Sign in

Ben Chrisinger

@bchrisinger.bsky.social
2K followers 1.3K following 624 posts

Assistant Professor in Community Health at Tufts, formerly faculty @dspi-oxford@bsky.social. I study place and health, especially food and welfare. #SNAPmatters facultyprofiles.tufts.edu/benjamin-…

PostsRepliesMedia
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Surely “too much red tape” is the obvious take-away from a summer of food-borne illness… 🥗
LinkedIn post from official USDA account reads: "For too long, federal agencies have
overcomplicated matters through overregulation and red tape that doesn't serve food safety purposes...
That is why we launched the Small Processors Action Plan earlier this year. The goal is simple: keep food safety standards strong and make USDA easier to work with." -USDA-FSIS Administrator Justin R.
Ransom, Ph.D.
More from his op-ed with Agri-Pulse
Communications J”
020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Having recently gotten a new cell plan I assume he means more expensive than you’d expect, time-consuming, difficult to compare, and dominated by like 3 companies.
030
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
This comes up a lot in an undergrad seminar I teach about food access. That there’s just so much noise out there right now about food it’s hard to sift through.
130
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Misinformation, disinformation, hidden motives… Who could blame consumers for being confused? 🥗 🛟
theguardian.com
A ‘freaked out’ US food industry is hitting back at Maha – with social media influencers
Cross-partisan support in Washington on issues like pesticides and food additives pose a threat to the industry’s bottom line
1125
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Totally. I *massively* prefer a list of clear comments than several wordy sentences on each item! And as reviewer, I only devote that kind of space when I think it’s a Big Issue for the authors to consider.
020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Ugh… what a pain. I do think worth confidentially flagging for journal editor. AE’s can rate the quality of review (which might influence whether the person gets asked to review in future).
000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Even when it’s just the “more complete thoughts” version, my feeling is this is creating more work for authors to parse through comments. I’ve noticed that some reviews have gotten a bit more long-winded… I suspect not a result of reviewers just wanting to volunteer more time to writing.
131
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
The inconsistencies in MAHA have been clear for a long time. But I don’t blame folks for earnestly having a glimmer of hope for making a healthier food system. But it’s telling that one of the only MAHA “wins” is taking choices away from SNAP participants. 🥗
theguardian.com
Food-borne illnesses, funding cuts and layoffs: Maha movement’s glaring limitations are now showing
Policies enacted by RFK Jr have not delivered the expected results, but have instead hindered people’s ability to eat healthy
020
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Hansi Lo Wang (he/him) @hansilowang.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
SCOOP: After the Census Bureau issued a highly unusual report tied to a President Trump-aligned think tank, the bureau’s parent agency, the Commerce Department, cut language banning political interference from its scientific integrity policy, @npr.org has learned www.npr.org/2026/08/31/n...
npr.org
Trump officials cut political interference ban after unusual Census Bureau report
After the Census Bureau issued a report tied to a Trump-aligned think tank, the bureau's parent agency cut language banning political interference from its scientific integrity policy, NPR learned.
23950509
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Audience faces suggest not the biggest topic at the kitchen table rn
000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
(This is not to say the recent working papers aren’t thoughtfully or rigorously done; just that they thoughtfully and rigorously analyze data that may not generalize well to all SNAP households)
010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
By now you’ve seen headlines on early evidence from state SNAP restriction and soda purchases. I urge you to read this excellent explainer on the structural issues these evaluations face. We should view evaluation evidence with this (rather substantial) grain of salt. 🥗 🛟 🩺📈
120
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Milbank Memorial Fund & The Milbank Quarterly @milbankfund.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Since 2025, the USDA has granted waivers to 23 states to restrict the types of foods that can be purchased with SNAP benefits. In a new Milbank Quarterly guest Opinion, authors describe the lack of data for evaluating the dietary impact of such restrictions and other evaluation challenges.
milbank.org
SNAP Food Restrictions May Help or Hurt—But We Will Probably Never Know | Milbank Memorial Fund
It is important to rigorously assess whether SNAP restrictions on foods yield meaningful benefits to diet and health. Yet evaluation faces numerous challenges.
023
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
States are scrambling to reduce SNAP error rates (making enrollment much harder), but basic stats principles (sampling & uncertainty) are overlooked. "...there is no guarantee that good-faith efforts to improve program administration will be reflected in the form of a lower payment error rate"
010
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
New study out today on SNAP restrictions and soda (not my work). I spoke with @statnews.com to put it in context. Big finding: soda purchases declined among SNAP shoppers w/ restrictions. Equally big finding: restrictions have led to stigma; participants feel disrespected and judged. 🛟 🥗 🩺📈
statnews.com
Americans bought 12% less soda under new SNAP restrictions, study says
The drop in soda purchases is meaningful, but not enormous, one of the study's authors said.
241
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
As I said to STAT, the stigma finding is concerning. Especially because economists don't have similar statistics on stigma to weigh against any projected health benefits or costs savings. So, assessments like "SNAP restrictions could save X dollars" only offer a partial accounting.
010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Here's the paper: www.nber.org/papers/w35659
nber.org
The Effects of SNAP Sugary Drink Restrictions on Consumption and Welfare
Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an...
010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
New study out today on SNAP restrictions and soda (not my work). I spoke with @statnews.com to put it in context. Big finding: soda purchases declined among SNAP shoppers w/ restrictions. Equally big finding: restrictions have led to stigma; participants feel disrespected and judged. 🛟 🥗 🩺📈
statnews.com
Americans bought 12% less soda under new SNAP restrictions, study says
The drop in soda purchases is meaningful, but not enormous, one of the study's authors said.
241
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
SNAP participants can volunteer in order to meet the work requirement. This is especially helpful for folks that can't find suitable work beyond the 3-month SNAP time limit. How easy is it to use the volunteer option? Depends on where you live. Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.social
frac.org
State Approaches to the Volunteer Option to Meet SNAP Time Limit Work Requirements - Food Research & Action Center
People subject to SNAP time limits can meet these work requirements through volunteering or unpaid work. But access to that option varies widely depending on how states promote, administer, and suppor...
023
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
SNAP participants can volunteer in order to meet the work requirement. This is especially helpful for folks that can't find suitable work beyond the 3-month SNAP time limit. How easy is it to use the volunteer option? Depends on where you live. Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.social
frac.org
State Approaches to the Volunteer Option to Meet SNAP Time Limit Work Requirements - Food Research & Action Center
People subject to SNAP time limits can meet these work requirements through volunteering or unpaid work. But access to that option varies widely depending on how states promote, administer, and suppor...
023
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Anytime you hear about SNAP "error rate" (ineligible people receiving SNAP), remember it's ONLY PART of the equation. Payment error rates are MUCH smaller compared to "case and procedural error rates" (eligible people wrongly denied SNAP). Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.social 🛟 🥗
frac.org
Balancing SNAP Accuracy and Access: Pay Attention to CAPERs - Food Research & Action Center
Published June 10, 2026 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payment error rates (PER) are in the spotlight. The H.R. 1 megabill changed the way that SNAP benefits will be paid for: Starti...
143
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
How we define (and incentivize states to control) error rates matters enormously for SNAP participants.
000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Anytime you hear about SNAP "error rate" (ineligible people receiving SNAP), remember it's ONLY PART of the equation. Payment error rates are MUCH smaller compared to "case and procedural error rates" (eligible people wrongly denied SNAP). Great analysis from @fracposts.bsky.social 🛟 🥗
frac.org
Balancing SNAP Accuracy and Access: Pay Attention to CAPERs - Food Research & Action Center
Published June 10, 2026 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payment error rates (PER) are in the spotlight. The H.R. 1 megabill changed the way that SNAP benefits will be paid for: Starti...
143
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
The policy context is one of SNAP reduction + undermining states' capacity to administer things like incentives (or restrictions, for that matter). So - at present - we aren't likely to see both. And the foundational element (reliable, secure SNAP), is at risk.
010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Also (no shade to the authors - I've done this myself), we've got to stop saying, "SNAP restrictions are best paired with incentives." These aren't the SNAP policies we're seeing (someone please correct me if there's an incentive I've missed). To justify SNAP restriction, policy context matters.
120
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
... In the study, 58% of total calories were from UPFs; slightly higher than the general population (www.cdc.gov/nchs/product...). Other research points to cost and convenience as big drivers of this difference.
cdc.gov
Products - Data Briefs - Number 536 - August 2025
Published: 8/7/2025
101
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Total UPF intake associated with lower diet quality among SNAP participants, BUT some UPF subgroups associated with higher diet quality. Results seem to warrant caution for UPF-oriented SNAP restrictions... 🛟 🥗
sciencedirect.com
Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and diet quality among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participating adults
Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake is linked to poor health, though some subgroups may offer affordable, nutritious options. Few studies have examined …
123
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
100% - the OP mentioned this in the replies (apparently the account had been posting in the forum for a long time)
000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
This is dangerous. What blows my mind is the AI front of universal expertise. Like, a professional (or good friend) would might say, “this is serious, I don’t know everything about this. Let’s connect you to someone who does.” There is help - good help, live-saving help - out there.
120
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Katie Bergh @katiebergh.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Exactly this. People who want SNAP caseloads to return to where they were 25 years ago should probably explain why they want a highly effective & efficient anti-hunger program to reach a much smaller share of the people who need it.
115052
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
This point definitely isn’t getting enough coverage. I’m also struck by error rate / admin burden trade-off discourse, like it’s any other program. Really neglects the urgency of SNAP.
020
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Pam Herd @pamherd.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
The NYT piece notes SNAP use doubled since the early 2000s to explain cuts. But SNAP take up was artificially low. In the 90s ~80% of the eligible received benefits. This dropped to 52% by 2002. Bush admin worked on it. We were back at ~90%. We're about to see take-up among the eligible plummet.
210851
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Also remember: MANY states (R and D-led) have room for improvement here (even pre-HR1). Tell your state reps. It doesn’t have to be this way.
010
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
HR1 is making states fearful of SNAP errors, yes. But these kinds of errors - denying or delaying SNAP to eligible people - aren’t counted in the HR1 equation Don’t forget: SNAP is food. When people need it, they need it yesterday. 🛟 🥗
130
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 19/07/2026
anyone else noticed how flying anywhere for any reason has become awful? never *loved* air travel but geesh this feels worse than ever
010
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Project Bread @projectbread.org · 06/07/2026
☀️🍉⚽ Happy Summer Eats Awareness Week! School’s out, and summer meals are IN. Join us in promoting this completely free, awesome program that provides nutritious meals and fun for kids across Massachusetts during summer break, all summer long.
122
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
Congressional GOP now “dunking” on advocates about SSBs and the “Nutrition” part of SNAP acronym… Should give pause to public health folks supporting restriction. SNAP is **the tool** to reduce poverty and food insecurity. These “gotcha” moments wont lead to stronger SNAP. They undermine it.
020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 26/06/2026
Hunger is a policy choice.
020
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
Key to this judgment is that only Congress can impose SNAP restriction (though will have to see how it plays out in courts…) Don’t sleep on this: proponents are already pitching nationwide SNAP restrictions in Congress. SNAP needs protection, this is not it.
194
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Robert Reich @rbreich.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
Your Prime Day reminder that half of Amazon warehouse workers struggle with food & housing costs. A third have had to rely on government assistance like SNAP — which was gutted last year. If Bezos can spend $500M on a yacht, Amazon can afford to treat its workers with dignity.
776215227253
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
Key to this judgment is that only Congress can impose SNAP restriction (though will have to see how it plays out in courts…) Don’t sleep on this: proponents are already pitching nationwide SNAP restrictions in Congress. SNAP needs protection, this is not it.
194
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
A brief observation on framing: The setup isn't "should SNAP be used to buy candy" OR "should SNAP be restricted from candy purchases." It's "should SNAP stay a straightforward program serving many different needs," or not. Even the NYT photo (candy) falls into this trap. 🥗 🛟
nytimes.com
Judge Blocks Bans on Using Food Stamps for Sugary Drinks and Candy
252
Reposted by Ben Chrisinger
Russell England @russellengland.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
"When a child born today becomes a parent, the average temperatures of summer 1976 will be normal. When they become a grandparent, they will look back and think that the summer of 1976, or even the summer of 2025, were remarkably cold." - Professor Ed Hawkins 50th anniversary of the 1976 heatwave
Average summer temperature anomaly in 1976 - most of the world is blue, the UK and Northern France are redAverage summer temperature anomaly in 2025 - most of the world is red or dark red
47430
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
Also: 20 states pursuing SNAP restriction is notable. Equally notable is how this is tied to rural health funding: www.kff.org/other-health...
kff.org
Key Takeaways from CMS's Rural Health Funding Announcement | KFF
This brief describes five key takeaways from CMS's Notice of Funding Opportunity for the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program. It includes information about how CMS intends to review state ...
020
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
A brief observation on framing: The setup isn't "should SNAP be used to buy candy" OR "should SNAP be restricted from candy purchases." It's "should SNAP stay a straightforward program serving many different needs," or not. Even the NYT photo (candy) falls into this trap. 🥗 🛟
nytimes.com
Judge Blocks Bans on Using Food Stamps for Sugary Drinks and Candy
252
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
More complicated rules also raise risk of eligible people being declined. Seeing this powerfully now with SNAP, where states are scrambling to lower error rates (or else pay millions in benefit costs).
000
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 31/05/2026
Similar trends in SNAP, for some similar reasons. Plus states are fretting more about error rates (will be used to calculate benefit cost-sharing obligations - a huge financial risk). Many people who are *fully eligible* for safety net programs are not getting to them.
040
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
folks have been making this point for a long time doi.org/10.1080/0194...
doi.org
Getting to Root Causes
Many planning and health collaborations name the built environment as an “upstream” factor for health disparities. Though some give mention to the structural dimensions of inequality (e.g., unequal...
120
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
Also (channeling @jlynch13.bsky.social here), we should be wary of this kind of health problem frame. It’s rhetorically useful, but dodges more impactful social policies.
130
Ben Chrisinger @bchrisinger.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
So much of me wants to like what Booker is saying. But too much of me knows health behaviors are downstream results of structural issues.
120