Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Third, a Psychology of Science Hub collaboration I co-authored: ⚡ Publishing, Incentives, and Conflict: An Action Research Inquiry 📅 Thu, Oct 8 | 10:30–11:25 UTC Sessions have several talks; stay for the whole slot! 🎟️ Register free: bigteamscienceconference.github.io 053
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 03/10/2026⚡ ManyContexts: Measuring the Worlds That Big Team Science Samples 📅 Wed, Oct 7 | 13:00–13:55 UTC ⚡ Invariance Blindness: When Cross-Cultural Inference Outruns Measurement Validity 📅 Thu, Oct 8 | 10:30–11:25 UTC 141
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 03/10/2026We have three Lightning Talks at the Big Team Science Conference 2026, and I'm presenting two live on Zoom 🌍 Two, with @onurcanyilmaz.bsky.social, ask what cross-cultural research often skips: 1. Do we know the contexts we're comparing? 2. Do our measures mean the same thing everywhere? 140
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Excited to present our work at the Culture & Cognition 2026 Conference! Across four preregistered studies (N = 4,102) in the US and Türkiye, religious and secular authority primes changed cognitive accessibility—but not generosity. See you at #Psychonomic2026! 000
Reposted by Ensar AcemSociety for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · 25/08/2026Congratulations to the project “Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not,” which received🏆2026 SIPS commendation! It uses action research to explore whether the structural incentive to publish constitutes a conflict of interest that ought to be disclosed.conflictofinterest.scienceConflict of Interest ResearchAcademic publishing advances knowledge, but it also advances careers. 173
Reposted by Ensar AcemEvolutionary Social Psychology @socialpsych.bsky.social · 27/07/2026Empirical evidence suggests human cooperation often departs from classic reciprocity models. Long-term relationships, partner choice, and relationship maintenance may be more central than tit-for-tat-like exchange. Rethinking Reciprocity(Mathew & Boyd, 2026): www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 12010
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 27/07/2026Share your perspective through our survey on the project website. Your input will help inform future discussions on conflict of interest, transparency, research integrity, and better scientific practices. Project website: conflictofinterest.science 030
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 27/07/2026Grateful to be part of this project. Thanks to my coauthors at the Psychology of Science Hub: @verheyensteven.bsky.social @duddaleonie.bsky.social @mamsmandrill.bsky.social @martakowal.bsky.social @milkos.bsky.social @moralnosc.bsky.social @bzubaly.bsky.social and all coauthors not on Blusky! 141
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 27/07/2026For a summary of the paper and the full discussion, see this thread: bsky.app/profile/ensa... 121
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 27/07/2026Honored that our paper, "Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not," received a 2026 Commendation from the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (@improvingpsych.org). 263
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 26/07/2026Many thanks to @akinunver.bsky.social, the organizing team, lecturers, assistants, my teammates—Mehrdad Heshmat, Chengqian Wang, and Zehra Usta—and all the participants for making SICSS such a rewarding experience. Looking forward to the collaborations and ideas that began in Istanbul. 000
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 26/07/2026I'm excited to explore how AI- and LLM-based experiments can complement my research on social cognition, cooperation, and moral behavior. Beyond the methods, what made #SICSS special was its intellectually stimulating environment, inspiring discussions, and the friendships. 120
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 26/07/2026The biggest takeaway for me was our group project, RoboPsyche. After 10+ years of designing and conducting experiments with human participants, this was my first experience experimenting with #LLM agents. I have a feeling this won't be the last. 100
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 26/07/2026We explored how LLMs are reshaping #ComputationalSocialScience — from computational text analysis and AI agents to causal inference and the methodological challenges of integrating these systems into research. A truly thought-provoking experience. 110
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 26/07/2026Grateful to have participated in the Summer Institute in Computational Social Science ( #SICSSIstanbul2026). This year's theme—Social Sciences in the Age of Large Language Models—offered an exciting perspective on how LLMs are transforming computational social science. 110
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 05/04/2026Huge thanks to @balazsaczel.bsky.social and @szaszibarnabas.bsky.social for leading this ambitious project, and to all contributors involved—and to @cos.io for making it possible. Really happy to be a small part of this collective effort pushing toward more transparent and robust science. 030
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 05/04/2026Our large-scale multi-analyst project is now out in Nature (@nature.com)! 🚨 Same data, different analysts → different results. Analytical choices matter more than we assume, with implications for robustness in social & behavioral science. www.nature.com/articles/s41...nature.comInvestigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences - NatureWhen 100 social and behavioural science claims were examined, 34% of reanalyses closely matched the original results, with 74% reaching the same conclusion, revealing limited robustness of single... 1124
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 25/03/2026Learned of Robert Trivers’ passing. His ideas shaped how I think. I remember writing his name repeatedly in my grad school applications, alongside E. O. Wilson, W. D. Hamilton, and Edward Westermarck. I like to imagine them in conversation somewhere. 010
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 23/11/2025And kudos to Melih Varol for presenting our lab’s theoretical projection: 🔹 The Future of Moral Psychology: A Multilevel Integrative Approach with Dual Inheritance Theory Looking forward to more events that bring together researchers passionate about the science of morality! 🔬✨🙌 020
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 23/11/2025Thanks to my co-authors for their talks: 🔸 The Moral Intention–Behavior Gap in Religious and Non-Religious Individuals — @ilaydavelioglu.bsky.social 🔸 Authority Reminders and Prosocial Behavior — @rozelinvurgun.bsky.social 🔸 Religious Ingroup Bias in Anonymous Interactions — Selenay Keleş 110
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 23/11/2025I had the pleasure of presenting two of our studies: 🔹 Metaethics, Beliefs, and Prosocial Behavior: A Longitudinal Study 🔹 Divine Order and Human Justice: The Impact of Religious Identity and Cues on Third-Party Punishment 100
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 23/11/2025This weekend, our Moral Intuitions Lab presented five studies from our Templeton Religion Trust project (@templetonrelig.bsky.social) at the III. National Symposium on Morality Studies in Social Psychology. A fantastic gathering of researchers working on morality! 🧠✨ 121
Reposted by Ensar AcemBenjamin Zubaly @bzubaly.bsky.social · 14/11/2025A lovely summary by @ensaracem.bsky.social of our new paper in Theory and Society. Many great collaborators and I provide a balanced overview of, and some potential responses to, this important normative scientific conflict. Open access in his thread. We'd love to hear your perspective. 021
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 13/11/2025To broaden the conversation, we are now collecting perspectives across fields. If you work in research, we would be grateful for your input. 📋 Survey: erasmusuniversity.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_... 022
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 13/11/2025Thanks @duddaleonie.bsky.social, @mamsmandrill.bsky.social, @martakowal.bsky.social, @milkos.bsky.social, @moralnosc.bsky.social, @bzubaly.bsky.social and all co-authors (not on Blusky too)! Special thanks to @verheyensteven.bsky.social for leading this collaboration. Grateful to be part of it! 121
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 13/11/2025We suggest: • Integrating COI & bias discussions into training • Encouraging everyday reflexivity • Examining institutional incentives • Using safeguards like preregistration & registered reports 140
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 13/11/2025We argue that simply declaring “I publish to advance my career” is not necessarily helpful. Instead, we need better reflection on how incentives operate—not just more boilerplate COI statements. 110
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 13/11/2025Publishing matters for knowledge, but also for jobs, promotions, and stability. This dual function creates incentives that can subtly shape decisions throughout the research process—often without being acknowledged. 110
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 13/11/2025Our new paper is out in Theory and Society: “Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not.” We examine whether the structural pressure to publish should itself be understood as a conflict of interest—and what that means for research culture. link.springer.com/article/10.1...link.springer.comWhy I declare a conflict of interest and you should not - Theory and SocietyAcademic publishing is both an indication of scientific contribution and a currency for career advancement. This dual role gives rise to a normative scientific conflict: Does the structural incentive ... 182
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 17/08/2025See the details of our latest TRT (@templetonrelig.bsky.social) project: templetonreligiontrust.org/explore/does...templetonreligiontrust.orgDoes Religion Make Us Better? Exploring Faith as Moral GPS 010
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 24/05/2025Had a great time presenting our results on how religious and secular authority cues shape altruistic punishment at the "Trust and Cognition" workshop hosted by OZU Social Cognition Lab, led by Dr. Pınar Ugurlar. Big thanks to everyone who sparked such thought-provoking discussion! 010
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 10/02/2025We tested MFQ-2 and MAC-Q in a Turkish sample (N=1099). 1️⃣ Both fit well. 2️⃣ MFQ-2 explained more variance in psychological variables. 3️⃣ MAC-Q better predicted moral behavior (e.g., generosity, cooperation). #MoralPsychology #moralfoundations #moralityascooperation 🔗 doi.org/10.1007/s121...doi.orgValidation of the moral foundations questionnaire-2 in the Turkish context: exploring its relationship with moral behavior - Current PsychologyDespite the considerable attention it has received, Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) remains open to criticisms regarding failure to conceptualize the moral domain. MFT was revised in response to these ... 162
Reposted by Ensar AcemCognitive Science of Religion @scienceofreligion.bsky.social · 08/02/2025As religious beliefs increase, the perception of compatibility between religion and science on existential issues rises. Conversely, as belief in science grows, the perception of conflict between religion and science increases. The data comes from the UK, the Netherlands, and Kazakhstan. 1102
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 08/02/20253) Yes, reflection may manifest differently across groups. In this study, we measured it using standard techniques, such as the CRT, Raven's Matrices, and open-mindedness measures. Believers generally score lower on these measures than nonbelievers in the US. Do these answer your questions? 100
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 08/02/20252) While genetic modes are unclear, individual differences certainly exist. For example, quest religiosity is positively linked to cognitive reflection, whereas intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity are negatively linked. 100
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 08/02/2025Thanks for your questions! 1) Yes, cultural differences likely influence this relationship. Literature shows a positive relationship between reflection and religious belief in places like the US and China. 100
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 08/02/2025🚨 New paper! 🚨 Cognitive reflection was negatively correlated with belief in God & disbelief in evolution—for both Christians & non-believers. This challenges the idea that reflection simply reinforces prior beliefs—challenging ERM and supporting DPM. 🔗 doi.org/10.1017/jdm.... 292
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 02/05/2024🚨 Our chapter, "Heroism as Moral Intuition," is now available in the Encyclopedia of Heroism Studies. We explore heroism as evolved moral intuition for conflict resolution from the perspective of Morality as Cooperation Theory. link.springer.com/referencewor...link.springer.comHeroism as Moral Intuition'Heroism as Moral Intuition' published in 'Encyclopedia of Heroism Studies' 2123
Reposted by Ensar AcemEvolutionary Social Psychology @socialpsych.bsky.social · 28/09/2023Generalized morality culturally evolves as an adaptive heuristic in large social networks. psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?d... 1153
Reposted by Ensar AcemCognitive Science of Religion @scienceofreligion.bsky.social · 27/09/2023🚨 Post-doc alert 🚨 Post-Doctoral Fellowship in the Cognitive Neuroscience of Religious Belief in Jordan Grafman’s Cognitive Neuroscience Lab at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab & Northwestern University Details: www.cognitiveneuroscienceofreligion.org/opportunities 052
Reposted by Ensar AcemCognitive Science of Religion @scienceofreligion.bsky.social · 27/09/2023A new model of the evolutionary function of awe. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....journals.sagepub.comThe Evolutionary Function of Awe: A Review and Integrated Model of Seven Theoretical Perspectives - ...This narrative review aims to contribute to the scientific literature on awe by reviewing seven perspectives on the evolutionary function of awe. Each is presen... 041
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 27/09/2023🧠 Curious about the fascinating world of cognitive science and religion? 🚀 Follow this account for insightful updates that will expand your understanding. #CognitiveScience #Religion 242
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 23/09/2023🔬🧠 #HiSciSky! I'm a PhD candidate in Psychological Sciences exploring the fascinating overlap between social psychology and behavioral economics. My focus? Morality, religion, politics, and cooperation. Stay tuned for intriguing insights from my research journey! 🌟 1232