Sign in

Fabian Prochazka

@fprochazka.bsky.social
935 followers 652 following 62 posts

👨‍🎓 Junior Professor in Communication @unierfurt.bsky.social, @ipb.bsky.social 💻 Researching journalism and audiences online, trust in news & media effects

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour @ipb.bsky.social · 29/01/2026
📣 Call for Contributions: Policy Ultra Briefs (PUBs) zu Frühwarnsystemen & Klimarisiken Wir starten eine neue PUB-Reihe zu verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Evidenz für Frühwarnungen (z. B. Hitze, Flut, Extremwetter). Ziel: kompakte, policy-relevante Erkenntnisse für Entscheidungsträger:innen.
113
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
A very familiar feeling :) Looking forward to reading this, looks really helpful!
010
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
Sure, but it is a difference if the AI does the reviewing or just polishes the text a human wrote. I don't know what other prompts the reviewer gave from the screenshot, of course
000
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
Sounds quite reasonable, though: "take my original text and smooth it". Isn't that a completely legitmate use of an LLM? (and something I wish more reviewers would do, quite honestly...)
100
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 15/12/2025
Huh I wonder if there were any other global events happening in in 2008. Guess we’ll never know.
412426
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
I already spent half my morning reading some of the excellent entries in this massive volume. Congratulations and thank you @dominiquewirz.bsky.social @alessandronai.bsky.social and @maxgroemping.bsky.social My entry on self-effects is also available as a preprint: osf.io/preprints/os...
173
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 02/12/2025
Works the other way around too. “If I was Jonathan Haidt, how would I destroy the next generation?”
913342
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Digital Democracy Centre @ddc-sdu.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
Our new Postdocs @andre-k-rodarte.bsky.social & @hannahdecker.bsky.social plus our current fellows @fprochazka.bsky.social & Maryam Khaleghipour present their research programs. Covering politician-influencers, targeted ads, views on climate change, & digital hate speech.
142
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
Und zu Fact-Checking die Arbeiten von Regina Cazzamatta: scholar.google.com/citations?hl...
scholar.google.com
010
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
Altay et al. (2023). Misinformation on Misinformation: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
210
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
But: ChatGPT knows...
052
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 20/06/2025
I like that metaphor for peer-review a lot! @gpccomm.bsky.social seems off to a good start! :)
150
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 20/06/2025
Hier bin ich heute Nachmittag und freue mich schon jetzt auf die Projekte unserer Studierenden im BA Kommunikationswissenschaft!
110
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Danbischof @danbischof.bsky.social · 19/06/2025
The study has N=54 split in three groups. It basically has no power to detect the effects it seeks to detect. I’m all for pre-published media engagement but this is not enough to get it outside of your own lab environment. time.com/7295195/ai-c...
time.com
ChatGPT's Impact On Our Brains According to an MIT Study
The study, from MIT Lab scholars, measured the brain activity of subjects writing SAT essays with and without ChatGPT.
1144
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
They have bike lanes in roundabouts 🤯Biking is really something else when not almost getting hit by a truck every five minutes!
000
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
The @ddc-sdu.bsky.social is a great environment with really smart, friendly and engaging people - plus: Odense and Denmark are beautiful, so do apply for their fellowships!
121
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
Findings are based on survey data from political journalists in Belgium, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Full paper (open access) here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
010
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
This tendency to project is stronger among right-leaning journalists, but weaker when journalists are experts on a topic or think public opinion is ambiguous. Experience and audience orientation don’t seem to make much difference.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
How do journalists estimate public opinion? 👀🧠 Our new paper in Journalism (w/ Karolin Soontjens, @kathleenbeckers.bsky.social, David Hopmann & @andreasschuck.bsky.social) shows that many rely on their own views. The more they agree with policy proposals, the more they assume the public does too.
150
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
👇 Und der Journalismus darf jetzt wieder aus dem Game-Frame rauskommen und sich inhaltlich mit der Koalition auseinandersetzen. Da gibt's genug zu tun
020
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 30/04/2025
Congratulations, Emil! 🎉
100
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Lara Wolfers @larawolfers.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
I am hiring :-). I look for a PhD student & a postdoc for my new Digital Lives team at the U of Basel. Looking for 2 who are excited to study our everyday digital lives with me in the next years. Please share with your network. jobs.unibas.ch/offene-stell... jobs.unibas.ch/offene-stell...
jobs.unibas.ch
Universität Basel: PhD in Media Psychology (100%)
The Faculty of Psychology is one of seven faculties of the oldest university in Switzerland. With our core focus on Society & Choice and Health & Interventions, we are successful both nationally and i...
03929
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Danke an Nina Springer und Hans-Jürgen Bucher und natürlich die Herausgeber:innen für die vielen hilfreichen Kommentare zum Beitrag!
000
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
3️⃣ Wie steht es um die "tatsächliche" Qualität der Medien, gibt es den oft bedauerten Qualitätsverlust im Journalismus wirklich? (Spoiler: so pauschal nicht) 4️⃣ Wie nimmt das Publikum Qualität im Journalismus wahr und wie lassen sich falsche Wahrnehmungen erklären?
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
1️⃣ Was bedeutet Qualität im Journalismus eigentlich, was sind wichtige Kriterien für Qualität und wer stellt welche Qualitätsansprüche mit welchen Gründen? 2️⃣ Wie wird Qualität im Journalismus selbst diskursiv verhandelt, sichergestellt und kontrolliert?
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Ich durfte ein Kapitel zu "Journalismus und Qualität" beisteuern und beleuchte journalistische Qualität darin aus Perspektive der Kommunikator-, Inhalts- und Publikumforschung. Es geht um vier Themen:
110
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Dieser Tage in der Post: Das neue Handbuch Journalismusforschung von @thanitzsch.bsky.social Wiebke Loosen, und @annikasehl.bsky.social. Es ist ein mächtiger und umfassender Band mit vielen tollen Beiträgen geworden!
140
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
Of course, I hope it is used for good things, but if LLMs help people write, access knowledge or automate tedious tasks, I am glad my work helped.
000
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
What I publish is out there, and people or companies can use it to their advantage/profit. I don’t need to give permission or be aware of all the uses of my work (I don't even know how I could). It is part of human knowledge and others are free to use it.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
My texts are constantly stripped of context and intention by *humans* who mis-cite my work, interpret it to fit their narrative and so on. But that is okay, it is part of knowledge spreads, and I probably do the same sometimes.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
(Besides, as far as I know most AI companies actually don’t profit (yet), because it is staggeringly expensive to run these models, develop them, etc.)
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
Intellectual labor is constantly “absorbed into systems that generate value elsewhere". Taxpayer-funded Universities train students, and companies profit from their skills. Social media companies profit from user generated content, advertisers use research to make more effective ads…
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
Thank you for the thoughtful arguments! I see what you mean, and I agree with most of it. That said, I think a) much of what you describe isn’t unique to AI and b) I don’t necessarily see it as problematic.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 20/03/2025
Unpopular opinion but I don't really care. If a human uses my writing to learn something, I am happy. Why should I oppose to an AI learning from my writing?
110
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 20/03/2025
Auch noch nicht gehabt: die Ordinärskala. #studentsatwork
031
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 26/02/2025
Das klingt ja toll, herzlichen Glückwunsch! 👏
010
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Gute Truppe für die anstehenden Koalitionsverhandlungen in Bonn!
0101
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Side note: I am really happy (and a little proud) that this paper came out of working with my first cohort of BA students during the "project study phase" of our BA program at @unierfurt.bsky.social! 🎓
020
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
💬 Our results highlight how expressing opinions online shapes what people believe—especially on new topics. This could be a previously often overlooked factor in understanding polarization and radicalization.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
🔍 Key finding: Writing and posting a comment does change opinions—but mainly for those who didn’t have a firm stance to begin with. The opinion climate (agreement/disagreement) didn’t change this effect.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
In an online experiment with ~1000 participants, we tested whether commenting (vs. just reading a news post) influenced opinions, depending on whether the surrounding comments agreed or disagreed.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
New paper out in Communication Research Reports! 📄✨ We explore the self-effects of online commenting—does writing and posting political comments on social media change people’s opinions? Open access here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Screenshot of the paper head for "self-effects of online commenting in different opinion environments"
150
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 01/02/2025
Ergänzend: massives Strategie-Framing (wer gewinnt, wer verliert, wer kann wen "treiben"). Zu wenig Auseinandersetzung mit Inhalten, Ursachen von Problemen bei Migration/Integration und Lösungen - plus Verdrängung anderer Themen. Führt gut belegt zu politischem Zynismus und Normalisierung der AfD
020
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 28/01/2025
Hier ist das (für Deutschland) nachzulesen: www.waxmann.com/index.php?eI...
waxmann.com
000
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 28/01/2025
"Teenager" wurden übrigens auch nicht befragt, sondern 15-Jährige. Und: Das ist Selbstauskunft. Ob sie "Fake News" dann tatsächlich erkennen oder nicht, wissen wir (aus dieser Studie) nicht.
110
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 28/01/2025
Nur rund 15% geben an, die Qualität von Informationen online nicht beurteilen zu können, oder Mühe zu haben, es allein zu schaffen.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 28/01/2025
Für Österreich sind die Daten nicht veröffentlicht, aber in Deutschland sagen 47%, sie schaffen das leicht, weitere 35%, sie schaffen es "mit etwas Mühe". In Deutschland glauben also 82%, die Qualität von Informationen im Netz "leicht" oder "mit etwas Mühe" beurteilen zu können.
100
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 28/01/2025
Das hat die PISA-Studie aber nicht erhoben. Erhoben wurde in Selbstauskunft (!), ob sie "die Qualität von gefundenen Online-Informationen beurteilen" können. Da sagen 44% "Ich schaffe das leicht".
101
Reposted by Fabian Prochazka
Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour @ipb.bsky.social · 23/01/2025
#SaveTheDate Das Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour (IPB) lädt herzlich ein zum 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗪𝗮𝗵𝗹𝘀𝗽𝗲𝘇𝗶𝗮𝗹, einer spannenden Diskussion über Demokratie, politische Teilhabe und wie Bürger:innen aktiv zum Klimaschutz beitragen können.🗳️ @unierfurt.bsky.social 👉 www.uni-erfurt.de/institute-fo...
uni-erfurt.de
Climate Connect Spezial: Mehr Bürgerbeteiligung für eine stärkere Demokratie?
Veranstaltung mit Kathrin Schlup (Senior Projektleiterin und ehemalige Co-Direktorin sanu ag, Schweiz) im Rahmen der Reihe "Climate Connect".
1103
Fabian Prochazka @fprochazka.bsky.social · 16/01/2025
Es ist wichtig, Obstskeptiker nicht von der gesellschaftlichen Debatte auszuschließen
010