Sign in

Eyas Ayesh

@eyasayesh.bsky.social
16 followers 26 following 13 posts

CoCo Fellow and Cognition & Brain Science PhD • Interested in Language, Brains, and AI Safety

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Eyas Ayesh
Anna (Anya) Ivanova @neuranna.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Our #CogSci2026 paper on **self-reported variations in inner language** got the Disciplinary Diversity & Integration Award (philosophy + cogsci!) Paper: escholarship.org/uc/item/1qr6... +a journal-length preprint coming soon By Raquel Krempel, Jin Li @ruimingao.bsky.social @ruifengyu.bsky.social
escholarship.org
2245
Reposted by Eyas Ayesh
neurotaha @neurotaha.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
Excited to be at #CCN2026 in NYC! I’ll be presenting our poster, “Divergent Scaling Patterns in the Auditory Cortex vs. Other Brain Regions Reveal Distinct Sources of LLM–Brain Alignment,” with @neuranna.bsky.social 📌 Poster B78 · Session B 🗓️ Tuesday, August 4 Come say hi and check it out!
083
Reposted by Eyas Ayesh
Ruimin Gao 高睿敏 @ruimingao.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
How many subjects do you actually need for reliable task fMRI studies? Much larger samples are often recommended—but that depends on how you analyze the data. New preprint with @neuranna.bsky.social biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Scaling laws for group-constrained, subject-specific task fMRI analyses
Functional MRI provides a powerful way to characterize the architecture of the human brain. Yet individual brains often vary in the exact anatomic locations of functionally specific regions; as a resu...
2349
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Read more here: t.co/pIRHza5Snf
t.co
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/audwf_v1
000
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
We conclude with a call to action: AI deception research should be mechanism-sensitive. Rather than seek catch-all solutions, researchers should identify the capabilities and representations driving deception and use them to develop targeted monitoring, intervention, and mitigation strategies.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Box 2: Understanding a model’s cognitive-capabilities can inform us about its capacity for deception (can it deceive?), but not its propensity (will it?). The latter requires us to study agentic environments and how they incentivize deception. We briefly explore some of these incentives.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Two additional points. Box 1: Without mechanistic evidence, classifying deceptive behavior may be difficult. Evaluators can use either a parsimonious heuristic, assigning the lowest plausible level, or a precautionary one, assigning the highest, depending on their goals.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Language Fluency: the ability to generate plausible, strategically framed communication. Linguistic deception extends beyond just producing believable lies. An agent can hypothetically deceive via omission, implication, ambiguity, framing, or technically true but misleading statements.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
World Modeling: the ability to model and simulate the environment. Understanding the current state of the world, simulating plausible alternatives, and predicting how different actions would affect future outcomes can greatly enhance an agent's ability to successfully deceive.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Theory of Mind: the ability to model another agent’s beliefs, goals, and internal mental states. Explicit deception requires some ability to reason about what another agent currently believes, what belief the deceiver wants them to adopt, and how a particular action might change current beliefs.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Intentionality: an agent’s capacity for deliberate action. We break this down further into the ability to represent a goal, plan how to achieve it, and selectively execute or suppress actions in service of that goal.
110
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
We identify four core competencies that support explicit deception: intentionality, theory of mind, world modeling, and language fluency.
110
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Then, we focus on the most sophisticated level—explicit deception—where an agent acts with the deliberate goal of inducing a false belief in another agent. We ask: what cognitive capabilities are necessary for, or would greatly enhance, explicit deception?
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
First, we extend Mitchell’s 1986 framework for characterizing animal deception to AI systems, drawing parallels between animal and AI deception at each level. This framework classifies deceptive actions by their cognitive complexity, ranging from automatic or preprogrammed to deliberate.
110
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
In our new preprint, we take a cognitive approach, drawing on deception research in animal cognition and human cognitive psychology to identify cognitive capabilities that enable deception in AI systems.
100
Eyas Ayesh @eyasayesh.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
🚨New position piece! “Deception-Enabling Cognitive Capabilities in AI Systems” 🧠🤖 w/ @dobyrahnev.bsky.social @apurvaratan.bsky.social @neuranna.bsky.social To better identify and mitigate deceptive AI behaviors, we need a deeper understanding of their complex and multifaceted nature...🧵👇
1115