Sign in

Artemis

@artemis-8588.bsky.social
56 followers 251 following 23 posts

… really trying to ‘be the change …’ 💙☮️ It is a challenge. ❤️my husband & dog ✨mom, grandmother 🌎here to learn🇺🇦Slava Ukraini!🇺🇦 ⚖️supporter 🚫No maga🚫

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Artemis
HELL Kennedy @helenkennedy.com · 18/01/2025
Jan 20, 1961. A blizzard the day before. Temperatures well below freezing. Without a coat or hat, JFK gave a speech we still quote today. Robert Frost, 86, recited a poem. Steinbeck and Hemingway and Rothko were among the VIPs. A million people gathered in the cold to hear it. This is the precedent.
Kennedy speaking at his inauguration, looking young and vital.
668208675702
Reposted by Artemis
Anil Dash @anildash.com · 10/01/2025
We’ve been watching the Watch Duty team do absolutely *unbelievable* technical work all week (they’re members of our Fast Forward open source program), handling a surge of millions of people trying to see where the fires are in real time. There are still people who do such good on the internet.
563868747
Artemis @artemis-8588.bsky.social · 10/01/2025
@muellershewrote.bsky.social Hi ! Ok I am still here. Good. I just saw this and wanted to send it to you right away( I do not know why I do this? But I appreciate your take on justice. On Twitter: this article www.theroot.com/the-messy-li... Wow! AG there is a whole bunch of history in this
010
Reposted by Artemis
Mark Hamill @markhamillofficial.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
For all my followers on bsky.app:
media.tenor.com
a man with a beard wearing a leather jacket is pointing at his forehead .
ALT: a man with a beard wearing a leather jacket is pointing at his forehead .
3072639643342
Reposted by Artemis
Moon lover @moon1over.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
7115992
Reposted by Artemis
Moon lover @moon1over.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
8412180860
Reposted by Artemis
Ron Filipkowski @ronfilipkowski.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
So Mace walked into the House today with her arm in a sling and posted 500 tweets that she was the victim of a violent assault and THIS is what happened????
2130190595114
Reposted by Artemis
Adam Kinzinger @adamkinzinger.substack.com · 12/12/2024
Watching the people who were tortured by Assad…. And my anger for @TulsiGabbard defending him grows hotter. Every senator that votes yes on her is complicit
708314966735
Reposted by Artemis
Just Jack @just-jack-1.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
BREAKING: Herschel Walker remains hopeful for an ambassadorship to the state of Georgia.
931202531834
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
THREAD: A timeline for you of facts. I'm just sharing facts, so no need to get yelly or upset. 1. DoJ opened two investigations into Trump and the coup in January 2021 within two weeks of the attack on the Capitol 1/
27939731390
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
2. During the first 3 months after the attack but before Garland got to DoJ, JP Cooney pushed to investigate the Willard War Room lieutenants and their connections to Trump, the Oath Keepers, and the Proud Boys. 2/
71129138
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
3. Garland got to the DoJ in March, but trump holdovers prevented JP Cooney from meeting with Garland to read him in on his investigation because these trump holdovers were trying to quash it. (Their names are Mike Sherwin and Steven D'Antuono.) 3/
151167179
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
4. By June, Garland created the "investigations unit". Not a bottom-up, boots on the ground only probe. This was an investigation that began with the Willard war room based on JP Cooney's idea and Garland explicitly said to follow it all the way to Trump if necessary. 4/
51039125
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
5. By the end of 2021, Garland was frustrated with the pace of the probe and found out that trump holdovers at DoJ and FBI were sandbagging his team's search warrants. Frustrated, Garland used post office cops and the IG to seize Clark, Eastman, and Perry's phones. 5/
131203167
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
6. Garland then replaced the FBI CoS that kept stonewalling him, the trump holdover at DoJ resigned before he was investigated, and by February 2022, the FBI was finally playing ball. 6/
91076137
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
7. For the next year plus, 8 key witnesses in Garland's case were claiming executive privilege, so DoJ had to sue to force their testimony. Because of the court slow schedule, backed up from COVID and J6, this fight - which Garland won - took over a year. There would be no case without these 8. 7/
81114150
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
8. Meanwhile, the FBI was still pushing back, insisting they didn't want to execute a search warrant on Mar a Lago, but Garland pushed for the raid after the subpoena for the documents was obstructed. 8/
41049136
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
9. Also meanwhile, we had Judge Cannon letting trump sue for a special master, which Garland fought and won. It was around that time he appointed Jack Smith. It was also around that time the J6 committee was refusing to give its stuff to DoJ. Stalling another three months. 9/
71047139
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
10. To be clear, DoJ didn't need the committee's stuff because they didn't do any work. They had all their interviews and they had to compare them with the J6 interviews because if there are inconsistencies, trump could use that to impeach DoJ witnesses. That's how Durham lost his case. 10/
171122139
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
11. In 2023, DoJ arrested Trump. Twice. Trial dates were set for March 4, 2024 for the January 6 case, and May 20, 2024 for the espionage case. But at the end of 2023, Trump filed for immunity. That's interlocutory, so you have to resolve it before trial. 11/
24802109
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
12. After the lower court judge denied the immunity claim, DoJ went immediately to SCOTUS, leapfrogging the Appeals Court, and said "only you can make this call, so let's do this now, mofos." (I'm paraphrasing). 12/
677392
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
13. SCOTUS said "nah bro. Let the appeals court do it first." That added Six months of delay. The Appeals Court ruled that trump wasn't immune in this case. DoJ told SCOTUS "we don't need you now, bro. We got a solid ruling. You should deny cert." 13/
377996
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
14. But SCOTUS said "NO! ONLY WE CAN MAKE THIS CALL! WE SHALL MAKE A RULE FOR THE AGES THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE, AND THEN WE'LL SLIDE A REMARK IN THERE ABOUT HOW JACK SMITH WASN'T LEGALLY APPOINTED!" 14/
8850103
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
15. John Roberts swiped this one for himself, and he knew the outcome before oral arguments - which he scheduled on the last possible day of the term, and then issued his ruling on the last possible day to issue rulings. 15/
4868113
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
16. The immunity he gave trump was designed to be just for trump, and he crafted it so that trump would have to file a second interlocutory appeal that would have to go all the way back up to the Supreme Court - guaranteeing that no trial would take place before the election. 16/
8865120
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
17. Even if Trump lost the election, Judge Chutkan would have to rule on immunity, then trump would appeal her ruling, then it would go to the appeals court, then the Supreme Court. That would take another year. 17/
676490
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
18. At that point, SCOTUS could kill the case by decided Trump's acts were official and immune. But if they somehow let it survive, it would go back down to the lower court, and there'd still be about six months left of pre-trial stuff before the trial would start. 18/
573980
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
19. A couple more facts: in 2021, several republican senators that participated in the coup including Cruz, Russia Ron Johnson, Tuberville, Rick Scott wrote to Garland and blocked all Biden's nominations to DoJ until and unless Garland investigated the George Floyd protests. 19/
14787118
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
20. That stonewall made it so that Biden's pick for US Attorney in DC - who would take over the coup investigation - didn't arrive until NOVEMBER of 2021. 20/
1173997
Reposted by Artemis
Allison Gill @muellershewrote.com · 26/11/2024
21. So even if Garland could have shaved six months off the timeline, there'd still be no trial before the election, and if somehow there could have been, SCOTUS would have killed the case at the second interlocutory immunity appeal. 21/
4172994
Artemis @artemis-8588.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Gotta ‘memorialize this thread!’ You were in my ears as it all happened. Thank you!🙏 I learned so much from you!
000
Reposted by Artemis
Just Jack @just-jack-1.bsky.social · 11/11/2024
I, like many of you, have been contemplating our predicament since election night. We are in a losing war for our democracy and I'm not sure we collectively know who our true adversary is. It's not the voting blocks...white women, Latinos, Gen X. It's not MAGA. It's not even Trump. 🧵
1734168244489
Reposted by Artemis
ibuddha.bsky.social @ibuddha.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
The Billionaire class. Capitalism >Fascism >Nazi regime. Kamala won. I believe the Mail-in ballots were destroyed by PM DeJoy. Took 5 days to count in 2020. Kamala got 15M votes less than Biden? tRump 3M less. 🤬
2217
Reposted by Artemis
Moon lover @moon1over.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
799386444
Artemis @artemis-8588.bsky.social · 18/11/2024
@jim-stewartson.bsky.social Hey I just read your MAAA post. How about MA3, maybe use exponential notation or preferably 🇺🇸♾️. I think we need some symbolism to share…
010
Reposted by Artemis
Shirley Wang @shirleybwang.bsky.social · 16/01/2024
New year, new lab, new website! I'm so excited to open the Computational Clinical Science Lab at Yale this summer, and to share my new lab website: ccslab.yale.edu Huge thanks to Beyond Bounds Creative for the brilliant illustrations of my lab's core research directions!
5408
Reposted by Artemis
Snarky pediatrician🎗️🦄🇮🇱🇺🇦 @snarkypeds.medsky.social · 16/11/2024
#pedsky #medsky The American Academy of Pediatrics is collecting stories from physicians about patients we have cared for with vaccine preventable diseases to help in their advocacy against RFK’s confirmation. Please share your stories to patientstories@aap.org
36979514
Reposted by Artemis
Dr Kate Womersley @katewomersley.com · 15/11/2024
#PsychSky - a global community of psychiatrists, psychologists, mental health professionals, people w lived experience, policy folks & anyone else interested in the brain - is growing! Follow starter packs I & II below. Just say if you want to be added 🧠 go.bsky.app/C36fgiD go.bsky.app/3UH1pKc
20725982
Reposted by Artemis
Kristin Bruning MD🪷 @klbmd.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
515428
Reposted by Artemis
Helen Burstin, MD, MPH @helenburstinmd.medsky.social · 17/11/2024
Extraordinary new album by Jon Batiste! He reimagines classic Beethoven infused with blues. Truly brilliant ✨
912815
Reposted by Artemis
Kristin Bruning MD🪷 @klbmd.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
443254423825
Reposted by Artemis
Lord Jeffrey of Nottingham #FBPE 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🇬🇱 @onemoregoodman.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
343458296829
Reposted by Artemis
Moon lover @moon1over.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
Moon dressed up as Uranus
1123834155264
Artemis @artemis-8588.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
@markhamillofficial.bsky.social Hi Mark Hamill! I moved here could you follow me?
000
Artemis @artemis-8588.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
@repjasmine.bsky.social Hi Jasmine! I was on Twitter enjoying your words! Would you follow me?
000
Artemis @artemis-8588.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
@aoc.bsky.social You should run for President 2028. I saw your interview on msnbc(?). You were stunning!💫
010