Sign in

iiinova is part of the Atmosphere — an open, public network where you own your identity.

Estelle Platini

@estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy
4 followers 2 following 37 posts

I discuss entanglement, beliefs, entitlement. (I purposely do not propagate news.) Banner: sepia photo of a 26-year-old facing the camera – Hannah Arendt, Europe, 1933 🌉 bridged from ⁂ techhub.social/@estelle, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

PostsRepliesMedia
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 18/10/2026
#Hasbara continued Brad Parscale's firm is registered under the US Foreign Agents Registration Act. Its supplemental statement for the six months ending 31 March 2026 reports $15,000,000 received from Havas Media Germany GmbH. The filing says in its own words what the work was:
$15Mto Brad Parscale's firm, for Israel's US campaignOfficial filing

Clock Tower X LLC of Medina, Ohio, whose owner the filing names as Bradley Parscale, is registered under the US Foreign Agents Registration Act as registrant 7649. Its supplemental statement for the six months ending 31 March 2026 reports $15,000,000 received and $13,061,802.50 spent. The filing says in its own words what the work was:

"Registrant has provide strategic communications, planning, and media services in support of Havas' engagement by the State of Israel to develop and execute a nationwide media campaign in the United States to combat antisemitism. Registrant has created websites, including regular blog and content updates; social media, including videos; and other content debunking misinformation about the state of Israel. Registrant's efforts have been exclusively conducted via online media."

Clock Tower X LLC, answer to Item 12, transcribed as filed

The money arrived from Havas Media Germany GmbH in six payments.

extract from https://whofundedgenocide.com/manufacturedconsensus/#proof-15m
000 0
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 14/10/2026
A protest movement born from anger over examination scandals has widened into a challenge over the accountability of #India's institutions. By Muhammad Amir: pearlsandirritations.com/post/2026/…
This is where the cockroach has become more dangerous. Exam scandals and voter rolls seem to belong to different worlds, but both raise the same question: can ordinary Indians trust the institutions that decide their opportunities and rights? The movement has joined the frustration of young people who believe effort no longer pays with the anxiety of voters who fear their voice may not count.

For more than a decade, Modi’s advantage has rested on more than winning elections. The BJP has shaped the national conversation through friendly television, a formidable social media machine and the language of nationalism. Critics were branded anti-national and uncomfortable questions drowned out. Often, the government could simply change the subject.

The cockroach complicates that strategy. It is difficult to humiliate people who have already turned an insult into their identity, and difficult to dismiss questions that cut across party loyalty. A student worried about exam leaks does not necessarily oppose the BJP; a voter questioning the rolls does not necessarily support Congress. The movement’s strength lies in giving such grievances a common language.
002 2
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 13/10/2026
"The Climate Movement Isn’t in Retreat, It’s Under Attack… and It’s Time to Fight Back", by Amy Westervelt: drilled.media/newsletter/the-climat…
No one group or policy will solve everything or appeal to everyone, and building a movement that can sustain requires tolerance of a wide range of approaches. The radical flank is crucial to expanding what’s deemed politically viable; the centrists and politicos are necessary for getting policy written and passed; and the movement as a whole has to show up for other movements. The key civil rights battles in this country have never been won only by the group whose rights were in question. The climate movement is battling the same exact organizations and people that oppose immigration, workers’ rights, women’s rights, and LGBTQ rights, and increasingly those organizations are being funded and amplified by the very same industries the climate movement is working to hold accountable, Big Oil and Big Tech.
000 0
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 03/10/2026
"The positive radical flank effect observed here suggests that non-violent radical actions may constitute a largely untapped strategic resource for moderate groups within the broader climate movement." M. Ostarek, B. Simpson, C. Rogers, J. Ozden (2024) […] [Original post on techhub.social]
Radical climate protests linked to increases in public support for moderate organizations

Abstract
Social movements have the power to drive large-scale social change but the effectiveness of disruptive tactics in achieving this change is uncertain. To shed light on this debate, we conducted nationally representative surveys before and after a week-long disruptive campaign to block London’s M25 motorway (November 2022) by the protest group Just Stop Oil (n = 1,415). Our results suggest that increased awareness of a radical group as a result of a highly publicized non-violent disruptive protest can increase identification with and support for more moderate climate groups (here, Friends of the Earth) in the span of only 2 weeks. Our study provides new insights into the dynamics of social movements and the role of radical protest in driving change. The positive radical flank effect observed here suggests that non-violent radical actions may constitute a largely untapped strategic resource for moderate groups within the broader climate movement.
211 2
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 25/09/2026
"We argue that scientific creativity is not merely an individual trait but an emerging property of a supportive academic landscape and that maintaining or restoring it may require substantial structural reforms. These include promoting stable research pathways […] [Original post on techhub.social]
Abstract
We argue that contemporary scientific systems progressively constrain high-risk and conceptually innovative research while being increasingly structured around short funding cycles, productivity-based evaluation criteria and risk-averse frameworks that favour predictable and non-transformative research outputs. Drawing on recent empirical literature, we show how such systems can place disproportionate pressure on early-career researchers by incentivizing safe, tractable and easily evaluated outputs. Structural academic mechanisms such as peer review and funding, escalating publication costs and institutional inequalities interact with precarious employment and hierarchical dependencies. In this environment, we contend that strategic conformity becomes a rational career path. This risks suppressing creativity and critical thinking precisely at the stage when scientific independence could otherwise emerge. Consequently, the probability of substantive contributions by early-career researchers is declining, while talent may increasingly abandon academia or cluster within a limited number of well-resourced institutions and national systems. By adopting a systems-level perspective, we argue that scientific creativity is not merely an individual trait but an emerging property of a supportive academic landscape and that maintaining or restoring it may require substantial structural reforms. These include promoting stable research pathways, decentralized decision-making and evaluation frameworks that better recognize collaboration, originality, persistence and nonlinear career trajectories. Without systemic change, we risk stifling the potential of early-career researchers to go beyond the confines of existing methods and approaches and deliver transformative advances. This would limit their capacity to meaningfully change our understanding of the world or benefit society, with impacts that fall short of their potential.
011 1
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 23/07/2026
'Applying an identical rule to unequal starting points does not produce a fair outcome. It simply reproduces existing advantage and calls it consistency.' 'We asked him to reconsider, and set out why a flat, one-size-fits-all deadline disadvantages […] [Original post on techhub.social]
equality vs equity, a cartoon by Angus Maguire
132 3
Estelle Platini @estelle.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 12/07/2026
Description and notification do not prevent sexual violence against children. What is efficient includes: * building community; * empowering children; * school-based behavioural change programs; * self-defense training. "What works to prevent sexual violence […] [Original post on techhub.social]
Awareness-raising campaigns (national): no effectMandatory reporting: conflicting
Notification of juveniles: harmfulTherapeutic approaches for survivors: effective
Therapy for child/youth offenders: effectiveschool-based behavioral change programs: effective
self-defense training: effective
101 1