
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
I took this photo back in 2019, on the day I helped open the Post’s first real San Francisco bureau. Most of that office was cut today. (No idea if they're gonna keep the bureau.)
3391
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
I plan to keep fighting for “We the users” of technology. And if you’re part of an organization that could make use of my expertise in tech, policy or investigations, I’d love to hear from you. I’m geoffreyfowler.88 on Signal.
6314
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
After 8 years writing the tech column @washingtonpost.com, I am among folks who were laid off today. I’m grateful for the stories I got to tell and the impact we made on privacy, sustainability & AI. You can keep following my work on my new (free) Substack geoffreyafowler.substack.com
geoffreyafowler.substack.com
Geoffrey's Substack | Geoffrey Fowler | Substack
My personal Substack. Click to read Geoffrey's Substack, by Geoffrey Fowler, a Substack publication. Launched 16 hours ago.
2439394
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
AI will transform medicine.
But today’s chatbots are overselling what they can safely do with your body data. I walked away more worried — not more informed. My full @washingtonpost.com column here (gift link): wapo.st/49GEASP
wapo.st
Column | I let ChatGPT analyze a decade of my Apple Watch data. Then I called my doctor.
I gave the new ChatGPT Health access to 29 million steps and 6 million heartbeat measurements. It drew questionable conclusions that changed each time I asked.
0151
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
ChatGPT isn’t alone. Anthropic’s Claude also now lets you import Apple Watch data.
It graded me a C — using many of the same shaky assumptions. Both bots say they’re “not doctors.” But that isn’t stopping them from providing personal health analysis. That disconnect is the real danger.
1131
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
I asked @erictopol.bsky.social to look at ChatGPT’s analysis. His view: “This is not ready for any medical advice.” The bot leaned heavily on Apple Watch VO₂ max estimate—which independent studies show can run ~13% low on average—and treated fuzzy metrics like hard facts.
1458
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
The more I used ChatGPT Health, the worse its answers got. When I asked it the same heart-health question repeatedly, its analysis changed. My grade bounced back and forth between F and a B. Same data, same body. Different answers.
3141
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
You can now connect ChatGPT to an Apple Watch. So I imported 29 mil steps & 6 mil heartbeats into the new ChatGPT Health. It graded my heart health an F. ⁉️ Cardiologist @erictopol.bsky.social called it “baseless.” Any bot claiming to give health insights shouldn’t be this clueless. Even in beta. 🧵
79334
Reposted by Geoffrey A. Fowler
Eric Topol @erictopol.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
The performance of the newly released ChatGPT Health, via a thorough assessment by @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social with his health data, is very disappointing gift link wapo.st/49GEASP
wapo.st
Column | I let ChatGPT analyze a decade of my Apple Watch data. Then I called my doctor.
I gave the new ChatGPT Health access to 29 million steps and 6 million heartbeat measurements. It drew questionable conclusions that changed each time I asked.
611540
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
If you do just one thing to protect your privacy while using AI tools, do this: Use temporary chats. The buttons look like this.
052
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
You can do something about it: In this @washingtonpost.com column, I've got a clickable guide to the privacy settings experts agree we should be using on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and Meta AI. wapo.st/44LNJXc
wapo.st
Column | ChatGPT’s year-end review knows way too much. How to fix your privacy settings.
A clickable guide to fixing the complicated privacy settings for ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini and Meta AI.
162
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
The most-popular chatbots are, by default, keeping files on you that can: * target you with ads * manipulate you * train their AI * potentially be accessed by lawyers or governments
133
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
ChatGPT now has a Spotify Wrapped-style "Your Year with ChatGPT." Cute — until you realize it only works because OpenAI has been logging everything you've been chatting about all year. Could you imagine Google reminding you it knows everything you've searched for? wapo.st/44LNJXc
12914
Reposted by Geoffrey A. Fowler
Kevin Schaul @kevinschaul.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
I partnered with @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social to test a bunch of AI editing tools, and something ~very interesting~ happened. We asked Gemini to generate a professional photo of an actor crying at the Oscars. It did — including a fake copyright notice from a real AP photographer.
AI-generated imageZoom in on the lower left, which reads AP PHOTO/CHRIS PIZZELLO
94316
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Want to check all the test images yourself? See the whole story here with a $4 day pass to the Post: 👇 www.washingtonpost.com/technology/i...
washingtonpost.com
Review | We asked five AIs to give The Rock hair, draw fingers and delete an ex. Only one was a clear winner.
Tap through our test to see which AI tool generated the best images according to our judges: an artist, a Pulitzer-winning photographer and a photo-retouching master.
200
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
The big takeaway: Google has a lead on image generation, for now, particularly because of how it edits existing images. And its realism is getting to a level that raises serious concerns about becoming an “misinformation superspreader."
141
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
What about the new ChatGPT Images 1.5 model that just came on today? It missed our test cut-off, but I checked the same prompts again and … it still couldn’t beat Gemini. Here it removed someone from a photo, but left phantom fingers on Kristen Stewart’s side.
120
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Also, it’s worth noting all the tools defaulted to making the subject a white man — and Meta AI even decided on its own to make someone who looks like Leonardo DiCaprio 😅.
130
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
But wait: If you look close, Gemini also included a tiny fake “credit” using the name of a real AP photographer. The judges gave it high scores for realism, but a zero for ethics. (Neither Google nor AP answered our questions about whether it had rights to train on AP pictures.)
140
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Here’s how the bots created a “professional photograph” that “captures raw emotion” of an actor crying “tears of joy” after winning an Oscar.
110
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Meta AI and Adobe Firefly struggled — especially on realism and anatomical accuracy. Some outputs looked very off, like strange objects in weird places. They still made hands that were distorted or had too many digits.
100
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
🥇 Google’s Gemini 3 Nano Banana Pro came out on top on every test — producing the most convincing edits and realistic compositions.
100
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
@kevinschaul.bsky.social and I gave ChatGPT, Gemini, Adobe Firefly, ByteDance Seedream and Meta AI the same 5 image tasks — including edits, emotional portraits, and making original “art.” Expert judges scored them blind. www.washingtonpost.com/technology/i...
washingtonpost.com
Review | We asked five AIs to give The Rock hair, draw fingers and delete an ex. Only one was a clear winner.
Tap through our test to see which AI tool generated the best images according to our judges: an artist, a Pulitzer-winning photographer and a photo-retouching master.
120
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
🚀 We tested 5 leading AI image generators @washingtonpost.com to see which tool is truly the best at editing & creating visuals. From adding bangs to The Rock to removing people from photos — the results might surprise you 🧵👇
19138
Reposted by Geoffrey A. Fowler
Will Oremus @willoremus.com · 04/12/2025
New: AI chatbots can change voters' minds, according to a pair of in-depth studies published just now in Science and Nature. How they do it is interesting — and concerning. Gift link: wapo.st/49RSstP
wapo.st
Voters’ minds are hard to change. AI chatbots are surprisingly good at it.
New research suggests AI chatbots can shift people’s political views more effectively than campaign ads on TV.
817083
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Uber charged me $77. Lyft charged $49. Same ride. Same minute. I ran 80 tests @washingtonpost.com to find out why—and discovered a few things that could save you hundreds of $$. Use this link to read it, or buy a Day Pass to The Post: www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
172
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
The Post analyzed 47,000 public ChatGPT conversations. While 35% use it for info and 11% for coding, the most striking finding? The emotional intimacy. ChatGPT: "You're not crazy sweetheart — you're just early." Use this link to read it with a $4 day pass to @washingtonpost.com: bit.ly/47QOjUb
84613
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 22/10/2025
ChatGPT’s new Atlas browser doesn’t just see what you read — it remembers it. @eff.org’s Lena Cohen showed me it even logged “memories” of her looking for *abortion care* and her doctor’s name. Out-surveils even Chrome. My @washingtonpost.com column: wapo.st/49bOcVC
wapo.st
Column | ChatGPT just came out with its own web browser. Use it with caution.
OpenAI’s Atlas promises AI-powered convenience. The price? Letting ChatGPT track and store “memories” of what you do online.
34452328
Reposted by Geoffrey A. Fowler
Will Oremus @willoremus.com · 04/08/2025
Meta fired its fact-checkers, citing concerns of liberal bias, and replaced them with a version of X's "Community Notes." How's that going? Well, my coworker @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social proposed 65 fact-checks debunking false posts... and only 3 got approved. www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
washingtonpost.com
Column | Zuckerberg fired the fact-checkers. We tested their replacement.
Our tech columnist drafted 65 community notes, Meta’s new crowdsourced system to fight falsehoods. It failed to make a dent.
10344150
Reposted by Geoffrey A. Fowler
Alexios Mantzarlis @mantzarlis.com · 04/08/2025
7 months since Zuck's vaunted moderation pivot, one of its core planks is still barely registering. @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social submitted 65 perfectly suitable community notes and only 3 got published -- presumably because not enough people rated the others. www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
washingtonpost.com
Column | Zuckerberg fired the fact-checkers. We tested their replacement.
Our tech columnist drafted 65 community notes, Meta’s new crowdsourced system to fight falsehoods. It failed to make a dent.
1186
Geoffrey A. Fowler @geoffreyfowler.bsky.social · 04/08/2025
Of my 65 draft community notes, only 3 got published. That’s less than 5%. The problem: not enough other users voted that my notes were “helpful,” even though they were 100% about stuff pro news outlets had fact checked. wapo.st/3IZ1Al1
wapo.st
Column | Zuckerberg fired the fact-checkers. We tested their replacement.
Our tech columnist drafted 65 community notes, Meta’s new crowdsourced system to fight falsehoods. It failed to make a dent.
2131