Sign in

egg

@eggular.bsky.social
192 followers 93 following 197 posts

the sea advances insensibly in silence, nothing seems to happen, nothing moves, the water is so far off you hardly hear it.. yet it finally surrounds the resistant substance.

PostsRepliesMedia
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 21/06/2026
Love how this is literally so wrong (d=6 is the critical dimension.... not well-understood lol)
010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
Wedderbum...
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
while searching for Menshikov's paper "Coincidence of critical points in percolation problems", AI Overview provided one of the worst explanations of universality I've ever seen. literally so wrong (p_c is not universal lmao)
210
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
this is not how you state theorems, you don't state the assumptions inline way above and say "f will be x" and then write sentences starting (and ending) with mathematical notation saying things like N_p \geq 2
010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
what the hell is the ultimate Cauchy theorem
200
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
for example, he proves this proposition with strong assumptions and a weak conclusion, while a much stronger statement is true (for principal value sums) for arbitrary analytic f with |zf(z)| = O(1). Then he assigns a bunch of sum problems that are unsolvable with the weak version given in the book
100
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
typesetting is nightmarish, everything is some long in-line derivation which randomly introduces 3 or 4 important definitions, generally not in their own environment, which is then used 4 or 5 pages later. exercises in chapter 11 end up using some random prop in chap 6
100
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 09/01/2026
Why not just say branch...
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
I honestly do so much math on WhatsApp. Overleaf I associate with misery, Discord likewise. Yet I love talking to my friends about math on WhatsApp... If every messaging service had inline LaTeX society would revolutionize... just imagine....
140
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
Uh huh
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
👀
Wikipedia article called "Cabal (set theory)". The main text reads, The Cabal was, or perhaps is, a set of set theorists in Southern California, particularly at UCLA and Caltech, but also at UC Irvine. Organization and procedures range from informal to nonexistent, so it is difficult to say whether it still exists or exactly who has been a member, but it has included such notable figures as Donald A. Martin, Yiannis N. Moschovakis, John R. Steel, and Alexander S. Kechris. Others who have published in the proceedings of the Cabal seminar include Robert M. Solovay, W. Hugh Woodin, Matthew Foreman, and Steve Jackson.

The work of the group is characterized by free use of large cardinal axioms, and research into the descriptive set theoretic behavior of sets of reals if such assumptions hold.

Some of the philosophical views of the Cabal seminar were described in Maddy 1988a and Maddy 1988b.
040
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
local lovecraftian horror the alexander horned sphere asking "please sir, I want some more". would you deny him?
image of Alexander Horned Sphere. made by Ryan Dahl, Creative Commons license
1135
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 01/09/2025
I find this excerpt from Rayne Fisher-Quann really interesting, and also sad - I don't feel this way at all! but I used to.
040
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 28/08/2025
I lowkey love when textbooks are written like this
020
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 19/08/2025
how does this follow at all from the previous two sentences ????
120
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 19/08/2025
reading reactionary bullshit on Substack (this article is called PhDs are easy) and the suggestions to make PhDs more meritorious are mind-numbingly idiotic
381
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
if I was a highly educated mathematician I simply wouldn't swallow up pro-ethnic cleansing agitprop slop so breathtakingly overt as to insult one's intelligence
240
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 22/05/2025
scaling limits is a very refined serious subject with refined serious random objects
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
ouch
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
I wonder if it's really satisfying to write this kind of paper (5ish of the references are cited precisely because they assert something incorrect)
130
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Question, by May Swenson
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 18/05/2025
from "Some comments on piecewise-projective groups of the line" by Nicolas Monod
000
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 14/05/2025
Love a page of handwritten notes (scanned into PDF) that begins with "Fact 🙁"
by Greg Hjorth (I think), from here: https://www.math.ucla.edu/~popa/workshop0307/ucla07hjorth.PDF
020
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 08/05/2025
Brushing up
010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
Jill Lepore's recent New Yorker article was one of the stupidest things I've ever read
010
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
algebraic geometers use banana integrals as it is well-known in algebra that reducing the problem to fruit makes the problem significantly more tractable, see e.g.
020
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
yes I'm an analyst, yes I do banana integrals 🍌
120
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 24/04/2025
from Mathematics Made Difficult by Carl E. Linderholm
050
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
hell of an opening
040
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 13/04/2025
April, by Louise Glück, from the Wild Iris, 1992
140
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
I really want to be able to use TikZ to draw a branching random walk (ideally through actual code, maybe at most I have to specify the first two vectors of displacements, but I don't want to spend 3 hours fiddling with points and spacing by hand.) Anyone know how to do this?
120
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
! AI is the future of mathematics
Greenlinger's lemma is a mathematical result that is used to prove other statements.
040
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 09/11/2024
recent Bass Serre theory presentation I gave
160
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 07/11/2024
when I talk about random trees now, I increasingly think about this line by Brecht: "What times are these, in which / A conversation about trees is almost a crime / For in doing so we maintain our silence about so much wrongdoing!"
What times are these, in which
A conversation about trees is almost a crime
For in doing so we maintain our silence about so much wrongdoing!
And he who walks quietly across the street,
Passes out of the reach of his friends
Who are in danger?

It is true: I work for a living
But, believe me, that is a coincidence. Nothing
That I do gives me the right to eat my fill.
By chance I have been spared. (If my luck does not hold,
I am lost.)

They tell me: eat and drink. Be glad to be among the haves!
But how can I eat and drink
When I take what I eat from the starving
And those who thirst do not have my glass of water?
And yet I eat and drink.
072
egg @eggular.bsky.social · 07/11/2024
a lot to digest here
Factoring in the Chicken McNugget monoid, see https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.01606
090