iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

it's variable selection im concerned about not df within model

yes that's why im saying this looks like garden of forking paths

given that fit we should expect a much larger deviation from the trend line than observed though? that is not a tight fit

100

I didn't independently find brokenwheel through repost analysis. There's also a distinction between sources, boosters, and both (e.g. where Will S****** is reposted most by the network but doesn't repost them back). Just tryna be careful about agreement vs artificial boosting.

120

the last two are not sources, just boosters, they post no actual content but repost the main trios content aggressively yeah

other relevant accounts that are not as clearly part of a coordinated reposting network but tightly linked are vibecession forever, marbleliberal, kerravon, fascismheckler, and nutedawn

just look at counts of those accounts reposting each other's content for validation starting in Feb 2024 it is very blatant

210

he, Ellie, segfaultvicta, simon-blone, and gojira007 form a reposting network (simon mostly for mike and gojira mostly for ellie) that spreads anti-anti-transphobic, anti-anti-Israel, pro-establishment-D, and general left-punching content. This has existed since the bsky public launch in Feb 2024

111

Sorry I meant why would i want an argument from someone incapable of making one

100

you haven't made an argument yet

100

he isn't *making* an argument in this thread, he is claiming his opponents aren't and that's false

100

he is acting like his objectors are responding to the argument he lays out in his first point. They are responding to his other argument. do you follow?

100

andy is the one claiming he only made one argument. i am just saying he didn't

210

also anita sarkeesian did not think more feminism in gaming was going to prevent the cornell 7 this is insane thinking

000

can you show me one person who thought not like us was gonna reduce child abuse or was about anything other than drake? be for fucking real

livia 🇵🇸 @livartz.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

if earth had a thicc booty would it be oriented like *this* or like *this* 🤔

000

Reposted by DJ

listening to dvorak. no clue how he played this on that weird keyboard

07326

I am actually curious (sorry for not being able to detach @s) what you qua being in privacy perceive MLPs to be doing? In my mind the answer is highly dependent on hidden layer dimension relative to I/O dimensions (background in comp psych/comp neuro)

your post specifically argues a different positive case that hypothetical machine ability to perform tasks similar to consciousness should make us more likely to believe current LLMs think and understand–a completely urelated and non sequitur argument. that's likely some cause of the confusion

100

grindset people now code alone 10 hours a day academics saying their network is their net worth what the hell

121

be careful, someone is going to call you a "folk-Cartesian" for this one fr fr

040

also your 4 million number *includes* bernie trump so you're the one who included them in the first place

000

you have not quantified the bernie or bust cohort at all! you're just doing implication!

100

sanders-didn't vote are also not mostly leftists and progressives! sanders stein is tiny!

000

My issue is you are misidentifying the quantity of actual progressives or leftists who abstained in 2016 and certainly there were very few in 2020 so why is it still your whipping horse because it clearly doesn't matter going forward unless you want to punch left which is worse for the party *now*

000

you keep saying "left abstainers" to describe socially conservative and crank independent primary voters in often open primaries in generally red states who make up the sanders trump cohort in 2016

200

do you have a source for this? my understanding is that 15% comes from exit polls (notoriously unreliable for self report) whle the higher estimate comes from voter rolls

000

I don't think that's really right. Bernie 2016 had many more independents and social conservatives, 2020 was more progressives and leftists in his coalition. The change you are identifying is that leftists are strong party soldiers relative to, eg Clinton 2008 or independents and social cons

ok and 25% of clinton primary voters who voted in the general voted *for McCain*. All of these data points suggest that it is centrists and crank independents that swing against liberals, not progressives or leftists

100

This is a fully general way to say electing unpopular candidates in primaries that go on to lose is the fault of their more broadly popular opponents

000

that's not...that's not meaningful at all like how many *Clinton* primary voters didn't vote for Clinton in the general?

200

bernie or bust if even measureable is like what 5% the size of nader? 1%?

100

I argued the only reasonable prior over the question insofar as it doesn't already encode your beliefs about the future is the Haldane prior. If it does encode your beliefs about the future you can't use it to update your own beliefs about the future. Really not that complicated, but idk

if there's no functional definition of "intelligence" of which to have a super amount, it's impossible to define a limit, though

020

between 2014 and 2024 each biased presidential and midterm underestimated Rs, that is the cause of the impression

the person I responded to specifically doesn't seem to think it was meaningless or an interruption and it is relevant to other conversations I have had with him

im not talking about capabilities

100

I don't believe this is true, but I will consider it

ftr I'm talking about this refrain about "small community of experts" as a catch all rebuttal not this specific thread

this would be more convincing if they didn't self-select for specific beliefs. academic experts in the same field do not have the same unity of thought here

230

There is no utterance of any valence upon which you cannot find such a reading. That is the issue with this generality, anything all-encompassing and irrefutable is a natural law or logical tautology. The problem comes when you say "don't do a conservatism" when you can count everything as such

020

i am not death, illness, pestilence, or war