Sign in

Finn Lübber

@finnluebber.bsky.social
247 followers 92 following 12 posts

PhD student Psychoneuroimmunology, University of Lübeck www.social-neuroscience-lab.com Open and Metascience osi-luebeck.de

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Finn Lübber
Laborjournal @laborjournal.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
#PeerReview galt immer als Goldstandard der #Forschungsförderung. Aber musste er das je beweisen? @finnluebber.bsky.social und @soerenkrach.bsky.social erklären in unserem Essayheft, warum ausgerechnet eine Lotterie fairer, billiger und robuster sein könnte: 👉 www.laborjournal.de/rubric/essay...
Titelseite eines Laborjournal-Essays mit dem Titel „Das Los der Wissenschaft: Warum die Forschungsförderung sich nie beweisen musste – und Lotterien es könnten" von Finn Lübber & Sören Krach, Lübeck. Rechts eine Illustration: eine Hand hält eine Mehrkanalpipette wie einen Würfel oder ein Losobjekt.
064
Reposted by Finn Lübber
Nicolas Mouquet @nmouquet.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
🔥 A lottery-first system 🎲 makes research grants allocation cheaper, faster, and boosts funding for women, while "traditional" (patriarcal?) peer review drags everyone down. 🤔 Maybe randomness is fairer than the experts. 🔄 Time to rethink the whole game! 💣 www.nature.com/articles/s41... 🧪
nature.com
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line - Nature Communications
The authors show evidence from a German funding line that a lottery-first approach followed by peer review is accompanied by increased female representation both at the submission stage and among fund...
03010
Reposted by Finn Lübber
Kirsty Grainger @kirstygrainger.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
Leaders at @ukri.org should be seriously looking at the lottery first idea. 68% lower economic costs, increase in diversity of award holders and well received. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line - Nature Communications
The authors show evidence from a German funding line that a lottery-first approach followed by peer review is accompanied by increased female representation both at the submission stage and among fund...
13420
Finn Lübber @finnluebber.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
New publication about funding! In this new piece in @natcomms.nature.com we present data from an evaluation of the lottery-first approach to funding: an initial lottery controlling entry, followed by peer review. www.nature.com/articles/s41... #funding #metascience #scienceofscience #peerreview
nature.com
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line - Nature Communications
The authors show evidence from a German funding line that a lottery-first approach followed by peer review is accompanied by increased female representation both at the submission stage and among fund...
163
Reposted by Finn Lübber
Ketika Garg @ketikagarg.bsky.social · 01/12/2024
1st post on bsky - about bsky! I was fascinated with academic starter packs and made an interactive network to see academic communities and how they connect - a map of knowledge! link to an interactive & searchable network: ketikagarg.github.io/blueSkyAcade...
26448146
Reposted by Finn Lübber
Berna Devezer @devezer.bsky.social · 30/11/2024
"our scientific representations are not, as many hoped in the heyday of logical empiricism, a super vending machine to which we can feed in facts about the questions we are interested in, turn the crank of logical derivation, and pick up answers that fall out." —Cartwright, The Tangle of Science
722047