egg @eggular.bsky.social · 21/06/2026Love how this is literally so wrong (d=6 is the critical dimension.... not well-understood lol) 010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 14/04/2026while searching for Menshikov's paper "Coincidence of critical points in percolation problems", AI Overview provided one of the worst explanations of universality I've ever seen. literally so wrong (p_c is not universal lmao) 210
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026this is not how you state theorems, you don't state the assumptions inline way above and say "f will be x" and then write sentences starting (and ending) with mathematical notation saying things like N_p \geq 2 010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026for example, he proves this proposition with strong assumptions and a weak conclusion, while a much stronger statement is true (for principal value sums) for arbitrary analytic f with |zf(z)| = O(1). Then he assigns a bunch of sum problems that are unsolvable with the weak version given in the book 100
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026typesetting is nightmarish, everything is some long in-line derivation which randomly introduces 3 or 4 important definitions, generally not in their own environment, which is then used 4 or 5 pages later. exercises in chapter 11 end up using some random prop in chap 6 100
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 07/12/2025I honestly do so much math on WhatsApp. Overleaf I associate with misery, Discord likewise. Yet I love talking to my friends about math on WhatsApp... If every messaging service had inline LaTeX society would revolutionize... just imagine.... 140
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 10/11/2025local lovecraftian horror the alexander horned sphere asking "please sir, I want some more". would you deny him? 1135
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 01/09/2025I find this excerpt from Rayne Fisher-Quann really interesting, and also sad - I don't feel this way at all! but I used to. 040
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 19/08/2025how does this follow at all from the previous two sentences ???? 120
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 19/08/2025reading reactionary bullshit on Substack (this article is called PhDs are easy) and the suggestions to make PhDs more meritorious are mind-numbingly idiotic 381
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 28/07/2025if I was a highly educated mathematician I simply wouldn't swallow up pro-ethnic cleansing agitprop slop so breathtakingly overt as to insult one's intelligence 240
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 22/05/2025scaling limits is a very refined serious subject with refined serious random objects 000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 21/05/2025I wonder if it's really satisfying to write this kind of paper (5ish of the references are cited precisely because they assert something incorrect) 130
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 18/05/2025from "Some comments on piecewise-projective groups of the line" by Nicolas Monod 000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 14/05/2025Love a page of handwritten notes (scanned into PDF) that begins with "Fact 🙁" 020
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 02/05/2025Jill Lepore's recent New Yorker article was one of the stupidest things I've ever read 010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 25/04/2025algebraic geometers use banana integrals as it is well-known in algebra that reducing the problem to fruit makes the problem significantly more tractable, see e.g. 020
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 09/04/2025I really want to be able to use TikZ to draw a branching random walk (ideally through actual code, maybe at most I have to specify the first two vectors of displacements, but I don't want to spend 3 hours fiddling with points and spacing by hand.) Anyone know how to do this? 120
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 07/11/2024when I talk about random trees now, I increasingly think about this line by Brecht: "What times are these, in which / A conversation about trees is almost a crime / For in doing so we maintain our silence about so much wrongdoing!" 072