<p><span>The legal architecture of the Defense Department’s domestic operations significantly changed in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. This was perhaps most

YouTube video by University of Miami School of Law

The president’s theory of constitutional authority to deploy active-duty troops is more dangerous than the government’s briefing suggests.

OPINION: President Trump’s order to pay members of the military during the government shutdown is a blatant — and troubling — violation of the Constitution, Christopher Mirasola writes.

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF WAR               THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET SUBJECT:       Use of

By Christopher Mirasola

In response to adverse judicial rulings, the President's advisers and supporters are claiming courts lack the power to halt domestic use of the military. A critical early precedent is to the contrary.

The constitutional basis for Trump’s use of the military in LA has a long history but is ultimately unmoored from constitutional text.

The president’s deployment of the armed forces on American streets is an alarming escalation. Fortunately, there’s a playbook for fighting back.

A living resource on presidential reporting practice and the use of U.S. armed forces abroad.

A firm grasp of international law has seldom been more important for the U.S. law student. Notwithstanding President Donald Trump's attempts to disengage with c

Congress’s appropriations authority might be its best tool to restrict these deployments.