D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 11/10/2026This press release has been making the rounds. But like a lot of university press releases, it's overhyped. The headline finding is a change of a few percentage points and doesn't show up in one of the three component studies. 170
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 10/10/2026primate: Happy Caturday! Jasper the Kitten: Why do you disturb my repose¿¡? 070
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The author of the novel was a neuroscience professor?! 110
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 02/10/2026Back on my bullshit (regressing multidimensional scales of right-wing authoritarianism against multidimensional scales of trust in science) 280
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Similar results here, also haven't read this yet www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 000
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 08/09/2026This paper came up in a search for social determinants of hesitancy that vary by gender. Haven't read it yet, but super interesting: men's hesitancy is more explained by far-right conspiracism and complacency, women's hesitancy by low SES and safety concerns. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC... 100
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Same thing with gender: pre-vaccine politicization, women were more likely to express vaccine hesitancy than men 100
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 08/09/2026You're talking about vaccine skepticism, the quoted post is talking about vaccine hesitancy. Before vaccines were politicized in 2020-21, hesitancy was highest among Black people. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC... 110
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 27/08/2026btw can't recommend highly enough this way of walking through the syllabus on the first day of class 172
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 18/08/2026Uhhhh this is also not in the Introduction, Preface, or Acknowledgments 1110
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 13/08/2026This is trolling and engagement bait and we all know the thing to do is just ignore the trolls, right? 020
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 12/08/2026Though the other use maybe fits with Rose's interpretation (Bonus: Probably the first instance of me doing a bibliometrics) 030
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 12/08/2026One of only two uses in my dissertation, but does seem to fit with this pattern 220
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 10/08/2026Being an assistant department chair is exhausting work 2102
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 23/07/2026Today we're mad that Substack has made a partnership with Pangram, an AI detector that (a) has an extremely low false positive rate, (b) isn't based on "AI tells," and (c) does not itself use generative AI 020
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 21/07/2026Was there supposed to be something between these paragraphs? It's also blank on my nothing-disabled-nothing-blocked Safari 100
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 18/07/2026I see we've decided to move on to conspiracy theories and/or confusing LLM training with social media algorithms 170
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 15/07/2026This is what I was thinking of, from this LA Times story: www.latimes.com/california/s... We don't have test data for current students/recent applicants. Even if we started collecting them this year, we wouldn't get any outcome data until June 2028, and that's just for first-year grades. 100
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 08/07/2026Thinking about this some more, I suspect the DAG looks like this. Which is not great for trying to make an inference using only present data. 010
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 11/06/2026Sending a post to 2 friends: is there someone you forgot to ask? 010