iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 14/10/2026

The best resistance is existence. I WILL NOT COMPLY!!

Trans flag with blue, pink, white, pink and blue stripes, with the words "The best resistance is existence"

Trans flag with blue, pink, white, pink and blue stripes, with the words "I WILL NOT COMPLY"

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 13/10/2026

She’s wrong on many factors, but I find it wild these transphobes who regularly declare that woman = "adult human female" miss the fact that 12- 17-year-olds aren’t adults, and therefore NOT women! Maybe Helen Joyce makes the same mistake when she reads erotic fanfic involving children (doubt it 🤮)

"Janet Murray
@jan_murray
·
Oct 12
Apparently, I’m an “individual of childbearing potential (12–55)”.

I think you’ll find the word is WOMAN.

And in its bid to be “inclusive”, this NHS Trust appears to have overlooked the fact that some girls start their periods before the age of 12, and some women continue after 55. While pregnancy at those ages is rare, the age range isn’t an absolute boundary.

So WOMEN AND GIRLS might be clearer still.

In healthcare communications, clarity should always take priority over ideology.

Familiar words like "women" or "girls" are easier to understand than “individuals of childbearing potential”, particularly if English is your second language.

And before anyone tries the “what about pregnant children?” argument - yes, people really use that to justify removing women's sex-based language 🙄 - it is widely understand that, while less common, a young woman i.e. a "girl" could also be pregnant."

1111

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 13/10/2026

The BBC has already responded to my complaint from yesterday, via copy and paste. This is unacceptable. I’ve raised a complaint in response to demand that my complaint is adequately addressed.

"Thank you for contacting us about Strictly Come Dancing regarding the blurring of a message on a T-shirt seen in a training room clip.

As is standard practice on any entertainment show on the BBC and in line with our editorial guidelines, appropriate steps are taken to reduce the inclusion of any overt branding or slogans that may be present, regardless of the wording or statement in question.

Thanks again for getting in touch. We’ve shared your comments with the Strictly team and with senior BBC managers through our complaints reporting process.

If you’d like to understand how your complaint is handled at the BBC, you might find it helpful to watch the short film on the BBC Complaints website about how the BBC responds to your feedback. It explains the BBC’s process for responding to complaints, what to do if you aren’t happy with your response and how we share the feedback we receive.

Kind regards,

BBC Complaints Team
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints"

"
Your response acknowledges my complaint but fails to address it. You've repeated a generic statement about editorial guidelines while ignoring the points raised.
I didn't contact you to hear your branding policy repeated back to me. I complained because the BBC blurred a message supporting transgender women's safety, visibility and respect.
In December 2025, the BBC described "Protect the Dolls" as calling for "the safety, visibility and respect of transgender women against anti-trans rhetoric and violence". Which part of that message does the BBC not want its audience to see?
You claim to remove "any overt branding or slogans" regardless of wording. Yet Carlos Gu wore a T-shirt repeating "Feminist" during week one rehearsals. As a feminist, I'm glad he wore it and support his right to do so. But if the policy applies regardless of the message, why was his shirt acceptable while Bethany's was blurred? Your explanation isn't consistently applied. Explain why.
This also sits within the BBC's wider record on trans issues. A Good Law Project-commissioned poll found 70% of trans respondents considered BBC News's reporting about them hostile. TACC has documented patterns in UK media coverage of trans people and our rights. The BBC has helped sustain hostility towards trans people. Against that background, hiding a message calling for our safety and visibility raises serious questions about its role in our erasure.
Your response has addressed none of this. Sharing my comments with senior managers doesn't answer my questions.
I expect a substantive response identifying the exact guidelines that justified blurring Bethany's shirt, explaining the apparent inconsistency, and addressing the impact of suppressing messages of solidarity with trans women.
The BBC knows what this message means. It explained it publicly, yet chose to hide it. Why? Answer the complaint I actually made, rather than repeating a generic statement that evades it."

517943

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 13/10/2026

What country was this in? Can't have been the UK; What decade? 2026; certainly can't have been the UK then... Oh wait, Bayswater has the "evidence"... okay, so I’m calling bullshit then 🤦‍♀️

"Maya Forstater reposted
Janet Murray
@jan_murray
NEW 🚨 This is what critics of Labour’s so-called Conversion Practices Bill have been warning about.

Parents are already being referred to social services - and even the police - for refusing to affirm a child experiencing gender distress.

Saying no to a child who wants you to buy them chest binders, agree to puberty blockers or call them by a different name is what many would regard as good parenting.

Children’s brains are still developing. What they say they want at 14 may be very different a decade later - by which time some changes to their body may be irreversible.

Now imagine giving the state even more power to intervene.

Parents must be free to question life-changing decisions about their children without fear of being treated as abusers.

My latest for the Mail on Sunday.

Link below "

5222

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 12/10/2026

We need more of this. Questions need to be asked, and pressure needs to be applied. They cannot claim they are unaware if we have the receipts. (Source: www.instagram.com/reel/DeKiVPZ...)

514545

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 12/10/2026

Amazing complaint from @coramcgladdery.bsky.social raising some important points. I’ve also raised a complaint asking which part of the meaning of "Protect the Dolls" the BBC doesn't want to promote.

"I’m complaining about the BBC blurring “Protect the Dolls” on Bethany’s T-shirt during Saturday’s Strictly Come Dancing broadcast after deleting and reposting promotional footage that avoided showing the message. Apparently, even a message of solidarity with trans women was too much for the BBC. A spokesperson defended this, stating “appropriate steps are taken to reduce the inclusion of any overt branding or slogans”. But this isn’t branding. It’s a message of solidarity with transgender women, and the BBC knows exactly what it means. In a December 2025 article, the BBC itself described the phrase as calling for “the safety, visibility and respect of transgender women against anti-trans rhetoric and violence”. Those are your words, not mine. So which part of that message does the BBC not wish its audience to see? Our safety? Our visibility? Our right to be treated with respect? Let’s call this what it is: trans erasure. A message affirming the visibility and safety of transgender women has been deliberately obscured. At a time when trans people face relentless hostility, the BBC has chosen to hide a message of solidarity rather than let it be seen. Hiding the message doesn’t make us disappear, but it does raise serious questions about whose visibility the BBC considers expendable. A generic reference to editorial guidelines isn’t an adequate answer. Would the BBC treat a message supporting another marginalised group in the same way? If not, why are trans women being treated differently? I want the BBC to identify the specific editorial guideline that justified this decision and explain why a message advocating our safety, visibility and respect was considered unsuitable for broadcast. The BBC knows what “Protect the Dolls” means because it’s already explained it to the public. So why, having acknowledged the importance of our safety and visibility, did it choose to hide a message calling for precisely that?"

516438

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 04/10/2026

Also, the event in question appears to have more protesters than attendees. And there appears to be a lot of men attending this women's event 🤔

An event with several people seated. Around 70% of the chairs are empty. To the side is a large trans flag held by protesters. And to the front a large TV screen with a woman giving a presentation.

0111

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 04/10/2026

Learn biology before you chat shit, we all have a pelvic floor 🤦‍♀️

"Green Women's Declaration
@GWDeclaration
We are hearing reports from inside the
@GreenPartyWomen
fringe that they have been invaded by Trans Rights Activists trying to close down the presentation about Women’s pelvic floor health by
@GussieGrips

We are disgusted by this and send love & solidarity to our sisters 💚"

2192

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 04/10/2026

This is the post they are commenting on for context... I can't work out how she deduced what she said.

"
Colin Wynter KC
@QcWynter
·
Sep 30
This was yesterday afternoon on Arundel Street in London. This is not a dedicated bike park. It is a pavement, with space for pedestrians reduced to perhaps a single metre.
Same thing on Aldwych, outside the LSE. Hundreds of green bikes littering the pavement, just left there."

140

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 04/10/2026

When we say they’re obsessed with us, we mean it. This is a comment in response to a post about the pavement outside the London Stock Exchange, which is blocked by electric bicycles, and somehow Fiona McAnena had to try to spin it as a dig at the LGBTQ+ community 🤦‍♀️

"Gerda 💚🤍💜
@Gerda835782
·
Oct 1
When I was able to go out in my electric wheelchair there were times I had to turn round and go home because of blocked pavements.
Fiona
@DerryBanShee
That's just awful. People can be utterly thoughtless, especially about the impact of disability.

There is so much virtue-signalling about the TQ+ etc and so little thought for practical stuff like this, that really affects people's lives."

2381

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 03/10/2026

parkrun has a lowercase 'p ', you bigot

"Helen Joyce
@HJoyceGender
·
14h
This piece is great. Such a clear explanation of why Parkrun's prioritisation of what it calls "inclusion" (of men in the women's category) is both unfair and uninclusive (to and of women)"

180

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 03/10/2026

51% do not need protection to participate; just the very small minority of transphobic women feel that they need protection because people call out their bigoted views

"
Rosie Duffield MP
@RosieDuffield1
·
4h
Another political party where women need the presence of police in order to participate.
How is this acceptable to any party - that 51% of those who vote need *protection* to get involved in the politics of our own country in the 21st century...?!"

1335

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 03/10/2026

I’ve emailed Andy Burnham and Bridget Phillipson with a name change suggestion for next year's conference.

"Dear Ms Phillipson and Prime Minister Burnham,

I understand that Labour’s National Annual Women’s Conference took place in Liverpool on 26 September, with reports suggesting that attendance was somewhere around 200 women, compared with roughly 1,000 in previous years.

Given that rather spectacular reduction, I have a modest suggestion for next year.

Perhaps the event could be renamed the Labour Party (Handful of) Women’s Conference.

It would certainly be more accurate, and it might save on printing costs.

Of course, there is a more serious point underneath the joke. When a women’s conference loses the vast majority of its attendees, perhaps it is worth asking why so many women decided they no longer wanted to be there.

If Labour genuinely wants to represent women, it might be worth listening to the women who stayed away.

Yours sincerely,"

07211

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 03/10/2026

Maya Forshater thinks that gender-affirming surgeries are a 'human rights abuse'. Yet they’re internationally recognised medical procedures for gender dysphoria.

"
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
·
Oct 2
This is a human rights abuse.

It is modern "conversion therapy" - doctors persuading young unhappy patients to have their genitals removed, effectively sterilising them and removing sexual function under the false pretense that this can change their sex.
Quote
Paul St
@chester_fence
·
Oct 1
This data never ceases to "amaze" me. In 2005, very few people received any transition related genital surgery (120 over the whole of 🇩🇪), in 2025 it was 4,184.

And the shift in the age distribution is staggering: Surgeries on 18-25 "

7302

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 30/09/2026

Still waiting for @bsky.app to introduce a "...reposted the repost of your repost" notification 🤦‍♀️

010

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 29/09/2026

I have written to @bphillipsonmp.bsky.social to ask some important questions relating to her appearance and comments on The Daily T's Sunday Showdown, where she stated she was "a woman, defined by my biology", and that a women’s refuge should be for those of us who are “biologically women"

"... When asked whether you would have allowed a trans woman fleeing domestic abuse into the women’s refuge you once managed, you answered: “No.”

You said that alternative provision could be made, and that a women’s refuge should be for those of us who are “biologically women”.

That deserves considerably more scrutiny than another political soundbite.

You have chosen to justify your position by appealing to biology, so I would like you to explain what you mean by that claim in biological terms, rather than simply referring back to the law, the Supreme Court or the EHRC.

What, biologically, is a woman?

The scientific picture is considerably more complicated than the neat binary your statement suggests. Sex-related biology involves multiple characteristics, including chromosomes, gonads, reproductive anatomy, hormones and secondary sex characteristics. These characteristics do not always align in the stereotypical way, which is why medicine recognises differences of sex development. Contemporary scientific literature describes sex-related biology as involving multiple interacting characteristics rather than one single biological test that can infallibly sort every human being into one of two boxes.

You already know this. Biologists, doctors and other experts sent you an open letter specifically explaining these issues. They warned that reducing human sex biology to an immutable binary is an oversimplification and that policy built upon that oversimplification can cause real harm.

That does not mean biological sex is meaningless. It obviously is not. Female and male reproductive biology are real and medically important. But acknowledging that doesn't require pretending every human body is a perfectly standard biological specimen.

So let us get away from slogans.

You say that you are a woman “defined by my biology”. You say that I am not.

What, precisely, is the biological distinction you are making?"

"...And how would you establish it?

Would you take my blood? Sequence my chromosomes? Examine my gonads? Inspect my anatomy? Measure my hormones? Demand medical records?

Because the moment “biologically a woman” has to become a real-world test rather than a political phrase, the simplicity disappears.

And nowhere is that more obvious than in the refuge you once managed.

Imagine a woman arriving at the door after fleeing an abusive partner. She is terrified. She has no passport, no birth certificate and no medical records. She may have left everything behind to get herself and her children somewhere safe.

You have said the refuge should be for women who are “biologically women”.

So how does the refuge establish that?

Does she need to prove her chromosomes before being allowed through the door? Does somebody examine her body? Does she have to produce evidence of her reproductive anatomy? Or does a member of staff simply look at her and decide whether she appears sufficiently female?

Because the last option is not biology.

It is gender policing.

And then comes the question you cannot escape: how would you identify a trans woman without simply assuming that she is trans?

You cannot see somebody's chromosomes. You cannot see their gonads. You cannot see their hormone levels. You cannot see their developmental history.

If your answer is appearance, you have created a system in which women can be challenged because they are too masculine, too tall, too muscular, too deep-voiced, too gender-nonconforming or do not conform to somebody else's idea of what a woman is supposed to look like.

That is not a minor administrative problem. It is the policing of women's bodies, dressed up as biological certainty.

And feminism should recognise that for what it is...."

"...Sex and gender are related, but they're not interchangeable concepts. Sex encompasses biological characteristics and processes; gender also encompasses the social and personal dimensions through which human beings understand and live their gender. The scientific literature itself recognises that these concepts interact in complex ways rather than functioning as two completely separate boxes.
...You have experience running a women's refuge. You know what a woman arriving at that door needs. She does not need a politician's abstract definition of womanhood. She needs safety.

So I am asking you, as Minister for Women and Equalities, to answer some very straightforward questions.

What biological characteristics make you a woman and make me not one?

How would you establish that distinction in practice?

How does your definition account for women with differences of sex development?

What happens to women whose chromosomes do not fit the stereotypical XX model?

What happens to women who cannot produce eggs, who have no ovaries, who have undergone hysterectomy or who have otherwise experienced changes to their reproductive anatomy?

And most importantly:

How does a frightened woman fleeing domestic abuse prove that she is “biologically a woman” without being subjected to exactly the kind of bodily scrutiny and gender policing that feminists have spent generations challenging?

If your answer is that she does not have to prove it, then why should a trans woman?

If your answer is documentation, what happens to the woman who has none?

If your answer is appearance, whose idea of female appearance are you using?

And if there is no practical biological test, then perhaps “biology” is not quite the straightforward answer you have presented it as.

Women fleeing violence need refuge workers asking whether they are safe, not whether they can pass an ideological biology exam....."

"...You have chosen to draw a line between yourself and me by saying that you are a woman defined by biology and that women like me are not. I am therefore asking you to explain where that line actually is.

Not in a court judgment.

Not in an EHRC document.

Not in a political slogan.

In biology.

Because if you cannot define the biological test, and cannot explain how it could be applied fairly to women standing at the door of a refuge, then “biologically a woman” is not the clear, objective safeguard you claim it is.

It is simply a phrase being used to decide which women are allowed through the door.

And when the woman on the other side of that door is fleeing an abuser, that is not an abstract debate.

That is somebody's life.

Yours sincerely,

A woman who apparently needs a biology exam to prove it,'

67919

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 29/09/2026

So sex is "boringly simple, straightforward and immutable", you say, Maya... I think you will find it is none of these things unless you ignore the scientific consensus...

"
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
·
34m
How about this- people can say whatever they like about their gender and change it as many times a day as they like, with as many options as they like, without any state involvement or constraints.

Meanwhile their sex - which is what laws, rules and rights relate to remains boringly simple, straightforward and immutable."

6516

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 27/09/2026

₩Ɇ ₳ⱤɆ ₮ⱧɆ ₳ⱠⱠ-₱Ø₩ɆⱤ₣ɄⱠ ₮Ɽ₳₦₴Ɇ₴, ⱧɆ₳Ɽ Ʉ₴ ⱤØ₳Ɽ, ₩Ɇ Ⱨ₳vɆ ₴Ø ₥Ʉ₵Ⱨ ł₦₣ⱠɄɆ₦₵Ɇ ₳ⱤØɄ₦Đ ₮ⱧɆ ₩ØⱤⱠĐ... ØⱧ ₩₳ł₮, ₮Ⱨł₴ ₴ł₦₲ɄⱠ₳Ɽ ₵₳₴Ɇ ł₦ ₮ⱧɆ Ʉ₭ Ⱨ₳₴ ₮₳₭Ɇ₦ ₳₩₳Ɏ ₳ⱠⱠ ØɄⱤ ₱Ø₩ɆⱤ 🤦‍♀️

"Helen Joyce reposted
Jill Foster
@JournalistJill
·
15h
One of the (many) things that baffles me about gender identity ideology is how it has twisted truths in so many of the institutions which are supposed to rely on facts - journalism, law, health. This is a fascinating podcast about all of that and more ⬇️"

4100

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 26/09/2026

Can someone tell me how the fuck gay men are victims of trans women "stealthing", or what that even fucking means... seems to me that every bit of 'evidence' Sex Mattress provided was bulshit that was not relevant to trans women

"
Sex Matters
@SexMattersOrg
·
Sep 25
The judgment recognised that Sex Matters had standing as an expert charity and thanked our legal team, Sarah Vine KC and Chris Knight KC, for the “very high quality of the submissions”.

To that I would add thanks to our solicitor, Janet Farrell at Bhatt Murphy, and to Dennis Kavanagh of the Gay Men’s Network, who provided a witness statement in relation to gay men as victims of “stealthing” by trans-identifying women."

10367

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 26/09/2026

Wonder if they are aware of the £38,555 of funding she has received... not for her case but so "she can treat herself to something she loves."

"In support of Sandie Peggie
Mansfield, England, United Kingdom
In support of Sandie Peggie
£38,555
Successful
2,288 supporters
Share
Need to raise money?

Get started with Crowdfunder
Paula Hill

About the project owner
Aim
Let’s show Sandie some love and support, and imagine that when this is all over, she can treat herself to something she loves."

810219

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 25/09/2026

Sex Matters' claim that the Sex by Deception guidance by the CPS is not transphobic enough has been dismissed: Sex Matters v Director of Public Prosecutions www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u... DPP agreed before the case to make some changes to the guidance, which we will need to see how it's changed

"The outcome
156. For the reasons we have explained at paras 123-134 above, we do not accept that a
suspect’s deception as to their gender identity is incapable of vitiating consent to sexual
activity for the purposes of section 74 SOA whatever the circumstances. In order to
avoid any misunderstanding, we emphasise that our decision goes no further than that.
We do not conclude that a deception as to gender identity will negate a complainant’s
consent to sexual activity; whether or not a particular deception has that effect will fall
for consideration on the basis of the circumstances and evidence in the case in question.
However, on the current state of the law we cannot conclude in advance of such cases
arising that a deception as to gender identity could never negate a complainant’s consent
and it would be unwise and inappropriate for us to do so.
157. It follows that we have rejected the claimant’s Ground 1. The DPP’s Deception
Guidance does not wrongly state the law in this regard (paras 135-142 above).
158. We have also rejected the claimant’s Ground 2, as the DPP’s guidance does not present
a misleading picture of the true legal position, as we have explained at paras 145-153
above.
159. Accordingly, we will dismiss the claim"

3436

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 23/09/2026

Apparently, children don't need hormones... or surgery... and god forbid a cis child needs "puberty blockers", because clearly they don't need that either... or is it just trans children that don't apparently need these things 🤦‍♀️

"
global
2HW
14
RY
SCO
Serving suggestion Rywita Original
CHILDREN NEED THERAPY NOT PUBERTY BLOCKERS, HORMONES & SURGERY"

4384

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 23/09/2026

She states that period poverty is a women's rights issue, tick in a box to say they have done something to aid women's rights instead of talking about the "more difficult issues", yet she doesn't talk about them. She very rarely talks about anything else other than attacking trans people

"
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
·
Sep 8, 2019
My view: 'period poverty' is not a thing. Poverty is a thing. "Period poverty" is a made up issue to tick the "women's rights" box instead of talking about more difficult issues. https://x.com/JoDrant/status/JoDrant/status/1170618001923674114
"

1221

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 23/09/2026

This is a prime example of how she happily sacrifices the rights of women and girls in her crusade to eradicate trans people. More posts...

1223

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 23/09/2026

Notice how there is a lot of overlap between how she attacks this issue and trans issues. Her denial of period poverty and her uncontrollable ramblings, in my opinion, are solely due to the inclusive language used and the support of trans folk by these orgs.

1243

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 23/09/2026

Just like to remind people that this middle-class woman thinks period poverty is a 'made-up thing' and is 'not real'... while trying to claim she is a feminist, and that she is only interested in protecting women and girls

5448

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 22/09/2026

The UK Maths Olympiad for Girls has updated its policies to exclude trans girls, and the transphobes, of course, are celebrating. Sooo they are celebrating the notion that boys are smarter than girls... not very feminist of them

"Maya Forstater reposted
John Armstrong
@johnarmstrong5
·
Sep 18
The UK Maths Olympiad for Girls has finally announced it will use sex to determine eligibility.

It is depressing to think how little opportunity maths has given to women in its 3000 year history.

1/3"

The underneath is provided in the next image, with full alt text

"Please see below for some important updates for this academic year before placing your order.
Update to MOG/MCG eligibility
UKMT has reviewed the eligibility criteria for our girls' competitions (the Mathematical Olympiad for Girls, and the Mathematical Competition for Girls) following the UK Supreme Court judgment last year in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers.
The purpose of these competitions is to encourage and support participation by girls in advanced mathematics competitions.
Having taken legal advice, UKMT has concluded that, under the Equality Act 2010 as determined by the Supreme Court, eligibility for these competitions must be based on biological sex. Consequently, our past practice of accepting entries by transgender girls to the girls' competitions can no longer continue.
UKMT remains committed to treating all students, staff and volunteers with dignity and respect without exception and provides a comprehensive range of competitions for all young people.
For more information about these competitions, please see our website."

33914

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 22/09/2026

Funny how many key members of Sex Matters are also racists, and they claim they are not anti-rights 🤦‍♀️

"Anya Palmer reposted
Tyler
@cillianblack
·
Sep 17
The lefties currently trying to destroy Ed Sheeran with a relentless campaign of hate, shame, and guilt are the same troglodytes who, two weeks ago, were telling you that the media was responsible for murdering Jason Arday and that everyone should just be a bit nicer."

082

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 21/09/2026

Sex Mattress continues to refer to their legal challenge as if it is a gotcha, but neglects to mention that they lost the case: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u... This is what the anti-trans movement does.

"
Sex Matters
@SexMattersOrg
.
@mbmpolicy
’s latest analysis examines how Police Scotland has invoked the language of human rights to justify its shifting decision-making on sex and gender identity, while keeping the advice behind those decisions out of public view.

We have brought a legal challenge against similar “consensual” searching policies in England and Wales.
Quote
MurrayBlackburnMackenzie
@mbmpolicy
·
Sep 15
Replying to @mbmpolicy
Our analysis is also reported in today's @TheScotsman...'

1417

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 21/09/2026

JK Rowling calls trans suicides a lie. Of course like all the studies the anti-rights* mob cite, this has been debunked. *Anti-rights as defined by UN Women (2024)

"Helen Joyce reposted
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
Sep 20
Every glib, arrogant, virtue-signalling celebrity who’s broadcast the lie that kids will kill themselves if not allowed to transition deserves to have this read aloud to them non-stop through a megaphone for a year.
Quote
Kurt Mahlburg
@k_mahlburg
·
Sep 19
A landmark Finnish study has found a sharp rise in psychiatric illness among adolescents following sex-alteration procedures.

The peer-reviewed study, published in Acta Paediatrica, tracked every young person under 23 who contacted Finland's gender clinics betwe..."

57220

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 18/09/2026

Ro Edge's anti-trans propaganda is getting a little close to home for her, who knows a cis woman who is also being targeted. Yet still, she fails to see that the damage is caused by people like her, who scrutinise who is a woman and who is not. This is a world of your own creation.

"Ro Edge
@rosey_nz
·
14h
Jill is a woman. I went to school with her. Gender ideology trained people to treat “woman” as a look, so now a female cop gets the side-eye because she doesn’t match the approved aesthetic. It does my head in!

Women shouldn’t have to pass a beauty test to be believed.
Quote
Ximene
@dellavaris
·
Sep 17
Meet Jill 🙄"

611213

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 18/09/2026

If Graham Linehan's kids didn't paraphrase Father Tedd, I would be deeply saddened by a failure to provide better comedy than Glinner: "So you're a transphobe now, Father"

An older man in a tweed coat and cap stands behind a stone wall in a green field; meme caption reads, “I hear you’re a racist now, Father.”

060

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 18/09/2026

What is a woman, then, since female relates to sex? As per the version of the definition they love, "Adult Human Female", woman clearly is not a sex, so it is a gender... which makes up part of someone's identity... oh wait, so gender identity 🤦‍♀️

"
Róisín Michaux
@RoisinMichaux
·
9h
Woman is a 'gender identity', according to the EU research agency.

GENDER IDENTITY
Researchers participating to Horizon Europe proposals and projects can self- declare their gender identity along three categories:
O European Union, 2026. Source: Master1305, Shutterstock.
• woman,
• man,
⚫ non-binary.
However, as the 'non-binary' category currently represents less than 1% of the self-declared gender identities, it is not taken into account in the calculation of the ranking criterion for ex aequo proposals."

172

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 17/09/2026

So their actions are directly endangering lives

"Terrorism
The Terrorism Act 2000 defines terrorism, both in and outside of the UK, as the use or threat of one or more of the actions listed below, and where they are designed to influence the government, or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public. The use or threat must also be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.

The specific actions included are:

serious violence against a person;
serious damage to property;
endangering a person's life (other than that of the person committing the action);
creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public; and
action designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system."

55026

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 17/09/2026

So fucking what. Can women not work in 'porn shops'? Can lesbians not? Newsflash: women do!

"Genevieve Gluck: Trans flag creator worked at a porn shop while 'transitioning' to a 'lesbian'"

1251

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 15/09/2026

Or...now hear me out on this... the reason for the lack of interest in your podcast is.... that people are aware you are a bunch of bigots...just an idea 🤷‍♀️

"Maya Forstater reposted
ThisIsntWorkingPodcast
@IsntWorkingPod
·
19h
The lack of interest in our podcast from charity people speaks volumes. They don't want to fix their problems because they don't think they have any. Pray for their service users 🙏
Quote
Daily Mail
@DailyMail
·
Sep 14
Fury as NSPCC say male teachers can supervise girls in changing rooms https://trib.al/ilToTDN"

130

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 15/09/2026

And of course, even this exclusionary policy, which overreaches beyond the Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC Code of Practice, is not enough for FWS, which has published its consultation responses. Basically reads as: "trans 'women' are men and therefore they have to use the men's facilities"

"The third point is less clear. Cubicles are not rooms. A self-contained room with a toilet and sink with a lockable door accessed from an open public area, and designated for use by either sex is fine. However, cubicles within a room – regardless of whether they contain a sink and have floor to ceiling partitions – is a mixed sex facility and carries heightened risks for women and girls. In the above case, at para 47, the court found that the shared waiting area outside such cubicles to be an integral part of the toilet space. Many parents would consider it unsafe to allow their young daughter to go to the toilet by herself and potentially be alone in a room with several men. It would also make it difficult for a mother to use the toilet herself, as this is often done with the cubicle door slightly open to keep an eye on the baby in a buggy or toddlers waiting outside. It is entirely foreseeable that some users, in particular women and girls, would experience such mixed sex toilets as discriminatory or amounting to harassment (hostile environment, etc) on the basis of sex."

081

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 15/09/2026

Know matter how much they try to deny it, the fact is that these spaces have always been used by trans women, and they always will. This is the moral panic, that trans people are some new fad social contagion, yet we have been documented throughout history.

"Imagine now, how a young girl will feel.

Women's toilets have always been safe for young girls to use unaccompanied, because of the singular fact that men are not allowed in them!

Mothers have, heretofore, been able to let younger girls use female toilets (and thereby begin to develop independence), because they have been exclusively female spaces.

And, I'm sure we can all remember as teenagers, using the loo in droves to gossip, put on make-up, do our hair, and frankly, just to socialise.

Now that final bastion of female security and refuge is being removed from adolescent girls.Imagine now, how a young girl will feel.

Women's toilets have always been safe for young girls to use unaccompanied, because of the singular fact that men are not allowed in them!

Mothers have, heretofore, been able to let younger girls use female toilets (and thereby begin to develop independence), because they have been exclusively female spaces.

And, I'm sure we can all remember as teenagers, using the loo in droves to gossip, put on make-up, do our hair, and frankly, just to socialise.

Now that final bastion of female security and refuge is being removed from adolescent girls."

260

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 14/09/2026

Sex Mattress should probably start acting like a charity first, Maya.

"
Maya Forstater✔ @MForstater. Sep 12
This week I've been at @BayesCCE learning how to be a charity CEO
BAYES
BUSINESS SCHOOL CITY ST GEORGE'S VERSITY OF LONDON
11
18
356
il 5.2K"

1203

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 14/09/2026

Let's be clear: they're raising a formal complaint and calling for the guidance to be replaced with what they deem to reflect the law, which will lead to legal action if they do not comply. They are attacking the NSPCC. Vulnerable children will be affected.

We note that NSPCC continues to report the numbers of its trustees, staff and volunteers who are "male (including transgender men)" and "female (including transgender women)". This is inconsistent with the Equality Act and undermines understanding that people who identify as "transgender women" are male and people who identify as "transgender men" are female.
It is a serious institutional failure for the nation's pre-eminent child-protection charity to lose sight of the need for clear policies and recordkeeping. An institution that encourages confusion and ambiguity about safeguarding practice in relation to male and female adults and children is in danger of losing the nation's trust.
Please treat this as a complaint. This guidance should be withdrawn and replaced with guidance that is clear and in line with the law.
Yours sincerely
Maya Forstater
Chief Executive

0171

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 14/09/2026

Along with being an anti-rights organisation, it's reasonable to call Sex Matters an anti-charity organisation, from celebrating the closure of a period poverty organisation, due to inclusive language, to the constant complaints and legal threats, all from an org that claims to uphold human rights.

"
Maya Forstater
@MForstater - 10h
I have written to Chris Sherwood, CEO of @NSPCC about their changing room guidance for schools.
Instead of responding to increasing clarity about the law by making guidance clearer it has gone the other way.
Instead of being clear that that "where possible, the adults who are supervising children getting changed should be of the same sex as them" it just droped that part of the guidance."

36711

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 14/09/2026

This prediction of a "trans woman working at tesco could be fired for using the bathroom at work" is becoming increasingly possible, since they have reportedly updated their policy to segregate trans people

"
c. Colleague facilities
Our priority is to ensure that all colleagues are treated with dignity and respect and have appropriate facilities at work. We are committed to providing inclusive gender-neutral facilities for our trans, non-binary and gender-fluid colleagues. Our aim is to incorporate inclusive facilities for all our colleagues wherever practicably possible, including investing in gender neutral toilets. Other facilities may include access to lockers or changing facilities.
Where these facilities (toilets, lockers and changing facilities) are readily accessible, trans, non-binary and gender-fluid colleagues should use these facilities, or the facilities that correspond with their sex assigned at birth/biological sex."

571

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 10/09/2026

Women of the world, there is an atlernative... just saying 😂

Lesbian flag with an image of Kermit the Frog, with a scrunched-up face, with the words "Ew...men."

151

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 09/09/2026

@translucent.org.uk do you not think it would be good to share this good news on this platform? This happens a lot: regular posts on Twitter with poor visibility due to it being transphobe-dominated, while neglecting to post here. translucent.org.uk/media-bias-a...

"On 22 August 2026,
@ScotExpress
published an article written by David Walker about the trans community; we filed a formal IPSO complaint.

Yesterday, they were compelled to correct their reporting after our complaint about factual inaccuracy."

1235

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

Back in July, I made extensive edits to Halsey's Wikipedia page so that the article fully reflected their pronouns (she/they). These changes have been reverted for 'consistency '; I do not consider this reasonable. Respect for someone's identity should not be sacrificed for 'consistency'

"Reverting of pronouns
Latest comment: just now
1 comment
1 person in discussion
Halsey uses she/her and they/them pronouns, of which I made edits to reflect this. Changing these for consistency does not show respect to their identity, which in circumstances in which an individual uses a mixture of pronouns, is to alternate between their preferred pronouns. Not doing so shows a lack of respect for their identity. Yes I could undo these changes, but I feel this will be reverted back again.

This is not the same issue that is ongoing in relation to Royce White, this reflects clear evidence, statements, articles, etc that reflect the validity of Haley's identity. If we believe in accurate information, respecting people, making edits for 'consistency' is not the way to do it"

1102

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

She called an event celebrating black culture as "Racist, divisive and disgusting"

"Kellie-Jay Keen
@ThePosieParker
·
Sep 6
Racist, divisive and disgusting. Shame on the organisers and attendees.
Quote
Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan
@MayorofLondon
·
Sep 5
For a few hours, Trafalgar Square stopped being a landmark and became a meeting place.

Now in its fourth year, Black On The Square shines a spotlight on the Black culture, talent and influence, which continues to shape London’s

070

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

Posie 'KKK' Parker wants to repatriate British citizens; this is who organisations like Sex Mattress align themselves with.

"Kellie-Jay Keen
@ThePosieParker
·
44m
Repatriation would be much more noble than reparations.
Quote
GB News
@GBNEWS
·
1h
'Britain ended slavery a long time ago!'

Martin Daubney clashes with anti-racism campaigner Imarn Ayton. She believes Jamaica should be awarded slavery reparations.
"

1195

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

This was a response after he had been called out for his invasion of women's spaces

"
Katie Herzog
@kittypurrzog
Every time I mention Graham Linehan I regret it but since we're mentinoned here, the reason Jesse and I (very lightly) criticized Graham in the first place was because he went on this campaign to publicly humiliate the transwomen using a dating app where they were welcome to be. So the self-proclaimed protector of women was bullying both the users and the female owners of the app for not adhering to HIS vision for THEIR app.
Quote
Jesse Singal
@jessesingal
·
Sep 5
"Full email exchange with Jon Ronson, 19th–20th May 2021"

Graham Linehan posted emails with Jon Ronson that he (Linehan) agreed to keep confidential. An interesting read!
"

070

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

"I did it to expose them"... honest officer 😭

"Graham Linehan
@Glinner
·
21h
The real alarm and harassment comes every day via men pretending to be lesbians on that app. I did it to expose them. Why are you pretending not to understand that?
Quote
rdbabyshambles
@hellomoe123
·
Sep 6
Replying to @SVPhillimore
Glinner accessing the app when he had no right to was an invasion of space. He did so in order to harrass and alarm other users. Why did he do it ? For the attention of terfs, he’s no better than those other voices in the manosphere a simp and incel for Nazi terfs"

1141

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

This is the far right. She is a woman who was attacked by a group of men. If you support Reform, you support this!

"
Rare | ♻️🇬🇧
@RareRestore
·
Sep 6
The handling of the lunatic lefty who disrupted the Reform UK conference has divided opinions.

Some say she f*cked around and found out, whilst others ran to West Midlands Police crying assault.

Whichever way you look at it, are you surprised that she does this for a living?'

"
fast eddie
@LuckieEddie
·
Sep 6
Epic orgam face when you pull her hair
Rare | ♻️🇬🇧
@RareRestore
·
6h
🤣"

"
RAT PT 01 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
@Dekka_44
·
Sep 6
Remember folks don't stick your dick in crazy. 😂
Rare | ♻️🇬🇧
@RareRestore
·
6h
ngl it is tempting
RAT PT 01 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
@Dekka_44
·
6h
Well I did try to warn you 😂"

1235