Sign in

Burnst

@burnstjamp.com
140 followers 141 following 150 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 14/05/2026
Lol
110
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 12/12/2025
This has been driving me crazy forever
010
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 04/08/2025
It's a png.
120
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 03/08/2025
You don't say......
000
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 03/08/2025
CITATION NEEDED
100
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 03/08/2025
WHY wont the GREEDY DOCTORS let us start diagnosing patients with our awesome magic black box?? Surely it's only because AI is simply too good that they would all be out of a job. There could be no other possible reason
100
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 03/08/2025
The "strengths" of AI given by the author are: 1) already possible (Chess) 2) meaningless when done by AI (Illustrations, Poetry!?!) 3) at best acceptable for a layman, at worst detrimental or useless for a professional (Coding, Summarizing technical reports) 4) dangerous (Medical diagnoses?!?!?)
Text from article: "But in most fields of endeavor, AI engines now rival all but the most gifted humans. They are astonishingly good at translating texts and at playing chess, at writing poetry and at teaching you new skills, at coding and at making illustrations, at diagnosing a medical condition and at summarizing a technical research paper in the form of a podcast. To dismiss this astonishing box of varied wonders on the basis of a few tasks the technology has not yet cracked is reminiscent of the well-worn joke about two old Jews who go to the circus. An acrobat crosses a high wire on a unicycle while juggling seven flaming torches and playing a virtuoso piece on the violin. Dismissively, one Jew turns to the other and laments: 'Paganini, he isn’t.'"
110
Burnst @burnstjamp.com · 02/02/2025
Seriously. Luke Farritor, named in the WIRED article:
081