iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 30/09/2026

My funny and silly sticker pack keeps growing! These adorable funny stickers are made by @skiwhitepelt.bsky.social

1124 12

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 13/09/2026

I got these superb custom made latex gloves from @punztokahlika.bsky.social! Aren’t they amazing???

3175 17

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 09/09/2026

More potential allegations of OpenAI scooping the work of mathematicians using their products. Full thread in alt text. This is very worrisome and defo won’t be the last of it we’ll here. mathstodon.xyz/@andreasthom... mathstodon.xyz/@andreasthom... mathstodon.xyz/@andreasthom...

Andreas Thom on the linked thread on Mathstodon:

1/3 I want to record a number of points that I realized after reading up on the controversy. In fact it recalls an exchange I had with OpenAI after its non-sofic-group announcement. It exposes a serious, unanswered question about whether researchers can trust OpenAI with unpublished mathematics.

I wrote in an email to Mark Sellke and Sebastien Bubeck shortly after the surprising finding of a non-sofic group using the methods of Kun and myself:
“Another point is that I and a colleague in Dresden were discussing the expander matching problem and various extensions of the work with Gabor Kun actively over the last months with ChatGPT, so that we are of course curious if that was part of the training data or accessible to the reasoning process. There is a certain (frankly unacceptable) lack of transparency here; and I fear it will damage the communal process of math more than the new AI-generated results will benefit the subject.”

Mark Sellke’s complete answer was: “Regarding your conversations with ChatGPT: that did not happen.”

I had explicitly asked about two different things: (1) whether our conversations entered training data, and (2) whether they were accessible to the solving process. The categorical answer now looks as though it addressed only direct access under (2). No such qualification, explanation, or evidence was given. I take this as dishonesty to say the least.
OpenAI now says in the Buckmaster-Alpöge case that no specific user data was accessed, but adds that it “cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models.”

2/3 OpenAI is drawing a distinction that its answer to me erased, despite the fact that my question explicitly made that distinction.
We are not required to reverse-engineer OpenAI’s internal training pipeline to establish what happened. Only OpenAI has the relevant data for that. If Sellke and Bubeck give a categorical denial, it must disclose the basis: product and privacy settings, relevant datasets and checkpoints, and what “de-identified data derived from usage” means.
I disabled model training on 29 June. That control is still only a promise whose implementation users cannot audit, and it is prospective: it does not answer what happened to earlier conversations or to derivatives already selected. OpenAI’s answer did not mention the setting or any account-specific check.
There is also a mathematical parallel, though a less explicit one. The approach of Kun and myself was not the main line of attack on non-soficity, in fact there were other more promising approaches along the line of quantum games etc. OpenAI’s detailed command of our techniques therefore made me wonder how the model found this route. If nonpublic research supplied by users improved a model and the provider then used that model to race those users to publication - without informed consent, disclosure, or credit - that would be ethically indefensible. De-identification may remove a name; it does not remove the intellectual content of a mathematical idea. Sellke and Bubeck seem to be blind to this simple moral aspect.

3/3 Sellke’s categorical answer was, at minimum, unjustifiably broad and materially misleading; looking back it was plainly dishonest. Bubeck’s acknowledged attacks and his attempt to exclude Alpöge from a proposed OpenAI-proof paper deepen the concern that there is a loss of moral compass. Taken together, this raises serious questions about their judgment and personal integrity.

082 8

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 08/09/2026

The fuck. Nintendo copied Microsoft fucking Recall????

031 3

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 28/08/2026

This sketch page showcasing Debbie and some of her interests is AMAZING! This is a Celeste tier Patreon reward by @siplick.art. Go support them on Patreon! www.patreon.com/siplick

16922 69

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 25/08/2026

Omg. They outright give it to you. I bought The Witcher 3 super discounted, like €20 for the game plus all DLC!

Screenshot from the Nintendo eShop showing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Remastered available as a free download instead of the €59.99 pre-sale price.

030 3

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 23/08/2026

Pues yo creo que deberíamos confinar por donde quiera que pase Feijóo, no sea que su estupidez sea contagiosa.

052 5

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 12/08/2026

Morning! Today is eclipse day!!! I’ll be watching it from within the region of totality! So excited aaaaaa

092 9

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 21/07/2026

Debbie redesigned! Taking inspiration from tieflings and made into a sorceress! Would you have her on your party? Superb piece by @lionrae.bsky.social!

33111 31

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 17/07/2026

I miss CFz. Such a fun con! And so many friends going... I wanna go again but pricing has gotten a bit steep :/ Anyway, happy #FursuitFriday!

1110 11

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 12/07/2026

Forgot to show this super cute key cap set my friends got me for my bday~ Thanks a lot @kibabytes.art @rongchipeachy.bsky.social @therunop.bsky.social (listed alphabetically :3)

A custom mechanical keyboard featuring cute How to train your dragon key caps

0162 16

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 11/07/2026

Mis novies me retaron a subir esta foto si les gustaba la comida que había hecho uwu

271 7

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 10/07/2026

Maybe a bit more risqué than usual but… do you like your dragons shiny? 😘 Happy #fursuitfriday! I have more but those are definitely too spicy to post here… ;3

1326 32

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 28/06/2026

Pride Month may be nearing its end but the fight keeps going! Art by Garu t.me/GaruGallery

3304 30

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 24/06/2026

Deltarune today!!!! But... still a few hours to go... *splat* Art by @canideo.bsky.social

060 6

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 23/06/2026

Water so green you’d think this is the reflective pool in DC

0101 10

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 17/06/2026

Truly huge innovations using the productivity unlocked by AI, am I right?

020 2

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 17/06/2026

I got an update and this shows up every time I empty my notifications. What the fuck xD

020 2

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 02/06/2026

Vibe coded website working perfectly. I had to fetch my phone to be able to change my avatar. The file I was uploading was exactly the same on both devices xD

141 4

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 24/05/2026

This is not a joke. Here's the title in my feed in Spanish compared to the correct title.

A screenshot of the YouTube app showcasing a video titled "Reaccionando al botón de envío" (Spanish), which would translate as "Reacting to the shipping button" in English.

Screenshot of the YouTube website showing a video titled "Reacting to Shipping a button".

020 2

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 18/05/2026

Si el 67,1% de Andaluces creen que la mejora de la sanidad pública es la principal razón para ir a votar y el PP recibió un 41,6% de los votos, al menos casi una cuarta parte de votantes del PP votaron PP para mejorar la sanidad????

293 9

Debbie 🐉🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈@🇵🇹 @debbiedragoness.eu · 15/05/2026

Wanna join the plushies? :3 #fursuitfriday Picture taken at the NFC photoshoot!

0235 23