Sign in

Casper Kerrén

@ckerren.bsky.social
315 followers 311 following 83 posts

Postdoc Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.

PostsRepliesMedia
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
And importantly, it wasn't simply about time. In a final experiment, we separated delay from interference.
100
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
When they knew which item would be needed, the semantic advantage in non-decision time was almost completely eliminated. When attention remained distributed across several memories, it was large.
100
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
Next, we asked what causes this. Using retro-cues, we allowed people to focus attention on one memory before being tested.
100
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
Semantic judgements consistently had shorter non-decision times than perceptual judgements, across memory loads and delays. Differences in drift rate were much more conditional, emerging particularly under greater mnemonic demands. Semantic advantage appears primarily before evidence accumulation.
100
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
We first revisited our previous working-memory data using hierarchical drift-diffusion modelling. This allowed us to separate two things hidden within a simple reaction time: → processes occurring before evidence accumulation → the accumulation of evidence itself The result was striking.
110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
What happens to a visual memory once it is no longer in front of us? We find that working memory systematically prioritises what something is over what it looked like. But importantly, we wanted to know why.
100
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
We also found that hippocampal theta-cortical gamma coupling preceded the increase in cortical dimensionality, suggesting a potential mechanism by which hippocampal output coordinates large-scale cortical reorganisation during retrieval.
130
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
We found that successful retrieval was associated with: • stronger cortical reinstatement of encoding-related information • increased cortical representational dimensionality • greater separability of memory representations All emerging shortly after hippocampal ripple onset.
130
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Our central hypothesis was that ripples don't simply reactivate stored memories. Instead, they trigger a transformation from relatively compressed representations into richer, higher-dimensional cortical activity patterns capable of supporting detailed recollection.
130
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
8/9 DDM again: sem. effects were primarily pre-accumulation (non-decision time) and selectively larger when items had to be maintained under competing demands.
110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
7/9 Experiment 2 (Immediate vs Delay vs Interference): delay alone didn’t reliably amplify sem. prio, but interference did.
110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
6/9 DDM nailed the dissociation: Valid cueing eliminated the sem. advantage in non-decision time (access demands reduced). But it boosted sem. advantages in drift rate (how efficiently evidence is used once decision starts). So cueing shifts where the sem. edge shows up in the decision pipeline.
110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
5/9 Experiment 1 (retro-cues): tested whether sem. prio is just a decision/selection bias. Valid cue lets you pre-select the to-be-tested item. Neutral cue forces you to keep multiple items available until probe. Result: semantic prioritisation shrinks with valid cues but doesn’t vanish.
120
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
4/9 Reanalysis of our earlier dataset: sem. judgements showed a robust reduction in NDT across loads + lags → consistent w faster pre-accumulation access to sem. info. Drift-rate advantages for semantics were conditional (mainly under higher demands: higher load / longer lag btw study & test).
110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
2/9 The striking behavioural pattern: when multiple items are in VWM, people are faster (and often more accurate) for semantic judgements than perceptual ones. That’s the reverse of perception, where low-level visual features typically win the race.
120
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
1/9 New paper with @gonzalezgarcia.bsky.social and @lindedomingo.bsky.social : “Characterising semantic prioritisation in visual working memory.” Core question: when we hold visual info briefly in mind, what gets accessed first: perceptual details or semantic meaning?
13510
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Critically, inference stretches neural distances along relevant dimensions and compresses irrelevant ones right before a decision, predicts faster RTs, and this re-shaping precedes feedback-related frontal theta tracking model-derived PE.
150
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
The brain’s representational space flexes with inferred complexity. Neural effective dimensionality scales up in 2D vs 1D, and is higher on correct vs incorrect trials. In 2D, the two attended features show up as near-orthogonal axes in a shared planar manifold plane. 6/8
130
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Eyes tell the same story Gaze selectively shifts toward task-relevant features, irrelevant features drop out. Gaze entropy decreases as beliefs stabilise, and negative prediction errors from the HSI model trigger broader sampling (exploration), while positive PEs tighten focus (exploitation). 5/8
180
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
A Hidden State Inference (HSI) model best explained choices and inferred contexts, beating Q-learning variants (standard, forgetting, counterfactual). HSI captures something structurally different from incremental RL. 4/8
130
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Participants adapted fast: first trial after a switch was at chance level, then rapid recovery. RTs drop and accuracy rises within context blocks - they used the structure to take decisions. 3/8
140
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Serial reversal learning task with same cars, same feature space (3 dimensions), but the rule silently flips. Different dimensions matter in different trials. Sometimes one dim matters, sometimes two dims. You only find out via feedback, meaning participants had to infer the latent state. 2/8
150
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
New preprint: Inference over hidden contexts shapes the geometry of conceptual knowledge for flexible behaviour. In this pre-reg study, our core claim was that we don’t just learn stimulus-reward. We infer hidden context and that inference re-wires attention and neural state space on the fly. 1/8
13816
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
📄 In our new paper, we argue: The best retrieval cue matches the memory now, not just how it was encoded. Always a pleasure working with @lindedomingo.bsky.social. Amusing summary below courtesy of ChatGPT:
050
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
🔗 A synchrony bridge? We found theta–gamma phase–amplitude coupling (TG-PAC) between hippocampus and cortex right after ripples. TG-PAC peaks before cortical expansion, suggesting it may help coordinate the shift from compressed hippocampal codes to expanded cortical states.
2100
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
🌐 After ripples, the brain’s state space unfolds. Cortical dimensionality expands — neural patterns spread apart, making memories easier to decode. More expansion → Faster retrieval and more reinstatement. This raised a question: 🧠 What mechanism is driving this cortical transformation?
1101
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
🧠 First, ripple characteristics: More ripples on correct vs. incorrect trials 📈 Ripples cluster before memory responses ⏳ Timing suggests ripples help initiate retrieval, not just reflect it.
1110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
During an associative memory task, we tracked how ripple events in the hippocampus related to cortical dynamics. 🌟 Hypothesis: Ripples trigger a shift from compressed to expanded neural representations in cortex, making memories readable again.
1111
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
🧠✨How do we rebuild our memories? In our new study, we show that hippocampal ripples kickstart a coordinated expansion of cortical activity that helps reconstruct past experiences. We recorded iEEG from patients during memory retrieval... and found something really cool 👇(thread)
516661
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
By examining cross-species evidence, we highlight neural mechanisms that may support episodic memory and identify crucial questions for future research.
120
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
We put forward the hypothesis of how dimensionality reduction and expansion enable the brain to encode, store and retrieve a vast amount of episodic memory information. Reduction compresses sensory input into simplified, storable codes, while expansion reconstructs vivid details.
130
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
What began as a slightly intoxicated walk on Huntington beach in California with my buddy @benjamingriffiths.bsky.social summer of 2023, ended in a published Opinion paper today in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social, together with Daniel Reznik and Christian Doeller at @mpicbs.bsky.social.
1102
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
We put forward the hypothesis of how dimensionality reduction and expansion enable the brain to encode, store and retrieve a vast amount of episodic memory information. Reduction compresses sensory input into simplified, storable codes, while expansion reconstructs vivid details.
110
Casper Kerrén @ckerren.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
We put forward the hypothesis of how dimensionality reduction and expansion enable the brain to encode, store and retrieve a vast amount of episodic memory information. Reduction compresses sensory input into simplified, storable codes, while expansion reconstructs vivid details.
131