Sign in

Elliot Mamet

@emamet.bsky.social
817 followers 769 following 21 posts

Associate Research Scholar and Lecturer, Princeton School of Public and International Affairs. “Hope is a song in a weary throat”—Pauli Murray. spia.princeton.edu/faculty/em1886

PostsRepliesMedia
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Many thanks, @rlarochelle.bsky.social, and to the Robertson Prize committee; we are very appreciative!
010
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 06/06/2026
*in the style of the Aristocrats*: "The Insular Cases!"
23923
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
The Conversation U.S. @us.theconversation.com · 06/06/2026
About 3.6 million Americans live in U.S. territories, but they can't vote in presidential elections. Why? The answer goes back to a series of Supreme Court decisions from 125 years ago.
theconversation-dot-yamm-track.appspot.com
US territories have a voice in Congress but no vote – here’s why
125 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that some territories belonged to the US but weren’t part of it. The reasoning was openly racist – and it still shapes how millions are represented in Congress.
03621
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Honolulu Civil Beat @civilbeat.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
Some 3.6 million residents of U.S. territories can vote in presidential primaries but not the general election because of where they live.
civilbeat.org
US Territories Have A Voice In Congress But No Vote. Here’s Why
Some 3.6 million residents of U.S. territories can vote in presidential primaries but not the general election because of where they live.
131
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
New piece in @theconversation.com from Austin Bussing and me, reflecting on 125 years of the Insular Cases and their legacy in Congress. theconversation.com/us-territori...
theconversation.com
US territories have a voice in Congress but no vote – here’s why
125 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that some territories belonged to the US but weren’t part of it. The reasoning was openly racist – and it still shapes how millions are represented in Congress.
001
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
@emamet.bsky.social also wrote this barnburner about how House delegates don't make up for the lack of formal representation for US territories and DC: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10....
Representation on the Periphery:
The Past and Future
of Nonvoting Members
of Congress
E L L I O T M A M E T
A B S T R A C T
Nonvoting representatives, representing American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mari-
ana Islands, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, and Washington, DC, inhabit a periph-
eral space within the US Congress. House rules bar them from voting on the floor, their
authority derives not from the Constitution but from statute, and the office they hold can
be revoked at the whims of Congress. Drawing on original archival research, this article
sketches out three justifications given for this institution: that nonvoting members
would increase information flows to the legislature, that they would incorporate periph-
eral territory prior to statehood, and that they would empower members to use tools be-
sides voting to exercise political power. It then evaluates the normative status of nonvot-
ing representation in democratic theory, arguing that representation without voting is
incongruent with notions of consent and equal power required for democratic self-rule.
281
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
Allow me to alert you to the existence of this paper on why democratic equality requires DC statehood and the scholar, @emamet.bsky.social, doing the hard work of outlining perhaps the most significant gaps in basic democratic representation under the American flag: doi.org/10.1017/S153...
Democratic Equality for Washington, D.C.!
Elliot Mamet
The political status of Washington, D.C., is a longstanding question in American political thought. Intervening in that debate, I
argue that Washington, D.C. deserves democratic equality. Democratic equality entails that, at a minimum, D.C. residents should
have the power to vote for representatives in national and local legislatures (like residents of the several states), that their vote should
have equal weight to others, and that D.C.’s elected legislative representatives should have power to vote on what the law is. This
ideal of democratic equality for D.C. is only possible via D.C. statehood. Drawing on original archival research, the article provides a
historical overview of D.C.’s democratic disenfranchisement, outlines three principal forms of democratic inequality faced by
D.C. residents, and imagines what democratic equality for D.C. might look like. It concludes by sketching a broader research
agenda about the democratic injustices accorded to those Americans living outside the several statesThe article proceeds as follows. First, I survey D.C.’s
long history of democratic disenfranchisement. Second, I
outline three principal forms of democratic disenfranchise-
ment faced by D.C. residents: in its limited local self-
government, votelessness in the House, and voicelessness in
the Senate. Third, I present an argument that D.C. deserves
democratic equality and respond to the most persuasive
objections. Fourth, I imagine what democratic equality for
D.C. would look like in practical terms. And last, I propose a
broader research agenda about the democratic injustices
accorded to Americans living outside the several states. In
addition to Washington, D.C., the territories of American
Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto
Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands are all located on the
U.S. democratic periphery, and the residents of those terri-
tories also confront acute democratic inequalities. Political
science ought to better confront the state-centered bound-
aries of U.S. politics, boundaries which create an enduring
inequality between states and non-states in American
democratic life.
1245
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 08/10/2025
Thanks very much to the GW Hatchet for this write-up of my talk at the GW Museum and Textile Museum @gwu1821.bsky.social gwhatchet.com/2025/08/28/p...
gwhatchet.com
Political scientist talks DC’s nonvoting delegate, home rule ‘under attack’
Elliot Mamet, a research associate and lecturer at Princeton University, said home rule has never been “under attack” as much as it is today by President Donald Trump’s administration and discussed th...
022
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
LSE US Politics and Policy blog - USAPP @lseusablog.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
The weakening of the Voting Rights Act is a fundamental threat to multiracial democracy write @michaelgreenberger.bsky.social of @uofdenver.bsky.social and Jasmine Carrera Smith of George Washington University blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/20...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
The weakening of the Voting Rights Act is a fundamental threat to multiracial democracy | USAPP
Federal enforcement has historically been the only reliable guarantee of Black political representation - and therefore multiracial democracy - in the South.
021
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
LSE US Politics and Policy blog - USAPP @lseusablog.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
Washington, D.C deserves democratic equality – and that means statehood writes @emamet.bsky.social of the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/20...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
Washington, D.C deserves democratic equality – and that means statehood | USAPP
D.C. residents should be afforded the democratic rights enjoyed by most other Americans.
022
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 21/05/2025
#OpenAccess from the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics - Federal Enforcement and Black Political Representation: Evidence from Reconstruction and the Voting Rights Act - cup.org/4drlmAz - @michaelgreenberger.bsky.social & Jasmine Carrera Smith #FirstView #JREP10
Logo featuring the acronym "JREP" in white letters on a large red circle, with a grey background adorned with numerous smaller red circles. The hashtag "#OpenAccess" is displayed in white at the bottom.
022
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
APSA CFP @apsacfp.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
From one Capitol to another! 💡 Our Congressional Fellows explored the Richmond State House, gaining insights from Delegate Pugh Kent, Senator VanValkenburg, Cal Whitehead, Dr. Lauren Bell (CFP '97-'98), & Elizabeth Beyer (CFP '22-'23). Grateful for the opportunity to learn from the best! #APSACFP
CFP Fellows taking an informative tour of Richmond State House
031
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Perspectives on Politics @poppublicsphere.bsky.social · 18/03/2025
NOW OUT ON FIRSTVIEW!! #Democratic #Equality for #Washington, D.C.! By @emamet.bsky.social doi.org/10.1017/S153...
052
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 18/03/2025
Amid ongoing debates about Washington, D.C.'s autonomy, I have a new article out arguing that democratic equality for D.C. is only possible via statehood. @poppublicsphere.bsky.social
061
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
Hakeem Jefferson @hakeemjefferson.bsky.social · 12/02/2025
Just ordered @profjw.bsky.social’s new book, We Choose You. Looks like tmrw is drop day. It explores what shapes Black voters’ candidate choices beyond race, highlighting how signals of group commitment matter most. Can’t wait to dive in. Congrats, Prof. Wamble! www.cambridge.org/core/books/w...
cambridge.org
We Choose You
Cambridge Core - American Studies - We Choose You
35913
Reposted by Elliot Mamet
John Hutchins @johnehutchins.bsky.social · 08/12/2024
Promoting Bipartisanship in an Era of Polarization: The House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress, by @mbcoven.bsky.social & @emamet.bsky.social successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications...
2113
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 15/11/2024
Congress bluesky: excited to have published this case study on the House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress with Martha Coven. The Committee made real changes to improve Congress—and modeled a way of working together across differences. Available here:
successfulsocieties.princeton.edu
Promoting Bipartisanship in an era of Polarization: The House Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress
In 2019, amid record high levels of political polarization, the US House of Representatives established a Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress. The committee’s goal was to “make Congress ...
051
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 17/05/2024
Thrilled to share this article, with Austin Bussing, on race, democracy, and the creation of four new seats in Congress in the 1970s. The story conveys an enduring political inequality for residents of Washington D.C. and the U.S. territories. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...
021
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 06/11/2023
"Delegates to the House of Representatives: Who Are They and What Do They Do?" Happy to share this episode of the Understanding Congress podcast. Listen here: www.aei.org/podcast/dele...
110
Elliot Mamet @emamet.bsky.social · 22/09/2023
Thrilled to have this piece with Cameron Dehart now in print in State Politics & Policy Quarterly. We study the nonvoting tribal delegates in Maine’s state legislature, and ask about what it means for them to have a voice, but not a vote. Available open access here: cambridge.org/core/journal...
060