👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Best film adaptation of The Odyssey, wrong answers only 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 18/03/2026I grew up with one of these parked in the back yard. Over time a garage grew up around it. 010 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 14/03/2026This is the wrong distinction. The mafia also acts on principle. T doesn’t understand people whose principle for action isn’t always-be-richer. 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 01/03/2026One would need to factor this new interactivity into the equation 100 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 01/03/2026Great question posed by @adamtooze.bsky.social in his chartbook this morning. 100 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 24/02/2026You have 4 dull crayons, 10 minutes, and no do-overs. Don’t fuck this up, kids. 182 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 16/02/2026Guy policing interpretations really upset someone might police his interpretation 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 08/02/2026This remark from Tamara Kolda that closes the article hints at something critical about our relationship to technology. From www.nytimes.com/2026/02/07/s... 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 01/02/2026Amazing exchange. You can feel the contempt breaking like waves against a rockface, barely leaving a mark. It would take eons to erode the thickness. 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 16/01/2026Masaki Fujihata on interactivity vs reactivity, 2008. 010 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 11/01/2026Reminds me of the time we cleaned out the garage where I grew up and found these 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 09/01/2026like, Vice is enshrined in the heart of the thing 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 26/12/2025“Ineffability” has been getting dumped on a lot here of late -- somewhat uncritically imo — but it has its respected defenders. Here’s Schrödinger: 010 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 04/12/2025Apart from the bad arithmetic and general dislike of Spotify (insert plug for community radio, e.g., WPRB) I think I’m ok with this. 020 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 01/11/2025Frederic Kaplan (quoted by Stiegler) on the economic dimension of autocorrect: 110 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 28/10/2025So this is one of the “major events” chronicled on the White House website page devoted to Trump’s proposed ballroom addition 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 21/09/2025For generations the squirrels of these woods have kept a tally of the bears who fuck this tree. It’s said that every 40th new moon a bear-shaped acorn will fall from the canopy, granting its finder a dark and terrible power … 010 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 30/07/2025Tired: google Expired (but infinitely more fun): Henley’s 020 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 28/07/2025At a moment of reflection on the relationship between big tech and right-wing politics, it’s interesting to recall the early days of ecommerce and the convenient affinity between libertarians and corps. From Simon Singh’s _The Code Book_, 1999 131 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 07/07/2025From a profile of Jack Whitten in NYRB www.nybooks.com/articles/202... 064 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 05/05/2025internet on radio on internet cc @leyawn.bsky.social 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 12/03/2025Omg they look like my guy. Probably just as sweet 120 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 25/02/2025Google Photos lacks Cheers-level face recognition 000 0
👖Emancipants👖 @fgshprd.bsky.social · 22/02/2025Going through boxes looking for a birth certificate. Found this in an old Village Voice, 6/22/93. 000 0
![E: The audience is a very important part of your work and I wonder again whether they are also a 'site of production', and by interacting they produce the piece. But, when the work isn't interactive, do they still provide this function?
M: I am strongly trying to question what is interactivity, between the pieces and with the visitor (and maybe I can say'participant' or'user' in this case). In the last 10 years people have been over using the buzz word 'interactive art. The term 'interactive comes from computer technology. The computer was so slow in the 70's when engineers first tried to add interactivity. At that time, an interactive terminal meant that when you typed a word, characters would appear on the screen. This was an interactive terminal! [laughs] but I should say this is 'reactive, it's a reaction from the computer. Even today, most of the interactive art showing is 99% reactive. The term "interactive" has a deeper meaning and can be used to describe public space, social areas, and social interaction. How we communicate, how we talk, and how we meet each other is interactive and of course when we see a painting or read a novel we interact with it.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:t6irrjbeuyw7qifywe37btc7/bafkreiffxlkfhih63pprfxve55pyets624o4wl4sflrgerx3mu5wt5tadm)
