Sign in

Edward Hasbrouck

@ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy
53 followers 10 following 249 posts

Anti-fascist, travel writer, author, journalist, consumer & human rights advocate, ally to youth liberation, bicyclist, consultant to the Identity Project […] 🌉 bridged from ⁂ urbanists.social/@ehasbrouck, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
myrmepropagandist @futurebird.sauropods.win.ap.brid.gy · 27/09/2026
There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed. Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words. The […]
sauropods.win
Original post on sauropods.win
6446
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 27/09/2026
"For continued military planning aimed at Cuba, the document generated last week calls for a medical brigade as well as a forward resuscitative and surgical detachment to provide emergency surgery and trauma care closer to U.S. forces." […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
002
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 27/09/2026
Rusty Martin, Presente! hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002854.…
Nonregistrants Rusty Martin, Jerry Mehalovich, Jeff Patch, and Gary Eklund burn draft registration forms outside the main post office in Des Moines, IA, on 21 July 1980."Hundreds of Thousands Protest Nuclear Arms", AP, 13 June 1982. "Among the speakers was Rusty Martin, president of the Student Senate at the University of North Iowa... a public non-registrant for the draft..."Edward Hasbrouck, Rusty Martin, and Matt Meyer, Des Moines, IA, 17 September 2023
002
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 14/09/2026
Court bars AAMVA from giving away driver’s license data — for now: papersplease.org/wp/2026/09/14/cour…
papersplease.org
Court bars AAMVA from giving away driver’s license data — for now
Last Thursday, September 10th, Judge Anthony Trenga of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia heard arguments on whether his temporary restraining order (TRO) barring the bulk transfer of commercial driver’s license records from the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) to the U.S. Deopartment of Transportation (DOT) should be converted into a preliminary injunction. If granted by the court, a preliminary injunction would remain in effect until a final ruling in the lawsuit brought by state governments challenging the data demand by the Feds. Judge Trenga took the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement without issuing a decision. In response to the motion for a preliminary injunction, DOT cooked up an array of patently pretextual and impermissibly _ex post facto_ new excuses for why it needs a dump of all the records of commercial driver’s licenses in AAMVA’s SPEXS database. DOT also made a new threat to have its Office of Inspector General demand the data, in bulk, without a warrant or probable cause, for investigation of unspecified possible crimes. It seems unlikely that either the briefs or the oral argument last Thursday have given Judge Trenga any reason to depart from the reasoning in his initial decision granting a TRO. In that ruling, Judge Trenga found multiple independent ways in which the demand for this data is illegal. He also found that the claimed basis for the demand is a pretext to obtain data that would actually be used (illegally) for immigration enforcement: > The FMCSA has also conceded it has not demanded the MPRs [Master Pointer Records] solely to use those records itself, but also to share them with DHS for “immigration enforcement purpose[s].”… But the relied upon exception under the DPP A that authorizes disclosure of protected data to effectuate FMCSA’s own statutory mandate does not authorize FMCSA to simply pass that data onto another agency…. > > [W]hen repeatedly pressed at the hearing on this point, the Federal Defendants were unable to explain how the data would in fact assist them in performing their statutory functions, or point to anything that they cannot already do without this data… > > Federal Defendants have failed to dispel the compelling inference that they seek these 17 million files in large part, if not primarily, for immigration enforcement, which is not part of [FMCSA]’s statutory mandate…. > > [B]ecause the Data Demand is unlawful, the public interest inherently favors issuing an injunction…. > > The issuance of an injunction is also in the public interest given the harm the termination of federal funding to AAMVA would cause since CDLIS would effectively cease its operations and impair Plaintiff States’ ability to issue and renew CDLs and compromise the safe operation of commercial motor vehicles…. Furthermore, as the AAMVA contends, the “CDLIS … is interconnected with all forms of driver licensing” and therefore any shutdown “could disrupt, or even stop, the issuance and renewal of any driver license in the United States.” Meanwhile, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has moved to intervene in the case on behalf of AFT members including school bus drivers whose commercial driver’s license data is included in the Federal data demand. AFT says that states — like AAMVA — have their own interests, including retaining Federal funding, and can’t be relied on to represent the interests of individuals whose data is at risk. AFT’s motion to join the case against both DOT and AAMVA is set for a hearing this Wednesday, September 16th. While Judge Trenga has ordered AAMVA, for now, not to hand over records of all commercial driver’s licenses to DOT, the outcome of the lawsuit remain uncertain. No one state such as California can control AAMVA’s decisions. The head of each state’s driver licensing agency has one vote on AAMVA’s board of directors, so states that want to hand over AAMVA’s records for immigration enforcement can outvote those that don’t. The ongoing litigation should teach a lesson to California and other states that once they hand over data to AAMVA, they can’t control to whom or for what purposes it is passed on voluntarily or involuntarily by AAMVA to Federal agencies or other third parties. The same lesson applies to non-commercial as to commercial driver’s licenses, both of which are stored by AAMVA in the same database. In comments to Wendy Fry and Khari Johnson of Cal Matters, a spokesperson for California Governor Gavin Newsom falsely claimed that AAMVA’s databases of commercial and non-commercial driver’s license records “are separate systems”. In fact, CDLIS records for commercial driver’s licenses and S2S records for non-commercial licenses are both stored by AAMVA in the SPEXS database. Californians should have second thoughts about the upload of non-commercial driver’s license records to SPEXS, planned for 2027 and authorized by a law rushed through the state legislature by Governor Newsom while Federal demands for SPEXS data were already pending.
001
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 12/09/2026
RE: infosec.exchange/@Em0nM4stodon/1172… "Apple's always-listening tech is at odds with the law in several U.S. states. Some states require all parties' consent before being recorded."
infosec.exchange
002
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 12/09/2026
RE: liberdon.com/@papersplease/11719147… Tell SFO to order a full review (inc. legal opinion from Citty Atty) and public report on collaborating with immigration enforcement and what SFO can do to mitigate danger of ICE at SFO. SF should challenge DHS claims of unlimited […]
liberdon.com
Original post on liberdon.com
002
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/09/2026
The Pentagon to take the guardrails off AI for war. What could possible got wrong? theintercept.com/2026/09/08/pentago…
theintercept.com
The Department of Defense asked OpenAI to provide the U.S. military with a special version of its artificial intelligence technology designed to turn down the military commands as infrequently as possible, according to documents obtained by The Intercept. The desire for a custom AI tool with “minimal refusal rates” to Pentagon commands was revealed in files released to The Intercept as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking information about the military’s secretive deals with AI companies. ## Related ### AI Giants Work Hand-in-Hand With the Pentagon, Contracts Reveal OpenAI, along with rivals Google, xAI, and Anthropic, all agreed in 2025 to develop militarized prototypes of their state-of-the-art AI to assist the armed forces in uses including logistics, intelligence decision-making, and general “warfighting.” Earlier this year, the Pentagon sought to expand the scope of these agreements and deploy them across U.S. classified computer networks, resulting in a high-profile showdown with Anthropic over whether and how the company could restrain military uses of its technology. The clause seeking “minimal refusal rates” from OpenAI appears in an updated contract — version “P00003” — expanding upon last summer’s prototype deal, worth up to $200 million over the contract’s two-year duration. A separate document, signed by both OpenAI and the government on February 6, indicates that OpenAI agreed on that day to the contents of an expanded version “P00003.” OpenAI and the Pentagon deny agreeing to such “minimal refusal ” language, claiming that the “P00003” document provided to The Intercept was a draft and not the final version. “OpenAI has never agreed to contract language requiring ‘minimal refusal rates.’ This language does not appear in our executed contract,” said spokesperson Nate Evans. “The document you received appears to be an earlier draft proposed by the Department before we provided feedback. We rejected that language, the department agreed to remove it, and the final executed agreement does not include it,” Evans said. A screenshot of a heavily redacted Department of Defense document indicating the military’s desire for a version of OpenAI’s technology with “minimal refusal rates,” yellow highlight added. Document: Department of Defense Working with Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology, The Intercept’s FOIA inquiry specifically sought only final, executed contract documents. The request asked the Pentagon to exclude any draft materials. None of the documents released through the lawsuit is marked as a draft. When asked to confirm whether the document containing the “minimal refusal rates” clause was in the final agreement, a Department of Justice attorney representing the Pentagon in the lawsuit said it was indeed the signed and executed version of the contract. Hours later, and following The Intercept’s outreach to OpenAI, however, the Pentagon’s lawyer said to disregard the prior confirmation, stating that the Department of Defense required more time to investigate the matter. The Intercept was then contacted by Trevor Tiedeman, a special assistant to the under secretary of war for research and engineering, who prior to his Pentagon position worked for President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign. “There might be some stray voltage or wires crossing between whatever FOIA information you may have received versus what actually exists versus what is an executed contract per se,” Tiedeman said in an interview. ## Most Read Claudia Sheinbaum Wants to Ban Dual Citizens From Office to Shield Mexico From Trump Jorge Medellín A True-Crime Star’s Lurid Claims Sent a Man to Die. Her Key Witness Just Recanted. Liliana Segura, Jordan Smith Kash Patel Got Arrested for Public Urination After a Night of Drinking Trevor Aaronson He suggested the document containing the “minimal refusal rates” clause may have been a draft copy, but said he was unsure of exactly what the document was, why it was produced to The Intercept pursuant to its FOIA request and lawsuit, or why the Department of Defense abruptly reversed course. ## Related ### Hegseth’s War Department Slashed Civilian Protection Staff, Brought in AI Assessments Tiedeman told The Intercept he would provide a full accounting of how the document was erroneously flagged by Pentagon FOIA officers, cleared for release by the Department of Defense, and then confirmed as accurate by the Pentagon’s lawyers. When asked if the Pentagon could share the correct version of the OpenAI contract it ostensibly neglected to release, Tiedeman said he would investigate the matter. He then stopped responding to The Intercept’s inquiries. OpenAI similarly did not provide the full contract. (In 2024, The Intercept sued OpenAI in federal court over the company’s use of copyrighted articles to train its chatbot ChatGPT. The case is ongoing.) Days later, the Justice Department lawyer representing the Pentagon further backtracked, stating the document in question “was not the final version of that document,” and that the “correct document” would be shared later, “although I do not have a definitive timeline.” Department of Defense spokesperson Jacob Bliss later said in a statement “the phrase ‘minimal refusal rates’ does not appear in any active Department of War contract with OpenAI.” The language indicating the military sought a more pliable version of OpenAI’s technology is found in a section of a contract document describing what OpenAI was obligated to deliver to the Pentagon. These deliverables included “Testing, Evaluation, and Refinement of OpenAI Mission Models” for “national security problem sets.” The document explains “’OpenAI Mission Models’ refer to OpenAI models that are designed for national security use cases and have minimal refusal rates.” There is no indication in the paperwork about what these “national security problem sets” may entail. Nor is there any description about the kinds of requests the Pentagon hoped OpenAI’s technology would minimally refuse. However, a large language model that would aid in the process of spying on, targeting, and killing people would require a substantial relaxation of safeguards to be useful for any military. ## Related ### It’s Time to Rein in Lethal AI Drones Like many of its rival platforms, OpenAI’s flagship LLMs contain built-in guardrails that direct the tool to reject certain queries, typically on the basis of safety. Asking the consumer version of ChatGPT for help prioritizing drone-based airstrike targets, for example, generates this reply: “I can’t provide a prioritization scheme for conducting UAV airstrikes against specific enemy combatants.” OpenAI and its competitors ban the public from using their models for other dangerous applications, like the development of weapons of mass destruction. ## We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us. Become a member ## Join Our Newsletter Thank You For Joining! Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? I'm in Become a member By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. ## Join Our Newsletter ## Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I'm in Heidy Khlaaf, chief scientist at the AI Now Institute and former systems safety engineer at OpenAI, told The Intercept the notion of national security-specific guardrails is in itself worrying. “Minimal refusal is likely referring to little or no safeguards on the model being used,” Khlaaf said. > “Minimal refusal is likely referring to little or no safeguards on the model being used.” No matter the final contract language, experts like Khlaaf are concerned about the role corporate policy is already playing in combat. “It is a worrying development that private corporations are given the power to [make] determinations in warfare that are ultimately state obligations, whether it be for targeting recommendations, or the guardrails deployed to constrain a state’s military use.” Questions of what limits — if any — tech firms can or should place on battlefield usage were at the center of this year’s public brawl between the Pentagon and Anthropic. The company claims its military deal to expand into classified networks collapsed when the Defense Department refused to place contractual prohibitions against the use of its technology for autonomous weapon systems and domestic surveillance. The Trump administration in turn designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk and moved to ban it from government use (the designation was overturned late last month by a federal judge). Such tensions didn’t stop OpenAI from quickly cementing its version of the deal. On February 27, OpenAI signed the latest iteration of its Pentagon agreement, permitting the use of its services across the U.S. military’s classified networks. The classified deployment contract update includes the same “Testing, Evaluation, and Refinement of OpenAI Mission Models” header, but its text, unlike the previous version, is redacted entirely. OpenAI claimed that it secured red lines on autonomous killings and spying against Americans. But the way the deal is drafted ultimately allows for any uses the government deems legal. Share * Copy link * Share on Facebook * Share on Bluesky * Share on X * Share on LinkedIn * Share on WhatsApp _IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT._ What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate **_IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING_** year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history. We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking. In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow. **That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?** ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate **_I’M BEN MUESSIG,_** The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history. We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking. In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow. **That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?** ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate ## Contact the author: Sam Biddle sam.biddle@theintercept.com @sambiddle.99 on Signal @sambiddle.com on Bluesky @samfbiddle on X ## Related ### Anthropic Says We Must Stop Authoritarian AI. But What About Its Authoritarian Investors? ### Musk Warns of Killer AI — While He and the Rest of Silicon Valley Cash In on AI That Kills ### OpenAI on Surveillance and Autonomous Killings: You’re Going to Have to Trust Us ### AI’s Imperial Agenda ## Latest Stories ### AI Giants Work Hand-in-Hand With the Pentagon, Contracts Reveal Sam Biddle - 5:00 am The Intercept sued to obtain records that reveal an intimate relationship between the military and OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI. Voices ### Right-Wing Speech Crackdowns Turned Charlie Kirk Into a Meme Katherine Krueger - Sep. 7 By elevating Kirk to a martyr, the right made his ridicule a logical reaction to their repression. ### A True-Crime Star’s Lurid Claims Sent a Man to Die. Her Key Witness Just Recanted. Liliana Segura, Jordan Smith - Sep. 6 The DNA expert at Jeff Prible’s trial accuses then-prosecutor Kelly Siegler of using his testimony in an “inflammatory” way. Join The Conversation
000
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 03/09/2026
RE: flipboard.com/@calmatters/calmatter… “AAMVA’s behavior with respect to these commercial driver’s licenses gives California compelling reasons not to trust AAMVA to safeguard the much larger number of non-commercial […]
urbanists.social
Original post on urbanists.social
000
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 02/09/2026
RE: infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/117198… Another reason not to show ID, in case you need another:
infosec.exchange
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/09/2026
9th Circuit upholds injunction against cash transaction reporting order: papersplease.org/wp/2026/09/01/9th-…
papersplease.org
9th Circuit upholds injunction against cash transaction reporting order
In March 2025 we reported on an order from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the US Department of the Treasury commanding all money transfer agencies and currency exchanges in seven counties in California and Texas along the US-Mexico border to file reports with FinCEN including the identities of all customers engaging in all cash transactions over $200. Separate lawsuits challenging this order were brought by the Institute for Justice on behalf of storefront financial services business in California and Texas. FinCen revised and reissued the order several times, raising the reporting threshold from $200 to $1000 and changing the areas to which the order applied. But despite these moves by FinCEN, US District Courts in both California and Texas issued preliminary injunctions against enforcement of the order. A year later, a panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the injunction in the California case by a 2-1 vote. The majority of the 9th Circuit panel found that the rule was arbitrarily and illegally issued without the required notice and comment, that FinCEN failed to consider the impact on affected businesses (which would likely be put out of business by the cost of compliance, and whose customers would likely go to businesses in counties not subject to the order rather than provide the information required for FinCEN reports), that this harm was sufficiently severe and irreparable to justify a preliminary injunction, and that FinCEN’s repeated changes to its orders hadn’t rendered the case moot or eliminated the need for the injunction. The dissenting judge made a strained argument that being put out of business isn’t an “irreparable” harm sufficient to justify a preliminary injunction. Unfortunately, neither the District Court nor the 9th Circuit addressed the rights of customers whose transactions would be reported to FinCEN, only the rights of the plaintiff money transfer and currency exchange businesses. Nor did the courts reach the plaintiff’s claims that the FinCEN order was an unreasonable search and seizure of information. According to the 9th Circuit opinion: > Because the district court held that Plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their APA [Administrative Procedure Act] claims, the district court declined to address Plaintiffs’ claim that the Border GTO [Geographic Targeting Order] also violated the Fourth Amendment. We similarly decline to do so. The government’s appeal challenging the injunction in the Texas case is still pending in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
SomeGadgetGuy @somegadgetguy.techhub.social.ap.brid.gy · 31/08/2026
People applauding MapQuest for a lake name. I feel Here Maps deserves a little love too.
111
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 31/08/2026
Airline reservations are still being used to target dissidents: papersplease.org/wp/2026/08/31/airl… ... Mr. Tunick wasn’t singled out for anything “suspicious”. CBP agents were sent an automatic email alerting them in advance […]
liberdon.com
Original post on liberdon.com
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 31/08/2026
SFO evades criticism of its role in immigration enforcement: papersplease.org/wp/2026/08/30/sfo-…
Excerpt from illegal contract awarded by SFO to SITA describes facial recognition hardware, software, and services paid for by the City and County of San Francisco, deployed by SITA on City and County property at SFO, and used to collect and transit mug shots of passengers and “permission to board” messages between airlines, the airport, and CBP/DHS, for purposes including immigration enforcement.
002
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 28/08/2026
Army to deploy nuclear reactors at U.S. bases. What enemy are they targetting? Who are they putting at risk? www.army.mil/article/294891/army_re…
army.mil
Army reaches agreement with private industry for nuclear micro-reactors
WASHINGTON — The Department of the Army is announcing today that the Janus Program has selected five nuclear energy vendors, and five initial locations.
000
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 27/08/2026
San Francisco Airport Contractor Exports Facial Data to Federal Agencies, Critics Charge: Privacy advocates say the Airport Commission’s tech at SFO violates sanctuary city policies by delivering personal information to Homeland Security […]
liberdon.com
Original post on liberdon.com
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
αxel simon :pride_heart: @axx.mstdn.fr.ap.brid.gy · 25/08/2026
Without anyone's approval, Linkedin scraped my employer's website and created job postings on its Linkedin page for job openings listed on the website, and set the location of the job to completely wrong places (Nigeria and Kansas). Another win for for #LargeLyingModels! #genai #llm
102
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 25/08/2026
RE: urbanists.social/@ehasbrouck/117017… See you TODAY at 9 am, San Francisco City Hall, Room 400. My written comments to the SF Airport Commission (verbal comments at the meeting are limited to 2 minutes per person) […]
urbanists.social
Original post on urbanists.social
000
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 18/08/2026
Tell the SF Airport Commission to rein in ICE at SFO: Tues., 8/25, 9 am, SF City Hall, Room 400 indivisiblesf.org/events/2026/9/1/t… More info and talking points for comments to the Airport Commission […] [Original post on liberdon.com]
ICE out of SFO!
002
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 15/08/2026
DHS demands AAMVA’s national commercial driver database for immigration enforcement: papersplease.org/wp/2026/08/14/dhs-…
Immigration Enforcement Subpoena from DHS to AAMVA for "all individual pointers found within ... CDLIS"
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 12/08/2026
Is America Headed for a Special Skills Draft? www.antiwar.com/blog/2026/08/11/is-…
antiwar.com
Is America Headed for a Special Skills Draft?
A YouTuber with a million followers, Ryan McBeth, devotes his latest video and Substack column today to a denunciation of an article I wrote last month for Responsible Statecraft, “Why is the Selective Service war gaming a ‘special skills’ draft?” Mr. McBeth also attacks the Quincy Institute
001
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 11/08/2026
If you're kicking yourself for missing the total eclipse of the sun in a few hours, here's the definitive guide to one next year with even better prospects for viewing conditions in relatively accessible and affordable locations: eclipsophile.com/tse2027
eclipsophile.com
Total Solar Eclipse 2027 August 2
#### Total Solar Eclipse 2027 August 2 #### **Overview** The 2027 lunar shadow first embraces the Earth over the sub-tropical mid Atlantic in a region of moderately cloudy skies well to the north of the hurricane-breeding zone off western Africa. The umbral path misses the islands of Porto Santo and Madeira by a meagre 70 km on its eastward trek, choosing instead to make landfall in Spain and Morocco six minutes later. For the next 4,000 km, it first skips along the Mediterranean shore before gradually turning to a southeast heading. The turn to more southerly latitudes comes with increasing amounts of cloud, but, except in the mountains of Arabia, most of that intrudes after the path heads out across the Indian Ocean, toward its ending near the remote atoll of Diego Garcia. Few eclipses come with a guarantee of cloud-free skies, but, in parts, the path of the 2027 total across North Africa comes very close. Figure 1, composed from measurements taken by several satellites in the course of the day, shows a broad area of blue tones along the track, particularly over Egypt and Libya. Because this is an average for the whole day, differences between morning and afternoon are lost; but farther along, we will take a look at cloudiness a little closer to eclipse time. In Figure 1, there are a few weather challenges in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, but because the larger part of the eclipse track skirts the north side of the Sahara Desert, the climatology farther along the shadow path borrows its character from that great sand sea. It’s hot, it’s dry, it’s sunny, and it’s dusty. _Figure 1: Average August cloud fraction from 2000 to 2019 derived from observations by several polar-orbiting satellites throughout the day. Data: EUMETSAT/CM SAF. Eclipse track: Xavier Jubier._ An eclipse thrives on that kind of climatology. Some parts of the eclipse track—over Libya and western Egypt—have seen no August cloud on eclipse day whatsoever in the past 23 years. And even though Spain and Northwest Africa have their cloudy days, it’s not common and eclipse-day chances are still very good. Most of this good weather comes courtesy of the Azores (or Bermuda) High that lies in the mid-Atlantic west of the Straits of Gibraltar in mid-summer. The High extends a pressure ridge across northern Spain with an extension southward into the central Mediterranean near Tunisia. A stationary heat low takes up a summer home every year in northern Mali, near the Algerian border while a second (and much stronger) heat low can be found further along the track, over the Arabian Desert. Both of these affect the wind flow and the generation of dust storms, but have little influence on cloudiness. From Morocco to Tunisia, cloudy disturbances largely follow the wind. The high-level subtropical jet typically lies over Northern Spain in mid-summer and disturbances along this flow only rarely reach the African part of the eclipse track. These are systems that bring large shields of cloud, smothering the eclipse track and all but ending any chances of a view of the Sun. Fortunately, they are uncommon in August and only affect the western part of the path. A small tributary jet stream comes out of the southwest, flowing over Morocco and Algeria and carrying disturbances up from equatorial regions that trigger the formation of cloud and thundershowers when they reach the Atlas Mountains (Figure 5). Thunderstorms require heat, and so most buildups come in the afternoon, after the lunar shadow has passed. Their influence on eclipse visibility is subdued, as they are usually composed of patchy mid-level cloud in the early morning. There are other minor weather systems that can have an impact on eclipse viewing, but with a more regional impact. One of these is the Atlas Low, which forms south of the Atlas Mountains in northeast Algeria and moves eastward. It is not a cloud producer, but can generate widespread dust storms. Infrequently, small lows can form off of the Atlantic coast of Morocco and the Mediterranean coast of Algeria, but their cloud shield is usually limited to regions near the shore. Over Libya and Egypt, cloud is almost unknown in the summer months and it’s not until the track reaches Luxor that the cloud fraction begins to climb above zero. After the shadow leaves the African continent for the Arabian Peninsula, sunshine prospects begin to weaken, but even here there are clear-sky refuges that will tempt the most fastidious eclipse chaser, particularly along the Red Sea coast. **Morocco, Spain, Gibraltar, Algeria, and Tunisia** Figure 3 shows a zoomed-in map of the mean morning cloudiness over the western Africa eclipse track. Its corresponding graph in Figure 4 traces out the cloud fraction (i.e., percent cloud if multiplied by 100) along the centreline and the north and south limits. The data are pretty encouraging. Cloud cover seems highest over water, even though there appears to be a large contribution from sun glint in the satellite measurements. Cloudiness is lowest where the Sahara Desert has its biggest impact, near the south limit over Tunisia. High terrain (Figure 2) has a minor influence: it sometimes wears a cloudy cap in the morning, but it’s very subdued until the daytime temperatures climb and convection starts. In the morning hours, average cloud amounts rise only about 4 percent between the Moulouya River and Oudja as the south limit crosses the Rif Mountains; on the centreline, there is an 8 percent rise across the Aures Mountains in eastern Algeria. Because these graphs are derived from mid-to-late morning satellite passes, they come after the shadow will pass and so fail to capture the influence of some early morning cloudiness that haunts coastal regions before first contact. The next few sections will deal with that cloud. Figure 2: Topographic map of the Alboran Sea and surrounding area along the eclipse track. Eclipse track: Xavier Jubier. Data: NASA. **I n detail: Morocco west of the Atlas Mountains ** Ocean temperatures play a major role in forming cloud along the Atlantic coast of Morocco and Spain. The cool Canary Current saturates the overlying air, forming a patchy low-level cloudiness and coastal fog that creeps inland at night. At the same time, cool overnight temperatures saturate the low-lying air over the land, giving rise to fog banks that may form in small patches or in extensive shields that cover large parts of the landscape, often lifting toward morning to turn into a layer of stratus clouds. Though the marine stratus typically moves only a short distance onto the coast, it occasionally merges with the land-formed stratus and goes on to form large sheets of shallow cloud that can cover the southern half of eclipse track for 100 km inland. This is most likely to occur near coastal towns of Asilah, Larache, and Souk el Arbaa where the terrain rises slowly from the coast (Figure 2). At times, the stratus blankets the landscape almost as far as Ouazzane at the foot of the Atlas Mountains. Figure 3: Mid-late morning cloud fraction along the eclipse track extracted from observations made by the Terra polar-orbiting satellite between 2004 and 2024. In this region, the satellite passage comes after the time of eclipse by an hour or two. Data: NASA. Eclipse track: Xavier Jubier. Figure 4: A graph of August cloud fraction derived from the same dataset as in Figure 3. Station names are placed on the traces according to their location with respect to that part of the track. In general, maximum cloud amounts are associated with an over-water passage or higher terrain. Cloud fraction can be converted to percent cloudiness by multiplying by 10. Data: NASA. Tangier is not immune from the marine cloud, but because the city is tucked a small distance into the Straits of Gibraltar, the stratus tends to stay on the western side of the Tangier Peninsula where a 300-m rise in the land (Cape Spartel) hampers its intrusion into the city. It’s not complete protection, as the stratus cloud has a depth of about a kilometre and can sneak around the coast into the Strait. On rare occasions, stratus that piles up on the east side of the Tangier Peninsula near Ceuta makes its way around the 1,000-metre Rif Mountains that separate the two cities, but this is very unusual. In spite of the mountain barriers, there is often a misty character to Tangier’s sunrise and rarely, a nasty cloud cover that won’t go away in time for an eclipse. Figure 5: Terra satellite image from August 1, 2025. The time of satellite passage is about a half-hour after second contact. The mid cloud over Algeria is due to a mid-level disturbance and will blossom into convective cloud in the next few hours. Coastal stratus has piled up on the shores of Spain and Morocco and is gradually burning off, but too late if the eclipse were to occur on this day. Image: NASA. Eclipse track: Xavier Jubier. On eclipse day, the biggest uncertainty may be “how quickly will the stratus will burn off after sunrise,” as the eclipse reaches maximum at about 9:44 am local time. For Tangier, the answer is “very likely,” but for other sites along the coasts, it’s not at all certain. An observing site on the western beaches of Morocco, at Asilah or Larache, may find that the marine cloud lingers past totality (Figure 5), as the cool ocean nearby makes the Sun’s heating less effective. Farther inland, the fog/stratus dissipates more quickly and is likely gone before second contact. A short move inland will often settle the problem unless the low cloud is particularly wide spread. Another complication is whether the cooling associated with the eclipse will cause the fog to reform. It did so along the Baja coast in 1991, and I’d guess the answer here is also “yes” if the cloud hasn’t dissipated before the mid-way point between first and second contact. To get a better answer to this problem, I’ve examined geostationary satellite images from 2024 and 2025 for several viewing sites along the eclipse track from Tangier to Sfax and selected days in which the eclipse would have been visible (Figure 6). The data were collected for dates between July 12 and August 18 in both years, as close to 2nd contact as the images permitted. The resolution of the satellite images is about 1 km and did not always give me a conclusive answer about whether the eclipse would be visible, usually because the cloud was patchy or semi-transparent. In some cases, I examined webcams from the sites for a better idea of eclipse-time cloud cover. Figure 6: Graph showing potential eclipse visibility between July 12 and August 18 in 2024 and 2025 at or near the time of second contact for a selection of sites between Tangier and Sfax. These data mark a lower bound, as at many sites (such as Gibraltar), a small movement would bring an observer into better skies. There were only a few days where skies were completely opaque. At sites that fared poorly, marine stratus was often the problem. In Tangier, eclipse-viewing sites that lie in the central or east side of the city are most likely to avoid a lingering morning mistiness. In particular, the beaches along the Bay of Tangier are very attractive as a viewing site. If you want to observe from the south limit in Morocco, it’s probably a good idea to go at least 70 km inland, toward Ouezzane, as the flat terrain in around Souk al Arbaa (Figure 2) is a gateway for marine cloud. **In detail: Spain from Cadiz to Tarifa ** The Atlantic coast of Spain is visited by the same marine cloud that affects Atlantic Morocco. The pattern is similar: a threat of morning cloud and fog on the coast, but generally clear skies inland. The Atlantic Ocean cloudiness usually doesn’t penetrate into the Strait of Gibraltar past Tarifa, so Marbella and other sites along the Alboran coast fare particularly well. Cadiz, near the north limit, has a lower frequency of marine cloudiness (but more high-altitude cloud) than Spanish sites farther south, such as Barbera, Atlanterra, and Tarifa. The city had an 88 percent frequency of sun-visible days in the survey, while the other three sites averaged a less promising 74 percent. The best advise that can be offered on this coast is to go inland since ocean cloud is blocked by the rugged terrain along the shoreline. According to the satellites, inland Spanish sites are excellent eclipse havens with average cloud amounts that drop below 15 percent. **In detail: Gibraltar ** Gibraltar is a special case. The tiny peninsula sports a steep 300-400-m escarpment that faces the sunrise horizon and a gentler slope that falls away to sea level on the west. The terrain flattens toward the south tip (Europa Point), providing a clear view to the rising Sun on eclipse day. The terrain is a mixed blessing – it intercepts an easterly flow and allows any marine cloud to pack up against the coast, but also provides wide-ranging vistas for an eclipse party. Wind is an important component of the weather in the Strait, almost exclusively blowing from either the east (Levanter) or the west (Poniente) across the Alboran Sea. The Levanter (Levante in Spanish) tends to be the more persistent, sometimes blowing steadily for days and even weeks, particularly in the summer months. The two winds make the Strait and the Gulf of Cadiz prime spots for kite boarding and wind surfing. Figure 3 shows that the waters of the Alboran Sea and the Strait of Gibraltar are cloudier than any other region along the western track. Fed by inflowing Atlantic currents, the cool surface waters of the Alboran Sea create a stable, surface-based temperature inversion. Air beneath the inversion often (but not always) turns to fog, stratus, and haze as it is cooled from below. This ground-level cloud is thickest in the morning and evening, but it’s usually only about a kilometre deep and has trouble moving inland against a rocky coast. It’s also quick to burn off in the morning sunshine. Morning fog gives Gibraltar sunrises a misty character and they are often semi-transparent once the Sun has had an hour or two to work on them, though parts may persist in some form through the eclipse. Webcams in Gibraltar reveal that the stratus cloud that impacts the peninsula is usually patchy and a hypothetical eclipse watcher could often find a clearer patch to watch the Sun somewhere nearby or accept a less-than-perfect view. Data in Figure 5 gave Gibraltar a 74 percent chance of a sunny view, but this is too pessimistic for a mobile observer, as it reflects only the presence of cloud somewhere against the peninsula and not necessarily the whole of it. The resolution of the satellite images is too low to pinpoint just where the cloud lies on the peninsula, particularly as its location is variable from day to day, but it’s probably fair to say that the flatter southern suburbs are more likely to see the eclipse. The Levanter is also responsible for a streaming flag of cloudiness that frequently flies from the upper slopes of the 426-m Rock of Gibraltar when the wind blows between 15 and 40 km/h. The size and persistence of this iconic banner depends on the strength of the wind, the amount and depth of the moisture, and the stability of the air and can take on many engaging forms, all hanging unmoving from the peak. Because the banner is stationary, it is easily avoided, as it lies on the north side of the Territory, next to the airport. Eclipse photographers looking for an image that includes the banner should pay close attention to the wind forecast and position themselves off to the side of the peak with a view of the Sun. The eclipse lies in an easterly direction (095°) at relatively low altitude (38°) from Gibraltar. The banner cloud is most visible from the airport with its restricted access and will be difficult to frame in an eclipse picture from any other land-based site. A composition from the water might work. The Poniente, is a dry westerly or northwesterly wind that brings good visibility in the summer months—enough to see the coast of Africa from Tarifa. It’s not as frequent as the Levanter and generally a bit weaker. Outside the Strait, at Cádiz, the Poniente is a cool and humid flow that moderates the high temperatures of summer. Table 1: Climate data for selected sites in Spain, Gibraltar, and Morocco. Sunshine statistics for sites in Spain and Morocco are less favourable than the satellite observations would suggest, but these incorporate afternoon hours when clouds are usually more extensive. The small amount of rain in the records probably reflects the impact of cold fronts that reach the track. In Oudja, it’s probably due to thundershowers in the Atlas Mountains. **In detail: The Alboran coast of Morocco** The western end of the Alboran Sea is constrained by the Sierra de las Nieves on the Spanish side and by the Rif Mountains of Morocco on the south, causing winds to be squeezed through the Strait. While the terrain on the Spanish coast has little influence on cloud (except at Gibraltar), that on the Moroccan side is much more imposing. Easterly flows are concentrated by the shape of the coastline of Morocco, which has a scooped or basin shape (like a baseball mitt), trapping onshore winds (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 5, stratus clouds and the rare weather systems that move over the Alboran Sea pack up against this coast, pressing cloud against the Rif Mountains. The cloud is more persistent than the marine stratus along the Atlantic, because the Rif Mountains also help to lift the air, adding a second mechanism for building cloud. Ceuta is less affected by this trapped cloudiness than sites farther south, between Tetouan and El Jebha; that coast should be avoided on eclipse day. Very occasionally, the cloud along the Ceuta coast is deep enough to cross the 1000-metre Rif Mountains and reach Tangier. Further along the coast, to Al Hoceima and Melilla, stratus is also a frequent daily visitor, though it burns off a little more readily. Nevertheless, the results in Figure 5 suggests that the Mediterranean coast of Morocco is a dicey place to wait for an eclipse, especially as a small movement inland would bring much better weather. Sunshine measurements at Melilla average only 61 percent of the maximum possible, well below the 75 to 80 percent at many other locations along the track. **Algeria, and Tunisia** Algeria’s climate is strongly influenced by topography, particularly the Tell Atlas range that runs parallel to the Mediterranean coast (Figure 7). To the south of these coastal mountains lies a dry highland plateau, the Hautes Plaines (High Plateau), ranging in elevation from 400 m in the east to over 1000 m in the west. Still farther inland lies a second parallel chain of mountains, the Saharan Atlas Range, higher than the Tell Atlas and defining the northern boundary of the Sahara Desert. The coastal range creates a rain shadow on its southern side, blocking moisture that would arrive with westerly and northerly winds from moving into the plateau and the Sahara Desert. The Hautes Plaines, while dry enough to be described as a part of the Sahara, are home to numerous salt lakes and salt pans that can act as a source regions for local dust storms. The Sahara Desert itself (the Ergs) is located on the south side of the Saharan Atlas Range and intrudes onto the eclipse track only in southeast Algeria and southern Tunisia. Figure 7: Topographic map of Algeria and Tunisia along the eclipse track. Data: NASA. The north limit of the eclipse track generally lies along the coastal plain (Tell) as far as Alger after which it encounters the Tell Atlas Range and then the Tebessa Mountains along the Tunisian border. The centre line samples all of the regions—the Tell, the Tell Atlas Range, the High Plateau (Hautes Plaines) and the Aures Mountains; the south limit traverses the Hautes Plaines and the Sahara Desert into Tunisia. In spite of this rough and varied landscape, morning cloudiness is very subdued and promising eclipse weather can be found at most sites. The relatively minor impact on cloudiness of these three regions can be teased out of Figures 3 and 4. Most noticeably, it can be seen that the Tell Atlas and the proximity to the Mediterranean gives the north limit a higher average cloudiness than either the high plains or the desert, as might be expected. Another prominent terrain impact can be seen over the Aurès Mountains on the centreline, which are high enough to form their own brand of cloud, though only increasing about 8 percent above the surrounding terrain. These are morning cloud statistics – by afternoon, when the convection begins to build, the eclipse track is much cloudier. Figure 8: Suomi satellite image showing dust plume over the eclipse track. Image: NOAA. As in Morocco and Spain, wind is a major feature of the North African climate, particularly for its role in bringing dust and sand storms. Prominent among the various types is the sirocco, a south or southeast wind in advance of a low-pressure system coming from the west. As a south wind, it has many aliases along the eclipse track—ghibli, khamsin, harmattan, chibli, haboob, and simoom—though not all are born of the same conditions. In Algeria and Tunisia, the sirocco brings hot and dry weather from the Sahara; after crossing the Mediterranean and reaching Europe, it’s much more humid. The desert climatology of much of the eclipse track makes for dry summer weather but on some parts of the track, the proximity of the Mediterranean and its ready moisture supply makes for a wetter August than at inland locations. Occasional cold fronts that sweep across the Mediterranean can bring wet days when they run up against the Tell Atlas Range and likely contribute much of the rainfall at Constantine and Alger in Table 2. Days with thunderstorms are frequent over the mountains and are responsible for the small amount of precipitation inland, such as at Djelfa and even Ouargla (though only once every ten years). Table 2: Climate statistics at selected sites in Algeria and Tunisia along the eclipse track. In Tunisia, the whole of the shadow path is over land as it descends from the Tebessa Mountains onto the smoother terrain along the Mediterranean coast. On the centre line, the Aures Mountains in Algeria boost the cloudiness by a few percent but the Tebessa Mountains have almost no cloud-making ability. The north limit, crossing a rougher landscape, has about 10 percent higher cloudiness than the other tracks. Beyond the mountain heights, the cloud amounts drop sharply as the comes into the influences of the Mediterranean coast and the Sahara. This fortunate topography gives Sfax and the region to its south the lowest average cloud amount along the western part of the track. **Dust and sand storms** One cannot have an eclipse along and over the world’s biggest desert without having to contend with dust and sand storms. Figure 9 shows the 10-year mean August Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) over North Africa, a measure of the extinction of light by dust and haze. Some of this, particularly in Spain, is due to forest fire smoke, but along the eclipse track, it’s largely due to suspended dust. An AOD of 0.4 would correspond to a hazy atmosphere; in the U.S., the average value is between 0.1 and 0.15. A value of 1.0 would obscure the Sun. Along the centreline, the average August AOD just reaches about 0.3 until the track passes Luxor. The lowest values are near Sfax and Tangier. From the satellite’s perspective, most high-altitude dust plumes are semi-transparent and presumably are the same looking upward. This makes for a dismal but still successful view of the eclipsed sun. To get a really opaque dust storm, with lots of ground-level sand, you have to be close to the source region. Along the track, those sources lie most often on the high plateau of Algeria, between the Tell Atlas Range and the Saharan Atlas Range, and throughout the Sahara Desert. The main threat in Spain and Tangier is a dusty pall over the whole of the sky from dust blown northward from desert basins in Mali and Mauritania. Figure 9: Map of average Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) along the eclipse track derived from daily satellite passes. Data: NASA. Over Spain and Morocco, the average AOD ranges from 0.12 at the north limit in Spain to between 0.20 and 0.30 in Morocco with the higher values toward the Algeria border. There’s a considerable spread in Algeria, from 0.20 near Oran to 0.41 near the south limit between Biskra and Gafsa. Tunisia as a similar range with the lowest values near Sfax. Dust is strictly a function of wind speed and direction, and so is possible to forecast. You can obtain 72-hour forecasts of aerosol optical depth and other products from the Barcelona Regional Dust Center or from Meteoblue.com . Among the offerings at the Barcelona Center is one called “Extinction,” which is a measure of horizontal visibility at the surface. This may not be as useful as the AOD, since the eclipse is not being viewed along the ground, but it may give a better impression of the low-level intensity of a dust storm. There are several other products at the Barcelona Center that will allow you to explore the dust threat more fully, but local movement to avoid a mid-atmosphere plume from deep in the Sahara is not likely to be successful, since the dust pall tends to cover a large area. **Libya and Egypt** From Benghazi to the Red Sea at Berenice Troglodytica, the eclipse track traverses the Libyan and Egyptian Deserts (Figure 10) during one of the hottest months of the year. It’s a fascinating region with a well-developed tourist infrastructure. For the eclipse chaser, cloud cover—or the absence of cloud— doesn’t get much better. Figure 10: A topographic map of the eclipse track across Northeast Africa and the Middle East. The map of average August cloud cover in Figure 11 and the graph in Figure 12 gives more detail of the satellite-measured cloudiness along the centreline. While it’s not obvious in Figure 12’s graph, the region from Luxor southeastward begins to feel the impact of the eclipse track’s southward turn into more humid climates. At Luxor, the main “threat” comes from transparent cirrus cloud that will mostly affect the images of the deep corona. Very occasionally, there is the buildup of small cumulus clouds here and there, but these should fade away quickly with the large drop in temperature that will come with the approaching shadow. Shallow morning fog is a frequent nighttime visitor in the area between Marsa Matruh and Siwa Oasis, but this will dissipate long before the eclipse shadow arrives. Figure 11: Map of average early afternoon August cloud fraction derived from 20 years of observations from NASA’s Aqua satellite. These data are from an early afternoon pass. Data: NASA. Dust is only an occasional problem in Luxor, even though it’s close to where the AOD concentration in Figure 9 begins to climb. Though there were often heavy dust concentrations over southeast Egypt in the satellite images, the storms usually retreated before reaching the city. Given Luxor’s proximity to the Arabian Deserts and to the Sahara, it’s not unusual for even heavy dust storms to come by on occasion, but August seems to be spared the worst of them. Figure 12: Graph of centreline cloudiness along the eastern portion of the eclipse track. Data are from the same source as Figure 11. **Temperature** Temperature tends to take a back seat to cloud when it comes to evaluating an eclipse site, but in this eclipse, you and your equipment will have to be prepared for afternoon highs that can top the mid-40s and may even reach to 50°C (110 – 120°F) in Egypt. At Luxor, the average high on August 2 over the past 17 years was 42.0°C and there was very little spread from one year to the next. The highest temperature was 46°C. Modern cameras usually warn of excessive temperatures—usually around 45°C—inside the body and may shut down, especially when shooting video. Canon warns that very high temperatures (and your camera will be warmer than the ambient temperature) may degrade the quality of still images and suggests some ways of mitigating the effect. You can find several discussions of the problem online, but a simple damp white cloth to drape over your camera could be your best friend. Take a look at Tables 1-3 and plan for the expected temperatures. In any event, a sharp drop in temperature will become noticeable about half-way between first and second contact and the problem will likely end. But don’t forget yourself. Heat stroke is not compatible with solar eclipses. Take the usual precautions, but don’t rely on them. A buddy system with someone to watch you (and you them) may pay dividends. **The Arabian Peninsula and beyond** Beyond Egypt, both cloud and dust begin to increase. Notably, there is over a 40 percent rise in average cloudiness between Berenice Troglodytica and Jeddah, on the opposite sides of the Red Sea. Some of this increase in cloud cover across the Red Sea is probably an artifact of the cloud detection algorithms used to convert radiance measurements to cloud cover since the cloud contours outline the Red Sea so closely, but inspection of the daily satellite images shows that much of it is real. Once the shadow path reaches Saudi Arabia, cloud climbs more quickly (Figures 11, 12), but this is mostly over the Hijaz Mountains. The Tihamah Plain that stretches along the coast does not feel the mountains’ effects and remains sunny with August’s average cloud cover of just over 10 percent. It’s a small area, and so most of the other Saudi and Yemeni sites have sunshine percentages that drop into the 60s. Sunnier skies return as the track leaves the mountains and reaches Marib, where the dryness of the Arabian Desert begins to be felt. Table 3: Climate statistics for selected locations along the eastern portion of the eclipse track. The greatest problem for otherwise suitable sites in Saudi Arabia is dust, as the region is sandwiched between the Arabian Desert on one side and the Sahara on the other. As a result, the Tihamah Plain has by far the highest average AOD along the track in Figure 9. In particular, the regions south of Jeddah stand out with their dusty skies. For the eclipse seeker on the Arabian Peninsula, dust and cloud will both be ongoing concerns. Figure 13: Satellite image of the Middle East acquired on August 2, 2020 in the early afternoon. Note the pall of dust across the eclipse track. The dust does not reach as far as Luxor. Note also the cloud along the Asir Mountains in Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Image: NASA. Over Yemen, near Marib, where the eclipse track emerges from the mountain terrain, cloudiness falls to around 20 percent in Figure 12. In Somalia, the interior is protected from the Gulf cloud by the 2,400-m Ogo Mountains. Bosaso, on the coast, has an average August cloudiness of 50 percent, but this drops sharply to under 20 percent on the south side of the mountains where desert conditions prevail. August is the driest month on the Horn of Africa but the Ogo Mountains are high enough to catch a part of the Indian Ocean moisture and the high terrain enjoys a wetter month from a few convective clouds. The final stop for the lunar shadow is the Chagos Archipelago, a group of seven atolls in the Indian Ocean, that is formally known as the British Indian Ocean Territory. The northern portion of the Archipelago lies under the eclipse track but the only inhabited atoll is the island of Diego Garcia, the site of a joint British-U.S. military base that lies 130 km outside the south limit. It’s treated as a high-security base and access is presently extremely limited in spite of the recent agreement to return the atoll to Mauritius. The average cloud fraction for Diego Garcia is considerably at odds with the claimed 80 percent sunshine but in line with the average monthly precipitation in Table 3. **In retrospect** Cloud cover for this eclipse is among the lowest I’ve analyzed over the last 45 years and it’s easy to lose sight of that when the detailed statistics are inspected up close. Just about anywhere will present a good to excellent opportunity to see this event and bathe in over 6 minutes of totality. Dust is a threat in most areas, but only an occasional serious problem. If you want a guarantee, I’d suggest Siwa Oasis or the Bahariya Oasis (Batwi), both in Egypt, which have almost no prospect of cloud and seem to be relatively immune from dust storms. Benghazi similarly looks like a very good site. Updated August 2025 Return to Eclipsophile front page
000
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/08/2026
“Is America Headed for a Special Skills Draft?” My response to an attack video by YouTuber Ryan McBeth: hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002852.…
012
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/08/2026
“Is America Headed for a Special Skills Draft?” My response to an attack video by YouTuber Ryan McBeth: hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002852.…
012
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 07/08/2026
Thought for Hiroshima Day: The worst thing about Donald Trump being President of the USA is that he has the putative authority to give orders for nuclear omnicide. The survival of human life on Earth depends on the willingness of military subordinates not to carry out any such orders.
000
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 07/08/2026
Thought for Hiroshima Day: The worst thing about Donald Trump being President of the USA is that he has the putative authority to give orders for nuclear omnicide. The survival of human life on Earth depends on the willingness of military subordinates not to carry out any such orders.
001
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 05/08/2026
www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/five-star… "Flanking Trump in his AI-generated fantasy are the two officers most famously associated with insubordination and the two most storied soldiers on the scene the last time the Army attacked an encampment of American civilians in […]
urbanists.social
Original post on urbanists.social
101
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Paco Hope @paco.infosec.exchange.ap.brid.gy · 01/08/2026
RE: aus.social/@bastardsheep/1170193129… I bought a used Toyota EV and wanted to rip the telemetry device out of it. They make it SUPER hard. It’s buried deep in the dashboard. I went on a Toyota forum asking about whether anyone had done it on a BZ4X. (I’ve seen the one where […]
infosec.exchange
Original post on infosec.exchange
4229
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/08/2026
Can SFO rein in the feds? papersplease.org/wp/2026/07/31/can-…
papersplease.org
“Can SFO rein in the feds?”
As discussed in a feature article today by Clara-Sophia Daly on Mission Local, recent searches and arrests of passengers trying to board domestic flights at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) have prompted us to question what the airport has done, and what more it could and should do, to comply with city ordinances regulating use of surveillance technology and restricting collaboration with immigration enforcement. The arrest of Iryna Gorb by ICE at SFO on July 22nd and the search of Nikolas De Bremaeker by the TSA (and/or by Covenant Aviation Security, the contractor that supplies most of the checkpoint staff at SFO) at SFO on June 10th, raise questions about (1) the technologies in use to flag passengers to components of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) based on airline reservations, (2) whether equipment owned or operated by the airport is used to collect data passed on the DHS, (3) what if any limits are placed on warrantless access by DHS agents to airport premises, and (4) whether the policies of the airport, as put in place by the SF Airport Commission as an agency of the City and County, comply with city ordinances. For both domestic and international flights, the DHS requires airlines to send information about all passengers and their itineraries to DHS components starting 72 hours before departure. Reservation and itinerary information for international flights is sent to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and included in its Automated Targeting System (ATS). Information for domestic flights is sent to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) through its Secure Flight system. No airline is allowed to issue a boarding pass for either a domestic or international flight unless and until it receives an individualized, per-passenger, per-flight permission message from the TSA or CBP in the form of a “boarding pass printing result” (BPPR). The default in the absence of a favorable BPPR is not to allow them to fly. These fly/no-fly decisions are based on a black box of secret algorithms that incorporate list-based rules (blocklists) and other rules based on other known and unknown data. What’s less well known is that the DHS doesn’t just use the information it gets from airlines to decide whether or not to allow you to fly. It can also use this information to generate “handling codes” instructing checkpoint staff to conduct special searches of your person and property, or to generate messages to other agencies that may want to arrange an “unwelcoming” party to intercept you at the airport, on departure or on arrival, to question, search, or arrest you – with or without a warrant. We question the legality of many of these activities. Many of them have not yet been reviewed or approved by any court, and have little or no basis in law. Airline passengers need to know that, legal or not, this is happening. Travelers also need to know that, as we were the first to report last year (see here and here) and as was later confirmed by the _New York Times_ , some of the most intrusive and legally questionable aspects of these systems of surveillance and control of air travel, based on reservation data from airlines, have in the last year been expanded from international flights to domestic flights. Air travelers should beware. The Federal government has long claimed broad authority for searches of _international_ airline passengers as part of its authority for border searches. CBP also allows other law enforcement agencies to set a “TECS alert”, even without an arrest warrant or search warrant, so that the agency will be notified whether a person of interest is detected as having a reservation on an international flight. Typically, a TECS alert is triggered when the reservation is sent to CBP by the airline 72 hours before the flight, giving the agency that received the alert time to arrange to intercept the unwary traveler. These TECS alerts have been used for immigration enforcement as well as to target searches of political activists similar to that of Mr. De Bremaeker. But until 2025, we had never heard of this happening with a domestic flights within the U.S. – only with international flights where it could be rationalized as a “border search”. A memoranda of understanding (MOU) between the TSA and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), released this week in response to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, was signed on May 25, 2025. But the MOU fails explian how this TSA-ICE data sharing works or to resolve the legal issues it raises. The MOU was signed in secret, with no notice to airline passengers that information they provide to airlines when they make reservations, buy tickets, or check in for flights may be passed on to ICE, not just the TSA. The TSA’s legal authority for searches of passengers on domestic flights is limited to “administrative” searches for weapons, explosives, and items that pose a threat to aviation safety. Court have ruled repeatedly that the TSA has no authority to use its checkpoints as a pretext for all-purpose warrantless searches for general law enforcement purposes. The arrest of Ms. Gorb and the search of Mr. De Bremaeker recently at SFO appear to be further confirmation that the TSA is ignoring the legal limits on its authority and is setting alerts, similar to TECS alerts for _international_ flights, in the algorithms for the Secure Flight system for _domestic_ flights. These allow the TSA to alert other agencies such as ICE to the details of planned _domestic_ air travel by persons of interest and to intercept, question, and/or arrest them — without warrants. This is unconstitutional and should be stopped. No airline has challenged government demands for access to reservation data. Travelers should demand that airlines that don’t want to collaborate with ICE and other law enforcement agencies in spying on their passengers challenge these demands in court. As for the airport itself, SFO is located in an unincorporated portion of San Mateo County, but is owned and operated by the City and County of San Francisco. As the landlord at the airport, the city has the same authority to limit access to airport premises that any private landlord has, except for being required (1) not to discriminate between travelers on the basis of protected attributes or acts and (2) to allow space for TSA (or TSA contractors) to inspect passengers and luggage and CBP to inspect international passengers and cargo. The airport does **not** have to provide equipment for DHS components. If DHS wants to collect passenger information or operate facial recognition systems, the city can require the DHS to provide its own surveillance equipment, and the city can post its own signs alerting travelers to what DHS is doing. The city does **not** have to allow ICE to roam the airport freely, without warrants, outside customs and immigration areas. The city could restrict ICE agents to those areas unless they have warrants. But we now have more confirmation that reservation data – including data collected at city-owned shared-use check-in kiosks – is being passed on by the TSA to ICE. These issues have been debated by agencies responsible for governance of other publicly-owned airports. There were debates in Washington state with respect to airport purchases and installation of shared-use facial recognition systems at Seattle-Tacoma (SEA) airport that fed data to DHS components, and in Minnesota with respect to ICE roaming freely without warrants and abducting people on Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSP) airport premises. The SF Sanctuary City Ordinance prohibiting assistance to or collaboration with immigration enforcement applies to all City and County agencies — including the airport. The SF Surveillance Technology Ordinance exempts “Federally-regulated facilities at the airport”, but not all airport facilities, from some, but not all, of its provisions. Approvals and reporting on surveillance tech are still required, even for activities that aren’t prohibited. So far as we know, none of the issues posed by access to airport premises, use of surveillance technologies, or sharing of data between airport-owned shared-used systems and DHS components have been assessed by the SF Airport Commission or in terms of the SF Surveillance Technology Ordinance or Sanctuary City Ordinance. The SF Airport Commission should (1) disclose and publicly review its contracts and collaboration with all DHS components, (2) minimize collaboration, data sharing, and access to airport premises by DHS staff, and (3) be prepared to challenge, in court, collaboration or data sharing by the airport or warrantless access to airport premises by DHS agents not mandated by valid, Constitutional Federal laws. SFO is a City and County agency governed by a commission appointed by the Mayor. The next meeting of the SF Airport Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, August 25, 2026, at 9 a.m. at San Francisco City Hall, Room 400. We encourage concerned San Franciscans and others who travel through SFO to let the Airport Commissioners know what you think of their collaboration with ICE and allowing ICE agents free rein of the airport. As a gateway to San Francisco, SFO should exemplify our city’s values and message of welcome to all.
011
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 31/07/2026
As ICE arrests mount at airports, privacy expert [that's me] asks: Can SFO rein in the feds? TSA and ICE are sharing data and immigrant arrests at airports are increasing: missionlocal.org/2026/07/ice-arrest… Next SF Airport Commission meeting is 8/25, 9am […]
urbanists.social
Original post on urbanists.social
003
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Prof. Sam Lawler @sundogplanets.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 30/07/2026
Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. We either have 3 days or 8 days to respond now. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it. A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to […]
mastodon.social
Original post on mastodon.social
6736
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 29/07/2026
New FAQ on our Web site: Government jobs and Selective Service: Can I get a Federal or state job if I didn’t register for the draft? (more often than you think, yes) hasbrouck.org/draft/advice/jobs.html
002
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 27/07/2026
New on Resisters.info: Who will be drafted? How will a draft work? hasbrouck.org/draft/advice/who-how.…
002
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 25/07/2026
BREAKING: Selective Service Withdraws Proposed Rules for ‘Automatic’ Draft Registration: www.antiwar.com/blog/2026/07/24/sel… "Presumably, someone at the White House has realized that visible moves toward an […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
003
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
B Haas @belehaa.wandering.shop.ap.brid.gy · 21/07/2026
Dear conference organizers, Presentation ≠ PowerPoint If you will be requiring the use of PowerPoint, you must SAY SO in advance. It doesn't matter if "everybody" uses it. "Everybody" isn't everybody. Sincerely, Me
222
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Carl C @raven.fedi.raventhemaker.com.ap.brid.gy · 16/07/2026
@fuzzface This is why I have an 'in case of death" document with three different points of discoverability, plus my family has been told. I have a family-shared set of passwords for key accounts, plus the secrets necessary to unlock my private passwords. My document attempts to list everything I […]
fedi.raventhemaker.com
Original post on fedi.raventhemaker.com
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
fuzzface @fuzzface.epsilon-ix.masto.host.ap.brid.gy · 16/07/2026
I’m still trying to understand and get into my late wife’s accounts. I have a laptop I am trying to crack to get information for a stroke victim who can’t remember details. We need to advocate strongly for people not to ignore this because you just don’t know when something may go wrong with you […]
epsilon-ix.masto.host
Original post on epsilon-ix.masto.host
104
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 16/07/2026
Gov. Newsom signs law to upload California driver's license and ID data to privately-held national ID database: papersplease.org/wp/2026/07/16/gov-…
papersplease.org
Gov. Newsom signs law to upload California data to national ID database
Ignoring objections from grassroots organizations from diverse communities throughout the state and a litany of lies to the legislature from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Gov. Gavin Newson signed a bill into law this week which authorizes the DMV to upload information about about all California driver’s licenses and state-issued non-driver ID cards to the SPEXS national ID database. The bill, SB-169, is effective immediately. Gov. Newsom and the DMV have made much of the “guardrails” included in the bill. But as we testified at the last hearing before this bill was enacted (see video starting at 2:48:22) once the DMV uploads information about all California driver’s licenses and IDs to AAMVA (which holds the SPEXS database), the “guardrails” in this bill would do nothing to protect Californians against the threat that Federal or other states’ law enforcement agencies could obtain an order (1) requiring AAMVA to hand over this data in bulk and (2) prohibiting AAMVA from disclosing that order to the DMV or to the Californians — especially vulnerable immigrant and transgender Californians — against whom this data will be weaponized. Neither the DMV nor impacted Californians will even know this has happened, and it won’t be detectable by the audit of DMV records (not AAMVA records) required by SB-169. In its report on the signing of SB-169, the _Sacramento Bee_ erroneously states (perhaps based on misinformation from the DMV and/or the Governor’s office) that the data sharing authorized by SB-169 is “required by federal law.” But the regulations cited by the _Bee_ apply only to those states that _choose_ to comply with the REAL-ID Act. As a coalition of 170 organizations said in a joint statement quoted by the _Bee:_ > The first rule of combating tyranny is do not comply in advance. It is imperative that California not willingly give away data that the federal government could turn around and use to harm our communities. No state is required to comply with the REAL-ID Act. No state is required to upload data about its residents to a database held by a private company, AAMVA. This is a _choice_ — the wrong choice — for Californians.
012
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Divest from Tesla @divesttesla.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 11/07/2026
CalSTRS and CalPERS state pension funds for teachers & public employees still have >$2B each in TSLA stock. Tell them to sell it, now! CalPERS board meeting: Mon. 7/13, 9:30 am, Monterey (or comment by phone): actionnetwork.org/events/calpers-pe… […]
mastodon.social
Original post on mastodon.social
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Dan Q @dan.m.danq.me.ap.brid.gy · 09/07/2026
Fucking "app culture" drives me crazy. I got asked to install a mobile app just to look at the itinerary and accommodation information for a trip I'm going on. Why isn't it just a web page? So obviously I said "fuck that noise, hold my beer", reverse-engineered the app, and re-implemented it […]
m.danq.me
Original post on danq.me
821180
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 08/07/2026
Why is the Selective Service war gaming a "special skills" draft? (My latest on Responsible Statecraft, based on responses to my FOIA requests): responsiblestatecraft.org/war-draft… More on planning for a "special skills" draft […] [Original post on kolektiva.social]
Required skills: Computer network technicians, electronics technicians, aerospace engineers, divers, welders, gas turbine engine mechanics, electricians, heavy equipment operators, longshoremen, steel workers / pipefitters, radar / communications technicians, fiber optic technicians, mariners, aviation structural mechanics, cyber security specialists, robotics operators and technicians, air traffic controllers, logistics specialists, linguists.
003
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 05/07/2026
Important analysis of implications of new Florida law that's not getting much attention: www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/having-bi… by @hackingbutlegal
hackingbutlegal.com
"Having Birth": What Florida's New Security Law Is Actually For
Building a family in Florida now depends on where you were born. The Governor says that's the point. There's also prison time.
001
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 02/07/2026
virginialawreview.org/articles/abol… "Every state criminalizes conspiracy, and there are dozens of federal conspiracy statutes... Conspiracy’s hold on U.S. criminal systems is firm. I seek to break that hold. I contend that the crime of conspiracy promotes surveillance of […]
urbanists.social
Original post on urbanists.social
000
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 02/07/2026
#BadAlgorithms - I just learned (several days late, because credit card issuing bank didn't notify me) that bank blocked my credit card because I bought a book (from the publisher). Their "fraud" misdetection algorithm flagged this as a suspicious or unusual transaction. How often do I buy books?
010
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 01/07/2026
Did California’s DMV Director lie to the legislature about REAL-ID "agreement", "requirements", and "deadline"? papersplease.org/wp/2026/07/01/did-…
California DMV Director Steve Gordon, alongside other DMV staff,  responds to questions from members of Senate Budget Subcommittee #5 on Transportation, March 19, 2026.
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 27/06/2026
California legislature agrees to upload driver’s licenses to private national ID database: papersplease.org/wp/2026/06/27/cali…
papersplease.org
California legislature agrees to upload driver’s licenses to national database
Withdrawing its opposition under behind-the-scenes pressure from Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawless threats from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the California legislature has agreed to fund and revise state law to authorize the upload of information about all driver’s licenses and ID cards issued by the state to the private SPEXS national ID database operated by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA). The budget compromise between Gov. Newsom and the legislature announced last night includes “guardrails” intended to give an illusion of protection for license and ID data. There’s no time before the hearing on the budget compromise scheduled for Monday morning in the Senate Budget Committee for legislators to assess whether those guardrails will be effective. But to anyone aware of the real threat, it’s apparent that they are a sham. That was inevitable, as we’ve pointed out in our previous statements to the legislature. Once this data is transferred to AAMVA, components of the DHS or other Federal or state law enforcement agencies will be able to obtain it from AAMVA by court order. Such a subpoena or warrant could, and probably would, include a gag order prohibiting AAMVA from disclosing it to the state of California or to the individuals whose data is disclosed. Even after the fact, neither California nor individual Californians will know that this has happened or be able to challenge it. That data could be misused in many ways, but it’s especially likely be weaponized against immigrant and transgende Californians who are already being targeted by Federal agencies and other states. The summary of the proposed “budget trailer” bill released last night says that it “Limits data sharing to only that required by federal law.” But that’s not true. “Compliance” with the REAL-ID by California or any other state is optional, not required. Neither the Federal REAL-ID Act nor any other Federal law requires, or could require, California or any other state to share any data with AAMVA, a private nonprofit corporation. As we pointed out in our earlier testimony on the budget proposal, California has a choice. The state could and should say “No” to premature capitulation to DHS threats. The Legislature should reject this “compromise” sell-out. Instead, the state, through its Attorney General, could and should prepare to defend Californians against any interference by the DHS or Transportation Security Administration (TSA) with our right to travel.
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 13/06/2026
RE: mastodon.social/@nnomypeace/1166323… Still time to sign up for this webinar starting at 11 am PDT / 2 pm EDT today. (I'm leading a breakout session on Selective Service and the draft in the second hour starting at noon PDT / 3 pm EDT). Registration & more info […]
kolektiva.social
Original post on kolektiva.social
002
Edward Hasbrouck @ehasbrouck.urbanists.social.ap.brid.gy · 05/06/2026
[European airlines sit on €3.2bn in unpaid delay compensation] RE: eupolicy.social/@euwatchers/1166995… "Airlines are not required to inform passengers they are entitled to compensation when a flight is late or cancelled." My experience […]
urbanists.social
Original post on urbanists.social
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 05/06/2026
Protest at San Francisco DMV office Thursday morning against Governor Newsom's proposal to upload information about *all* California dirver's licenses to the privatized national ID database. This can;t be fixed with "guardrails". Tell California Assembly and […] [Original post on liberdon.com]
Protesters with banners and signs
001
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Resisters.info @draft-resistance-news.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy · 03/06/2026
The Draft Is Unpopular. Registration Becomes Automatic in December Anyway. The federal government will now dig through databases to register 18-year-olds for conscription. reason.com/2026/06/03/the-draft-is-…
reason.com
The Draft Is Unpopular. Registration Becomes Automatic in December Anyway.
Americans aren't interested in reinstating a military draft, but that's not stopping the government from "streamlining" Selective Service registration—for young men's own good, we're told. That's right, the government is automating draft registration, using the excuse that it's saving registrants from the legal peril inherent in choosing to not register. The real reason, of course, is that fewer men were voluntarily registering, and the government wants to gloss over that mass rejection by potential draftees. # Automated Registration for Your Own Good? One component of the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) "modernizes Selective Service through automatic registration," boasted Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D–Pa.), who helped push the change. "This update will save taxpayer dollars and reverse falling registration rates by ensuring the Selective Service automatically registers young men, so that none inadvertently face the serious penalties of failing to register." **You are reading _The Rattler_ from J.D. Tuccille and _Reason_. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.** Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Email(Required) SUBSCRIBE The Selective Service System (SSS) has now formally proposed a rule to implement automatic registration. How many men "inadvertently" face legal peril is an open question. There may well be some young men thankful that they're being spared the challenging task of deciding whether to fill their names in on a form. But they're probably offset by the many people who prefer to make their own choices. Admittedly, the potential penalties for _not_ registering are stiff. "Failure to register with Selective Service is a violation of the Military Selective Service Act," according to the Selective Service System. "Conviction for such a violation may result in imprisonment for up to five years and/or a fine of not more than $250,000." Additionally, "once you turn 26, it's too late to register. Even though you may not be prosecuted, you may be denied student financial assistance, federal job training, and most federal employment at the discretion of the entity providing the benefit or service." # Years of Declining Draft Registration Compliance Despite the penalties, more young men have been risking running afoul of the law in recent years. "SSS is experiencing a significant decline in registrations by 18-year-old men," according to Selective Service documents acquired through a Freedom of Information Act request by peace activist Edward Hasbrouck. "In 2020, the registration rate for 18-year-old men nationwide was 61.8%, today it is just 39.9%." Declining registration by young men reaching the age of majority eroded the total pool of men available for conscription in the case of war. The same document revealed that 90.5 percent of 18- to 25-year-old men were registered in 2020; by 2023 only 84.2 percent were registered. That said, Hasbrouck pointed out in 2024 that "most men register eventually, but often years after their prime draft eligibility. The SSS allows men to register without penalty until their 26th birthday. Some men deliberately or inadvertently delay registering until they are close to age 26. This minimizes their exposure to a possible draft while preserving their eligibility for federal or state jobs or other programs later in life." The records are actually less accurate than official data suggests. Men 18 to 25 are supposed to update address changes within 10 days, but few bother. Draft registration records that don't contain current contact information do the government little good. To deal with its compliance problem, Selective Service has pushed automatic registration for years. In its 2024 annual report, the agency said it sought to "automatically enroll eligible individuals by leveraging existing databases, ensuring compliance without requiring additional action on the registrants' part." It added that 46 states and territories already had "laws enabling constituents to register when obtaining a driver's license, learner's permit, or state identification card." My son was automatically registered when he got his Arizona driver's license. The 2026 NDAA enacts Selective Service's long-desired national policy. # Little Public Enthusiasm for Conscription But the move towards easing military conscription flies in the face of Americans' preferences. A May 2026 Overton Insights poll asked, "If President Trump implemented a military draft, would you support or oppose it?" Two-thirds of respondents strongly (59 percent) or somewhat (7 percent) opposed the idea of a military draft. Only a quarter strongly (11 percent) or somewhat (14 percent) supported the idea. Note that even 41 percent of Republicans opposed implementing a hypothetical Trump-chosen military draft (43 percent supported it). Eighty percent of independents and 86 of Democrats opposed the idea of a draft. It's worth pointing out that the poll frames the implementation of a military draft not just as a presidential power, but one exercised by the current White House inhabitant. In fact, while draft registration is mandatory, it would take an act of Congress to reinstate the draft itself. That would spread responsibility and likely make responses less partisan. But there's little evidence of enthusiasm for reinstating conscription. There might be even less for the new automated registration system that grants the Selective Service System access to information from a host of unrelated sources. "In reality, this means the federal government will now access databases from state Departments of Motor Vehicles, the Socal Security Administration [_sic_], and the Census Bureau to gather information to register young men automatically, without their consent," objects the Friends Committee on National Legislation. "This change also threatens the rights of conscientious objectors. Automatic registration removes the opportunity for individuals' moral decision making." Automatic registration will take us closer to the day when the government unifies data storage for general use and enforcement. That might be a gain for efficiency, but it's not obvious that we should want government officials to be able to more efficiently inflict every rule and whim on the population. One effect of automatic registration is that it's reminded some young Americans that they have skin in the game. There's been a revival of long largely dormant public pushback by individuals and organizations opposed to conscription. Last month, Sens. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.), Rand Paul (R–Ky.), and Cynthia Lummis (R–Wyo.) introduced a bill to repeal the Selective Service Act, abolish draft registration, and eliminate penalties for failing to register. Failing passage of the bill or other relevant legislative changes, draft registration becomes automatic for 18-year-olds in December 2026.
101
Reposted by Edward Hasbrouck
Papers, Please! @papersplease.liberdon.com.ap.brid.gy · 03/06/2026
STOP DMV Data Grab Rally! 1377 Fell St, San Francisco Thurs, June 4, 8-9 AM PDT bay-resistance.solidarity.tech/stop…... What's happening and why it matters: papersplease.org/wp/2026/04/29/uplo…
STOP DMV Data Grab Rally!
1377 Fell St, San Francisco
Thurs, June 4, 8-9 AM PDT
022