Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 03/06/2026Judgment hand down for the Palestine Action appeal will be live-streamed from the Court of Appeal on 15 June at 11am. 021
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 21/05/2026Judgment tomorrow in the Palestine Action proscription appeal is only on the issue of reporting restrictions, the judgment for the appeal hearing will be handed down at a later date to be confirmed. 010
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 19/03/2026The Court of Appeal hearing for the Home Secretary's appeal against the finding that the proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful has been listed for 28 April. 000
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 25/02/2026Divisional Court grants Home Secretary’s app for permission to appeal and suspends its quashing of proscription of Palestine Action pending determination of the appeal. Claimant’s app for permission to cross-appeal refused. The proscription Order remains in force. www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hu... 017
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 13/02/2026High Court’s judgment finding the proscription of Palestine Action was an unjustified interference with rights to freedom of association and assembly under arts 10/11 ECHR, and inconsistent with the Home Secretary’s own policy. www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u... 0169
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 12/02/2026The High Court will hand down judgment tomorrow in the judicial review against the Home Secretary’s proscription of Palestine Action. 04418
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 14/06/2025CA has listed a hearing on 26 June for Liberty’s appeal against the HC’s refusal of permission to challenge the length of the EHRC’s Code of Practice consultation, 4 days before the consultation is to end. @samuelwillis.bsky.social and I blogged below on the HC’s reasons for refusing permission. 031
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 22/05/2025It was a pleasure to reflect candidly on the role (both good and bad) social media use played in my pupillage application journey! Anurag was one of the first legal SM contacts I interacted and then met with in person, so here’s a picture from our ALBA moot participation 3 years ago to reminisce! 2172
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 30/04/2025Court of Appeal will hand down judgment in SSHD’s appeal against High Court’s judgment upholding Liberty’s serious disruption regulations judicial review this Friday. 041
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 16/04/2025Singh LJ on D’s duty of candour in JR: “The Court should (in proper evidence, i.e. in a witness statement) be given a full, accurate and clear explanation of the decision-making process used by the public authority concerned and should not… assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/202... 110
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 20/01/2025[27]: Procedural fairness is a hard-edged question of law and an appellate tribunal is not limited to overturning a decision on the basis that it was outside the range of reasonable outcomes; the question is simply whether the lower tribunal's decision is wrong. www.judiciary.uk/judgments/ra... 020
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 17/01/2025Underhill LJ in related case heard by same CA constitution: “It is a matter of basic fairness that a person whom the Secretary of State proposes to deprive of British citizenship should have the opportunity to put forward reasons in opposition… 100
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 26/09/2024Very pleased to have been cited judicially for the first time (with @LewisGrahamLaw.bsky.social) by the High Court..! Many thanks to HHJ Tindal for reading and citing our @ukcla.bsky.social blog on rationality and the PB re open conditions transfers. caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/admin/2... 130
Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social · 22/08/2024Decisions on whether to prosecute, legal aid eligibility for asylum interviews, and regulation of sewage sludge - what do they have in common? According to Fordham J, applying a “dual” variable intensity review to determine if they are irrational. 164