MICS? There isn't a huge difference in recovery times identified. Roughly 8.3 days in the ICU vs 6.3 days in the ICU with MICS. *If* there is even a difference (two studies found centers likely established and competent for MICS saw no difference in ICU time).
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
![ICU length of stay: Most studies showed shorter ICU stay for MICS patients. Jawad [27] and Ayers [36] reported reduced ICU days. In Sun [37] and Gosev [38], the difference was not significant, especially in centers with high surgical volume and established MICS protocols.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:i4i3ugum2atfwn7hwhmiosxx/bafkreidlfiagxlgwwa7tgqntcjxoafiozah3ol5hux6xtqlab62glpwr4y)
![PLUVICTO contributes to a patient's overall long-term cumulative radiation exposure. Long-term cumulative radiation exposure is associated with an increased risk for cancer.
Minimize radiation exposure to patients, medical personnel, and others during and after treatment with PLUVICTO consistent with institutional good radiation safety practices, patient treatment procedures, Nuclear Regulatory Commission patient-release guidance, and instructions to the patient for follow-up radiation protection at home.
Ensure patients increase oral fluid intake and advise patients to void as often as possible to reduce bladder radiation.
Before the patient is released, inform patients about the necessary radioprotection precautions to follow to minimize radiation exposure to others see Patient Counseling Information (17)].
After each administration of PLUVICTO, advise patients to:
• Limit close contact (less than 3 feet) with others for 2 days or with children and pregnant women for 7 days.
• frain from sexual activity for 7 days.
• Sleep in a separate room from others for 3 dav
from children for 7 days, or from pregnant women for 15 days.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:i4i3ugum2atfwn7hwhmiosxx/bafkreihksqwhrc3u7ce6k5eivy3noboh5uztnoq5w4arid2jomxvup2mpa)
![ARGUMENT
Plaintiffs Are Not Likely To Succeed on the Merits.
A.
Plaintiffs' Statutory Arguments Misapprehend ORR's Authority.
Plaintiffs' statutory arguments fail because they misapprehend the governing statutory
scheme. HHS has longstanding statutory authority to reunify unaccompanied alien children
(UACs) with their parents abroad. 6 U.S.C. § 279(b)(1)(H) authorizes the Department of Health
and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement ("ORR") to "reunit[e] unaccompanied alien
children with a parent abroad in appropriate cases." That authority fits together harmoniously with
the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 ("TVPRA") and the Immigration
and Nationality Act ("INA").](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:i4i3ugum2atfwn7hwhmiosxx/bafkreihhhrsg7ckkumzeq44gr27uvv5dmqzqaperwleqzn7ougnlsuqpki)
