Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 02/10/2026Surely “too much red tape” is the obvious take-away from a summer of food-borne illness… 🥗 020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026Having recently gotten a new cell plan I assume he means more expensive than you’d expect, time-consuming, difficult to compare, and dominated by like 3 companies. 030
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026This comes up a lot in an undergrad seminar I teach about food access. That there’s just so much noise out there right now about food it’s hard to sift through. 130
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026Misinformation, disinformation, hidden motives… Who could blame consumers for being confused? 🥗 🛟theguardian.comA ‘freaked out’ US food industry is hitting back at Maha – with social media influencersCross-partisan support in Washington on issues like pesticides and food additives pose a threat to the industry’s bottom line 1125
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Totally. I *massively* prefer a list of clear comments than several wordy sentences on each item! And as reviewer, I only devote that kind of space when I think it’s a Big Issue for the authors to consider. 020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Ugh… what a pain. I do think worth confidentially flagging for journal editor. AE’s can rate the quality of review (which might influence whether the person gets asked to review in future). 000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Even when it’s just the “more complete thoughts” version, my feeling is this is creating more work for authors to parse through comments. I’ve noticed that some reviews have gotten a bit more long-winded… I suspect not a result of reviewers just wanting to volunteer more time to writing. 131
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026The inconsistencies in MAHA have been clear for a long time. But I don’t blame folks for earnestly having a glimmer of hope for making a healthier food system. But it’s telling that one of the only MAHA “wins” is taking choices away from SNAP participants. 🥗theguardian.comFood-borne illnesses, funding cuts and layoffs: Maha movement’s glaring limitations are now showingPolicies enacted by RFK Jr have not delivered the expected results, but have instead hindered people’s ability to eat healthy 020
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerHansi Lo Wang (he/him) @hansilowang.bsky.social · 31/08/2026SCOOP: After the Census Bureau issued a highly unusual report tied to a President Trump-aligned think tank, the bureau’s parent agency, the Commerce Department, cut language banning political interference from its scientific integrity policy, @npr.org has learned www.npr.org/2026/08/31/n...npr.orgTrump officials cut political interference ban after unusual Census Bureau reportAfter the Census Bureau issued a report tied to a Trump-aligned think tank, the bureau's parent agency cut language banning political interference from its scientific integrity policy, NPR learned. 23950509
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 31/08/2026Audience faces suggest not the biggest topic at the kitchen table rn 000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 28/08/2026(This is not to say the recent working papers aren’t thoughtfully or rigorously done; just that they thoughtfully and rigorously analyze data that may not generalize well to all SNAP households) 010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 28/08/2026By now you’ve seen headlines on early evidence from state SNAP restriction and soda purchases. I urge you to read this excellent explainer on the structural issues these evaluations face. We should view evaluation evidence with this (rather substantial) grain of salt. 🥗 🛟 🩺📈 120
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerMilbank Memorial Fund & The Milbank Quarterly @milbankfund.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Since 2025, the USDA has granted waivers to 23 states to restrict the types of foods that can be purchased with SNAP benefits. In a new Milbank Quarterly guest Opinion, authors describe the lack of data for evaluating the dietary impact of such restrictions and other evaluation challenges.milbank.orgSNAP Food Restrictions May Help or Hurt—But We Will Probably Never Know | Milbank Memorial FundIt is important to rigorously assess whether SNAP restrictions on foods yield meaningful benefits to diet and health. Yet evaluation faces numerous challenges. 023
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 26/08/2026States are scrambling to reduce SNAP error rates (making enrollment much harder), but basic stats principles (sampling & uncertainty) are overlooked. "...there is no guarantee that good-faith efforts to improve program administration will be reflected in the form of a lower payment error rate" 010
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerBen Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026New study out today on SNAP restrictions and soda (not my work). I spoke with @statnews.com to put it in context. Big finding: soda purchases declined among SNAP shoppers w/ restrictions. Equally big finding: restrictions have led to stigma; participants feel disrespected and judged. 🛟 🥗 🩺📈statnews.comAmericans bought 12% less soda under new SNAP restrictions, study saysThe drop in soda purchases is meaningful, but not enormous, one of the study's authors said. 241
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026As I said to STAT, the stigma finding is concerning. Especially because economists don't have similar statistics on stigma to weigh against any projected health benefits or costs savings. So, assessments like "SNAP restrictions could save X dollars" only offer a partial accounting. 010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026Here's the paper: www.nber.org/papers/w35659nber.orgThe Effects of SNAP Sugary Drink Restrictions on Consumption and WelfareFounded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an... 010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026New study out today on SNAP restrictions and soda (not my work). I spoke with @statnews.com to put it in context. Big finding: soda purchases declined among SNAP shoppers w/ restrictions. Equally big finding: restrictions have led to stigma; participants feel disrespected and judged. 🛟 🥗 🩺📈statnews.comAmericans bought 12% less soda under new SNAP restrictions, study saysThe drop in soda purchases is meaningful, but not enormous, one of the study's authors said. 241
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerBen Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 19/08/2026SNAP participants can volunteer in order to meet the work requirement. This is especially helpful for folks that can't find suitable work beyond the 3-month SNAP time limit. How easy is it to use the volunteer option? Depends on where you live. Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.socialfrac.orgState Approaches to the Volunteer Option to Meet SNAP Time Limit Work Requirements - Food Research & Action CenterPeople subject to SNAP time limits can meet these work requirements through volunteering or unpaid work. But access to that option varies widely depending on how states promote, administer, and suppor... 023
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 19/08/2026SNAP participants can volunteer in order to meet the work requirement. This is especially helpful for folks that can't find suitable work beyond the 3-month SNAP time limit. How easy is it to use the volunteer option? Depends on where you live. Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.socialfrac.orgState Approaches to the Volunteer Option to Meet SNAP Time Limit Work Requirements - Food Research & Action CenterPeople subject to SNAP time limits can meet these work requirements through volunteering or unpaid work. But access to that option varies widely depending on how states promote, administer, and suppor... 023
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerBen Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 12/08/2026Anytime you hear about SNAP "error rate" (ineligible people receiving SNAP), remember it's ONLY PART of the equation. Payment error rates are MUCH smaller compared to "case and procedural error rates" (eligible people wrongly denied SNAP). Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.social 🛟 🥗frac.orgBalancing SNAP Accuracy and Access: Pay Attention to CAPERs - Food Research & Action CenterPublished June 10, 2026 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payment error rates (PER) are in the spotlight. The H.R. 1 megabill changed the way that SNAP benefits will be paid for: Starti... 143
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 12/08/2026How we define (and incentivize states to control) error rates matters enormously for SNAP participants. 000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 12/08/2026Anytime you hear about SNAP "error rate" (ineligible people receiving SNAP), remember it's ONLY PART of the equation. Payment error rates are MUCH smaller compared to "case and procedural error rates" (eligible people wrongly denied SNAP). Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.social 🛟 🥗frac.orgBalancing SNAP Accuracy and Access: Pay Attention to CAPERs - Food Research & Action CenterPublished June 10, 2026 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payment error rates (PER) are in the spotlight. The H.R. 1 megabill changed the way that SNAP benefits will be paid for: Starti... 143
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026The policy context is one of SNAP reduction + undermining states' capacity to administer things like incentives (or restrictions, for that matter). So - at present - we aren't likely to see both. And the foundational element (reliable, secure SNAP), is at risk. 010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026Also (no shade to the authors - I've done this myself), we've got to stop saying, "SNAP restrictions are best paired with incentives." These aren't the SNAP policies we're seeing (someone please correct me if there's an incentive I've missed). To justify SNAP restriction, policy context matters. 120
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026... In the study, 58% of total calories were from UPFs; slightly higher than the general population (www.cdc.gov/nchs/product...). Other research points to cost and convenience as big drivers of this difference.cdc.govProducts - Data Briefs - Number 536 - August 2025Published: 8/7/2025 101
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026Total UPF intake associated with lower diet quality among SNAP participants, BUT some UPF subgroups associated with higher diet quality. Results seem to warrant caution for UPF-oriented SNAP restrictions... 🛟 🥗sciencedirect.comUltra-processed food (UPF) consumption and diet quality among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participating adultsUltra-processed food (UPF) intake is linked to poor health, though some subgroups may offer affordable, nutritious options. Few studies have examined … 123
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 22/07/2026100% - the OP mentioned this in the replies (apparently the account had been posting in the forum for a long time) 000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 22/07/2026This is dangerous. What blows my mind is the AI front of universal expertise. Like, a professional (or good friend) would might say, “this is serious, I don’t know everything about this. Let’s connect you to someone who does.” There is help - good help, live-saving help - out there. 120
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerKatie Bergh @katiebergh.bsky.social · 21/07/2026Exactly this. People who want SNAP caseloads to return to where they were 25 years ago should probably explain why they want a highly effective & efficient anti-hunger program to reach a much smaller share of the people who need it. 115052
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/07/2026This point definitely isn’t getting enough coverage. I’m also struck by error rate / admin burden trade-off discourse, like it’s any other program. Really neglects the urgency of SNAP. 020
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerPam Herd @pamherd.bsky.social · 21/07/2026The NYT piece notes SNAP use doubled since the early 2000s to explain cuts. But SNAP take up was artificially low. In the 90s ~80% of the eligible received benefits. This dropped to 52% by 2002. Bush admin worked on it. We were back at ~90%. We're about to see take-up among the eligible plummet. 210851
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/07/2026Also remember: MANY states (R and D-led) have room for improvement here (even pre-HR1). Tell your state reps. It doesn’t have to be this way. 010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/07/2026HR1 is making states fearful of SNAP errors, yes. But these kinds of errors - denying or delaying SNAP to eligible people - aren’t counted in the HR1 equation Don’t forget: SNAP is food. When people need it, they need it yesterday. 🛟 🥗 130
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 19/07/2026anyone else noticed how flying anywhere for any reason has become awful? never *loved* air travel but geesh this feels worse than ever 010
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerProject Bread @projectbread.org · 06/07/2026☀️🍉⚽ Happy Summer Eats Awareness Week! School’s out, and summer meals are IN. Join us in promoting this completely free, awesome program that provides nutritious meals and fun for kids across Massachusetts during summer break, all summer long. 122
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 29/06/2026Congressional GOP now “dunking” on advocates about SSBs and the “Nutrition” part of SNAP acronym… Should give pause to public health folks supporting restriction. SNAP is **the tool** to reduce poverty and food insecurity. These “gotcha” moments wont lead to stronger SNAP. They undermine it. 020
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerBen Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 25/06/2026Key to this judgment is that only Congress can impose SNAP restriction (though will have to see how it plays out in courts…) Don’t sleep on this: proponents are already pitching nationwide SNAP restrictions in Congress. SNAP needs protection, this is not it. 194
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerRobert Reich @rbreich.bsky.social · 25/06/2026Your Prime Day reminder that half of Amazon warehouse workers struggle with food & housing costs. A third have had to rely on government assistance like SNAP — which was gutted last year. If Bezos can spend $500M on a yacht, Amazon can afford to treat its workers with dignity. 776215227253
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 25/06/2026Key to this judgment is that only Congress can impose SNAP restriction (though will have to see how it plays out in courts…) Don’t sleep on this: proponents are already pitching nationwide SNAP restrictions in Congress. SNAP needs protection, this is not it. 194
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerBen Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 23/06/2026A brief observation on framing: The setup isn't "should SNAP be used to buy candy" OR "should SNAP be restricted from candy purchases." It's "should SNAP stay a straightforward program serving many different needs," or not. Even the NYT photo (candy) falls into this trap. 🥗 🛟nytimes.comJudge Blocks Bans on Using Food Stamps for Sugary Drinks and Candy 252
Reposted by Ben ChrisingerRussell England @russellengland.bsky.social · 24/06/2026"When a child born today becomes a parent, the average temperatures of summer 1976 will be normal. When they become a grandparent, they will look back and think that the summer of 1976, or even the summer of 2025, were remarkably cold." - Professor Ed Hawkins 50th anniversary of the 1976 heatwave 47430
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 23/06/2026Also: 20 states pursuing SNAP restriction is notable. Equally notable is how this is tied to rural health funding: www.kff.org/other-health...kff.orgKey Takeaways from CMS's Rural Health Funding Announcement | KFFThis brief describes five key takeaways from CMS's Notice of Funding Opportunity for the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program. It includes information about how CMS intends to review state ... 020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 23/06/2026A brief observation on framing: The setup isn't "should SNAP be used to buy candy" OR "should SNAP be restricted from candy purchases." It's "should SNAP stay a straightforward program serving many different needs," or not. Even the NYT photo (candy) falls into this trap. 🥗 🛟nytimes.comJudge Blocks Bans on Using Food Stamps for Sugary Drinks and Candy 252
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 03/06/2026More complicated rules also raise risk of eligible people being declined. Seeing this powerfully now with SNAP, where states are scrambling to lower error rates (or else pay millions in benefit costs). 000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 31/05/2026Similar trends in SNAP, for some similar reasons. Plus states are fretting more about error rates (will be used to calculate benefit cost-sharing obligations - a huge financial risk). Many people who are *fully eligible* for safety net programs are not getting to them. 040
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/05/2026folks have been making this point for a long time doi.org/10.1080/0194...doi.orgGetting to Root CausesMany planning and health collaborations name the built environment as an “upstream” factor for health disparities. Though some give mention to the structural dimensions of inequality (e.g., unequal... 120
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/05/2026Also (channeling @jlynch13.bsky.social here), we should be wary of this kind of health problem frame. It’s rhetorically useful, but dodges more impactful social policies. 130
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/05/2026So much of me wants to like what Booker is saying. But too much of me knows health behaviors are downstream results of structural issues. 120