Sign in

Crash Krylova

@crash-w.bsky.social
225 followers 25 following 8 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
Thank you Rob!
010 1
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
I've written about the Outer House's decision in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2026] CSOH 59, a case about the placement of trans people in Scottish prisons, for the @ukcla.bsky.social. ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/07/16/c...
ukconstitutionallaw.org
Crash Krylova – Trans people in prison: For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2026] CSOH 59
Introduction On 19 June 2026, the Outer House of the Court of Session handed down judgment in the case of For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2026] CSOH 59 (“For Women Scotland 3”). This piece…
05822 58
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Relevant in light of the recent news about Girlguiding
032 3
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Thank you!
020 2
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
New piece up! Looking at some of the legal issues raised by the @womensinstitute.bsky.social announcements about trans members. medium.com/@crash.wigle...
medium.com
On the WI, trans members and discrimination in associations
Introduction
1125 12
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 06/06/2025
Surprising to hear Akua Reindorf KC speak in such strong terms when the EHRC’s statutory code of practice, laid before Parliament in 2010 and issued in 2011, says that service providers should treat trans people according to the gender role in which they present. www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Gender reassignment discrimination and separate and single-sex services
13.57 If a service provider provides single- or separate sex services for women and men, or provides services differently to women and men, they should treat transsexual people according to the gender role in which they present. However, the Act does permit the service provider to provide a different service or exclude a person from the service who is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or who has undergone gender reassignment. This will only be lawful where the exclusion is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate.
0123 12
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 12/05/2025
I think this is a compelling (and admirably succinct) piece. Thanks for sharing @robertmullins.bsky.social.
150 5
Crash Krylova @crash-w.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
I’ve written about the For Women Scotland judgment for the @ukcla.bsky.social blog - please take a look and share as you see fit!👇🏻
1187 18
Reposted by Crash Krylova
Good Law Project @goodlawproject.org · 30/04/2025
April’s Supreme Court decision is being treated as the final word. But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by over 20 years, says barrister @crash-w.bsky.social: goodlaw.social/d4n8
goodlaw.social
For Women Scotland: a legal critique | Good Law Project
April’s Supreme Court decision is being treated as the final word. But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by ...
515842 158
Reposted by Crash Krylova
Trans Legal Project @translegalproject.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
From @crash-w.bsky.social A powerful legal critique of the UKSC Decision. 'The judgment has jeopardised the UK’s compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights and introduced considerable uncertainty to the interpretation of the Equality Act 2010.’ www.translegalproject.org/post/for-wom...
translegalproject.org
For Women Scotland: a legal critique
Download this article here:Introduction  This article critically discusses the judgment in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for it be accessible to n...
28232 82