Reposted by David Pomerantz👻 David Weiskopf believes in spooks 👻 @dave.bzky.team · 02/10/2026Trump and GOP MOC just raised your bills by $6500. @energyinnovation.org did the math. Read more here:apnews.comHouseholds will pay more for energy because of Trump's policy changes, think tank saysHouseholds in the contiguous United States will pay thousands of dollars more for energy through 2040 because of federal policy changes since President Donald Trump returned to office. 1145
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 23/09/2026If I meant it about you specifically I would have said that. I don't know you in the foggiest! It was a broad comment, which I stand by. You can assume good faith or not. I chose to assume you weren't specifically accusing me of "right-wing & centrist slop" earlier in the thread. 🤷 100
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 23/09/2026The value in passing permitting reform is for the next 20 years, not the next 2. We obviously disagree on those costs, benefits and trade-offs, which is fine. 100
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 23/09/2026As for you original point on Trump: Trump is a lawless president; tough to really do much to change that during the remainder of his lame duck, and I don't pretend permitting reform does anything there. I think the way to solve that problem is to stop electing lawless presidents. 110
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Ok. Well just disagree about a lot of these trade-offs, but that’s fine. 100
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 11/09/2026Thanks Brendan - really appreciate that coming from you! 011
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 09/09/2026From what I know about it (not massive amounts) I am optimistic about both, yes. 120
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026PG&E's filing: pge.com/assets/pge/d... Sempra's filing: socalgas.com/sites/defaul...pge.com 030
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026That is why AB2065 is so necessary. Even with clear laws to protect ratepayers in place, utilities will keep trying to dodge them if they know there isn't a price for illegality. I hope Gov. Newsom signs the bill, and that other states pursuing utility accountability follow suit! 130
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Sempra's filing is even worse. They listed every employee in their filing w/ a title like "Manager," "Specialist," "Vice President," or "Attorney," conveying no info despite clear legal requirements. And they are charging ratepayers for 95%+ of nearly every employee they list. 151
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026An "Investor Relations Analyst Principal's" pay is 100% in rates. A "Sr. Director Investor Relations" is 78% in rates. Investor relations is prohibited from recovery. These are people making $200+/year, and there are many of them. That's millions or more in possible violations. 131
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Some "Govt Relations Reps"' pay are booked 100% to rates. Some "Regulation Relations Advocacy" staff's pay are being 96 - 98% booked to rates. The law's definition of "political influence" is quite broad: it beggars belief that these job titles aren't conducting any of it. 131
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026PG&E's filing ignored clear instructions in the law for how to file this form (e.g. they didn't include job descriptions for these employees.) Even with those obfuscations, PG&E appears to be charging ratepayers for some employees' salaries that it shouldn't be. 142
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026AB 1167 required utilities to post information about the compensation they paid to the employees who work in departments that conduct activities that they're prohibited from recovering in rates (politics, advertising, investor relations, etc.) 141
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Is all this necessary? A tour through CA utilities' filings this year shows that yes, it is! CA utilities began annual disclosures this spring in response to AB 1167. Those forms show massive red flags on compliance... 131
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Many states have now passed laws banning utilities from charging ratepayers for politics and advertising, but California is the first to have mandated penalties. The other states on this map could take notice and similarly upgrade their policies: energyandpolicy.org/tracking-sta...energyandpolicy.orgTracking State Legislation to Get Politics Out of Utility BillsSince 2023, 17 states have filed legislative proposals to prohibit investor-owned utilities from using customer funds to support political activities. 132
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026AB 2065 also takes away the California utilities' oft-used "oopsie" defense, where they claim they booked the costs to ratepayers accidentally. The bill specifies that they get amnesty if they catch their own mistakes, but if regulators or others do, they're on the hook. 131
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026AB 2065 specifies that if a utility tries to charge customers for prohibited costs and gets caught, they will be penalized for that same amount on top of issuing a refund. If the utility keeps screwing up, the penalty jumps to treble that amount. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTe...leginfo.legislature.ca.govBill Text - AB-2065 Rates: prohibited cost recovery.AB 2065 Rates: prohibited cost recovery. 132
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026AB 2065 closes a gap in last year's excellent AB 1167, which banned utilities from charging customers for political activities and other costs that don't benefit customers. 1167 mandated penalties for violations, but not amounts. energyandpolicy.org/california-l...energyandpolicy.orgCalifornia passes bill curbing utilities use of ratepayer money for political spendingState lawmakers last week made California the seventh state to pass a bill limiting investor-owned utilities from using customer money to pay for political and lobbying costs. 131
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026A great utility accountability bill is on Gov. Newsom's desk that I and probably many others didn't catch in the flurry of wildfire liability drama: AB 2065 would penalize investor-owned utilities who try to break the rules and charge ratepayers for illegal expenses. 🧵 1166
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Love to hear your thoughts if you've got some! 131
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026I hadn't realized how much of this was already playing out in fights, like between Google/Amazon and Dominion in VA, over whether hyperscalers can displace utility capital (and ROE). 240
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026What I found most interesting was that when you dig into it, you realize that sure, the hyperscalers may take some pushing. But none of this is a deal-breaker for them, and they're leveraged. The biggest opposition will come from the monopoly utilities. 260
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026The framework I've laid out here is hardly new: "... Data centers 1) paying their fair share, 2) driving savings through flexibility, 3) displacing utility capital, all in exchange for a more reasonable interconnection process that keeps them on the grid." 140
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/09/2026The off-grid, mega-gas-powered data centers that have been in the news are, from my perspective, the worst outcome to the data center rush for people. Which got me thinking: what is the best outcome? This post is my best effort to articulate that. utilitywatch.substack.com/p/keep-data-...utilitywatch.substack.comKeep Data Centers On The GridWe can do it, and lower people’s rates, but utilities are going to oppose any reforms that threaten their profits 182
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 18/08/2026Thanks from one of the stroller pushers, needed it today! 120
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/08/2026I did SFO-NYC in June w a 1.5 and 4.5-yo, solo, and similarly felt world-conquering afterward. A red eye w kids is a whole other kettle of fish though. Impressive! 010
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/08/2026If they had it would have been their fault. 120
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 08/08/2026You have my sympathies. Also you’re 47? You look great. 130
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 31/07/2026Please help my incomparable, amazing friend Casey and his family if you at all can afford to do so. ❤️❤️❤️ youtu.be/JnF91-kEGD4?...youtu.beFor two years, he couldn't talk to his daughter. Then a brain-science breakthrough happened.YouTube video by Team Casey 020
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 30/07/2026I’d encourage my friends from the environmental community who have taken a skeptical view of permitting reform to give this a good listen. I think it’s an excellent overview. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...podcasts.apple.comWhat a Permitting Reform Deal Could Look LikePodcast Episode · Shift Key with Robinson Meyer · July 29 · 1h 19m 131
Reposted by David PomerantzJosh Voorhees @joshvoorhees.bsky.social · 16/07/2026Fracking magnate and MAGA megadonor Harold Hamm, whose estimated net worth is $20bn, added: “It’s all relative.” via @us.theguardian.com: www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026... 042
Reposted by David PomerantzSue Sturgis @suesturgis.bsky.social · 09/07/2026NC Public Staff filed testimony today revealing what regulators found when they sampled Duke Energy Carolinas' capital spending: $50k+ in Carhartt, YETI, Leatherman & Amazon gear booked as capital expenses ... meaning ratepayers cover it AND Duke earns a return on it. 🧵 1128
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 10/06/2026A ne’er-do-well. Such a person might take a pass. 020
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 10/06/2026Look I like this starting 5 but I think there may be issues in the front court when Wemby confronts Chuck for calling him soft for a week straight on television. 010
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 10/06/2026We have some really cool jobs open right now at EPI, if I may say so. An early-career fellowship, a data engineer position, and a CA-focused research manager. My colleagues are amazing. We have fun and we make a difference. energyandpolicy.org/jobs/energyandpolicy.orgJobsJobs at the Energy and Policy Institute - a watchdog exposing the attacks on renewable energy and countering misinformation by fossil fuel interests. 25528
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 21/05/2026If you haven't made this switch yet and it's available to you: do you know how much more pleasant a school drop-off is by bike/e-bike than by car? My kids like it. No drop-off line. Get your blood moving just a little (or a lot, your call) to start the day... often my fave 15 min of the day. 040
David Pomerantz @davidpomerantz.bsky.social · 21/05/2026It is the literal definition of "YMMV" - but honestly so great at any level. 110