Sign in

Sam Boeve

@boevesam.bsky.social
64 followers 66 following 16 posts

Doctoral Researcher | Cognitive Science | Computational Psycholinguistics | FWO fellow | Bogaertslab | Ghent Univeristy

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Sam Boeve
In-Mind: Psychology for You! @in-mindmagazine.bsky.social · 29/12/2025
📊 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱: 📑 33 articles were published on In-Mind.
 📌 The most interacted article on Bluesky was “Language models: A new perspective on language and cognition” by @boevesam.bsky.social. 👉 Read the post here again:
bsky.app/profile/in-m...
bsky.app
In-Mind: Psychology for You! (@in-mindmagazine.bsky.social)
🔔 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲: 𝗔 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 🔔 How can computers help us understand language learning? 🤖 From readability scores to…
111
Reposted by Sam Boeve
In-Mind: Psychology for You! @in-mindmagazine.bsky.social · 30/12/2025
📑 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 In 2025, we published 33 articles and 12 blog posts. 📌 The most interacted article on Bluesky was “Language models: A new perspective on language and cognition” by @boevesam.bsky.social 👉 Read it again here: 
bsky.app/profile/in-m...
131
Reposted by Sam Boeve
BogaertsLab @bogaertslab.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
👁️ 📖 👁️ @boevesam.bsky.social made this interactive visualisation to get a feeling for word predictability: 🔗 wordpredictabilityvisualized.vercel.app Curious how these predictability indices were obtained? Find out in our new paper! 🔗 doi.org/10.3758/s134... #Reading #LargeLanguageModels #MECO
031
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Want to explore word predictability yourself on a sample of each corpus used in this work, check out this app: wordpredictabilityvisualized.vercel.app
wordpredictabilityvisualized.vercel.app
Word Predictability Visualization App
000
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Modelling reading times in Dutch?: gpt2-small-dutch (huggingface.co/GroNLP/gpt2-...) or gpt2-medium-dutch-embeddings (huggingface.co/GroNLP/gpt2-...) are great options.
huggingface.co
GroNLP/gpt2-small-dutch · Hugging Face
We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
3. Predictability effects are also logarithmic in Dutch, corroborating effects found in English (= linear effect of surprisal): For very unpredictable words, a decrease in predictability has a much larger slowing-down effect on reading times than the same decrease for highly predictable words.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
2. Language-specific models are generally better than multilingual ones (multilingual models are shown in blue in the figure below).
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Key findings 📝 1. Smaller Dutch models often predict reading times better (= inverse scaling trend) ~ in line with evidence of English models. But, with more context (in a book reading corpus), larger models catch up.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Large language models are powerful tools for psycholinguistic research. But, most evidence so far is limited to English. How well do Dutch open-source language models fit reading times using their word predictability estimates?
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
🚨 B&B is open for business 🚨 Not a new career move, the next Boeve & Bogaerts paper is out in Behavior Research Methods! doi.org/10.3758/s134... @bogaertslab.bsky.social
doi.org
A systematic evaluation of Dutch large language models’ surprisal estimates in sentence, paragraph and book reading - Behavior Research Methods
Studies using computational estimates of word predictability from neural language models have garnered strong evidence in favour of surprisal theory. Upon encountering a word, readers experience a pro...
120
Reposted by Sam Boeve
German Word Nerd Network @gewonnofficial.bsky.social · 12/03/2025
✨Playback at #teap2025 (Part 1) Thanks to the amazing speakers and the audience for the successful symposium on #languagemodels in #psycholinguistics! Katharina Menn, @hannawoloszyn.bsky.social, @boevesam.bsky.social, Marco Marelli, Fritz Günther, @benjamingagl.bsky.social
081
Reposted by Sam Boeve
BogaertsLab @bogaertslab.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Proud PI! 👏 On #TeaP2025 two lab members presented their work: Haoyu Zhou in the symposium #StatisticalLearning and its Role in #Language and #Reading acquisition. @boevesam.bsky.social in the symposium From Babies to Semantics: Leveraging #LanguageModels for #Psycholinguistic Research.
185
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
Overall, our results provide a psychometric leaderboard of Dutch large language models, ideal for researchers interested in effects of predictability in Dutch. Check out our full dataset and code here: osf.io/wr4qf/
osf.io
A Systematic Evaluation of Dutch Large Language Models’ Surprisal Estimates in Sentence, Paragraph, and Book Reading
A psychometric evaluation of Dutch large language models. Hosted on the Open Science Framework
000
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
Finally, we found a linear link between surprisal and reading times except for the GECO corpus where a non-linear link between surprisal and reading times fitted the data best. A challenge to the notion of an universal linear effect of surprisal.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
Second, smaller Dutch models showed a better fit to reading times than the largest models, replicating the inverse scaling trend seen in English. However, this effect varied depending on the corpus used.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
First, across three eye-tracking corpora, we found that in each case, a Dutch LLMs' surprisal estimates outperformed the multilingual model (mGPT) and the N-gram model in predicting reading times.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
3. Does surprisal still show linear link with reading times when estimated with a Dutch-specific language model as opposed to a multilingual model?
110
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
2. Do these Dutch-specific LLMs show a similar inverse scaling trend as English models? That is, do the smaller transformer models' surprisal estimates account better for reading times than those of the very large models?
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
1. What is the best computational method for estimating word predictability in Dutch? We compare 14 Dutch large language models (LLMs), a multilingual model (mGPT) and an N-gram model in their ability of explaining reading times.
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
The effect of word predictability on reading times is well established for English but not so much for Dutch. We adressed this and asked three questions:
100
Sam Boeve @boevesam.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
Ending the year on a high note with the submission of a new preprint: A Systematic Evaluation of Dutch Large Language Models’ Surprisal Estimates in Sentence, Paragraph, and Book Reading Preprint: dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.... OSF: osf.io/wr4qf/
osf.io
A Systematic Evaluation of Dutch Large Language Models’ Surprisal Estimates in Sentence, Paragraph, and Book Reading
A psychometric evaluation of Dutch large language models. Hosted on the Open Science Framework
130