Sign in

Eileen Clancy

@eileenclancy.bsky.social
138 followers 86 following 45 posts

Managing Editor for Lifecycle Journal at Center for Open Science @cos.io.

PostsRepliesMedia
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Paper-Wizard is an AI-powered evaluation that aims to deliver comprehensive, actionable feedback on academic papers in minutes to help authors critically evaluate and enhance their manuscripts with speed and precision paper-wizard.com
paper-wizard.com
An AI scientist for working scientists
Built by a lab that publishes its own autonomous research. Manuscript review, literature search, reviewer chat: every output uses the same engine that publishes our papers.
010
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
@unjournal.bsky.social is a grant-funded nonprofit organization aiming to make research more impactful and rigorous, recruiting paid peer review for research in economics and quantitative social science with potential for global impact.
020
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Statcheck can be considered a “spellchecker for statistics”: it searches the text for results of null hypothesis significance tests and checks whether the reported p-value matches its accompanying test statistic and degrees of freedom. statcheck.io
statcheck.io
statcheck // web
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
@socscipredict.bsky.social offers a systematic tool for collecting expert forecasts about study outcomes. By gathering expert predictions ex ante, researchers can establish clear benchmarks against which to compare eventual findings, to help mitigate publication bias and improve experimental design.
020
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
@researchhubf.bsky.social ResearchHub provides a innovative open peer review marketplace for authors and journals, reducing review timelines from months to an avg of 10 days. Reviewers are financially incentivized with ResearchCoin, promoting rapid, high-quality feedback while promoting open science
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
SciScore is a scientific methods integrity checking tool covering several checklists, including MDAR and STAR Methods. It provides a report that identifies which guideline items are found (or not) in submitted text, while assessing whether the criterion is applicable to the manuscript @sciscore.com
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
ReviewerZero AI spots potential integrity issues in research manuscripts—like statistical mistakes, citation errors, duplicated content in figures and tables, and potentially manipulated data www.reviewerzero.ai
reviewerzero.ai
Protect your science at any stage | ReviewerZero AI
ReviewerZero AI helps researchers protect scientific integrity by detecting threats early. Our AI-powered platform analyzes manuscripts for image manipulation, statistical errors, citation errors, and...
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
RegCheck leverages LLMs and AI to automatically compare preregistration plans with scientific publications. This lets researchers effortlessly identify if and how executed studies deviated from the initial plan regcheck.app
regcheck.app
RegCheck
RegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.
021
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
@prereview.bsky.social supports & empowers diverse and historically excluded researcher communities and other expert reviewers to engage in open preprint peer review, offering a free-to-use online review publication platform with a request-a-review feature that helps users find preprints to review
010
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
PCI is a peer-review and endorsement service that publicly evaluates – through peer review – and recommends/highlights high-quality preprints deposited in open archives. @peercommunityin.bsky.social @pci-regreports.bsky.social
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
@oga-community.bsky.social OGA evaluates the quality of information about antibody choice and use within a research protocol or manuscript and provides a report showing which experiments relied on antibodies, and information about the suitability of the antibodies for these specific experiments.
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
MetaRoR is a publish-review-curate platform for metaresearch where review reports and editorial assessments are shared publicly to help readers assess submitted metaresearch articles. The platform aims to change the way we communicate about science. @metaror.bsky.social
021
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
DataSeer fills the urgent need for low-cost, scalable solutions to measure open science, show researchers how to comply with policy, and deploy just-in-time interventions. @dataseerai.bsky.social
000
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
CODECHECK has a workflow and roles to evaluate computer programs underlying scientific papers for their reproducibility. A CODECHECK certificate states that one codechecker was able to follow author instructions at one point in time and largely came to the same outputs and results. codecheck.org.uk
codecheck.org.uk
CODECHECK
CODECHECK is a process for independent execution of computations underlying scholarly research articles.
010
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Lifecycle Journal is a publish-before-review, journal-agnostic evaluation model that couldn't exist without our evaluation and peer review partners. So this #PeerReviewWeek I want to give a huge THANK YOU for all of their hard work and for supporting Lifecycle Journal! #PRW2026
1440
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
"From Misconduct to Reform: Understanding Perceptions of Those who Commit & Call out Questionable Research Practices" by Lewis and Tullet prereview.org/preprints/do...
prereview.org
Write a PREreview
020
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
"Superstitions and economic activity: Evidence from eclipses in India" by Tagat, Vajjala, and Narvekar prereview.org/preprints/do...
prereview.org
Write a PREreview
020
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
"High Levels of Reporting of Exploratory Research in Registered Reports and Preregistered Articles" by Syed, Armstrong, Chan, and Person prereview.org/preprints/do...
prereview.org
Write a PREreview
020
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
It's #PeerReviewWeek! You can help us celebrate at Lifecycle Journal by reviewing some of our submissions through PREreview. See thread for manuscripts with open review requests (1/4) @prereview.bsky.social #PRW2026 #OpenPeerReview
333
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
We hoping to have some Lifecycle Journal submissions included in this effort!
020
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 30/06/2026
COS submitted a public comment opposing proposed revisions in OMB’s Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance. We join 300+ orgs requesting an extension to the comment period. Request is yet to be granted; comment period closes July 13. Read our concerns & add your voice:
cos.io
What OMB’s Proposed Grantmaking Revisions Could Mean for Research Integrity
The Center for Open Science (COS) submitted a public comment opposing several proposed revisions in the White House Office of Management and Budget’s proposed Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance. We share why we weighed in, our concerns, and how to add your voice.
027
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Incentivizing Open and Collaborative Research (ICOR) @icoropen.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
💡 How to redesign the publishing paradigm? Our recent webinar unpacked work towards a new framework for sharing, versioning, and verifying research. Thanks to our speakers! 🙌 🎬 Recording & summary out now: incentivizingopen.org/2026/07/want...
incentivizingopen.org
Want to Make Science Work Better? Let’s Talk About How. | ICOR
Rowan Cockett, Curvenote and Continuous Science Foundation Stephanie Orphan, arXiv Richard Sever, openRxiv Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, PLoS
023
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 07/07/2026
⚙️ New on the COS blog: Principal Research Scientist Noah Haber (@whaleactually.com) shares how the SCORE project developed a collaborative reproducible manuscript workflow, walks through two different approaches, and introduces an open-source R package. www.cos.io/blog/toward-...
cos.io
Toward Collaborative Reproducible Manuscripts
COS Principal Research Scientist Noah Haber shares how the SCORE project developed a collaborative reproducible manuscript workflow, walks through two different approaches, and introduces an open-sour...
0159
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Excellent news! Nature is expanding Registered Reports to all the fields in which they publish! A great result by all those proposing this strong solution to publication bias and selective reporting (and getting expert feedback before data collection)! www.nature.com/articles/d41...
114273
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
I'm looking forward to #WCRI2026 next week, I'll be presenting some of the @cos.io research team's work in the symposium on "The Interplay between Open Science, Transparency and Artificial Intelligence" Wednesday morning. Hope to see some of you there!
073
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 12/03/2026
The 2025 COS Impact Report is now live! From open infrastructure to research initiatives, policy engagement, and global partnerships, see what COS accomplished over the past year to advance transparent, rigorous, and accessible research. 🔍 Check out the report: www.cos.io/impact
094
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 12/03/2026
📋 TOP 101: An Overview of the Transparency & Openness Promotion Guidelines April 1, 11 AM ET Learn about the TOP framework, which provides recommendations for journals, funders, universities, & researchers about practices that can increase verifiability of research claims.
cos-io.zoom.us
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: TOP 101: An Overview of the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar.
The Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP) is a policy framework that can provide specific recommendations for journals, research funders, universities, and researchers about practices that are designed to increase the verifiability of empirical research claims. TOP was updated in 2025 and contains three main parts: Research Practices, Verification Practices, and Verification Studies. This webinar will include an overview of these components and how TOP’s tiered and modular structure makes it applicable to a diverse community of researchers and policymakers. This webinar is part of COS’s ongoing campaign to demonstrate implementations of our Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines (https://bit.ly/top-guidelines), grounding our policy framework in real-world examples. If you have feedback, implementation stories, or lessons learned from working with TOP, get in touch with us at top@cos.io.
043
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 21/02/2026
"A micro-panel data analysis of residential energy demand in Germany", a Research Plan in @cos.io Lifecycle Journal, is under review at @researchhubf.bsky.social. You can be part of the evaluation process, but hurry, bounty closes in 4 days! www.researchhub.com/paper/110835...
researchhub.com
A micro-panel data analysis of residential energy demand ...
Stylized representations of actually diverse populations of pr...
031
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 19/02/2026
COS has released its 2026–2028 Strategic Plan, outlining a focused direction for advancing openness, integrity, and trustworthiness in research. This plan aligns our work around Lifecycle Open Science (LOS)—research with publicly accessible plans, contents, and outcomes. 💡:
cos.io
Introducing COS’s 2026–2028 Strategic Plan: Advancing Lifecycle Open Science
The Center for Open Science (COS) has released its 2026–2028 Strategic Plan, outlining a focused, three-year direction for advancing openness, integrity, and trustworthiness in research.
066
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
Lifecycle Journal pub "Reversal or no reversal, that is the question – A conceptual replication of cross-cultural spatial-numerical associations" is under review at @researchhubf.bsky.social 2 days left on the bounty if you want to be part of the evaluation! www.researchhub.com/paper/105961...
researchhub.com
Reversal or no reversal, that is the question – A concept...
Reading direction is a central determinant of spatial–numerica...
011
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
"Consciousness and emotions in non-human animals: Are laypeople more or less skeptical than experts?", a Research Plan in @cos.io Lifecycle Journal, is under review at @researchhubf.bsky.social. You can be part of the evlauation process, bounty closes in 3 days: www.researchhub.com/paper/105979...
researchhub.com
Consciousness and emotions in non-human animals: Are layp...
Consciousness and the ability to experience affective states a...
032
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
"Motivated reasoning in sustainable consumption: A partisan environmental framing experiment", a Research Plan published in Lifecycle Journal, is under review with @researchhubf.bsky.social. Check it out if you'd like to be part of the evaluation process! www.researchhub.com/paper/105997... @cos.io
researchhub.com
Motivated reasoning in sustainable consumption: A partisa...
This project studies whether politically congruent environment...
054
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 04/12/2025
Over the past decade, COS has worked closely with partners across Europe. We’re now starting the process of establishing a formal presence in the EU to deepen that collaboration while continuing to support researchers worldwide. Read more: www.cos.io/blog/expandi...
cos.io
Expanding Our Work in the EU: An Update on COS's Next Steps
Today, we’re sharing an update on the steps we’re taking to establish a formal presence in the European Union in Brussels, Belgium and how we hope to collaborate with partners in the EU, Europe, and b...
0114
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 07/11/2025
"“Just Noticeable” Differences in Pay: A Systematic Review of Past Accomplishments and Future Opportunities", an Outcomes Report in Lifecycle Journal, is under review with @researchhubf.bsky.social Check it out if you'd like to be part of the evaluation process! www.researchhub.com/paper/961814...
researchhub.com
“Just Noticeable” Differences in Pay: A Systematic Review...
Compensation is of critical importance to organizations. Howev...
042
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
Portland: “Challenge accepted.” 🐸🐔
010
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
Two open positions on COS's research team! Project Coordinator: Undergraduate degree in research, or equivalent experience ats.rippling.com/cos-careers/... Program Manager: 10 yrs of project management experience or 2+ program management ats.rippling.com/cos-careers/... Please share w/colleagues
22821
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 04/09/2025
We are about a month away from releasing a complete refresh of the OSF user interface. The team has been working on this for a very long time, and we are very excited to be able to share it soon. A preview picture:
914830
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
You might be interested in checking out the work @whaleactually.com @cos.io is doing on Registered Revisions bsky.app/profile/whal...
020
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 07/08/2025
Exciting news! @metaror.bsky.social has joined Lifecycle Journal's growing list of evaluation service partners, & will review & assess metaresearch submissions. Under LJ's innovative model of scholarly communication, research is published first, then openly reviewed. 🔎: lifecyclejournal.org/about/
lnkd.in
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
094
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
Now available in final form without the "uncorrected proof" background image disrupting your pleasure reading.
042
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Rajini Rao @madamescientist.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
🧪BREAKING: NIH has laid out 5 options for funding publications costs on grants (yes, FIVE!). This is hugely impactful. Make your opinions known by September 15, fellow scientists. 🧪 grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
grants.nih.gov
NOT-OD-25-138: Request for Information on Maximizing Research Funds by Limiting Allowable Publishing Costs
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Request for Information on Maximizing Research Funds by Limiting Allowable Publishing Costs NOT-OD-25-138. NIH
33951
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 31/07/2025
🗣️ ICYMI: Lifecycle Journal is open for submissions! Learn more: lifecyclejournal.org/submission-g...
lifecyclejournal.org
Submission Guidelines | Lifecycle Journal
142
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 28/07/2025
@cos.io also recently launched a journal that puts a whole project from conception to publication (including multi-stage review) in one place called the Lifecycle Journal. If Registered Revisions is like a mini registered report, Lifecycle Journal is like a mega one. lifecyclejournal.org
lifecyclejournal.org
Lifecycle Journal | Adding trust to your research, from conception through completion
055
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 28/07/2025
Hi folks! Want to reintroduce a thing I'm leading at @cos.io: the Registered Revisions (meta) Trial. This project about new peer review policy and a WILD new way of doing actionable evidence generation via RCTs. A LOT of RCTs. Now piloted and ready for the main stage, and looking for partners! 🧵👇
22113
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 24/07/2025
Lifecycle Journal offers a new way to share and evaluate research: open, accountable, and designed to support rigorous work across the full research lifecycle. Dr. Keith’s experience highlights how diverse evaluations and a transparent publishing process can advance scientific progress.
The evaluations were timely, thorough, and public... I have been encouraging colleagues to submit work to [Lifecycle Journal and will continue doing so. This initiative can benefit our field substantially.
Lifecycle Journal author Julian Keith, Ph.D
Professor of Psychology,
University of North CarolinaOur goals should be to build a scientific psychology that is on a trustworthy foundation. Scientists should be rewarded for conducting rigorous research, regardless of the outcomes of studies, and all aspects of the work should be available to other scientists who can build on the work.
Lifecycle Journal author Julian Keith, Ph.D
Professor of Psychology,
University of North Carolina Wilmington
052
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 25/07/2025
The OSF was designed to make open scholarship possible and easy to adopt. As the role of AI in research continues to evolve, COS is assessing how our infrastructure can deter AI misuse and help researchers share their work in transparent, responsible ways. 🔗 Read more: www.cos.io/blog/eval...
cos.io
A Shared Challenge: Evaluating AI’s Impact on Open Research Infrastructure
OSF was designed to make open scholarship possible and easy to adopt, while upholding the values of transparency, credibility, and accountability. As we navigate the evolving role of AI in research, COS remains focused on strengthening open research infrastructure and helping communities embed open practices that foster rigor and trust.
086
Reposted by Eileen Clancy
ZBW – Leibniz Informationszentrum Wirtschaft @zbw-leibniz.bsky.social · 18/07/2025
At this year's Open Science Conference in Hamburg we will bring into focus the intersection between Open Science and AI. On-site as well as online participation are possible. Register now! Further information and registration: www.open-science-conference.eu #OSC2025
075
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
"How does the process of explaining affect one’s beliefs?", a Research Plan submitted to Lifecycle Journal, is now under review with @researchhubf.bsky.social. Go check it out if you'd like to be part of the evaluation process! www.researchhub.com/paper/943858...
researchhub.com
How does the process of explaining affect one’s beliefs?
People routinely try to explain claims of fact (why a food is ...
051
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
For those who missed it at #Metascience2025, @katiecorker.bsky.social kindly recorded our session on "Transforming research communication: innovations in publishing, peer review, & curation" and you can check it out here: youtu.be/6d-LJYbNBmE
youtu.be
Transforming research communication: Innovations in publishing, peer review, and curation
YouTube video by ASAPbio
192
Eileen Clancy @eileenclancy.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
Yes, definitely! I will be in and out the next couple weeks so I’ll reach out end of July
000